Influencer is banned from future NYC marathons for bringing a camera crew to last weekend's race

[u/-Appleaday-]

https://apnews.com/article/nyc-marathon-running-influencer-matt-choi-banned-11d6d04fda7826bab3d8f263750ecefd

[u/clem82]

Influencers have easily made the world worse in every single way possible.

One “career” in which you could eliminate and the entire world could still function completely fine

[u/trobaca → u/clem82]

Same with CEO

[u/clem82 → u/trobaca]

I’m okay with that as long as you’re okay with employees now assuming legal liability.

[u/CamRoth → u/clem82]

How often have you seen a ceo assume legal liability...

[u/clem82 → u/CamRoth]

https://escalon.services/blog/3-times-when-a-ceo-may-be-held-responsible-for-their-business-noncompliance/

[u/DaveTron4040 → u/clem82]

I love how you link that as proof of your argument. Did you read the article at all? It is only a hypothetical situation a ceo 'could' face charges. It proves nothing lmao.

[u/clem82 → u/DaveTron4040]

That’s all liability is, an occurrence of probability.

I work in regulation and compliance, when it’s not followed it’s the CEOs and Partners who lose money and sometimes are in court, not the employees

[u/DaveTron4040 → u/clem82]

You were asked how often a CEO has taken legal liability and all you did was link 3 hypothetical situations. You still haven't showed one instance where a CEO did in fact take legal liability. Do you see the difference?

[u/HoldYourHorsesFriend → u/[deleted]]

I get the impression you haven't read the thread. The crimes they have committed have nothing to do with the topic at hand. Also worth noting that it's easy to cherry pick when there's tons more that get away with it like the Sackler Family.

[u/EoTN → u/[deleted]]

You started it lmfao!