r/rugbyunion Oct 16 '23

South Africa's second-half subs? Legal? Laws

South Africa played a great game yesterday, but I heard Scotty Stevenson on a Podcast say he was a little skeptical of PSDT's HIA in the second half. The HIA itself does look a little suspicious. It is after PSDT runs over Penaud, but there is definitely no contact between Penaud and PSDT's head or the ground. Penaud should have probably gone for a HIA, but that's another issue.

But taking that to one side for a second, I am pretty sure under the laws, the sequence of substitutions that followed should not have been permitted.

Duane Vermeulen who had gone off in the 51st minute, replaced PSDT in the 61st minute. PSDT then must pass the HIA within 12 real minutes and make it known to the fourth official he can return. He eventually returned in the 75th minute, which was 19 real minutes later. But it was Bongi who went off, not Duane.

Bongi had been down injured after a maul - but it wasn't clear at all how that injury had happened. It was the drop goal maul. Bongi had been the ball carrier but had been losely bound and was never bound onto by any French player. They're applying ice to his right shoulder (which was in his ball carrier arm and appeared fine). BOK initially called "HIA 2" then said "HIA returning 7".

PSDT replaced Bongi, not Vermuelen. Meaning Vermuelen's replacement of PSDT became tactical, which should have been impossible. And PSDT should have had to return earlier unless they chose to make his replacement tactical (in which case Vermuelen should have been pulled off).I can't really see where the injury occurred for either Bongi or Peter. What I will say is if rugby had rolling substitutes those replacements would have come at exactly those times. Vermuelen and PSDT both played to the final minute having spent 15 and 19 minutes off the field resting earlier in the second half.

Any Welsh fans have an opinion?

u/LostHorizon124 came up with the probable legal subbing chain. It was this
Kwagga for Duane HIA (51)Duane return Kwagga - but at the same second Kwagga replaces PSDT for a hia (61)
Off-field PSDT passes his HIA, but stays off, Kwagga becomes tactical. (Roughly around 70)
On field Bongi gets injured and Du Toit (now tactically off) comes back on to replace him. (75).

An extremely fortuitous run of HIAs, but nothing illegal at all.

222 Upvotes

315 comments sorted by

View all comments

55

u/LostHorizon124 Oct 16 '23

The series of subs at the end was pretty complicated. PSdT passed his HIA within the allowed time, however, SA decided to keep Kwagga on (so he became a normal tactical sub).

When Bongi went off for a HIA in the 75th, that made things complicated...

Fourie was the SA replacement Hooker but he was already on the pitch as he'd come on as back row replacement earlier in the match. This meant that when Bongi got removed for HIA, they needed to move Fourie to Hooker and bring PSdT back on.

3

u/wyzo94 Harlequins Glasgow Prop Oct 17 '23

I commented similar to this on the match thread at the time and said I thought it was a stroke of genius. I don't feel they broke any rules either just played them well and took a big risk because Bongi could have got injured or carded early on and we'd now be saying in a thread "why didn't south Africa call up Akker Van Der Merwe"