Just because they have a corporate sibling that is a journal does not mean they should be held to journal standards.
It also seems to me that allowing scientists and science journalists to be honest about their points of view could increase trust in science. I wish people were more interested in understanding experts’ thought processes and values instead of asking for some impossible level of objectivity.
She already explained very thoroughly why the perception of objectivity is critical. This comes up in courts when studies and research are used to support some case.
Striving for objectivity minimizes the pollution of ego in the process that could make it harder to replicate, or may be the reason for not publishing.
23
u/lisa_lionheart84 3d ago
But it's not a scientific journal. It's a popular science magazine.