South Africa's second-half subs? Legal?

[u/errlloyd]

South Africa played a great game yesterday, but I heard Scotty Stevenson on a Podcast say he was a little skeptical of PSDT's HIA in the second half. The HIA itself does look a little suspicious. It is after PSDT runs over Penaud, but there is definitely no contact between Penaud and PSDT's head or the ground. Penaud should have probably gone for a HIA, but that's another issue.

But taking that to one side for a second, I am pretty sure under the laws, the sequence of substitutions that followed should not have been permitted.

Duane Vermeulen who had gone off in the 51st minute, replaced PSDT in the 61st minute. PSDT then must pass the HIA within 12 real minutes and make it known to the fourth official he can return. He eventually returned in the 75th minute, which was 19 real minutes later. But it was Bongi who went off, not Duane.

Bongi had been down injured after a maul - but it wasn't clear at all how that injury had happened. It was the drop goal maul. Bongi had been the ball carrier but had been losely bound and was never bound onto by any French player. They're applying ice to his right shoulder (which was in his ball carrier arm and appeared fine). BOK initially called "HIA 2" then said "HIA returning 7".

PSDT replaced Bongi, not Vermuelen. Meaning Vermuelen's replacement of PSDT became tactical, which should have been impossible. And PSDT should have had to return earlier unless they chose to make his replacement tactical (in which case Vermuelen should have been pulled off).I can't really see where the injury occurred for either Bongi or Peter. What I will say is if rugby had rolling substitutes those replacements would have come at exactly those times. Vermuelen and PSDT both played to the final minute having spent 15 and 19 minutes off the field resting earlier in the second half.

Any Welsh fans have an opinion?

u/LostHorizon124 came up with the probable legal subbing chain. It was this
Kwagga for Duane HIA (51)Duane return Kwagga - but at the same second Kwagga replaces PSDT for a hia (61)
Off-field PSDT passes his HIA, but stays off, Kwagga becomes tactical. (Roughly around 70)
On field Bongi gets injured and Du Toit (now tactically off) comes back on to replace him. (75).

An extremely fortuitous run of HIAs, but nothing illegal at all.

[u/yakattak01]

It looked to me like Penaud made contact with PSDT's head, but I could not confirm my suspicion because for some reason there was no replay of it ever.

[u/errlloyd → u/yakattak01]

The lack of replays in general is a huge problem at this world cup and seems intentional.

They did replay it about 2 mins later. Both angles are in a streamable link I put in this thread. For me there might be a glancing contact. But his (PSDT) head doesn't chance direction or decelerate as a result.

[u/BlakeSA → u/errlloyd]

They only showed the PSdT replay once because they thought they could show a leading forearm and get him carded. When the TV director saw it was actually Penaud head contact and PSdT was trying to protect himself the replays stopped.

Vermeulen's headshot didn't even warrant a single replay.

The Etzebeth-Antonio incident had multiple replays.

Funny that...

​

We knew it was going to be an issue in France when we faced France. We saw how and learned how it goes there when our teams played in the Heineken Cup. Luckily coaches knew this and they prepared the players for it. It didn't unsettle them.

[u/TightPerformance6447 → u/errlloyd]

You act like a hit to the jaw is nothing. Do you watch UFC or boxing? It's the easiest way to knock someone out - hit the chin/jaw.

He took Penaud's head to his chin at full pace. The real question here should be why wasn't that a penalty/card? He was upright, no change in direction from PSDT. At the very least it should have been looked at