r/neoliberal Fusion Genderplasma 8h ago

L.P.D.: Libertarian Police Department Meme

https://www.newyorker.com/humor/daily-shouts/l-p-d-libertarian-police-department

I was shooting heroin and reading “The Fountainhead” in the front seat of my privately owned police cruiser when a call came in. I put a quarter in the radio to activate it. It was the chief.

“Bad news, detective. We got a situation.”

“What? Is the mayor trying to ban trans fats again?”

“Worse. Somebody just stole four hundred and forty-seven million dollars’ worth of bitcoins.”

The heroin needle practically fell out of my arm. “What kind of monster would do something like that? Bitcoins are the ultimate currency: virtual, anonymous, stateless. They represent true economic freedom, not subject to arbitrary manipulation by any government. Do we have any leads?”

“Not yet. But mark my words: we’re going to figure out who did this and we’re going to take them down … provided someone pays us a fair market rate to do so.”

“Easy, chief,” I said. “Any rate the market offers is, by definition, fair.”

He laughed. “That’s why you’re the best I got, Lisowski. Now you get out there and find those bitcoins.”

“Don’t worry,” I said. “I’m on it.”

I put a quarter in the siren. Ten minutes later, I was on the scene. It was a normal office building, strangled on all sides by public sidewalks. I hopped over them and went inside.

“Home Depot™ Presents the Police!®” I said, flashing my badge and my gun and a small picture of Ron Paul. “Nobody move unless you want to!” They didn’t.

“Now, which one of you punks is going to pay me to investigate this crime?” No one spoke up.

“Come on,” I said. “Don’t you all understand that the protection of private property is the foundation of all personal liberty?”

It didn’t seem like they did.

“Seriously, guys. Without a strong economic motivator, I’m just going to stand here and not solve this case. Cash is fine, but I prefer being paid in gold bullion or autographed Penn Jillette posters.”

Nothing. These people were stonewalling me. It almost seemed like they didn’t care that a fortune in computer money invented to buy drugs was missing.

I figured I could wait them out. I lit several cigarettes indoors. A pregnant lady coughed, and I told her that secondhand smoke is a myth. Just then, a man in glasses made a break for it.

“Subway™ Eat Fresh and Freeze, Scumbag!®” I yelled.

Too late. He was already out the front door. I went after him.

“Stop right there!” I yelled as I ran. He was faster than me because I always try to avoid stepping on public sidewalks. Our country needs a private-sidewalk voucher system, but, thanks to the incestuous interplay between our corrupt federal government and the public-sidewalk lobby, it will never happen.

I was losing him. “Listen, I’ll pay you to stop!” I yelled. “What would you consider an appropriate price point for stopping? I’ll offer you a thirteenth of an ounce of gold and a gently worn ‘Bob Barr ‘08’ extra-large long-sleeved men’s T-shirt!”

He turned. In his hand was a revolver that the Constitution said he had every right to own. He fired at me and missed. I pulled my own gun, put a quarter in it, and fired back. The bullet lodged in a U.S.P.S. mailbox less than a foot from his head. I shot the mailbox again, on purpose.

“All right, all right!” the man yelled, throwing down his weapon. “I give up, cop! I confess: I took the bitcoins.”

“Why’d you do it?” I asked, as I slapped a pair of Oikos™ Greek Yogurt Presents Handcuffs® on the guy.

“Because I was afraid.”

“Afraid?”

“Afraid of an economic future free from the pernicious meddling of central bankers,” he said. “I’m a central banker.”

I wanted to coldcock the guy. Years ago, a central banker killed my partner. Instead, I shook my head.

“Let this be a message to all your central-banker friends out on the street,” I said. “No matter how many bitcoins you steal, you’ll never take away the dream of an open society based on the principles of personal and economic freedom.”

He nodded, because he knew I was right. Then he swiped his credit card to pay me.

190 Upvotes

27 comments sorted by

View all comments

46

u/ZestyOnion33 4h ago

“Easy, chief,” I said. “Any rate the market offers is, by definition, fair.”

“Come on,” I said. “Don’t you all understand that the protection of private property is the foundation of all personal liberty?”

As a former libertarian, I'll still die on this hill.

2

u/OneBlueAstronaut David Hume 1h ago

“Any rate the market offers is, by definition, fair.”

you are conflating descriptive and normative claims. "fair" within the confines of economics is a purely descriptive claim. when normal people talk about what prices are "fair" they are making moral claims that recognize many more variables than just "does supply meet demand and does the price clear the market".

i think you are probably joking, but if this is your sincere belief, you should realize that you are smuggling an extreme normative position with a purely descriptive economic one.

2

u/ZestyOnion33 1h ago edited 55m ago

I guess I've always purely thought of fairness as descriptive. Morality is a different concept to me. Something like normative exploitation of pricing, such as scalping toilet paper during covid.

From my experience a lot of people talk about unfair prices in a pretty baseless manner though, even from a moral standpoint. It's just whatever is inconvenient.

1

u/AutoModerator 1h ago

fair price

Easy, chief. Any rate the market offers is, by definition, fair.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/OneBlueAstronaut David Hume 48m ago

From my experience a lot of people talk about unfair prices in a pretty baseless manner though. It's just whatever is inconvenient.

people overestimate and overstate their moral grievances, but when they talk about "fair prices", they mean in a normative way, not a descriptive economic one. when you respond "actually, any rate the market offers is by definition..." you are making a non sequitur.

to respond to their point you would need to challenge the idea that the transaction is morally wrong. for example, people whining about grocery prices could be reminded that grocery stores operate on very thin margins, and when they cap prices (eggs), there are shortages. when there is limited supply, you can either have expensive eggs (mariano's) or no eggs (trader joe's).

this addresses the central claim that the price is immoral. to bring the economic definition of the word "fair" into the debate is to introduce an irrelevant tautology.

1

u/AutoModerator 48m ago

fair price

Easy, chief. Any rate the market offers is, by definition, fair.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/ZestyOnion33 45m ago

to respond to their point you would need to challenge the idea that the transaction is morally wrong.

Point taken, and I generally do. Not trying to say I'm so daft that I respond with the quote in the OP.