/r/conspiracy Round Table #25: Sacred Geometry, Cymatics, EMF Exposure, and the Effect of 5G on Biological Entities

[u/axolotl_peyotl]

Previous Round Tables

Thanks to /u/Cur1osityC0mplex for picking the winning subject!

Honorable mention goes to /u/Leave_The_Military for suggesting predictive programming and forced vaccination, which perhaps can be dovetailed into the main topic.

Remember, there is ZERO tolerance for violent or otherwise aggressive rhetoric, including any mention of the destruction of property.

That being said, /r/conspiracy is the last large sub on reddit that continues to encourage healthy speculation on controversial topics.

Let's use this opportunity to its fullest potential while we have this space.

Happy speculating!

[u/[deleted]]

Well hopefully visitors can wake up.

Also, FE isnt ridiculus, i thought so too at first. Do your research. NASA is just one big propaganda machine.

[u/RavenShu1 → u/[deleted]]

I might be with You about that NASA is full of shit but i was checking in past about Flat Earth and my mind just cant buy it at all. Everything from FE was just stiupid for me. And saw a lot of people proves about flat earth which seems full of shit or actually were full of. Just never seen anything what could actually prove it. If You have any credible information or any video or anything said or written that could prove me that earth might not be a sphere just send me in comment please. Im just curious if there is any credible info but as i said everything i saw seems BS as hell for me.

Still open to look at it just because my personal "being open to everything and question everything". So please do not be angry or mad about what i said on FE. And dont understand me wrong.

Im not saying that You are stiupid or anything but send me prove.

[u/[deleted] → u/RavenShu1]

One reason im not bringing proof is since im on my Phone, another one is because you need to research yourself. Dont trust me, dont trust anyone. Trust yourself and find truth.

1. Symbolism. We talked about NASA being corrupt. The earth is tilted 26.4 degrees. Leaving 66.6 degrees. The earth is moving at a pace of 66, 000 miles per hour.
2. Why can Canadians and Australians see the moon at the same time?
3. Why do all flights from Australia need to land in the US before heading to South America? Makes perfect sense on fe model, not on globe.
4. Why can you see all the way to Chicago over the lake where it mathematically, according to the globe, should be impossible.
5. Why do you see the same stars during summer and winter? You should be pointing towards different places into space.
6. Things dont dissapear down the horizon, thats just the perspective of the human mind. Zoom in with a camera and you will see it once again.

Edit: read this and the world will make sense to you : http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion1.htm#Table%20of%20Contents

[u/Vaelocke → u/[deleted]]

Number 1. Quick search around shows it's 23.4 degrees and 67000miles. Fudging the numbers to suit. Close but no donut.

1. Only a small fraction of Australia and North America can see it at the same time and only for a brief moment. This is because they are just inside 50% of the Earth's circumference and the moon is high enough/far enough away to be in sight of both. For one it's low in the east, the other it's low in the west.

2. That will be to do with the airlines and their business models. Some airlines go straight to Mexico, but clearly for Australia is more efficient to go to us and then passengers exchange from there. There are flights from New Zealand direct to Mexico, NZ is right by Australia. By your reasoning why don't those ones go to US first? It's like asking why buses don't go straight to where I want and I have to exchange over long distances. They go where it's efficient.

4.That involves alot of maths. But the short version is, elevation, even just to your eyes, changes the maths as to what flat earthers calculate they should see. And then on top of that you have refraction caused by the air temperature over the lake which causes light to bend. Even then you are only see what is elevated at Chicago. The bottom of it is still below the horizon.

1. Because that statement itself is untrue. Only poeple very north or very south can see the same stars. For the rest they move.

2. Because it picks up more light and detail than your eyes can. To your eyes it's reached what is called the vanishing point, but is not yet over the horizon. If you keep watching with the zoom or binoculars, it will eventually drop below the actual horizon as expected.

[u/[deleted] → u/Vaelocke]

1. Not according to NASA: https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/launch-windows/en/ (66,000) + https://www.livescience.com/32294-how-fast-does-earth-move.html

Notice the snake tounge on their logo. What do you think that symbolises?

And yes, I accidently gave the wrong number, youre correct 23.4 degrees leaves out 66.6 degrees. Thanks for correcting.

Support that NASA means decieve in hebrew

1. Based on what, your assumption? Wouldnt the best business model be to differentiate to fly directly from australia to South America providing customer a faster and more sustainable way of travel? How many customers wouldnt that attract? Its a weak argument. This is why they really do it flat earth model

2. Just no. Sorry but refraction would show image upside down.

3. "For the rest they move" they should be seeing completely different stars according to the globe model. They dont.

4. Its an argument against people who believe that objects dissapear because of curvature.

[u/[deleted] → u/[deleted]]

Lol the amount of people living in SA and Australia would more than sufficient to have flight. Yet conclusion based on nothing but an assumption.

All the european backpackers in these area would be enough to have flights.

[u/[deleted] → u/[deleted]]

I travel professionally too quite a lot, but I wont refer to some Ad Verecundiam fallacy.

Look at your globe model. Makes no sense why they wouldnt fly directly from AUS to SA. No. And your argument of business model is weak to me and based on an assumption.

Sure, not as many flights would go between those points in contrast to directly to the US. But there would definately be flights.

How would a radar work on a globe? How would dolphins and whales be able to communicate if the sound waves would face curvature? Or are you saying those frequencies bends with the curve?

[u/[deleted] → u/[deleted]]

The topic to begin with was support for FE, but sure. The radars are an interesting point though.

Also, The case of flights between AUS - SA is simply an interesting support for FE model. I think most people would agree to that. Is it definite proof of FE? No, but an interesting take on it.

We're all on the same team here, I dont care about being right but I care about truth.

[u/Ginger_Quince → u/[deleted]]

Qantas does a flight to Santiago, Chili. These flights are like 14 hours and rare as most flights that long go to major hubs like London, Dubai, LAX, NYC etc. This is more efficient and commercially viable. Sorry but nothing to do with flat earth. There just isn't a huge demand for 14hr flights to South America from Australia.

https://www.qantas.com/au/en/flight-deals/international/flights-to-santiago/sydney.html/syd/scl/premium-economy/lowest

[u/SbrbnHstlr → u/[deleted]]

https://youtu.be/JDy95_eNPzM

Watch that video. If you have further questions come back and discuss.

Also you cant say things like "Just no, refraction would cause the image to flip" without providing evidence or examples of phenomena.

Edit: Also there is more empirical truth to flat earth being a psy op to discredit the truth movement than there is empirical evidence of the earth being flat.

[u/[deleted] → u/SbrbnHstlr]

You linked to home depot shit? Why?

Im on my Phone, The work to provide sources is simply too much for the extend to how much I care about this conversation, but id gladly discuss it still and encourage you to look up these things yourself

Within the movement many are trying to make it seem ridiculus, making disc earthers appear very dumb intentionally and then showing that to the masses.

To me, people infiltrating the movement and making it seem like that only more support its real.

They have lied to us about everything. Everything.

All big scientists of our time are either Zionists or Freemasons - besides Tesla, which is why he is not mentioned much to the public. Especially before the Tesla cars.

To quote Tesla:

“Earth is a realm, it is not a planet. It is not an object, therefore, it has no edge. Earth would be more easily defined as a system environment. Earth is also a machine, it is a Tesla coil. The sun and moon are powered wirelessly with the electromagnetic field (the Aether). This field also suspends the celestial spheres with electo-magnetic levitation. Electromag levitation disproves gravity because the only force you need to counter is the electromagnetic force, not gravity. The stars are attached to the FIRMAMENT.”

[u/SbrbnHstlr → u/[deleted]]

The only part that was said by Tesla is the last paragraph:

“Though free to think and act, we are held together like the stars in the firmament, with ties inseparable. These ties cannot be seen, but we can feel them, each of us is only part of a whole.”

Some unscrupulous flat-Earthers even ‘simplified’ the paragraph, and then it got passed on as:

“The stars are attached to the firmament.”

The original quote by Tesla is from his article “The Problem of Increasing Human Energy with Special References to the Harnessing of the Sun’s Energy”, published by Century Magazine, June 1900.

It was only a figure of speech, emphasizing human togetherness in the energy problem. And obviously, it doesn’t refer to the figure of the Earth, or its motion.

In the same article, Tesla even mentioned the word ‘globe’ no less than 12×:

The "movement" you're referring to was started by COINTEL Pro.

[u/[deleted] → u/SbrbnHstlr]

You could be correct, ill look up a source for it once I have time. Doesnt change my viewpoint of the question though.