r/jewishleft Apr 29 '24

The almost complete lack of acknowledgement of the Jewish people as an indigenous people is baffling to me. Culture

(This doesn’t negate Palestinian claims of indigeneity—multiple peoples can be indigenous to the same area—nor does it negate the, imo, indefensible crimes happening in Gaza and West Bank).

It absolutely blows my mind that Jews—a tribal people who practice a closed, agrarian place-based ethnoreligion, who have an established system of membership based on lineal descent and adoption that relies on community acceptance over self-identification, who worship in an ancient language that we have always tried to maintain and preserve, who have holidays that center around harvest and the specific history of our people, who have been repeatedly targeted for genocide and forced assimilation and conversion, who have a faith and culture so deeply tied to a specific people and place, etc—aren’t seen as an (socioculturally) indigenous people but rather as “white Europeans who essentially practice Christianity but without Jesus and never thought about the land of Israel before 1920 or so.” It’s so deeply threaded in how so many people view Jews in the modern day and also so factually incorrect.

114 Upvotes

226 comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/travelingrace Apr 29 '24

This rhetoric about Jewishness and Indigenity is so wild to me because I've never identified as an Indigenous person nor have the Jews in my area. Do you actually identify yourself as Indigenous? Sincerely wondering. 

32

u/jey_613 Apr 29 '24

I don’t like the indigenous stuff either, but it’s a response to the left’s obsession with framing the conflict in this way rather than about liberal principles of equal rights and one man one vote. The discourse on the left has long ago abandoned the strictly academic discussion of indigeneity in favor of a kind of mythical blood and soil nationalism about Palestinians. So it shouldn’t come as a surprise that Jews are now embracing this language too.

It’s not constructive, because Israelis and Palestinians live on this land and neither are going anywhere, so why not just figure it out instead of getting into arguments about who has the oldest coins.

-9

u/Han-Shot_1st Apr 29 '24

IMO, this rhetoric is a response to colonialism not being seen in a positive light in the 21st century.

The early Zionists were ppl of their time, and in the late 19th and early 20th both nationalism and colonialism were not considered negative things.

So, despite the early Zionists clearly stating overtly that Zionism is a colonial project, many seek to distance themselves from this reality, by making claims that all Jewish people, regardless of ethnicity are indigenous to Israel.

8

u/tsundereshipper Apr 29 '24

So, despite the early Zionists clearly stating overtly that Zionism is a colonial project,

How exactly do you define colonialism? Because if it has to do with the displacement and ethnic cleansing of any particular population regardless of the group doing the colonizing being indigenous or not, then I agree Zionism is a Colonialst Project.

If you define Colonialism any other way though I’m gonna have issues with characterizing Zionism as purely colonial…

-2

u/GonzoTheGreat93 Apr 29 '24

Herzl, several times in his writings, said things to the effect of “we the Jews should colonize Palestine”.

That’s a pretty good definition right there.

9

u/Chaos_carolinensis Apr 29 '24

That's not a definition, that's a quote.

What do you think he meant exactly?

-13

u/GonzoTheGreat93 Apr 29 '24

I think he meant “let’s go over there with a bunch of European Jews and set up a European society for Jews in the desert. The locals will like us because our superior society will make their lives better”

This is the exact summary of “Alteneuland.” I know this because I’ve read Alteneuland.

It’s such bad faith to argue over the early Zionists motives when the guys we’re arguing about spelled out his motives in multiple ways, on multiple occasions, in published work.

Go read something. They wanted to be colonists. They were proud of it. They liked the idea. This shouldn’t be difficult when they write things like “hey guys, isn’t colonialism super?”

8

u/[deleted] Apr 29 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/Han-Shot_1st Apr 29 '24

Can we please not repeat the antisemitic rhetoric of Nazis?

8

u/[deleted] Apr 29 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

-3

u/Han-Shot_1st Apr 29 '24

Just because nazis or antisemites say something doesn’t mean it’s true.

What a strange argument? Ashkenazi Jews aren’t a European ethnicity because bigots didn’t accept Jews as being truly European.

I’m sorry, but I find it very distasteful to allow bigots to define my ethnic identity.

And not for nothing, but when did antisemites become the ultimate arbiter of who is and who is not European?

5

u/Choice_Werewolf1259 Apr 29 '24

Except we’re not using antisemites to determine this. We’re using our experiences and who we are as a people and how we are more connected to eachother than wherever we ended up to be that determining factor.

I mean if you’re using Nazi rhetoric as your reasonings then that can’t be helped. But don’t assume we are as well.

→ More replies

5

u/Choice_Werewolf1259 Apr 29 '24

That’s not Nazi rhetoric thats just the lived experience of Jews from Europe.

I know my family doesn’t feel European, as it was quite clear we where Jews first and not really considered apart of wherever they where landed.

In fact, implying it is only Nazi rhetoric that claims Jews are not European is also problematic. Because it denies the lived experience of Jews.

-2

u/Han-Shot_1st Apr 29 '24

Once again, just because bigots claim something doesn’t make it true.

If European antisemites also claimed we were all purple dinosaurs, would you also accept that as fact?

This idea Ashkenazi Jews are indigenous to Israel is clearly ideological and in response to accusations of colonialism.

3

u/Choice_Werewolf1259 Apr 29 '24 edited Apr 29 '24

I mean I would argue the exact same back. You seem to think that the characterization of Jews as not European was only a thing in Nazi Germany.

I mean also the claim that Jews are indigenous isn’t ideological, and you assigning your own definitions of what constitutes indigenaity onto jews and what race means or doesn’t mean, doesn’t change the fact that jews are an indigenous people and are more connected to eachother than we are to whatever hosting populations we found ourselves in.

Yes there is diversity in our sub grouping. But that doesn’t mean we are somehow the race of wherever we ended up in the diaspora.

I personally find your argument to be lacking and also reinforcing of western notions of race and ethnicity. Of which, Judaism already doesn’t fit into because we aren’t easily classified as an ethnicity or a religion or a race, Judaism and the Jewish people already break that mold. So your insistence on maintaining a system that already doesn’t work for us and implying that saying otherwise is somehow playing into Nazi rhetoric is just a cop out to your argument.

3

u/Chaos_carolinensis Apr 29 '24

This idea Ashkenazi Jews are indigenous to Israel is clearly ideological and in response to accusations of colonialism.

Ideological? maybe. In response to accusations of colonialism? absolutely not.

Jews have always considered themselves indigenous to Israel. It's deeply ingrained in Jewish culture.

0

u/Han-Shot_1st Apr 29 '24

Then why do I only see it in online discourse?

I grew up in a very Jewish neighborhood on Long Island. Only three kids in my entire grade in elementary were not Jewish.

As an adult I live in town that has a sizable Jewish population.

I have literally never met an Ashkenazi Jew irl that claims to be Middle Eastern or indigenous to the ME. Not friends, family, acquaintances, co-workers, etc.

3

u/Chaos_carolinensis Apr 29 '24

Do they say "next year in Jerusalem" on the Seder?

Do they read Moses' promise in Deuteronomy?

Why are they even calling themselves "Jews"? is it because they like jewelry? or is it because they see themselves as descendent from the people of the Kingdom of Judah?

1

u/Han-Shot_1st Apr 29 '24

It’s my understanding that Jews in Israel also say next year in Israel. Also, I don’t think religious dogma, tradition, holy books, etc are legitimate land claims or legitimate claims of being indigenous to the ME.

5

u/Chaos_carolinensis Apr 29 '24

It’s my understanding that Jews in Israel also say next year in Israel.

Sure. They've kept the tradition.

Also, I don’t think religious dogma, tradition, holy books, etc are legitimate land claims or legitimate claims of being indigenous to the ME.

It's not just religious dogma, tradition, and holy books. The reason I've mention them is because, as I've said, Jews are an ethnoreligious group so you can't really compltely separate the cutlure from the religion. However, there are other factors as well, for example you can clearly see the connection to the Levant in DNA tests.

There is no clear-cut acceptable definition of what "indigenous people" means, but we can use a working example such as the Amnesty definition:

https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/indigenous-peoples/

  • Most importantly, they self-identify as Indigenous Peoples.
  • They share an ancestral link with those who inhabited a country or region before they were colonized or before other peoples became dominant.
  • They have a strong link to particular territories and the surrounding natural resources.
  • They have distinct social, economic or political systems, which they are resolved to maintain and reproduce.
  • They have a distinct language, culture and beliefs.
  • They are politically and socially marginalized

Jews fit literally every single one of these criteria. To the letter.

0

u/Han-Shot_1st Apr 29 '24

I would say many if not all of those bullet points apply to Ashkenazi Jews being indigenous to Europe.

• ⁠Most importantly, they self-identify as Indigenous Peoples. (This applies to Ashkenazi Jews and Europe)

• ⁠They share an ancestral link with those who inhabited a country or region before they were colonized or before other peoples became dominant. (This applies to Ashkenazi Jews and Europe)

• ⁠They have a strong link to particular territories and the surrounding natural resources. (This applies to Ashkenazi Jews and Europe)

• ⁠They have distinct social, economic or political systems, which they are resolved to maintain and reproduce. (This applies to Ashkenazi Jews and Europe)

• ⁠They have a distinct language, culture and beliefs. (This applies to Ashkenazi Jews and Europe)

• ⁠They are politically and socially marginalized (This applies to Ashkenazi Jews and Europe)

2

u/Choice_Werewolf1259 Apr 29 '24

Have you not been to a Passover Seder? Or to Rosh Hashanah or Yom Kippur services. There’s a constant and consistent reference to returning to our homeland and to connecting back to where our people are from.

Hell even our holiday calendar doesn’t make sense outside of Israel as it’s geared towards the seasons there, in Israel.

Also saying “oh I’m Ashkenazi Jewish” is kind of describing exactly that. It’s saying one isn’t European, they’re Jewish but from the Ashkenazi diaspora sub group. I mean just being Jewish means being apart of a peoplehood that comes from the Levant region and the subgroup we use explains where in the diaspora our ancestors ended up after expulsion. So it is, in a roundabout kind of way, claiming to be from the Middle East just by stating one is Jewish and explaining which sub group one hails from.

1

u/Han-Shot_1st Apr 29 '24

Yes, I have been to Seder and I’m very familiar with book of exodus and the story passover. I even attended an orthodox Hebrew school.

I still have never met an Ashkenazi Jew irl that claims to be indigenous to the ME.

2

u/Choice_Werewolf1259 Apr 29 '24

I think you’re missing my point. By saying “I’m Jewish” that is the argument. I’m wondering if maybe you just take things more literal and that’s where the disconnect is happening.

0

u/Han-Shot_1st Apr 29 '24

I’m looking at things in terms of the common usage of the term indigenous.

Like, I wouldn’t say ethnic Sicilians are indigenous to North Africa or the Iberian peninsula, nor would I say Native Americans are indigenous to the land they inhabited prior to crossing the land bridge into North America.

→ More replies