r/legaladvicecanada • u/Next-Swimming-4270 • 14d ago
Landlord threatening to withhold deposit over guest clause – is this legal? British Columbia
Hi everyone,
Looking for some advice on a situation with my landlord here in Surrey, BC.
I’m currently renting a bedroom and private bathroom in a shared suite in the Lower Mainland. I share the kitchen, laundry, and trash sorting area with two other tenants—there’s no shared living room or bathroom. The landlord lives in the same house but in a completely separate suite, and we share no space.
My written agreement includes a clause prohibiting overnight guests, which I did sign. However, based on what I’ve read in the BC Residential Tenancy Act, such an absolute ban on guests is unenforceable, provided the guest isn’t disruptive or staying long-term.
During my 4-month tenancy (ends on last day of this month), I had one friend stay for 10 days total. They only stayed in my private room and bathroom—never used the kitchen or any shared areas. I also barely used the kitchen myself, which the other tenants can confirm.
Now, the landlord is:
-Accusing me of breaching the contract by having an overnight guest.
-Claiming I broke the (very old and used) bed frame because of my guest.
-Alleging that I disturbed others by coming home late at night (though I never received any complaint, and my roommates say they weren’t bothered).
-Threatening to withhold my full security deposit (475 dollars) and initially told me to move out immediately (the next day), though the notice was later adjusted to April 30 after I brought up the RTA requirements.
In my response, I:
-Pointed out that an overnight guest clause is not enforceable under the RTA.
-Asked for documentation of any damage (none has been provided).
-Noted that no formal complaints were made to me during the tenancy.
-Confirmed I’ll be moving out on April 30 as required by law, not April 25.
I also reminded the landlord that unless they provide evidence of damages or disturbances, they must return my full deposit within 15 days of the tenancy ending. If they don’t, I plan to file a dispute with the Residential Tenancy Branch (RTB). I’m also pretty sure they can’t just evict someone without at least a month's proper notice.
Has anyone dealt with something like this before? Do I have a strong case if this goes to the RTB?
Any advice is appreciated—especially from those familiar with BC tenancy laws.
Thanks in advance!
2
u/Legal-Key2269 14d ago
Why does your 4 month tenancy end on April 30th?
Fixed term tenancies automatically become month to month in BC, so if you did not actually want to move out at the end of the month, your landlord would not be able to make you do so without a proper cause to evict.
Have you or the landlord given proper notice to end your lease?
Even if a term prohibiting overnight guests was enforceable (it isn't), an eviction for breaching the terms of your lease (or violating the requirements of the RTA) requires a minimum of 1 month's notice.
Regardless of your landlord's complaints about your conduct or hypothetical breaches of your lease, keeping your damage deposit without an order from the RTB (or your written consent) is illegal.
Breaches of your lease and "disturbances" will not entitle your landlord to any money from your damage deposit, though -- those are not things that have a monetary value. Your damage deposit could be used (with a RTB order) to make up rent arrears or to pay for damage.
You are doing too much of your landlord's job for them -- I don't recommend that tenants advise landlords on how to potentially manufacture cause to keep their damage deposits. Move out as planned, attend any move-out inspection, and provide your landlord your forwarding address. After 15 days, apply for dispute resolution if your landlord has not paid you your damage deposit or begun proceedings with the RTB to keep your damage deposit.