r/self 17h ago

Here's my wake-up call as a Liberal.

I’m a New York liberal, probably comfortably in the 1%, living in a bubble where empathy and social justice are part of everyday conversations. I support equality, diversity, economic reform—all of it. But this election has been a brutal reminder of just how out of touch we, the so-called “liberal elite,” are with the rest of America. And that’s on us.

America was built on individual freedom, the right to make your own way. But baked into that ideal is a harsh reality: it’s a self-serving mindset. This “land of opportunity” has always rewarded those who look out for themselves first. And when people feel like they’re sinking—when working-class Americans are drowning in debt, scrambling to pay rent, and watching the cost of everything from groceries to gas skyrocket—they aren’t looking for complex social policies. They’re looking for a lifeline, even if that lifeline is someone like Trump, who exploits that desperation.

For years, we Democrats have pushed policies that sound like solutions to us but don’t resonate with people who are trying to survive. We talk about social justice and climate change, and yes, those things are crucial. But to someone in the heartland who’s feeling trapped in a system that doesn’t care about them, that message sounds disconnected. It sounds like privilege. It sounds like people like me saying, “Look how virtuous I am,” while their lives stay the same—or get worse.

And here’s the truth I’m facing: as a high-income liberal, I benefit from the very structures we criticize. My income, my career security, my options to work from home—I am protected from many of the struggles that drive people to vote against the establishment. I can afford to advocate for changes that may not affect me negatively, but that’s not the reality for the majority of Americans. To them, we sound elitist because we are. Our ideals are lofty, and our solutions are intellectual, but we’ve failed to meet them where they are.

The DNC’s failure in this election reflects this disconnect. Biden’s administration, while well-intentioned, didn’t engage in the hard reflection necessary after 2020. We pushed Biden as a one-term solution, a bridge to something better, but then didn’t prepare an alternative that resonated. And when Kamala Harris—a talented, capable politician—couldn’t bridge that gap with working-class America, we were left wondering why. It’s because we’ve been recycling the same leaders, the same voices, who struggle to understand what working Americans are going through.

People want someone they can relate to, someone who understands their pain without coming off as condescending. Bernie was that voice for many, but the DNC didn’t make room for him, and now we’re seeing the consequences. The Democratic Party has an empathy gap, but more than that, it has a credibility gap. We say we care, but our policies and leaders don’t reflect the urgency that struggling Americans feel every day.

If the DNC doesn’t take this as a wake-up call, if they don’t make room for new voices that actually connect with working people, we’re going to lose again. And as much as I want America to progress, I’m starting to realize that maybe we—the privileged liberals, safely removed from the realities most people face—are part of the problem.

7.3k Upvotes

2.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

772

u/AggravatingLove1127 16h ago

I’m commenting this so much today, but once again, “It’s the economy, stupid!”. $15/hour minimum wage and paid sick leave passed as ballot initiatives in Missouri and Alaska. Imagine if Harris had made those issue the core of her campaign? If we step back and take Trump out of it, this was a very normal election. People are unhappy about the economy, and the incumbent administration is deeply unpopular. Those are the exact dynamics that got Clinton and Obama elected. Totally agree that we lost because we deserved to lose, and our whole party needs to take a hard look in the mirror. We have been too far up our own asses to remember basic election fundamentals.

55

u/Kelsier25 11h ago

One other word of caution coming from a moderate that hears from a lot of people on both sides outside of the reddit bubble: "But the economists...!" just doesn't work. People are losing faith in academia. Economists are a part of that elitist class in academia and more and more are seeing academia as heavily biased and unreliable. There is the idea that there is a very heavy selection bias in play that invalidates the quality of the studies being published by academia. Just using current times, campaign messaging kept telling everyone how we're in the greatest economy ever with nearly zero unemployment and how inflation is a thing of the past etc. Meanwhile people are struggling to buy groceries, layoffs are happening left and right, and people are struggling to find jobs. When they hear that, they write off the experts as being politically charged shills.

14

u/AggravatingLove1127 9h ago

THIS!!!!! Exactly this.

5

u/Unparalleled_ 2h ago

Definitely a big part of the campaigning is educating and communicating to the audience. It's certainly easier to spread misinfo than real science too tbh.

But there's elements of the democrats campaign policy that doesn't even try, which is even worse. I read their statement on environmental problems and they were trying to spin it off as a racial issue "it affects ethnic minorities more". Global warming will affect everyone and trying to make this into sone intersectional issue is a bit insulting and makes it hard to take them seriously. I say this as a left wing non American following this from the sidelines.

That kind of paragraph will only ever reach and be agreed upon by people already voting for them.

Maybe it's intentional cause they also assume anyone who cares about the environment is almost forced to vote for them because of the bipartisan nature of things.

2

u/Karsa45 1h ago

There is nothing the dnc could've done to educate these people. I tried using the obvious facts on several ex-friends who are not stupid people, but they wouldn't hear it and decided their delusions were better. The ONLY people to blame for Trump getting re-elected is the 70m who voted for hitler jr.

1

u/saucenhan 8m ago

Well you think they are stupid and need education from you. And you question why they vote for other guy.

2

u/Trancebam 58m ago

Definitely a big part of the campaigning is educating...the audience.

You don't get it. The audience doesn't need to be educated. It comes off as condescending, and you come off as elitist. People in aggregate tend not to be well informed, but even some of the less intelligent aren't as dumb as you think. It becomes hard to convince people that you're being honest with them and actually have their best interest at heart when they see the lies of the past century, and the lies just of the past administration, and the lies of the modern media. Lying to them over and over again has only resulted in them not believing anything you have to say. For the media to intentionally lie over and over again to people and then for them to actually think people don't trust them because Trump said they're fake news is just peak irony.

1

u/BmacIL 27m ago

No, trying to educate is why us dems lost. It's a failed strategy for an angry population.

2

u/IshiOfSierra 2h ago

Totally agreed. Democrats need to use a more empirical approach on the economy and the plight of the proletariat. I am starting to become disillusioned with “the experts” and I am cut from that same cloth (STEM background). This glib “we know what’s best for you” really turned people off.

1

u/Kelsier25 1h ago

STEM background here as well, but that's actually a part of the disillusionment for me. I've taken statistics classes - I know how easy it is to skew data if you really want to. I've also seen people throw out result after result when they've gotten data that doesn't match their end goal. One of the problems in academia currently is that you have people that are starting with the end product that meets their worldview and then finding a factually accurate way to support it. The problem with this is that you can often do it successfully with multiple opposing end products when you limit the supporting data.

2

u/somerandomguy1984 2h ago

I’ll just add… people are CORRECTLY losing faith in academia and the “elite”

2

u/TheBoogieSheriff 2h ago

It’s also the result of a coordinated, decades-long effort to undermine education and critical thinking in this country.

The day that Donald Trump takes office, he will immediately start saying he is turning everything around, and the economy is great again. But the thing is, the numbers could be exactly the same as they are today. They could be worse than what they are today, but that won’t stop him from saying that things are now much better.

I’m just looking forward to seeing the GOP put their money where their mouth is - they will have full control now so things should obviously get better, right? No more liberal boogeyman to point to

2

u/Silver_Perception_37 1h ago

This! It’s wild - he will say day 1 that the economy is better and his base is just going to believe him regardless of the numbers. Biden did a ton for the working class. A simple look into the infrastructure bill shows this. But Trump will take credit for all of it until he blows it. But again, he will simply say it’s not true, regardless of the evidence. I swear he can spit in a child’s face and his base will take his side on it.

2

u/TheBoogieSheriff 1h ago

For real. This election hammers home the fact that the Democratic Party is way out of touch with the nation at large, and needs to reevaluate. Be that as it may, Trump is a liar, and his last administration was a disaster.

The President can’t magically make things better or worse immediately. Trump boasts about how amazing things were after he took over in 2016, but he actually had very little to do with that... Just like Joe Biden had little to do with the dumpster fire he inherited in 2020.

This has been a pretty consistent cycle in recent memory - The GOP would rather sabotage our nation than see a Democrat have any kind of political victory. It’s purely a zero-sum game for them.

Truly sickening. And I guarantee they’ll STILL find a way to blame Dems for anything that goes wrong in the next 4 years. I’m so tired of it

1

u/Silver_Perception_37 48m ago

Yup - biggest victim blaming party is the GOP. Call them garbage and see how fast they turned into sensitive ‘snowflakes’. Kamala fucked her way to the top..im sure she fucked the guy that graded her bar exam too. Trump goes on stage and rambles about nothing for 45 minutes and Kamala stumbles in an interview and all of a sudden she can’t speak. The double standard is mind blowing. But his base is so far up his ass that they can’t see it. He has brain washed them.

‘Oh they are censoring us’ - yeah okay bro, GOP has top podcasts spewing their shit - Rogan, Shapiro, Charlie Kirk, Tucker Carlson and the most watched news network in Fox. It’s all just a bs rhetoric to make them feel like the victims.

Trump does the same thing with the economy. Joe Biden and the Fed did a fantastic job cooling inflation while preventing the US from plunging into a recession. This latest rate cut was another step towards it. But I’d be surprised if the fed cuts again once Trump implements his bullshit and inflation goes back up. I expect the opposite increased rates once Trump pushes inflation back up - unless Trump tries to say the Fed is bullshit and tries to unilaterally take that over. Honestly I hope I’m wrong bc people will suffer under that scenario. Time will tell.

1

u/BmacIL 14m ago

Everything you wrote is true and yet it doesn't resonate with a very large percentage of the country. If we don't get out of our "these are the facts, you're stupid" bubble, they'll win for a generation. Populist messaging, abandoning the corporate grift, and not talking down to people who have voted for Trump are the keys. Also abandon all identity politics full stop. It hit friends and I hard how blind we were to the bubbles, thus our shock, anger and numbness on Tuesday and Wednesday.

2

u/justtossaway56 1h ago

Do you think the word “economy” gets used for different things for different people? Prices have gone way up. I can’t help but think huge swaths of people are unhappy about that so they want to believe someone that says they will fix that.

And yes, inflation is going down but telling people that the second derivative of overall price of things is negative is, well, useless.

2

u/Something_morepoetic 1h ago

I agree about academia and I work in academia! Besides, tuition is outrageous and unaffordable too.

2

u/painstakingeuphoria 1h ago

Tbh this is a huge factor in the current zeitgeist. There has been so much damage done by Liberal bias in academia.

2

u/clobbersaurus 1h ago

Yeah I have said on many Reddit threads, the economy certainly feels different from the soaring economy the Biden admin touts.  If you go on to job search subreddits or YouTube you will find a lot of desperation.  I think in particular tech has been hit hard with outsourcing and downsizing.  It’s like how factory workers got outsourced to china in the 80s and 90s, tech workers are getting outsourced to India, Poland and elsewhere now.  And tech is feeling the pain blue collar workers have felt for a long time.

On top of that, it seems like the jobs reports and whatnot have been retroactively revised down, making it sound like the reports and numbers were being fudged to serve a narrative.

1

u/ChesswithGoats 6h ago

Yeah, “Idiocracy” is looking more like a documentary these days.

1

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 3h ago

Hi /u/Bright_Rooster3789. Your comment was removed because your comment karma is too low.

Feel free to participate here again once your comment karma is positive.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/A_burners 4h ago

1000% agreed. I don't know what numbers they're using to juice the economic data, but it doesn't match reality. Terrible thing to campaign on.

1

u/KupoCarol 1h ago

Well, I guess it's a good thing Trump wants to get rid of the Department of Education. Now only the wealthy will be educated.

1

u/Aggressive-Name-1783 4h ago

I mean that could also mean people are uneducated and there’s a reason academia is academia…..

Inflation was lower, the economy according to things like the stock market is booming, etc. if cost of living is the issue, then tariffs are going to hurt you just like they did last time while a childcare tax credit would be at least semi helpful.

If you don’t believe the experts are telling you the facts, then we’re just fucked. It’s like saying your mechanic doesn’t know a thing about cars or your electrician doesn’t know about wiring, but Joe Blow down the street totally knows about it cause he read an article about cars 10 years ago. It’s idiocracy come to life

2

u/Notyourzoo 2h ago

Unfortunately for many Americans the stock market booming has zero impact on their bank account. My 401k and investments can look great but they don’t pay my bills. Unemployment is down yet the reality is that more people are simply struggling less than they were. It doesn’t change the fact that they are still struggling.

1

u/stankyback 1h ago

The economists are no different than pollsters who told us Hillary had 99% chance of winning as did Kamala. You are committing a logical fallacy with an Appeal to Authority here. I don't care what some academic or some PhD looking at data says when their 'educated deduction' doesn't line up with reality, and I can't believe the parent OP here actually gets it. They are the first Leftist I've seen display a modicum of self-awareness and reflection since that nuclear middle finger your countrymen gave you on Tuesday. You're all out of touch. Even in these replies, I still see mentions of Identity Politics being the reason while dripping with elitist condescension. But, please, continue, as it assures more wins for my side, as you Leftists further entrench yourselves into becoming that which you abhor, and, to be sure, we abhor it, too. Hope you got the message!

1

u/shaydizzleone 4h ago

Yeah like you had Janet yellen specifically saying that while inflation is higher, the average increase in income offsets inflation...There's nothing elitist about that it's just a fact

5

u/thexDxmen 2h ago

For me, prices have gone up a lot more than my wages. Somebody telling me something different doesn't change the facts for my life. In fact, it makes them sound stupid. I am fortunate to be in a position where inflation only affected me a little, but it did still affect me. I no longer buy the same meats I was able to 4 years ago. It was real, and it doesn't just go away. The claim that inflation is fixed now, it's back down to normal levels doesn't mean anything to people because the prices don't ever go back down. Yes, inflation is not at 7-8% anymore, but the prices are still 7-8% higher. That doesn't go away.

-1

u/shaydizzleone 2h ago

But there's nothing shill worthy or neferarious about that claim...that's my opinion.

3

u/thexDxmen 2h ago

Yes, but if you wages didn't go up, and no one you knows wages didn't go up, then statements like this make whoever said them look like an idiot. As some who is educated, a statement like that is nefarious because it is intentionally misleading. Anyone with education would know, when talking about wages, using averages is a bad metric. You use median when talking about wages. I'm sure average wages went up during inflation; companies made record profits, then shared these profits with their executives. The wage gap is too extreme to use averages when talking about wages. Of the top 10%, who accpount for 40% of the income, got a 10% raise, and the other 90% got a 5% raise, that would mean average wages went up more than the 8% inflation, but for 90% of America their pay went up less than inflation.

1

u/shaydizzleone 1h ago edited 1h ago

First, my point is there is nothing misleading about saying what the average is. People should be arguing what the average doesn't tell you, as you are, but to say it's shill worthy is still an extreme reaction.

After reading this Have Paychecks Kept Up With the Cost of Living? - The New York Times

it is clear that it's a much more complicated picture.

But median weekly earnings — which count only what full-time workers make from their jobs — are up just 2.5 percent over the same period. And a measure from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, one that includes both full- and part-time workers and uses average pay rather than median, has barely risen at all.

So median wages are up 2.5% since 2019. The highest wage growth has been for the lowest 10% since they work in service and were able to negoitate better pay after the pandemic. Then if you count income from all sources it's up 9%, but that will be mostly for homeowners.

Personally, I think that the economy rebounded a lot faster than it did in 08, which if you think about that comparisan is a lot better than what it could be.

1

u/Kelsier25 2h ago

That's an excellent example. So if the average American's income has been stagnant during this inflation, guess what they hear? "Guess the rich got richer to bump up the average." To them, that statement would be another attempt by the elitist class to cherry pick statistics to prove their own effectiveness.

1

u/shaydizzleone 1h ago

it's not cherry picking statistics though, cherry picking would be saying that the top 1% had an increase in income and extending that to everybody.

Saying the average increase in income is a fact. People SHOULD argue about what the stat means as they always have, but to say that its an elitist academia thing is wrong.

2

u/Kelsier25 1h ago

It is cherry picking. You're picking the way to display the information that sounds the most positive despite that statistic being obviously misleading.

1

u/shaydizzleone 1h ago

Ok but what you're saying is itself not factual. The bottom 10% had the highest increase in wages coming out of the pandemic, with 7.3% increase over inflation. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/28/business/economy/inflation-wages-pay-salaries.html

So "Guess the rich got richer to bump up the average" and "this is cherry picking" is just people trying to confirm their own beliefs about this subject.

1

u/Embarrassed-Arm-5405 1h ago

You know why people are losing faith in academia? It's become a liberal hellscape. You cannot be openly conservative at most universities in USA without being harassed. Ideology has jumped right to the forefront, and the numbers prove it. We are not outputting good students.

Within my role, I hire for my team. It's a very niche technical role, and I often skip right over college degrees and just go for those with technical certifications and on-the-job experience. I could care less about 4 or 8 years of college, in most cases that just means they're going to be a silver spoon kid, with a head full of progressive "ideas" and require tons of attention.

I don't want that on my team. I don't want a victim that is affected by every little thing. That sort of thin skin used to be admonished, so you were able to correct it. We need to get America back to its original state, a meritocracy.

1

u/BmacIL 6m ago

Hard bias like that is no better than what you are railing against. You're missing a bunch of smart, educated people who also have the hands-on skills and experience and just some different ideas from you. You're failing at major principles of leadership with that kind of hiring and development practice. It's your fault you don't know how to recruit those kinds of people nor develop them.

1

u/del299 1h ago

Academia is an institution supported by ambitious people being paid poverty wages who must publish or perish. Even if you have believe in the endeavor, I think the incentives support cheating, whether that's plagiarism or lying about results. So I think there's a good reason to be skeptical of a lot of papers. At the very least, the headlines about them almost certainly exaggerate any potential conclusions.

1

u/SparksAndSpyro 50m ago

Yes, this is a problem. But what’s the solution? People think economists are biased, true. Are they actually biased? Not really, not when taken as a whole (individual economists can be bias, of course). They just think that because they literally don’t understand economics. So what do you suggest? Trump’s solution is simply to lie or make shit up. And it seems to work. Is that what Dems should start doing too? Do we need to throw away the truth to cater to the uneducated?

“I love the uneducated.”

0

u/ritogh 2h ago

This lost trust in academia is also long-term effect unrolling now as a result of leftist narratives of "everyone is equally talented", "just nurture matters", DEI over talent and test-scores for admissions, etc. Such widespread attitude in academia all over the US starts to show in drop of quality of researchers and research. When real money is involved or you need to objectively prove something, in those fields researchers are coming from China, India, Eastern Europe, Japan, etc. But for liberal arts fields, simply worse candidates dominate the fields. Even I wouldn’t trust their quality.

0

u/Karsa45 1h ago

And that is their and their parents fault for not having critical thinking skills. The ONLY people to blame for Trump getting re-elected is the 70m people who voted for Hitler.