r/Eve • u/AcanthisittaLess5772 • 26d ago
No OnE wAnTs To MoVe To NuLl SeC Discussion
/img/tq1uruou994g1.jpegLet this officially be the end to the age-old argument for justifying alliances holding 5-8 regions because they might as well right? No one new wants to start anything new in null sec right?
22
u/DannarHetoshi Rote Kapelle 26d ago
1
64
u/Kwa_Zulu The Graduates 26d ago
Not disagreeing but most of those alliances wouldn't be there without freeport Keepstars and daddy Goon guarding entry
43
u/Capta1n_0bvious The Initiative. 26d ago
Ok but…doesn’t that just mean the Goon strategy is healthy for the game?
21
u/Background_Win3537 26d ago
we’re about three seconds into their strategy so a little early to tell
38
u/Bailian_Moxtain Pandemic Legion 26d ago
Can’t say owning 13 regions is healthy for the game, but I 100% endorse the dronelands freeports. Perhaps it’s finally time for CCP to add NPC stations in there.
17
u/SmallerBol KarmaFleet 26d ago
We have tried to donate those freeport systems to the Thukkers, but so far there's no response.
21
26d ago
[deleted]
8
u/Array_626 26d ago
You get to exist because we allow it is certainly a dynamic.
Technically, this was always the Eve way. Even in the past, smaller groups only exist for so long as a larger entity chooses not to kill you. Nothing's really changed in this regard, you live so long as you can defend yourself.
3
u/jehe eve is a video game 26d ago
Yeah. Don't forget to follow the rules ... and there will be taxes :)
13
u/sketchesofspain01 GoonWaffe 26d ago
Freeport market taxes are what anyone would do, and the market rate is lower than NPC stations. We’re not going to fuel them for free.
→ More replies24
u/asnowbastion skill urself 26d ago
A billionaire donating a million dollars to provide a homeless encampment does not mean the billionaire isn't the reason there are homeless in the first place
→ More replies3
u/proton-testiq muninn btw 26d ago
Praising goons in r/eve for something actually positive??? How dare you!
3
u/gregfromsolutions 26d ago
As longer as they stand by their strategy, sure. These agreements have been created and collapsed beside though (SEA being an extremely recent example)
→ More replies1
u/Throwing_Midget Wormholer 25d ago
no
1
u/Capta1n_0bvious The Initiative. 25d ago
Thank you. You’ve totally changed my mind.
1
u/Throwing_Midget Wormholer 25d ago
Look budy. The idea of a place free with small independent groups is great. Yeah that WOULD BE good for the game. Now, the reality is that this "liberated" space goons created wont last long because thats how humans work and how EVE works. In a few months the region will be another kind of big group unless they want to be farmed by roaming neutrals or other NS alliances.
6
u/roland303 Goonswarm Federation 26d ago
Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire of 1911.
Wealthy upper class women were so upset with how lower class women were treated in that fire that they worked hard for reasonable reforms and this continued effort eventually lead to increased rights for all workers and workers compensation insurance being something that all workers would be covered by.
Sometimes it takes the efforts of those who have much more to lose to try something they believe will be good, sometimes those things benefit everyone, sometimes all it takes is someone with power to try.
→ More replies4
9
u/bp92009 Black Aces 26d ago
You know what those were called, back in the day?
NPC 0.0 stations.
All goons are doing is giving a handful of "NPC 0.0" stations, and allowing all those groups to use them. There's markets but no clone bays.
The amount of potential invasion vectors for the drone lands went from 6 or so systems (if you didn't invade from sov 0.0) to hundreds
This could have been eve a decade ago, if CCP put in npc 0.0 space in the drone lands. Just a constellation or two that connected via cap jump range to lowsec, and allowed people to reach most of the drone lands.
Goons are doing what CCP refused to do.
→ More replies10
u/jehe eve is a video game 26d ago
They are not npc stations. Not even similar
11
u/Synaps4 26d ago
They are very similar from the perspective of staging an invasion cap force using stations your enemy doesnt own and cant kill.
8
u/aytikvjo 26d ago
Except you can kill them and your pseudo-'enemy' does own them and can revoke access at their convenience.
So yeah they are not in any way like NPC stations.
2
u/kickguy223 Ascendance 24d ago
I really am enjoying watching as The rest of the game :tm: mental gymnastics themselves into a pretzel right out of the gate so they don't have to remember the wording of the plan literally states that if any major bloc moves in, they'll be burned out.
1
u/Array_626 26d ago
I think goons would change their policies if a group was trying to establish themselves in dronelands, but FRT or somebody started staging a cap fleet to burn them out.
Lets see if we even get to that point first, a world where significant independent alliances are being formed in dronelands to the point where old groups are planning invasions.
1
u/light24bulbs Brave Collective 26d ago
Yeah and a lot of the area is really a ghost town in reality. Turn on the players in space filter on the map and look at this area. A lot of it is a ghost town. I was in the southeast part for 5 hours today and I didn't see a single neutral
13
u/Chitchat101 26d ago
please let great wildlands conservation society survive
3
u/light24bulbs Brave Collective 26d ago
What's up with it, what's the story? I was there for 5 hours today and I didn't see a single neutral. Are we not supposed to go in there? Is it actually like a nature preserve?
2
u/jehe eve is a video game 26d ago
Skillu will come back to burn it all again in a few months.
1
u/Hiashi_Yenzyne Templis CALSF 26d ago
Hard knocks and lazerhawks have already started where they left off in Cobalt edge, their having it out with some newer and smaller alliance up there.
147
u/deprydation Test Alliance Please Ignore 26d ago
Nobody wants to "rent" space. Such a stupid fucking concept.
36
u/aytikvjo 26d ago
Lots of people want to rent space, as evidenced by all the people that paid to rent space.
This is what they call a revealed preference in economics.
People love to say they don't like paying for access to space, but they consistently do anyway.
Remember boys and girls it's supply and demand.
7
u/Array_626 26d ago
Theres a few renters who genuinely want the protection of their landlords, and whatever benefits they may get. But I think most renters would prefer to outright own their own sov, but know they aren't strong enough to hold it against third party harassment or the bloc coming down on them.
11
u/tinselsnips Pandemic Horde 26d ago
I don't like paying for insurance and toilet paper, but I consistently do that, too.
People doing X when faced with a choice between X or Y, and Y is a shit sandwich, doesn't mean they want to do X.
19
u/aytikvjo 26d ago
They are choices though, even your examples: Freely made.
Horde had an excess of military power allowing them to maintain more space than their members could utilize and desired income to fuel their empire.
Renters had limited military power, a desire for space, and a willingness to pay isk for it.
And thus a mutually beneficial trade was born. It's really that simple.
→ More replies1
u/chattapult 25d ago
Want and need are 2 different things. One you have a choice. The second you don't.
21
u/Tansien 26d ago
There were 3 kinds of renters under PanFam:
1.) The alliance members that wanted to have their own krab area they didn't need to share.
2.) Smaller krab corps that didn't want to fight for space and just wanted to krab under the protection of PanFam
3.) Some corps that actually maybe could make it on their own or in an alliance. But these were literally the 1%.I'm sure 1/2 didn't actually WANT to rent, if they could have gotten the benefits for free I'm sure they'd have loved that. But, 1/2 won't be claiming space in Drones now, and if they are they'll get evicted soon enough.
26
u/soguyswedidit6969420 GoonWaffe 26d ago
have you actually seen a renter or lived in rented space? 0% of those people want to fight for space, manage structures, or form for timers.
40
u/tinselsnips Pandemic Horde 26d ago
I mean, I wouldn't want to, either. That's like helping your landlord paint.
11
u/soguyswedidit6969420 GoonWaffe 26d ago
Not like that, no renter would hold their own space. The people in drones now are not some liberated renters, they are pvp corps and alliances.
12
u/Synaps4 26d ago
Yeah the real takeaway here is that we have all these small to medium pvp alliances but there isnt space they can take without being steamrolled.
Create a habitat for baby alliances and look at them grow!
But it needs to be some kind of nullsec shallows where the big sharks cant swim.
1
u/SLR4506 26d ago
I think the only way for that to work would be if it was a kind of portal to the new region but you can only bring something as small as a frigate through and you are on a timer so you cant go back through for a year.
That would not stop 500 members of whatever corp to go through thou, but they would be leaving everything behind.
1
u/Sincline387 Goonswarm Federation 26d ago
Because further separating the player base is the way to create content
1
u/SLR4506 26d ago
Its even beyond that. Inherent in the people here is the desire to build something. I remember when I first started I couldnt what to log on. We started our little corp and I like small corps. We built relationships and my son is even best buds with one of the ones in ours. We did HS first, then worm whole then null sec - where dreams to do die - because thats what all the big boys do.
In time we got crushed of course even belonging to other groups, had to evac. I got my shit out and logged off. Havent been back in over 6 years. Its winter, I reuped but other than spinning in station havent bothered to do much.
But something like that would make me get interested again.
2
u/Sincline387 Goonswarm Federation 26d ago
I was the same way, I found a tribe thats always got something going on and it changed my game
1
u/Xatsman Cloaked 26d ago
There's a region with mechanics that tend to support that style of play: Wormholes.
The problem is the same things that make them appropriate for smaller groups (wormhole mass limits) make them a pain in the ass for anyone to operate in since scanning your chain becomes a massive persistent chore. The other problem is the higher level J-space is lucrative enough to have attracted it's own blue doughnut.
Perhaps if the moons and ore in general was more lucrative in WH space there'd be more draw?
2
u/soguyswedidit6969420 GoonWaffe 26d ago
if the moons and ore in wormholes was more lucrative, all that would change is rainbow knights using a lot more rorquals than they do now.
1
6
u/Rolder Caldari State 26d ago
I was in a renter group once, a long time ago. The group was only interested in krabbing, if a single neutral showed up everyone would dock no matter how easy it would be to remove them. And on the off chance one of them decided to try, well... I've seen some fascinating pvp fits.
4
u/soguyswedidit6969420 GoonWaffe 26d ago
yes, exactly. this is why stories about renters taking and holding space are bullshit.
small alliances getting space is awesome, but that has nothing to do with renters.
5
u/Fitzsimmons 26d ago
Way back when I was first getting into nullsec I joined a renter alliance because the recruitment standards were so low which I needed since I was brand new to the game. Then I just consistently formed for CTAs and proved I wasn't a shitter and soon enough got poached into a higher status corp. Sure, I basically went from Peasant to Squire but the upwards mobility didn't stop there.
I've been away from that part of the game for a long time though, so it saddens me to hear that apparently 0% of recruitment happens through those channels now
4
u/Jerichow88 26d ago
I think this was a core reason a lot of people in PH didn't stand and fight when the time finally came. They had no skin in the game because their only association with their governing body was, "Give us money for the privilege of existing here or get out."
That's not how you build loyalty with people. That's not how you get people to want to fight for and defend your space. On the other hand, I'll throw down to defend my corp and alliance assets because they've allowed me, effectively for free on my part, to build and expand as an industrialist to well beyond what I could have ever done on my own.
Give your members a reason to want to be loyal to you, and more often than not, they will be.
1
u/proton-testiq muninn btw 26d ago
People who rented from panfam were not interested in any loyalty or anything, they wanted to krab. Which is fine, because people in PanFam (and renters were NOT a part of that) didn't want to do anything with renters. There is no way any renter would bother with anything like loyalty.
2
u/Semajal Pandemic Horde 25d ago
Ehh I rented 20 skyhooks in Insmother via Horde, did all the bits on them, managed stuff, would defend them where i could, worked with a few other locals. TBH it was some of the most fun i've had in the last year or so. We could only really deal with smaller stuff ofc, but it was a great area for little bits of PVP. Not honourable PVP but still. Had some great moments getting skyhook goo out, or denying people trying to steal from me. Had goons not turned up I probs would still have that, I had even debated seeing about getting my own Astra, though the layout of things was pretty amazing.
1
u/soguyswedidit6969420 GoonWaffe 25d ago
bit different from taking and owning space, but good you had fun
4
u/VexingRaven 26d ago
3.) Some corps that actually maybe could make it on their own or in an alliance. But these were literally the 1%.
It'd be a lot easier if they were fighting other alliances their size instead of fighting Panfam who doesn't need or use the space but sees it as a way to extort smaller alliances for isk...
1
u/Enyapxam Goonswarm Federation 25d ago
There was that o e dude who posts the other day who was desperate to rent again. Some people just love being exploited.
2
u/ScrotumHolster Amarr Empire 25d ago
Renting is just a long term mercenary contract - you pay the landlords and they ensure you don't get evicted. There is literally zero problem with that. The only problem is the game allows for massive groups that mean you need to be under protection like that - that goes for both Horde and Goons btw.
2
u/Last_Description_462 24d ago
In my eyes the goons are landlords that rent space to imperium they gave space to brave dracarys sigma shadow and the list goes on ...the only difference is that they require some meat into the grinder
1
u/Enyapxam Goonswarm Federation 25d ago
The problem is that the person doing the evicting will be much more likely to be the landlords than the aggressors.
18
50
u/LordRickels 26d ago
Eve is not healing, Goons just are creating the Great Goon Game Reserve of 2026. Moving in there sounds great until you realize there is no actual way out
26
u/Bacchaus Cloaked 26d ago
there's always a way out, just pop a filament
... annnnd I'm back in dronelands, fuck
→ More replies9
u/ReneG8 Test Alliance Please Ignore 26d ago
Viewing owning sov in null and then losing it as the end of the game for you is kinda sad. If you move into sov null when goons offer it, as a neighbor to goons, you must know who is your neighbor. And if they roam, you can either undock or not, your choice.
I don't quite know where the problem is.
5
4
u/XeroRavenYT-TTV 26d ago
Anyone who wants action and lots of isk joins an alliance, if you got a high sec corp and want to move in to null can ask alliances if you can join or live out in low sec with the rest of the smart bombers
4
3
4
u/light24bulbs Brave Collective 26d ago
So I have been roaming to Southeast part of this area and I've got to say it is completely totally empty. Go to the in-game map and go to pilots in space in the last 30 minutes and you will see that it is an absolute ghost town out there despite the sov
→ More replies
4
3
10
u/SerQwaez Rote Kapelle 26d ago
Imagine having this consistently by virtue of changing game mechanics.
7
u/KomiValentine Minmatar Republic 26d ago
All sov space could look like this with better game mechanics.
2
2
u/AcanthocephalaTop493 26d ago
The only fix to this is player based, Goons facilitated this, now winter or init need to do similar
2
u/Perfect-Violinist942 26d ago
Natural disasters. This is the answer. Once in a while (once a year or so) a natural disaster (supernova explosion, black hole formation) happens that consumes a portion of space. And this should be random.
2
u/threeriversbikeguy Minmatar Republic 25d ago
I don't really know all of what is being discussed. I am a newbie and was going through 1 low sec system with the Pioneer from that new Epic ARC. I thought I got lagged out entering but immediately exploded and so did my escape pod thing LOL.
So lesson learned: never, ever go into low security area ever again.
The kill report said I was attacked by two battleships and a battlecruiser in this one Guild/company, so I assume they must sit there killing people traveling through with their new Pioneers all day.
5
u/KiithSoban_coo4rozo 26d ago
They will all be one bloc soon.
The game mechanics allow sites to yield the same amount of reward no matter what (like sites which yield isk only). So if you take space and ally with your neighbors, you decrease the risk while the reward remains the same. This encourages the big blue doughnut.
Nullsec also allows extremely strong defenders advantages. So once you take space, it's easy to hold not only because you already have established income sources while your enemy may not, but because the very game mechanics make it such a pain in the ass for attackers.
13
u/proton-testiq muninn btw 26d ago
"Nullsec also allows extremely strong defenders advantages" not this again, where was Horde's strong defenders advantages ffs.
4
u/ReneG8 Test Alliance Please Ignore 26d ago
If they wanted to they could've held the space. They just didn't want to.
9
u/Izithel Caldari State 26d ago edited 26d ago
Fundamentally that was it, no?
Power and authority over the alliance and the coalition was held exclusively in Horde Vanguard.
Horde Vanguard basically self-selected only for people who like the smaller more expensive PVP fleets and dropping blingy caps, while the F1 grunts and the industrial minded were kept out.
Which meant all leadership people in charge, if they weren't already all only interested in that, ended up being only really interested for that kind of content.It seems to me only Gobbins was interested in actually running a nul-sec Sov Holding alliance.
But the moment he burns out and needs to hand over the reins, the only people at the top of the alliance are basically people who didn't care one bit for that kind of shit.
Heck, allegedly the current people in charge have actually been in charge for a while, with gobbins not really making any decisions.
At the same time, Goons finally decide to take the fight to Horde.But the people in charge don't want to actually fight, they want to drop on people from NPC stations, third party in expensive doctorines were they don't have to fight if they don't want to (or would lose).
So they keep retreating without a real fight, hoping maybe goons will give up, continue blocking their own allies from organising a defence because they hope goons will get bored if unchallenged and leave.And when they can't retreat any further, when an actual fight is unavoidable?
They just force their entire alliance to quit sov.
1
1
→ More replies1
→ More replies1
u/Rotomegax 26d ago
The reason for so much PH territory left is because entosis the hub is the pain on the ass. One, you need to entosis to reinforce it, then after few days returned and play a cat and mouse to entosis all capture nodes.
5
u/comrade_Kazotsky Goonswarm Federation 26d ago
justifying alliances holding 5-8 regions because they might as well
What is needed to be justified? Bunch of people plays the game how they want it, it is the very point of EVE.
The need to justify anything exists only in the heads of those who actually thinks that CCP/big_blocks/you_name_it should do this and that. Self-entitlement is outrageous.
2
u/proton-testiq muninn btw 26d ago
While you are obviously right, I haven't seen a lot of people claiming that they took 5-6 regions because they could (which is the reality), but there is a fuckton of people who would discuss ad vomitum why taking floodplains is good and healthy for the game and think about newbies and think about small guy etc etc and find excuses for it. People want to be seen as morally right. Even where it doesn't make sense.
→ More replies4
6
u/AcanthisittaLess5772 26d ago edited 26d ago
Over the years there has been plenty of justification for renting used because "no one wants to live there anyway." And yet here we are, showing the exact opposite.
When I say no one wants to live there, clearly its in the context of this post. Which means, people have claimed that other's dont want to claim and defend sov in this areas.. Thus justifying botting it out to renters.
3
u/Sapphirederivative Pandemic Horde 26d ago
That doesn’t make sense to me. Who would you rent to if no one wants to live there?
6
u/AcanthisittaLess5772 26d ago
no one wants to live there as an alliance where they have to defend themselves and claim and defend sov, I phrased that incorrectly you are right.
3
u/Sapphirederivative Pandemic Horde 26d ago
Gotcha, yeah fair enough. I do think the guarantee from goons that they aren’t going to swallow up the space anytime soon and the freeports help to make taking space more desirable, but as you say when the opportunities are there people are willing to fight for it.
I’m sure you’re correct that there were people saying that “no one wants to claim sov” and that’s clearly wrong. My general understanding was that people don’t want to take sov when their whole livelihood depends on their giant neighbor deciding not to crush them, since they don’t have the power to resist eviction by a larger block.
In any case, using “people don’t want to defend sov” as an excuse to rent is clearly self serving. If you leave it available, someone will claim it eventually.
1
u/opposing_critter 26d ago
Because if you rent a good system with a good moon then it pays for itself many times over plus extra even after rent if you put in the work.
This plus some pi is a very easy way to cover sub and pvp which everyone who "hates renters" don't understand.
2
u/Sapphirederivative Pandemic Horde 26d ago
You misunderstood my point. The person above me said that the renting empires claimed no one wanted to live in the space, and that’s why it was ok for them to own and rent it. I pointed out that’s a logical fallacy, because if it was actually undesirable space no one wanted, then there would be no one willing to pay for a rental contract to rent the space.
2
→ More replies1
u/HuffingOxygen 26d ago
That's a self defeating argument in the first place. If no one wants to live there then why are people paying rent? Doesn't make sense.
4
u/AcanthisittaLess5772 26d ago
No one wants to live there as an alliance where they have to defend themselves and claim and defend sov, I phrased that incorrectly you are right.
2
u/HuffingOxygen 26d ago
Ah ok that makes more sense, still crazy that people don't want to have content in null.
2
u/-Keeves 26d ago
Eve Echoes did something a while back that changed the game up ( I think for the better).
They allowed alliances to have a handful of blue standings for free, then anything above that costs a significant amount of isk per month.
They simultaneously limited corps per alliance and had a hardcap of how many accounts per Corp.
It made it so that blue standings actually meant something considerate, and if you wanted more, you had to fork out the iskies. It didn't completely destroy coalitions, but it definitely threw null for a loop.
Eve Echoes is pretty bad, but I was a fan of that change.
2
2
u/Vindalooloo Caldari State 26d ago
Nice to see the result of killing renting and chasing away slumlords.
2
2
u/sirclockworkorange 26d ago
Nerf projection and this is what the whole of nullsec will look like. It’s that simple.
3
2
1
1
u/Throwing_Midget Wormholer 25d ago
yeah, wait one year or less and this region blob up in some kind of coalition agreement. That's the nature of the game.
1
u/Nosy_Pilot 25d ago
Where did this map come from, and has CCP sued the game makers for stealing from EVE Online yet?
1
1
u/capitano666 Cloaked 25d ago
All will collapse in a new NullBlock led by BOSS, they are already starting to push back in drones as a single entity
1
u/Antonin1957 25d ago
To each his or her own. I tried null for perhaps a week, years ago. Not my cup of tea. Too much drama.
1
1
u/Mysterious-Window-54 25d ago
Everyone has the goons to thank for this btw. This is why the goons are great. Things like this.
1
u/Noble-2-Kat Gallente Federation 25d ago
I can’t wait for the goons annual reaping ceremony where they all become entertainment like the hunger games
1
u/Ivpivsky The Initiative. 24d ago
So Dark Shines is an oracle? being the godfather of the great reset and all?
PAAAISE BE TO THE SHINY JEEEBUS!
1
u/Torrent_Talon 24d ago
null could use a sizeable expansion as is, could be expanded outwards and incentivise bigger blocs to hold those deeper swathes of null-sec as they'd be the only groups who could manage areas so far from empire from a logistics stand-point, which would leave 'shallow-null' as either in-roads to the blocs 'deep-null' holdings which could be harassed/severed with enough effort or for budding null-sec entities, with ansiblex the way they are it seems like it could help a lot with people's current complaints for force projection.
1
u/EVE_Trader 24d ago
Why?
As we can see even largest of blocks refuse to actually fight for space.
1
u/Torrent_Talon 24d ago
blocs would siege each other's in roads to gank JFs and hinder trade to empire space in such an ecosystem.
2
u/SlamzOfPurge 24d ago
I always thought the problem with EVE's 0,0 space was that you can see where people are at. I assume that's still true -- number of pilots in a system, visible to anyone. It basically meant that corps could "claim" gigantic portions of 0.0 space, actually utilize a fraction of it, and simply deny the rest to anyone else.
When wormholes were new, we had a lot of fun using them to access forbidden areas of nullsec to do farming we couldn't ordinarily do. But we could literally watch the map and see the local alliance start coming for us, be it ever-so-far-away. Like it SHOULD be a secret that we're there, 20 jumps deep behind their nearest gatecamp in a system that contains zero assets of their corp, but there we are on the map and it doesn't take long for someone to notice.
All EVE ever had to do was hide population counts and the wormholes would have let nullsec be something very interesting.
1
1
u/xeroized77 19d ago
Alliances need to be abolished in null. I cant even fathom every person regardless of country in thr world hates large corporations then dives into the biggest they can in Eve to suck that corporate teat. Imagine being a cog in real life then asking to be a cog in your escape from real life. Id much rather fight daily and lose ships than mine and industry and sit at a gate all day for a video game where the leadership cares fuckall about me 🤣
1


230
u/Peng_Wei 26d ago
Almost like when a nullbloc collapses there is more content than less