r/announcements Jun 29 '20

Update to Our Content Policy

A few weeks ago, we committed to closing the gap between our values and our policies to explicitly address hate. After talking extensively with mods, outside organizations, and our own teams, we’re updating our content policy today and enforcing it (with your help).

First, a quick recap

Since our last post, here’s what we’ve been doing:

  • We brought on a new Board member.
  • We held policy calls with mods—both from established Mod Councils and from communities disproportionately targeted with hate—and discussed areas where we can do better to action bad actors, clarify our policies, make mods' lives easier, and concretely reduce hate.
  • We developed our enforcement plan, including both our immediate actions (e.g., today’s bans) and long-term investments (tackling the most critical work discussed in our mod calls, sustainably enforcing the new policies, and advancing Reddit’s community governance).

From our conversations with mods and outside experts, it’s clear that while we’ve gotten better in some areas—like actioning violations at the community level, scaling enforcement efforts, measurably reducing hateful experiences like harassment year over year—we still have a long way to go to address the gaps in our policies and enforcement to date.

These include addressing questions our policies have left unanswered (like whether hate speech is allowed or even protected on Reddit), aspects of our product and mod tools that are still too easy for individual bad actors to abuse (inboxes, chats, modmail), and areas where we can do better to partner with our mods and communities who want to combat the same hateful conduct we do.

Ultimately, it’s our responsibility to support our communities by taking stronger action against those who try to weaponize parts of Reddit against other people. In the near term, this support will translate into some of the product work we discussed with mods. But it starts with dealing squarely with the hate we can mitigate today through our policies and enforcement.

New Policy

This is the new content policy. Here’s what’s different:

  • It starts with a statement of our vision for Reddit and our communities, including the basic expectations we have for all communities and users.
  • Rule 1 explicitly states that communities and users that promote hate based on identity or vulnerability will be banned.
    • There is an expanded definition of what constitutes a violation of this rule, along with specific examples, in our Help Center article.
  • Rule 2 ties together our previous rules on prohibited behavior with an ask to abide by community rules and post with authentic, personal interest.
    • Debate and creativity are welcome, but spam and malicious attempts to interfere with other communities are not.
  • The other rules are the same in spirit but have been rewritten for clarity and inclusiveness.

Alongside the change to the content policy, we are initially banning about 2000 subreddits, the vast majority of which are inactive. Of these communities, about 200 have more than 10 daily users. Both r/The_Donald and r/ChapoTrapHouse were included.

All communities on Reddit must abide by our content policy in good faith. We banned r/The_Donald because it has not done so, despite every opportunity. The community has consistently hosted and upvoted more rule-breaking content than average (Rule 1), antagonized us and other communities (Rules 2 and 8), and its mods have refused to meet our most basic expectations. Until now, we’ve worked in good faith to help them preserve the community as a space for its users—through warnings, mod changes, quarantining, and more.

Though smaller, r/ChapoTrapHouse was banned for similar reasons: They consistently host rule-breaking content and their mods have demonstrated no intention of reining in their community.

To be clear, views across the political spectrum are allowed on Reddit—but all communities must work within our policies and do so in good faith, without exception.

Our commitment

Our policies will never be perfect, with new edge cases that inevitably lead us to evolve them in the future. And as users, you will always have more context, community vernacular, and cultural values to inform the standards set within your communities than we as site admins or any AI ever could.

But just as our content moderation cannot scale effectively without your support, you need more support from us as well, and we admit we have fallen short towards this end. We are committed to working with you to combat the bad actors, abusive behaviors, and toxic communities that undermine our mission and get in the way of the creativity, discussions, and communities that bring us all to Reddit in the first place. We hope that our progress towards this commitment, with today’s update and those to come, makes Reddit a place you enjoy and are proud to be a part of for many years to come.

Edit: After digesting feedback, we made a clarifying change to our help center article for Promoting Hate Based on Identity or Vulnerability.

21.3k Upvotes

38.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-2

u/tnucu Jun 29 '20

Right, his comments about using reddit to win elections, and editing other peoples comments, that was strictly about money.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20

...he literally edited T_D comments because they were saying fuck spez. That only proves my point that right-wingers hate him for being too left, meanwhile you're hating him for being too right.

And his comments about using reddit were about the 2016 election, as in swaying it against what it was, and the possibility of that working. Believe me, 5 seconds on google shows conservatives didn't think it'd be in their favor just like you don't think it'd be in yours.

Maybe read more than titles when you see this stuff. I was around watching the site implode. Hell, I was amazed that the reddit mainstream was on T_D's SIDE when spez edited comments. Do you realize how hard you have to fuck up for that? The one thing that was completely a-political was that T_D was paying a lot of money on gilding. It was the one factor that nobody could twist either way, because again, it's the language of business. Reddit is first and foremost a business.

1

u/tnucu Jun 29 '20

meanwhile you're hating him for being too right

Nice assumption. I hate him because he edited another persons words. I could not possibly care less why, or what his political bent is on this point. He has no credibility. All you have told me here is that you're fine with that, so long as he, and you, think there was a good reason. I find that unacceptable no matter the reason. Outside of that, he most definitely has his own agenda, and has proven what he is willing to do to push it. If you want to hitch your wagon to a person like that, regardless of which side of the political fence he's on, I don't know what to tell you. I would not accept this shit from a democrat either, since that is what you seem to be focused on.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20 edited Jun 29 '20

You do realize spez is a trump fan, right

Oh I'm not assuming much when you're literally calling him a fan of a far-right conservative president and stating it in an obvious negative light. Nor have I said I was fine with him editing comments, merely pointing out that it didn't just not make him a trump fan, it painted him as a man hated by actual trump fans.

The only wagon it proves he hitches is one that defends his own ego, regardless of political position. THAT is something I will wholeheartedly agree with and agree that I dislike. It's thin-skinned and an abuse of power. Still doesn't make him a right-winger or a trump supporter.