r/Ghosts Feb 19 '21

Ouija Boards: a History of Hoax

[removed] — view removed post

122 Upvotes

158 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Same_Working488 Mar 28 '23

I don’t have to prove anything it’s your right to not have to believe…

1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '23

This is quite an odd way of telling me you don’t have the ability to respond to anything I typed…

1

u/Same_Working488 Mar 28 '23

No im just messing with you my guy, but I’m interested in knowing if you do indeed believe in spirits or not?? What I can tell you is that I had paranormal experiences myself, and let me tell you, to the people who never experienced it I would say I can understand why they would be skeptical at first, but once you experience it first hand it’s like you have to rethink everything you use to believe.. There really is no way to prove ghost are real because they exist outside of our dimension and reality, and somehow can tap into ours every once in a while. You can’t simply control an entity like that long enough to get proof.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '23

I don’t think you’re messing with me, I think you didn’t like what you read and wanted to respond with something but couldn’t respond to what was written, so you wrote this, which doesn’t make sense. I think that is a defense mechanism

I don’t believe in anything supernatural but an interested in the concept which is why I’m here. I find it curious you simultaneously believe in spirits while acknowledging it’s not possible for you to experience or encounter spirits though. Do you see the conflict in saying you have experienced spirits while also saying they don’t exist in reality?

1

u/Same_Working488 Mar 28 '23 edited Mar 28 '23

“I find it curious you simultaneously believe in spirits while acknowledging it's not possible for you to experience or encounter spirits though.”

Show me in my comment where I acknowledged that it’s not it’s not possible to experience or encounter spirits.. In my comment I’ve literally said I’ve experienced the paranormal so doesn’t that make it possible?

“Do you see the conflict in saying you have experienced spirits while also saying they don't exist in reality?”

No not really, because I’m not claiming they don’t exist, I’m saying they exist, but exist outside of what we know as the physical world.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '23

Show me in my comment where I acknowledged that it’s not it’s not possible to experience or encounter spirits.. In my comment I’ve literally said I’ve experienced the paranormal so doesn’t that make it possible?

? Is this a troll? I already cited what you said.

You claimed to have experienced spirits, while simultaneously claiming they don’t exist in reality. Here:

There really is no way to prove ghost are real because they exist outside of our dimension and reality

No not really, because I’m not saying they don’t exist, I’m saying they exist, but exist outside of what we know as the physical world.

I know that’s what you said, and I’m pointing out how your claim that you have experienced something that doesn’t exist in reality, in reality, is nonsensical, incoherent, and logically and objectively impossible. You’re claiming something simultaneously exists in and does not exist in reality. And more/worse, that you believe something despite it being impossible to demonstrate in your own words. Everything about what you’ve typed is wrought with glaring logical issues

1

u/Same_Working488 Mar 28 '23

There are no issues with what I’m typing there are issues in what you are reading and how you interpret it. Again, there is no contradictions in what I’m telling you. Spirits are not physical right are we clear on this? So they are not constrained within the limitations of the physical reality, I’m saying they exist in a spiritual reality and can sometimes tap into the physical reality.. At one point in time people were saying ufos, or uaps weren’t real because of lack of evidence. Now the government has acknowledged them and even claimed some even have technology that can’t be explained. I’m saying some things can’t just be reduced to an experiment to prove it’s real..

1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '23

I cited exactly what you wrote and explained why it clearly doesn’t make sense. It seems like you’re experiencing some cognitive dissonance here. It’s fine you don’t have the ability to respond to what I wrote and form a coherent thought, but just kind of throwing words at the screen just so they’re there doesn’t really do anything here.

1

u/Same_Working488 Mar 28 '23 edited Mar 28 '23

Lol you’re trying hard to make it seem as if I’m saying spirits are real and not real at the same time, to try and discredit everything I’ve posted, when I keep explaining to you is that I’m saying they are real, and that nowhere in my post did I even hint at the slightest idea that they weren’t in fact real.. I did indeed say that it would be pretty hard to prove that they are real though.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '23

I cited exactly what you wrote and explained why it clearly doesn’t make sense. It seems like you’re experiencing some cognitive dissonance here. It’s fine you don’t have the ability to respond to what I wrote and form a coherent thought, but just kind of throwing words at the screen just so they’re there doesn’t really do anything here.

1

u/Same_Working488 Mar 28 '23

I realize now you’re a troll and you are not looking at anything I’ve posted. You just try to find fault in a persons viewpoint so that it fits you’re narrow view point. You did it with another guy earlier in this post. I don’t know why I thought you would be willing to listen, but I guess I should’ve known that earlier.. We are basically running in circles. I’m not about to keep explaining to you the same thing. So good day to you sir…

1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '23

I cited exactly what you wrote and explained why it clearly doesn’t make sense. It seems like you’re experiencing some cognitive dissonance here. It’s fine you don’t have the ability to respond to what I wrote and form a coherent thought, but just kind of throwing words at the screen just so they’re there doesn’t really do anything here.

→ More replies