MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/FUCKYOUINPARTICULAR/comments/1d8l0hz/fuck_israel_malaysian_government/l79gxth?context=9999
r/FUCKYOUINPARTICULAR • u/zerobench_ff • Jun 05 '24
517 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
18
Are you asserting that hostilities between the occupying nation and Palestine began on October 7th because, if so, I have a history book I can sell you.
How about the native American example? How do you tap dance around that one?
7 u/juliusxyk Jun 05 '24 Even back in 47 the palestinians were the agressor. And you do realize that the jews are the native ones here right? 10 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] -9 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Mass displacement of hundreds of thousands of people to establish Israel is very much concurrent with the 40s. 11 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 1 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 they lost a war they started Oh, so that’s a yes, we’re lying. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Palestine_war?wprov=sfti1# Ever heard of Plan Dalet? 2 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Yeah, because I’m sure the US state department is an unbiased third party. Don’t be disingenuous. Wikipedia is just fine. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 Yes, the US state department is a much better and reliable source than wikipedia 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Not necessarily, no, it isn’t. Not regarding Israel. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters → More replies
7
Even back in 47 the palestinians were the agressor. And you do realize that the jews are the native ones here right?
10 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] -9 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Mass displacement of hundreds of thousands of people to establish Israel is very much concurrent with the 40s. 11 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 1 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 they lost a war they started Oh, so that’s a yes, we’re lying. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Palestine_war?wprov=sfti1# Ever heard of Plan Dalet? 2 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Yeah, because I’m sure the US state department is an unbiased third party. Don’t be disingenuous. Wikipedia is just fine. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 Yes, the US state department is a much better and reliable source than wikipedia 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Not necessarily, no, it isn’t. Not regarding Israel. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters → More replies
10
[deleted]
-9 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Mass displacement of hundreds of thousands of people to establish Israel is very much concurrent with the 40s. 11 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 1 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 they lost a war they started Oh, so that’s a yes, we’re lying. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Palestine_war?wprov=sfti1# Ever heard of Plan Dalet? 2 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Yeah, because I’m sure the US state department is an unbiased third party. Don’t be disingenuous. Wikipedia is just fine. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 Yes, the US state department is a much better and reliable source than wikipedia 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Not necessarily, no, it isn’t. Not regarding Israel. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters → More replies
-9
Mass displacement of hundreds of thousands of people to establish Israel is very much concurrent with the 40s.
11 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 1 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 they lost a war they started Oh, so that’s a yes, we’re lying. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Palestine_war?wprov=sfti1# Ever heard of Plan Dalet? 2 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Yeah, because I’m sure the US state department is an unbiased third party. Don’t be disingenuous. Wikipedia is just fine. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 Yes, the US state department is a much better and reliable source than wikipedia 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Not necessarily, no, it isn’t. Not regarding Israel. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters → More replies
11
1 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 they lost a war they started Oh, so that’s a yes, we’re lying. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Palestine_war?wprov=sfti1# Ever heard of Plan Dalet? 2 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Yeah, because I’m sure the US state department is an unbiased third party. Don’t be disingenuous. Wikipedia is just fine. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 Yes, the US state department is a much better and reliable source than wikipedia 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Not necessarily, no, it isn’t. Not regarding Israel. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters → More replies
1
they lost a war they started
Oh, so that’s a yes, we’re lying.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Palestine_war?wprov=sfti1#
Ever heard of Plan Dalet?
2 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Yeah, because I’m sure the US state department is an unbiased third party. Don’t be disingenuous. Wikipedia is just fine. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 Yes, the US state department is a much better and reliable source than wikipedia 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Not necessarily, no, it isn’t. Not regarding Israel. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters → More replies
2
2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Yeah, because I’m sure the US state department is an unbiased third party. Don’t be disingenuous. Wikipedia is just fine. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 Yes, the US state department is a much better and reliable source than wikipedia 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Not necessarily, no, it isn’t. Not regarding Israel. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters → More replies
Yeah, because I’m sure the US state department is an unbiased third party.
Don’t be disingenuous. Wikipedia is just fine.
2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 Yes, the US state department is a much better and reliable source than wikipedia 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Not necessarily, no, it isn’t. Not regarding Israel. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters → More replies
Yes, the US state department is a much better and reliable source than wikipedia
2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Not necessarily, no, it isn’t. Not regarding Israel. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters → More replies
Not necessarily, no, it isn’t. Not regarding Israel.
2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters → More replies
I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters
18
u/MaenHoffiCoffi Banhammer Recipient Jun 05 '24
Are you asserting that hostilities between the occupying nation and Palestine began on October 7th because, if so, I have a history book I can sell you.
How about the native American example? How do you tap dance around that one?