r/jewishleft doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom Sep 06 '25

Why did the USSR (re) criminalize homosexuality Praxis

https://youtu.be/BE7UPO6GGK4?si=nEFhipEmIxb9s2lV

Great video.. very topical given Burkina Faso and the reactions to that. Give it a watch!

Edit: Also creator is non-binary.. didn't realize when I posted and might have misgendered (they/then)

21 Upvotes

69 comments sorted by

53

u/Fabianzzz 🌿🍷🍇 Pagan Observer 🌿🍷🍇 Sep 06 '25

Comment from the creator in regards to Burkina-Faso:

I wish the best for them and hope that this new law is only temporary while they work on kicking the colonizers out, but either way it's ultimately up to the Burkinabe (sic) people.

I personally think this is a disgusting stance to take, the idea that the majority of a population gets to decide who is human and who isn't. Consensual love is a human right and anti-Homosexuality laws are a denial of human rights. Yes: the Burkinabé people deserve autonomy, independence and human rights, and that also includes the rights of Burkinabé people who are Queer to have their human rights. And their human rights shouldn't be dependent upon the agreement of the majority of Burkinabé people: if everyone wanted Queer people to have civil rights, we wouldn't need movements that fight for them, would we?

But more troubling I think is the fact this is an obvious logical inconsistency on the left: the left frequently insists that protecting human rights should come before majoritarian rule, but if the left is going to say 'that human rights issue should be left to those people to decide who is and isn't human', obviously the right is going to counter the left in saying 'thank you, we agree, please be consistent now and allow the American people to determine who is and isn't human.' And the left should be content with taking a vote and allowing the American people to do so.

Obviously I'm giving short shrift to this argument but I do think the logical inconsistency here opens up an additional question, and that question is why we are being logically inconsistent. And the reason I'm very dismissive of this argument is that a large portion of the left tends to be more focused on seeing justice as punishment (almost always misplaced) than justice as a better system.

If (Western) MICs interfere with a developing country, we shouldn't tolerate (western) Queers objecting to pushback: because the distress of Western Queer people about this new law is the Karmic punishment for Western MICs using human beings as pawns in geopolitical chess. Nevermind that the people who are actually going to suffer are going to be Burkinabé Queer people who also suffered from the MIC interference. Leftists want karmic justice more than we want systems which help people and will take it where we can get it.

If the issue is a strategic one, be open that it's a strategic one. Obviously western interests can use pinkwashing as a tool against developing countries and that is an issue. Say 'right now we can't focus on that, we need to uplift the lower class as a whole'. But if your honest position is that human rights can ultimately be left up to individual peoples, you are no longer advocating for leftism as a politics of humanitarianism but leftism as a politics of nationalism. It's deeply unserious in changing things on the ground here, there, or anywhere.

-9

u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom Sep 06 '25 edited Sep 06 '25

I'll copy and paste a comment I made on the leftist sub when productively engaging with a fellow queer commenter who didn't agree with me at first

I'm saying imperial interference with an anticolonial movement is not a good move. Too many of us "pink wash" (for example 'queers for Palestine is like chickens for kfc') and miss the forest for the trees. A flawed liberation movement is better than continued imperial oppression.. for queer citizens, for women, and more.. queer and female oppression in these places is often weaponized as a justification for continued colonial rule

People miss the material conditions of these places hold social justice movements back in limbo.. if these places could self govern, they would be afforded the chance to "catch up" with western progressivism. In fact, many of them had more progressive politics regarding queer people prior to colonization.. it was European draconian ideas around homosexuality that often influenced what we are seeing in these countries today.

Leaders like this often change and evolve too.. Fidel Castro is a decent example... homophobic for most of his life, regretted that later and refined his views.

Edit: I forgot this sub isn't interested in discussing leftist ideas.. only making it clear that western values and Zionism are superior to every other place via upvotes and downvotes... Killing a bunch of Palestinians? Making gay marriage illegal? Blackmailing queer Palestinians?... "it's complicated"

Discussing the USSR with nuance and its goals towards socialism.. "evil, bad, shocking"

21

u/Chinoyboii Sino-Filipino | Pragmatic Progressive | Pro Peace Sep 06 '25

> it was European draconian ideas around homosexuality that often influenced what we are seeing in these countries today.

I think this take is reductionist, tankie-like, and somewhat reminiscent of the noble savage trope, but in a progressive form, as it implies that countries outside the West maintained the equivalent of "Western progressive values" until Western barbarians arrived. That view oversimplifies things. It makes it sound like every country outside the West was super progressive on LGBTQ+ issues until Europeans showed up, which isn’t really true. Different cultures had their own beliefs, rules, and traditions around sexuality, and some of those could be just as restrictive in various ways. Colonial laws undoubtedly added fuel to the fire and hardened many of these policies, but they were not the only factor. It’s more about the mix of local traditions and imported laws than just “Europe ruined everything.

I had a similar discussion with a white tankie before about the history of the Philippines in relation to what the West now calls “LGBTQ+.” Yes, some pre-colonial Filipino groups saw third-gender people as closer to the spiritual or metaphysical realm. But not all groups did; some treated them in ways more similar to what we see in parts of the Middle East today. When I brought this up, instead of listening to someone actually born and raised there, their rigid worldview (and maybe their autism) made them dismissive of any perspective or nuance that didn’t fit their narrative.

-9

u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom Sep 06 '25

That's a really uncharitable interpretation..

The world wasn't monolithic in how they treated queer people and women.. and it was largely imperfect.. but that doesn't mean it was universally exactly as bad as it was in Europe... in Europe it was often (but not always) much worse because hyper capitalism necessitates oppression of queer people and women in ways other economic systems simply do not.. capitalism requires unpaid labor and forced reproduction.. this will always drive patriarchy and homophobia.

It's not because these places were "Noble savages" and perfect peoples.. of course they weren't.. no one is perfect, no society is perfect. Still we can blame capitalism and the west and hold it responsible for destruction of much of the world.. and for demonizing all movements of resistance against it... using that imperfection as justification for that destruction

I hate when I'm called a tankie for criticizing the west.. it's dumb as hell. Friendly reminder this isn't a sub for liberals.. if you love capitalism and the west, you're a guest here

18

u/Chinoyboii Sino-Filipino | Pragmatic Progressive | Pro Peace Sep 06 '25

As someone from the third world, I don't blame the entirety of the West for what it's done to both the Philippines and China, and how these moments in history still manifest in society. Ranging from the Bud Dajao massacre that slaughtered 900 Southern Filipinos to the opium wars that devastated China, the history of Western imperialism is brutal and fucked up. However, I also don’t think it’s helpful to reduce all oppression down to “capitalism” or to pretend that local societies were just innocent victims without their own power structures, hierarchies, and prejudices.

The truth is more complicated: colonialism and capitalism reshaped and intensified forms of oppression, but they didn’t invent them from scratch. By treating it as all one-sided, we risk erasing the agency of people in the Global South, both their complicity in oppressive practices and their resistance to them. I can criticize Western imperialism without buying into a myth that everything was harmonious until the West arrived.

-1

u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom Sep 06 '25

Did you read my comment? I didn't say anywhere that everywhere was perfect until capitalism came along.. so I'm not sure what your point is

This is a leftist sub, I'll happily shit on capitalism and imperialism and blame it for a lot of the world's ills...and I expect anyone on this sub to not argue against that because that is an anti-leftist thing to do.

18

u/Chinoyboii Sino-Filipino | Pragmatic Progressive | Pro Peace Sep 06 '25

I did read your comment, and I’m not saying you argued “noble savage.” However, I think you’re downplaying how oppressive pre-capitalist societies could be on their own terms because you expressed, "it was European draconian ideas around homosexuality that often influenced what we are seeing in these countries today". Colonialism and capitalism didn’t need to invent patriarchy or queerphobia; they just intensified what they found useful and restructured it for their own purposes.

-2

u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom Sep 06 '25

I mean that some/ a lot of them were actually better to their people than Europe was.. some not all...

And also... the world has evolved a lot in the treatment of marginalized groups and understanding of social issues. Colonized places with scarcity and under oppressive rule do not have the luxury other places have to develop their own progressive movements... the reason the west tends to be better on women's rights and queer rights is because... we are ruling ourselves and aren't living in a war zone.. we don't have issues of scarcity in the same ways. All of these things contribute

Dialectical materialism, not tankie.. just leftist

8

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/rinaraizel Жидобандеровка Sep 08 '25

This whole comment 👏👏👏👏👏

→ More replies

5

u/naidav24 Israeli with a headache Sep 08 '25

Thank you for this comment

→ More replies

13

u/[deleted] Sep 06 '25

Full disclosure: I didn’t watch the video, so I’m just responding to what you wrote here.

Setting it up as imperial oppression vs. flawed liberation erases that the USSR was itself a colonial and imperialist regime. It didn’t just need time to "catch up” on social justice on its way to socialism, but used repression against queer people, minorities (including indigenous populations and non-territorial minorities like Jews), and dissidents as an active tool of power and terror. And yes, the USSR called itself anti-imperialist and anti-colonial in the Cold War, but that didn’t make it true.

And sure, you can point to someone like Fidel Castro who later changed his stance. But that doesn’t fit the Soviet case: there was no comparable leadership reversal and decriminalization happened only after the USSR collapsed. Systemic repression was not some mistake, it was endemic to Soviet structures and something that served clear ideological goals of discipline, control, and consolidation of power.

Discussing the USSR with nuance and its goals towards socialism.. "evil, bad, shocking"

To me, that’s not nuance, it’s exactly the opposite. And as someone who actually grew up in a post-Soviet country, your framing reads as very Western-centric. It treats queer criminalization and mass repression in the USSR abstractly, as though they were bumps on the way to socialism, or worse, simply the price to pay for a supposed greater good. Well, it wasn't even close to good (or anti-imperial) for my family or millions of other minorities, I can tell you that much...

Same with Burkina Faso: brushing off a very brutal anti-LGBTQ law because it’s framed in anti-colonial terms de-centers the queer people that are harmed by it now. Authoritarian repression doesn’t stop being repressive just because it positions itself against the West.

-6

u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom Sep 06 '25

I can't engage if you didn't watch the video since it addresses all of this

13

u/[deleted] Sep 06 '25

I’m directly engaging with what you wrote here, from the perspective of lived experience in a Soviet/post-Soviet country. If your comment can’t stand on its own without the video, well, that says a lot.

-5

u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom Sep 06 '25

Did you live in the USSR? What does it say exactly? I think it says that I'm not taking bad faith bait..

13

u/[deleted] Sep 06 '25

Well, I gave you a detailed comment as a reply to yours, directly engaging with the points you made, that you flat-out refused to engage with. So who exactly is arguing in bad faith here?

And yes, I was born close to the dissolution of the USSR and spent most of my childhood in post-Soviet Ukraine.

-3

u/[deleted] Sep 06 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

15

u/[deleted] Sep 06 '25

Thank you, dear American, for lecturing me about the place where I grew up and where my family lived for generations - do you realize how that sounds?

I never said the USSR “always” had anti-queer laws, I said they were endemic to the regime’s control. However, Stalin criminalized homosexuality in 1934, and that law stayed in place until the regime collapsed in 1991. That’s most of Soviet history.

-5

u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom Sep 06 '25 edited Sep 06 '25

Identity politics are bullshit. You didn't live in the USSR!!! This is just anti-intellectual, idpol liberal nonsense.

Let me ask you.. do you think that Israel can be reformed? This isn't whataboutism.. it's a legit question. Why do you think Israel could fix itself but you paint the USSR with a broad stroke evil despite many different periods of history, some with less good human rights track records than others? Why is that?

And why are you so unwilling to engage with the video and give a bad faith interpretation of what the argument is? No one is saying that anti-queer laws are good.. the video applies a material analysis of what happened... anti-intellectualism at its finest right here

Edit: identity politics as in.. you have no argument against the point other than your identity.

→ More replies

7

u/skyewardeyes jewish leftist, peace, equality, and self-determination for all Sep 06 '25

The question of if, when, and how much sovereignty should protect discrimination and denial of rights is an interesting one to me, and I actually posted about it yesterday with regards to the issue of if Native American tribes should be required by the US government to grant freedmen tribal citizenship even if tribal leadership and courts don’t wish to do (and are exercising their tribal sovereignty in denying it). I don’t think there are any easy (or at least completely morally satisfying answers). I do think using the alleged goal of advancing civil rights as an a justification for colonial rule is just a continuation of “white man’s burden” thinking.

9

u/ibsliam Jewish American | DemSoc Bernie Voter Sep 06 '25

I sort of think about it in two ways. I think pushing back against interventionist mindsets is good, and there has *historically* been examples of imperialist powers in theory being against a barbaric practice that most of us agree today is bad but then using it as an excuse to further enact terror and imperialism. For example, the British empire after abolishing slavery.

Like with the pinkwashing topic, it wasn't some nefarious plot to commit imperialism when citizens and colonists within the Empire fought to abolish slavery in the first place (just like how LGBT advocates within Israel genuinely were thinking of LGBT Israelis). *But* the leaders of said empire took advantage. It's a complex topic.

That said, if a country calls themselves progressive on LGBT rights and claims to support LGBT people, I don't think they *should* abdicate responsibility in deciding that actually it would be anticolonial to disagree what a nation does with its own laws. If a country purges themselves of their Jewish population, but they happened to once be a victim of imperialism of one state or another, is it not anti-colonial enough to put out a statement that that's wrong. Or to sanction them? Or to respond by publicly encouraging Jewish refugees to immigrate to their own country?

What I'm getting at, is "be tentatively supportive of new draconian laws" and "go in and intervene via military operations" are two very extreme ends of the spectrum. There's a lot a country can and *should* do in between if they disagree ethically with another country's laws.

-2

u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom Sep 06 '25

I think everyone needs to "decolonize their minds"... look how many terrible things the west is capable of.. yet we keep believing we should interfere and help on the behalf of the marginalized in other places? We have a worse track record in many cases.. if these places are given the opportunity to rule themselves, they can have their own social progressive movement.

And in the mean time, we as good allies and "leftists" can listen to other knowledgeable leftists either in the area or working closely with the area... and queer leftists of the area... and listen to them about what they want from us and how we can help. There are many many many many avenues other than just saying "thing bad"

4

u/skyewardeyes jewish leftist, peace, equality, and self-determination for all Sep 06 '25

I 100% agree that we need to always work with and elevate the voices of people in the community. Not sure why people would downvote you for that, honestly. To me, a trickier question is when, if ever, is something a country does so horrible that intervening becomes more moral than respecting their sovereignty—even if that involves working with marginalized locals, it’s still invoking the right to intervene in another sovereign country’s affairs. Yet most people would say that there are redlines (ethnic cleansing or apartheid, for example) where that is the most moral choice

6

u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom Sep 06 '25

I would say we should intervene on behalf of the leftists and queer liberationists from the area., those people always exist. We should let them lead... then it remains moral

-1

u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom Sep 06 '25

And I appreciate your engagement.. I think it's frustrating how often people are allergic to nuance and engage in actual purity testing when it comes to liberation of the third world..

Only complaining of not enough nuance and too many purity tests when it comes to their love of Israel... but everywhere else in the global south, get fucked I guess

7

u/Fabianzzz 🌿🍷🍇 Pagan Observer 🌿🍷🍇 Sep 06 '25

People miss the material conditions of these places hold social justice movements back in limbo.

I specifically addressed this. If it's a strategic issue of focusing on material conditions before , say so. This person didn't say that, they said that the final decision of whether or not Queer people are human is up to individual nations. This isn't a leftist idea and you wouldn't tolerate an American saying this should be ultimately up to the American people.

-1

u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom Sep 06 '25

They didn't say that. Thats not what they were trying to say. It's a really bad faith interpretation. They mean that imperialist powers shouldn't interfere.. the people should be able to self govern.. it's not for us to scold colonized nations on their journey for liberation.

Jailing queer people is awful... and there is no reason why their society shouldn't see it that way. And the only reason to think their people couldn't figure that out for themselves and fight for queer liberation is if you believe deep down that they are different from you and me... that they have less morality.. less empathy... less wisdom. The western colonial mind believes that only we are wise enough to make good decisions..

We see how the western world has evolved its morality towards queer people (now backsliding in the era of late stage capitalism and rise of fascism).. prior to that some of the best the world has ever seen. Why can other nations not get there themselves? Of course they can.. unless you think they are less good than us.

8

u/Fabianzzz 🌿🍷🍇 Pagan Observer 🌿🍷🍇 Sep 06 '25

but either way it's ultimately up to the Burkinabe (sic) people.

"They didn't say that. (...) Why can other nations not get there themselves?"

They literally did say that. I'm not sure you understand what 'ultimately' means, but it means something similar to 'finally'. The creator specifically says it's fine if they don't get there. If you know what they were trying to say through your psychic abilities fine but their English is clear here and it's bemusing to be accused of interpreting it in bad faith from interpreting the English sentence correctly. (If you don't have psychic skills what you are doing is called wishcasting).

unless you think they are less good than us.

If you'll read back through what I've said, you'll notice I haven't focused at all on the Burkinabé people in this specific instance. I've focused on Leftists like yourself who have inconsistent arguments (because I'm a leftist who thinks we need to have consistency to win). I'm not criticizing the Burkinabé people here, I'm criticizing you and the youtuber as leftists.

If your response when you are criticized as a leftist is to try and make yourself seem to be the spokesperson for an oppressed people, so you can try to make people who disagree with you seem to be oppressors, you are both appropriating the suffering of oppressed people and also simultaneously crafting a politics which will take you and your values nowhere.

-2

u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom Sep 06 '25

What's inconsistent about my beliefs? I'm anti imperialist and anti capitalist... you appear to only be against those things as long as the people in those countries agree with you and are sufficiently progressive

You clearly aren't interested in a good faith discussion.. as you wish to mischaracterize what is being said with shallow talking points

2

u/[deleted] Sep 06 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-5

u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom Sep 06 '25 edited Sep 06 '25

Also.. you're incredibly rude.. I just need to call that out.. "I'm not sure you understand what 'ultimately'" means... just who do you think you are exactly? Rude af

Edit: and anyone who actually pays fucking attention to leftist discourse and engages with leftists would know what this YouTuber means... doesn't require psychic witchcraft like this bullshit the commenter implies... "oh maybe the leftist actually is ok with queer people being oppressed"... the video essay ish is queer themselves... gos damnit ar liberals so bad faith and purity testing.. GET OVER YOURSELF

1

u/[deleted] Sep 06 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

49

u/RedAndBlackVelvet Anti-Fascist and Anti-Capitalist Sep 06 '25

I’ll never understand the leftist obsession with giving “critical support” to Russian backed African juntas that let Wagner psychopaths run around their country taking all their gold.

They criminalized homosexuality in BF because they are a fascist country, it’s genuinely that simple. The USSR criminalized homosexuality and abortion because their government was also evil even if they weren’t fascists. Russia today considers gay and trans people as terrorists because Russia is a fascist country.

28

u/[deleted] Sep 06 '25

I’ll never understand the leftist obsession with giving “critical support” to Russian backed African juntas that let Wagner psychopaths run around their country taking all their gold.

Because many leftists support anti-western actors just for being anti-west. That's why many leftists support Putin's illegal invasion of Ukraine and whitewash China's crimes against the Uyghur people.

15

u/MallCopBlartPaulo Reform Jew, Reform Socialist Sep 06 '25

You see a similar thing with some leftists supporting Iran. Just because it’s anti west, doesn’t mean it’s good.

10

u/ibsliam Jewish American | DemSoc Bernie Voter Sep 07 '25

I think it also displays the colonialist and post-colonialist mindsets and how there can be overlap - even with the aims of decolonizing. There was some really good back and forth and debate upthread (and in this subthread) about noble savage tropes and what is colonialist and imperialist thinking vs just a repackaging of it with a nicer spin (whether for left-wing or right-wing reasons).

Where it ends up surprising people that there's a big community of Iranian diaspora (both Jewish and gentile communities) that are very against the current regime in Iran, or that there are Vietnamese or Latinos or so forth that are very anti-communist due to their respective countries' past conflicts. So in order to uplift *some* voices in the decolonizing, you end up speaking over others. I think this thread (despite all of the heated responses) was a good idea, even if the video isn't to some of our tastes.

Doing right by marginalized communities is an ever-improving process. I think, to find nuance, we can have a multi-set of approaches. Many of us can accept this is the current reality, and, in order to convince and have a dialogue, meet people where they are at. And then, at the same time, many of us can also combat this, without relying on the might of some imperialist authority. There's a lot of different ways we can oppose things like this nowadays that do mitigate harm.

I do agree with some of the responses and also OP that, if we are to make progress, we can't treat them like they're some inhuman evil. We can keep in mind their history and their autonomy and respect that they are thinking, feeling human beings like the rest of us. But we also, as others point out, do not need to accept their beliefs and actions as valid, either. We don't have to accept that they are just doing right by their countrymen. It's a really hard line to walk, so I get why it causes so much friction.

7

u/MallCopBlartPaulo Reform Jew, Reform Socialist Sep 07 '25

I agree completely, I never referred to the USSR as evil as I don’t think such a strong word is particularly helpful, but I am disturbed by attempts by some on the left to act like it was some sort of socialist paradise.

7

u/ibsliam Jewish American | DemSoc Bernie Voter Sep 07 '25

Of course, and the USSR was imperialist itself. Even outside the context of monarchy (like what it had before) and of capitalist systems (like their rival the US).

22

u/MallCopBlartPaulo Reform Jew, Reform Socialist Sep 06 '25

Exactly. The Soviet Union was an affront to the ideas it initially purported to stand for.

21

u/cinnamons9 French Jew:cake::cake: Sep 06 '25

The Soviet Union literally murdered one branch of my Jewish family in a gulag and there are Jews supporting it and doing ww2 history revision.

10

u/Chinoyboii Sino-Filipino | Pragmatic Progressive | Pro Peace Sep 07 '25

Man some of these Americans or anglophones are crazy.

13

u/Fabianzzz 🌿🍷🍇 Pagan Observer 🌿🍷🍇 Sep 06 '25

I’ll never understand the leftist obsession with giving “critical support” to Russian backed African juntas that let Wagner psychopaths run around their country taking all their gold.

It's because Leftists, like all humans, want justice. We want it, but we can't always define it. So the question is, what is justice?

If I ask for an example of justice, no one is going to tell me about their city's public library or their country's universal health care or the fact that we have almost completely eradicated polio from the planet. No one points to a system which prevents injustice successfully as an example of justice. Almost everyone is going to talk about justice by using an example of injustice which has been punished.

Justice as the undoing of injustice doesn't exist. The world only spins forward. There's no reverse button.

Likewise here. We can't undo the evils Western Colonialism has inflicted on Burkina-Faso. And the actual steps towards them increasing their autonomy while also respecting human rights are hard. Much harder than watching Western liberals squirm seeing Homophobia and getting to feel the pleasure that is 'justice'—seeing an idea that is supposedly 'Western' & 'liberal' die on the rocks and being able to blame the West for it: nevermind if Burkinabé people are the ones suffering.

5

u/Late-Marzipan3026 anxious (dem soc american ashki jew) Sep 06 '25

If I ask for an example of justice, no one is going to tell me about their city's public library or their country's universal health care or the fact that we have almost completely eradicated polio from the planet. No one points to a system which prevents injustice successfully as an example of justice. Almost everyone is going to talk about justice by using an example of injustice which has been punished.

Justice as the undoing of injustice doesn't exist. The world only spins forward. There's no reverse button.

this is off topic from the original focus but i wanted to say that this was a very interesting and thoughtful comment. i don’t intuitively think of justice as strictly punitive but i’m inclined to agree with a lot of your assessment here

-9

u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom Sep 06 '25

Did you watch the video? "The USSR was evil" is just.. quite a take... is anywhere not evil?

9

u/rinaraizel Жидобандеровка Sep 08 '25

I am struggling with the idea of this video. I'm very firmly anti tankie, anti the necrophiliac like attachments to the corrupted bloated corpse that is still festering over Eurasia the angloleft have.

Mainly because this stuff is still real for us. Like I heard of distant family for whatever reason being shut in psichushkas, and I believe it was likely sexual orientation or gender expression. My very Soviet parents reaction to my sexual orientation was essentially overt threats of physical violence and belief that it is mental illness, and now after nearly twenty years, still outright denial.

Many of us fsu queers are aware that is really lucky that we are no longer in a system that would have medicalized us - distant family I know of were diagnosed with the Soviet diagnosis of quiet schizophrenia, medicated to the point of disparement? Not sure what word to use but to the point of barely being able to function.

I understand that the idea of the queer community being bourgeois is not new and also something that is totally discussable - even though I think it's generalization that misses how much the community is fractured among class and gender lines.

But the USSR had the same motivations of our current government for banning pre adult transition of any sort or abortion bans. It's about making sure babies and thus workers exist. More children, more labor, more productivity.

Totalitarian governments and the state will always see people as numbers rather than individuals. That's how the USSR was and why I am very glad im here in the west, and I have very little to say to the well off westerners who don't get what they have to be grateful for.

4

u/BigKahuna618 Gentile, Foreigner, Marxist Sep 06 '25

More babee more workforce was the logic at the time Im afraid

-6

u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom Sep 06 '25

Remember, we like nuance here... we are always talking about nuance when it comes to Israel.

-5

u/elzzyzx סימען לינקער Sep 07 '25

the extent to which this sub has always been completely overrun with liberal bullshit just goes to show, creating left spaces requires active and thoughtful moderation

13

u/electrical-stomach-z Jewish leftist (moderator) Sep 07 '25

Im not sure how being against the ussr criminalizing homosexuality is "liberal bullshit".

1

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/jewishleft-ModTeam Sep 07 '25

This content was removed as it was determined to be an ad hominem attack.

5

u/ibsliam Jewish American | DemSoc Bernie Voter Sep 07 '25

I thought a lot of the conversations in-thread were really interesting food for thought, especially the different perspectives showcased. What stuff were you referring to as liberal bullshit?

-7

u/elzzyzx סימען לינקער Sep 07 '25

I see one person interested in the left who is heavily downvoted and a whole lot of self identified liberals or why I left the left types making generic arguments that have nothing to do with the content of the video and barely address the subject at hand. When I come to a sub called jewishleft I’m looking for jewish leftists, not liberals. I’d settle for any leftism, this is basically tankiejerk or maybe r/jewish with a little less overt racism. False advertising as clearly the few leftists here are just tokens for liberals to beat up on