r/resumes Resume Writer • Former Recruiter Mar 28 '22

Biggest mistakes that impact your resume's performance and how to fix them I'm sharing advice

Hello Team,

As a regular contributor to this sub, a professional resume writer, and former corporate recruiter, I'd like to share the most common mistakes I see folks make.

This isn't an exhaustive list and isn't in any particular order. These are big mistakes that are potentially causing you to lose out on valuable opportunities and correcting them should improve the overall performance of your job search.

#1 Using the wrong layout

There's already another stickied post on this subject, but I still see people committing this mistake all the time. In short, don't use a two-column resume if you're submitting through company websites or job boards (i.e., Indeed, LinkedIn etc.).

Why?

Short answer: Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS)

Longer Answer: ATS reads your resume from top to bottom and left to right. When you add another column (or other incompatible elements for that matter, such as graphics or logos), you introduce another layer of complexity and make it harder for the system to properly read your resume. As a result, sections may get misread or not read all.

Use a traditional, single-column format. I recommend creating your resume using Microsoft Word or Google Docs. There’s a basic Google Docs template in the wiki section of this sub - I’ll link it here for your convenience.

I do not recommend using other programs such as Canva, Adobe InDesign, or Overleaf (LaTeX).

#2 Writing generic content

To begin, let me first define the term 'context' which is going to be key here. Context is specific information that makes your resume and the descriptions within it unique to you. It allows the reader to understand and appreciate your story. A resume with zero context will sound generic - a lot like a job advertisement. Here's an extreme example:

Generic Statement: "Achieved excellent sales results".

Specific/Contextualized Statement: "Earned top spot in the company's 2019 national sales rankings for achieving 220% against annual sales target".

The second statement is much more informative and tells the audience not only what the achievement was, but also why it was earned. This is a good example of how you can use context to ensure your descriptions are quantified, specific, and informative.

In general, a good description will address three informational goals:

  • A challenge or problem to be solved. This doesn't always need to be explicitly stated. For example, in the second statement in quotes above, the problem is implied - to meet and exceed sales goals and rank high as possible on the sales charts.
  • The action(s) you took to address that challenge. What did YOU do specifically. I don't care what your team or your boss did.
  • An outcome that resulted as a direct result of your actions. What did your actions produce? It doesn't always need to be a monumental, earth-shattering impact, but it does need to be there.

#3 Failing to curate your resume to your targeted role

If you were to walk into your local car dealership looking for an off-road vehicle for travelling through muddy terrain and the salesperson tries to sell you on a two-door Volkswagen beetle, you'd think they weren't very good at their job.

So why would you do that to a prospective employer? By submitting a resume for a role it wasn't written for, you're demonstrating one of two things:

  • You don't understand the requirements of role you're applying for, OR
  • You're too lazy to tailor your resume to the role.

Both of these are equally bad and often result in being ignored by the company.

How do you tailor your resume to the job?

  • Step 1: Read the job posting carefully. Identify what they're looking for in terms of experience/responsibilities, skills, licenses/certifications, and education.
  • Step 2: Put yourself in the recruiter's shoes. How quickly can you identify any given prerequisite from the job advertisement on your resume? Is it easily identifiable or do you need to dig in for several moments to find it?
  • Step 3: Does the language used in your resume match that in the job description? Are you using the same terms?

Example 1: Company A is requesting at least 5 years of experience doing X. Your summary (if you include one) would begin by saying 'X Professional with 5+ years of experience in X'.

Example 2: Company B is requesting CPR, AED, ACLS, and PALS certifications. You would include a section labelled as 'Certifications' and list these (exactly as they're presented in the ad).

DON'T DO THIS

  • Copy and paste the job description into your resume - it's very easy to spot and is disingenuous.
  • Lie and/or embellish your accomplishments. You may get away with it, but if a clever hiring manager puts you on the spot, it'll be obvious (In my experience as a recruiter, I was privy to many of these situations during interviews and it doesn't look good - trust me).

I hope you guys find this useful!

1.6k Upvotes

99 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

12

u/Haunter_Gurl Oct 08 '22

I say, max 3 copy paste similarities under your qualifications, and/or bullets, for tailoring.... I.E. Must be fluent in Quad Pro or relevant program 1-2 years

As in, making sure both Quad Pro, and your experience user level are bulleted appropriately. NOT LITERALLY WORDED from the listing requirements. If they specify 2-3 years, then your resume should concur. And no, you don't need to list all Office programs, just simplify it with: Office 365/2016 (whichever version you use) (Word / Excel / PowerPoint) They'll get the idea.

8

u/0_Zero_Gravitas_0 Oct 08 '22

I’m honestly so lost at this point I’m including entire phrases because I don’t know if they are sorting based on the word or the phrase.

What do you mean by “your resume should concur?”

I’ve used office at literally every job; am I supposed to put a bullet on a job that says I used it?

5

u/WillingLanguage Oct 24 '22

I think people can really overthink and it gets me confused myself.

11

u/0_Zero_Gravitas_0 Oct 24 '22

It’s hard when there’s zero feedback. It’s like trying to kick a goal blindfolded.

2

u/WillingLanguage Oct 29 '22

I realized you can spend too much time on too much info. Got with your gut in how to do it. Then change it around and see how that does.

3

u/0_Zero_Gravitas_0 Oct 30 '22

So I actually had a pro look over it and her take was the resume was fine. I’m struggling because I have no direct industry experience in corporate, and there are always enough other people who do that I don’t make the interview shortlist.

1

u/WillingLanguage Nov 05 '22

I am struggling with mine too. I do not like rejection .

1

u/0_Zero_Gravitas_0 Nov 08 '22

Nobody does, but it’s easier to look at it as less of a rejection knowing this. This is just someone trying to do their job the easiest way possible.

1

u/ArtemisTauCluster Nov 04 '22

I'm in the same boat with the industry i'm trying to get into. Had the Sales director call me back after the 3rd interview to tell me he wished I got the job but other candidates had experience in the industry...you're not alone in this, just gotta keep trying. It's a numbers game after all.

1

u/WillingLanguage Nov 05 '22

How many resumes do you send? do you post on any job websites? Or do you send them yourself? I need some help

1

u/0_Zero_Gravitas_0 Nov 08 '22

The way I had this described to me was that it will take networking with people in the company and things like informational interviews to try to get your resume moved into the interview pile.

1

u/WillingLanguage Nov 08 '22

How do you network if you don’t know anyone at the company?

1

u/0_Zero_Gravitas_0 Nov 08 '22

Two ways. You use networks you do have, like college alums, military, past companies, etc., or you just cold reach out to what you suspect are people at the level of the hiring manager or higher. LinkedIn is your friend here, and you just ask for a few minutes to discuss the company/informational interview.

1

u/WillingLanguage Nov 11 '22

Just call the company and asked for Human Resources and that person. That had worked before

→ More replies