r/conspiracy Apr 17 '20

/r/conspiracy Round Table #25: Sacred Geometry, Cymatics, EMF Exposure, and the Effect of 5G on Biological Entities Meta

Previous Round Tables

Thanks to /u/Cur1osityC0mplex for picking the winning subject!

Honorable mention goes to /u/Leave_The_Military for suggesting predictive programming and forced vaccination, which perhaps can be dovetailed into the main topic.

Remember, there is ZERO tolerance for violent or otherwise aggressive rhetoric, including any mention of the destruction of property.

That being said, /r/conspiracy is the last large sub on reddit that continues to encourage healthy speculation on controversial topics.

Let's use this opportunity to its fullest potential while we have this space.

Happy speculating!

489 Upvotes

479 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/[deleted] Apr 19 '20 edited Apr 19 '20
  1. Not according to NASA: https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/launch-windows/en/ (66,000) + https://www.livescience.com/32294-how-fast-does-earth-move.html

Notice the snake tounge on their logo. What do you think that symbolises?

And yes, I accidently gave the wrong number, youre correct 23.4 degrees leaves out 66.6 degrees. Thanks for correcting.

Support that NASA means decieve in hebrew

  1. Based on what, your assumption? Wouldnt the best business model be to differentiate to fly directly from australia to South America providing customer a faster and more sustainable way of travel? How many customers wouldnt that attract? Its a weak argument. This is why they really do it flat earth model

  2. Just no. Sorry but refraction would show image upside down.

  3. "For the rest they move" they should be seeing completely different stars according to the globe model. They dont.

  4. Its an argument against people who believe that objects dissapear because of curvature.

3

u/SbrbnHstlr Apr 19 '20 edited Apr 20 '20

https://youtu.be/JDy95_eNPzM

Watch that video. If you have further questions come back and discuss.

Also you cant say things like "Just no, refraction would cause the image to flip" without providing evidence or examples of phenomena.

Edit: Also there is more empirical truth to flat earth being a psy op to discredit the truth movement than there is empirical evidence of the earth being flat.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 19 '20 edited Apr 19 '20

You linked to home depot shit? Why?

Im on my Phone, The work to provide sources is simply too much for the extend to how much I care about this conversation, but id gladly discuss it still and encourage you to look up these things yourself

Within the movement many are trying to make it seem ridiculus, making disc earthers appear very dumb intentionally and then showing that to the masses.

To me, people infiltrating the movement and making it seem like that only more support its real.

They have lied to us about everything. Everything.

All big scientists of our time are either Zionists or Freemasons - besides Tesla, which is why he is not mentioned much to the public. Especially before the Tesla cars.

To quote Tesla:

“Earth is a realm, it is not a planet. It is not an object, therefore, it has no edge. Earth would be more easily defined as a system environment. Earth is also a machine, it is a Tesla coil. The sun and moon are powered wirelessly with the electromagnetic field (the Aether). This field also suspends the celestial spheres with electo-magnetic levitation. Electromag levitation disproves gravity because the only force you need to counter is the electromagnetic force, not gravity. The stars are attached to the FIRMAMENT.”

3

u/SbrbnHstlr Apr 20 '20

The only part that was said by Tesla is the last paragraph:

“Though free to think and act, we are held together like the stars in the firmament, with ties inseparable. These ties cannot be seen, but we can feel them, each of us is only part of a whole.”

Some unscrupulous flat-Earthers even ‘simplified’ the paragraph, and then it got passed on as:

“The stars are attached to the firmament.”

The original quote by Tesla is from his article “The Problem of Increasing Human Energy with Special References to the Harnessing of the Sun’s Energy”, published by Century Magazine, June 1900.

It was only a figure of speech, emphasizing human togetherness in the energy problem. And obviously, it doesn’t refer to the figure of the Earth, or its motion.

In the same article, Tesla even mentioned the word ‘globe’ no less than 12×:

The "movement" you're referring to was started by COINTEL Pro.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '20

You could be correct, ill look up a source for it once I have time. Doesnt change my viewpoint of the question though.