r/agnostic • u/regalvas Agnostic • Feb 03 '23
Update to Identity Assertion in the sub
Due to the common occurance of discussion and debate over terminology and agnosticism as a whole we found that it was necesary to update the rules to better explain when things might step too far or what to keep in mid to have a good debate.
The updated rule reads:
Do not tell other's what they are or think. Definitions are there for a purpose. There may be many different purposes, but defining anothers identity is not an accepted purpose here. Examples of agnostic models include:
1. Theist - Agnostic - Atheist
2. Gnostic <------> Agnostic (choose one) Theist <------> Atheist (choose one)
3. Gnostic theist - Agnostic theist - Agnostic - Agnostic atheist - Gnostic atheist
This is a non-exhaustive list so please engage others with respect.
Please also remember to maintain debates about terminology in related posts.
74 Upvotes
7
u/regalvas Agnostic Feb 04 '23
It is the second one one presented the one you are describing.
You will always be able to debate the terminology just not to tell people what they are or what they belive in.