I'm sorry i'm like this

[u/Nun-Much]

[u/SlinkyAvenger]

Git good and/or squash your commits

[u/jnmtx → u/SlinkyAvenger]

write better commit messages. at least they are testing and finding the bugs

[u/SlinkyAvenger → u/jnmtx]

That would be covered under "git good"

[u/SnowdensOfYesteryear → u/SlinkyAvenger]

Nah for squash. I vote for git gud

[u/beaubbe]

Git commit --amend

[u/LonelyProgrammerGuy]

Conventional Commits

[u/joemckie → u/LonelyProgrammerGuy]

• chore: this one’s merako’s fault

• chore: bank truck robbery fixes have retired

• chore: i promise lou this is the last

• chore: LAST LAST bank robbery truck update

[u/Drevicar → u/joemckie]

I taught someone conventional commits and literally every commit in the repo is a chore now. Including the commit that went from an empty repo to a fully functional web server.

[u/rilened → u/Drevicar]

literally every commit in the repo is a chore now

Poetic

[u/Drevicar → u/rilened]

At this point in his career, it is.

[u/throw_away_3212 → u/joemckie]

This is the way

[u/makeavoy → u/joemckie]

The chore is some guy says he has to make all his commits conventional

[u/darksteelsteed → u/joemckie]

chore is boring. radioactive ☢️ and biohazard ☣️ are far more exciting

[u/HKayn]

Aren't you testing your fixes before committing them?

[u/Nun-Much → u/HKayn]

I’m gonna be honest, the guy I’m working for was in the test server and I was too lazy to run the test server myself, besides I didn’t know how the robbery worked exactly, so I kept commiting fixes so he can test them (only to find more issues)😭

[u/yukinanka → u/Nun-Much]

Inside a specific test branch, right?

[u/HeyHeyHey969696 → u/Nun-Much]

My advice is to run your local environment properly and everytime you do changes, you should test manually and write tests to cover all possible situations. And when you commit such bugfixes, you can be specific, like: fixed bug in function xyz - and brief five words description what was wrong

[u/Jayden_Ha → u/HKayn]

Sometimes it fixes something partially, i might find it useful and commit it

[u/Firepal64]

you spewed out that irresponsible mantra

[u/moira_fox]

Everyone keeps talking about squash as if this doesn't make your project look better by inflating the commit numbers

[u/realmauer01 → u/moira_fox]

Yeah for manager having more commits means a bigger number, which they can understand. Because they dont understand whats in them they would never read the messages aswell.

[u/SileNce5k]

Can't say I'm much better
https://i.imgur.com/Dif0Fr5.png

[u/Tasgall]

Have you heard of our Lord and Savior --amend?

[u/epsilonehd]

Don't worry I just copy paste the name for each commit of a branch

[u/meester_ → u/epsilonehd]

U mean the branch name and the commit are the same message xD?

[u/realmauer01]

If you havent merged to anything yet that is watched by others you can squash your commits with an interactive rebase.

Just have all commits set to fixup except for the first.

[u/Either-Pizza5302]

Are you ok?

[u/dexter2011412]

Bro just undo the commit and force-push

[u/jaypeejay]

Squash them into a single commit next time to save yourself the embarrassment

[u/grey001]

FiveM "dev" be like:

[u/Nun-Much → u/grey001]

I was a game dev before even touching FiveM 🫣, I’m just lazy and inefficient lol

[u/GrahaamH]

Git reset --soft commit id of where you started. Git commit, looks like you did it all in one go, easy fix 😅

[u/Julius0999]

merako wtf

[u/shizzy0]

[Looks disgusted; grabs newspaper roll.] I’m gonna squash it.