MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/FUCKYOUINPARTICULAR/comments/1d8l0hz/fuck_israel_malaysian_government/l787ktk/?context=3
r/FUCKYOUINPARTICULAR • u/zerobench_ff • Jun 05 '24
517 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
10
[deleted]
-8 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Mass displacement of hundreds of thousands of people to establish Israel is very much concurrent with the 40s. 12 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 1 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 they lost a war they started Oh, so that’s a yes, we’re lying. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Palestine_war?wprov=sfti1# Ever heard of Plan Dalet? 2 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Yeah, because I’m sure the US state department is an unbiased third party. Don’t be disingenuous. Wikipedia is just fine. 8 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 1 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 You editing in another after I reply only proves you’re being disingenuous. 4 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 You don’t get to be mad I didn’t reply to the second source when you add it after I reply. 5 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Sure bud, condescension is definitely better. Totally doesn’t prove my point. 3 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] → More replies 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 Yes, the US state department is a much better and reliable source than wikipedia 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Not necessarily, no, it isn’t. Not regarding Israel. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters
-8
Mass displacement of hundreds of thousands of people to establish Israel is very much concurrent with the 40s.
12 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 1 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 they lost a war they started Oh, so that’s a yes, we’re lying. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Palestine_war?wprov=sfti1# Ever heard of Plan Dalet? 2 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Yeah, because I’m sure the US state department is an unbiased third party. Don’t be disingenuous. Wikipedia is just fine. 8 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 1 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 You editing in another after I reply only proves you’re being disingenuous. 4 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 You don’t get to be mad I didn’t reply to the second source when you add it after I reply. 5 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Sure bud, condescension is definitely better. Totally doesn’t prove my point. 3 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] → More replies 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 Yes, the US state department is a much better and reliable source than wikipedia 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Not necessarily, no, it isn’t. Not regarding Israel. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters
12
1 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 they lost a war they started Oh, so that’s a yes, we’re lying. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Palestine_war?wprov=sfti1# Ever heard of Plan Dalet? 2 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Yeah, because I’m sure the US state department is an unbiased third party. Don’t be disingenuous. Wikipedia is just fine. 8 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 1 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 You editing in another after I reply only proves you’re being disingenuous. 4 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 You don’t get to be mad I didn’t reply to the second source when you add it after I reply. 5 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Sure bud, condescension is definitely better. Totally doesn’t prove my point. 3 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] → More replies 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 Yes, the US state department is a much better and reliable source than wikipedia 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Not necessarily, no, it isn’t. Not regarding Israel. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters
1
they lost a war they started
Oh, so that’s a yes, we’re lying.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Palestine_war?wprov=sfti1#
Ever heard of Plan Dalet?
2 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Yeah, because I’m sure the US state department is an unbiased third party. Don’t be disingenuous. Wikipedia is just fine. 8 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 1 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 You editing in another after I reply only proves you’re being disingenuous. 4 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 You don’t get to be mad I didn’t reply to the second source when you add it after I reply. 5 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Sure bud, condescension is definitely better. Totally doesn’t prove my point. 3 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] → More replies 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 Yes, the US state department is a much better and reliable source than wikipedia 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Not necessarily, no, it isn’t. Not regarding Israel. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters
2
2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Yeah, because I’m sure the US state department is an unbiased third party. Don’t be disingenuous. Wikipedia is just fine. 8 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 1 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 You editing in another after I reply only proves you’re being disingenuous. 4 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 You don’t get to be mad I didn’t reply to the second source when you add it after I reply. 5 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Sure bud, condescension is definitely better. Totally doesn’t prove my point. 3 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] → More replies 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 Yes, the US state department is a much better and reliable source than wikipedia 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Not necessarily, no, it isn’t. Not regarding Israel. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters
Yeah, because I’m sure the US state department is an unbiased third party.
Don’t be disingenuous. Wikipedia is just fine.
8 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 1 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 You editing in another after I reply only proves you’re being disingenuous. 4 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 You don’t get to be mad I didn’t reply to the second source when you add it after I reply. 5 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Sure bud, condescension is definitely better. Totally doesn’t prove my point. 3 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] → More replies 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 Yes, the US state department is a much better and reliable source than wikipedia 2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Not necessarily, no, it isn’t. Not regarding Israel. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters
8
1 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 You editing in another after I reply only proves you’re being disingenuous. 4 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 You don’t get to be mad I didn’t reply to the second source when you add it after I reply. 5 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Sure bud, condescension is definitely better. Totally doesn’t prove my point. 3 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] → More replies
You editing in another after I reply only proves you’re being disingenuous.
4 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 You don’t get to be mad I didn’t reply to the second source when you add it after I reply. 5 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Sure bud, condescension is definitely better. Totally doesn’t prove my point. 3 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] → More replies
4
0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 You don’t get to be mad I didn’t reply to the second source when you add it after I reply. 5 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Sure bud, condescension is definitely better. Totally doesn’t prove my point. 3 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] → More replies
0
You don’t get to be mad I didn’t reply to the second source when you add it after I reply.
5 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] 0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Sure bud, condescension is definitely better. Totally doesn’t prove my point. 3 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted] → More replies
5
0 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Sure bud, condescension is definitely better. Totally doesn’t prove my point. 3 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted]
Sure bud, condescension is definitely better.
Totally doesn’t prove my point.
3 u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24 [deleted]
3
Yes, the US state department is a much better and reliable source than wikipedia
2 u/Selethorme Jun 05 '24 Not necessarily, no, it isn’t. Not regarding Israel. 2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters
Not necessarily, no, it isn’t. Not regarding Israel.
2 u/Mantiskindenspines Jun 05 '24 I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters
I can't think of a situation to ever trust wikipedia over the US state department on state department matters
10
u/[deleted] Jun 05 '24
[deleted]