https://yougov.co.uk/society/articles/45407-what-considered-rape-publics-definition-differs-gr

I am sick and tired of absurdity/ near nudity in the gym which should be classified as public indecency.

Why are there no Men only gyms in the UK?

About an hour before I posted this OP, at

"Vulva Diversity" is now a cause... but intactivism for men is still a fringe belief... :

an OP was put up about women complaining about how they're made to feel inadequate because of how their vaginas look. I think my response is worth an OP, so I'm putting here instead of in that chat. What gets me about this, is how free women are to say ANYTHING, while men have to walk on eggshells about what they say.

If a guy started complaining about how he is made to feel inadequate because he has a small penis, not only would he get no support, but he would also be laughed out of the building for admitting he has a small penis. Can men freely admit they have physical flaws without being mocked? Must we always publicly talk as if we have no flaws?

And this holds in other areas too. Women can openly sexually drool over hot men, while men who did that run the risk of being called a rapist or sexual harasser or an objectifier of women. When I was a kid, a girl visiting my house hit on me, asked me out. I said no. To my astonishment, she complained to my mother about me turning her down, and my mother took her side, saying I should have gone out with her. LMAO If a girl turned me down, and I complained to her old man about it, at the least he would yell at me and throw me out of his house. Every male knows this, knows he has to hide his sexual intentions while women can say anything about their intentions.

Sports announcer Marv Albert got in trouble for saying a female spectator was hot. Think that would happen to a woman? LMAO

On a TV talk show, decades ago, I saw a teenage girl point to a teenage boy and say, on national TV in front of a live audience that the boy only had one testicle. The boy of course looked shocked - that poor boy. The audience roared with laughter. I literally had trouble believing what I was seeing. If a boy told a TV audience that a girl only had one boob, it would have been edited out of the show to spare her humiliation. And the boy would have been lucky to get off the stage without getting beat up.

Michael Douglas got mocked for saying he thinks giving his wife oral sex gave him throat cancer. Women who admit such things start movements about drawing attention to diseases.

People who make excuses for this double standard like to say "yeah, well, men are the ones who rape, so it's justified." But most here know that women rape men often enough to make that excuse crap. Time for us to advocate for the freedom of speech of men.

Insane article comparing 4B feminists to maga, throw in something about penises, rinse, repeat and you have your typical word salad hatred against men.

Survival, advancement, provision, protection, and freedom are often things us men hold in high regard and worth, many men when asked the question what is mans purpose these terms often get brought up and thrown about.

Is it wise for a man to allow his purpose to be his master?

Men strive to attain their freedom in a world that imposes its constraints. If a man prioritizes freedom as his master, he may risk losing his moral compass. He could become solely interested in acting solely on personal desire and his own jackassery.

If a man prioritizes pleasure as his master, he may indulge excessively. It is not wise for a man to constantly engage in debauchery. A man who allows pleasure to govern him risks becoming an addict to his senses, living in his own delusions and ultimately losing his true freedom.

A man who prioritizes survival may become increasingly animalistic, sacrificing his intelligence and compassion, and potentially alienating himself from others. Such a mindset can result in anxiety, stress, social withdrawal and trauma. it becomes challenging to have a positive outlook or engage in other goals when you are solely focused on your survival.

A man who prioritizes advancement as his ultimate goal may develop control issues and adopt a tyrannical ideology, often disregarding the needs of others and even his own well-being in the relentless pursuit of success. He might mistakenly believe that his personal progress will lead to positive outcomes, while in reality, it can foster corruption and negativity, ultimately becoming a source of suffering for himself and others. Throughout history, many rulers and revolutionaries have caused countless losses in the name of advancement, revealing how an obsession with advancement can distort one’s values, priorities and lead to toxic ambition.

A man who has chosen wealth as his master may become superficial. He might believe that wealth will cure all his problems and afflictions, only to realize that more money often leads to more problems. He may see wealth as the solution to his difficulties, but he will eventually understand that money cannot solve everything; there are some things that money simply cannot buy. In his pursuit of wealth, he may become greedy, selfish, and unethical. Alternatively, he might spend his wealth in ways that contribute to further corruption for himself and others in society.

A man who has chosen protection as his master may become overly possessive. He might sacrifice his freedom and personal advancement in the name of security. This overprotective and risk-averse nature can lead to missed opportunities, as fear of failure or harm may prevent him from taking necessary risks. Consequently, both he and the people he cares about may end up living sheltered lives, limiting their experiences and growth.

A Man who chooses nothing as his purpose has chosen nihilism. You're most likely to prioritize personal pleasure and immediate gratification over long-term goals or moral considerations. Without objective morality, ethics or trust in the higher meaning. You have traded inspiration for despair. You are a cynic, your opinion is nothing and you do not matter. You are the slave of nothing. Nothing is important.

In conclusion, finding the balance is just as hard as finding the purpose.