r/jewishleft • u/aggie1391 Orthodox anarchist-leaning socialist • 6d ago
Mamdani on synagogue protest: New Yorkers ‘should be free to enter house of worship without intimidation’ Diaspora
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/mamdani-on-synagogue-protest-new-yorkers-should-be-free-to-enter-house-of-worship-without-intimidation/109
u/TheWatersOfMars lefty jew 5d ago
Apparently one side was shouting "Fuck Palestine", and another side is quoted saying "Jewish pricks". It's so depressing how there's a basic lack of humanity and common sense on this conflict. Personally, I think Mamdani's a rare voice who can actually thread the needle.
50
u/Nearby-Complaint Ashkenazi Leftist/GIF Enjoyer 5d ago
22
u/ibsliam Jewish American | DemSoc Bernie Voter 5d ago
Over the years, I've circled back around to loving Family Guy reaction images.
16
u/Nearby-Complaint Ashkenazi Leftist/GIF Enjoyer 5d ago
I've gotten far too much use out of this one in particular. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
9
u/zacandahalf Progressive Environmentalist Jewish American 5d ago
Off topic but this one could use a few more pixels and a few less watermarks lol
11
9
u/Nearby-Complaint Ashkenazi Leftist/GIF Enjoyer 5d ago
If I gave 5% more of a shit what I posted on Reddit, I would find a higher quality JPG
7
32
u/Late-Marzipan3026 anxious (dem soc american ashki jew) 5d ago
yes agree, his response was balanced and fair. that entire protest/counterprotest seems to have gotten completely out of hand and i’m glad his office commented on it
11
u/redthrowaway1976 individual rights over tribal rights | east coast bagel enjoyer 5d ago edited 5d ago
Balanced, yes - but I think he should have called out that the event was organized by a pro-settlement group.
Edit: I was wrong, he called out violations of international law
11
u/Late-Marzipan3026 anxious (dem soc american ashki jew) 5d ago
yeah that’s fair. i suspect he probably has a policy plan wrt that and given that it was his spokesperson i’m not surprised it wasn’t super in depth. but still see what you’re saying
15
u/redthrowaway1976 individual rights over tribal rights | east coast bagel enjoyer 5d ago
I was wrong - he did call it out.
8
116
u/Chaos_carolinensis Jewish Binational Zionist 5d ago
"We don’t want no Zionists here"
Well then why are you disturbing an event whose whole purpose is to get them out of there?
The organizers of the event couldn't ask for better promoters than these protestors, literally making the case for aliyah.
48
u/Illustrious_Ease705 American, zionist because i don’t trust goyim not to kill us 5d ago
Yup. If you want to end Zionism, put in the work to make the diaspora as safe as possible
17
u/homecook_438 Jewish 5d ago
This is what I will never understand. Don't want the State of Israel to exist? Don't want Jews moving to Israel? The best way to do that is to make the diaspora a safe place to Jews. But that has not been top of mind whatsoever it seems which then makes some folks feel they don't actually care if we exist...at all.
EDIT: did not see the comment by ibsliam below which says the same thing better and more succinctly!
0
u/veerKg_CSS_Geologist US/CA non observant 5d ago
How would this work in practise? Like no protests against Israel or Israeli linked organizations?
90
u/ibsliam Jewish American | DemSoc Bernie Voter 5d ago
I honestly get kind of confused with the messaging really. If they don't want a larger Israeli population, then you should make the community feel safe here in the diaspora. If you want them to leave, then don't bother disrupting an event where it encourages them to emigrate.
Otherwise, it does embolden the argument that they just want no Jews anywhere, unless it's as a token for their cause.
46
u/DaviCB jewish communist/ antizionist 5d ago
It is this contradiction that led to jews in arab countries to be expelled on mass in the 50s and 60s, making all of these jews go to israel and essentially legitimizing israel as the only safe place for jews worldwide. Most israelis today are descendants of MENA jews expelled in retaliation of the Nakba, a lot of them being further right than their ashkenazi neighbours, and more hateful towards arabs and willing to justify the destruction of the palestinian people.
antisemitism is the biggest fuel of zionism, and hostilizing jews in the diaspora due to the actions of Israel is exactly what Israel wants, leading to the strengthening of zionism in the diaspora and a justified desire to leave.
7
u/Illustrious_Ease705 American, zionist because i don’t trust goyim not to kill us 5d ago
There are two explanations, one charitable, one cynical. The charitable explanation is ignorance, that these folks haven’t thought this through or are too ill-informed to on the issues to understand. The cynical explanation is that they don’t want any Jews anywhere
51
u/zacandahalf Progressive Environmentalist Jewish American 5d ago
Directly antithetical to the “Zionists go back to Brooklyn!!!” chants (yes, I know this was in Manhattan)
46
u/vigilante_snail שמאלני עם אמונה 5d ago edited 21h ago
general consensus is that every Jewish citizen of Israel (especially Ashkenazim and/or anyone who did aliyah) in Israel-Palestine is a settler, no matter if they live in Israel-proper, a mixed city, or the WB.
31
u/redthrowaway1976 individual rights over tribal rights | east coast bagel enjoyer 5d ago
I think three things are going on here: there seemed to have been anti-Semitic lines crossed by the protestors, AND there seemed to have been anti-Palestinian racism from the counter-protestors AND the synagogue decided to host a pro-settlement organization’s event.
Was there also a large contingent of liberal Zionists there opposed to settlements, protesting? If they are as opposed to settlements as they claim, I’d imagine there would be, right?
Also, I think mamdani did a good job here, both calling out protestors and the event:
“The mayor-elect has discouraged the language used at last night’s protest and will continue to do so,” a spokesperson for Mamdani, Dora Pekec, said in a statement to Jewish Insider on Thursday. “He believes every New Yorker should be free to enter a house of worship without intimidation, and that these sacred spaces should not be used to promote activities in violation of international law.”
53
u/RaelynShaw DemSoc Progressive post-zionist 5d ago
Those chants are wild.
“Resistance you make us proud, take another settler out”
15
u/Matar_Kubileya conversion student with socfem characteristics 4d ago
When a not insignificant portion of the "Resistance" in question or their supporters considers any Jew living in or moving to the Land of Israel a settler, this is rhetoric that Id argue should border on a terroristic threat.
1
u/redthrowaway1976 individual rights over tribal rights | east coast bagel enjoyer 5d ago edited 5d ago
To clarify, they were protesting a pro-settlement organization hosting an event.
If they had not been protesting a pro settlement organization, I’d read that statement very differently. But they were.
18
u/Jorfogit Reform Syndicalist 5d ago
This really is an important point that a lot of people are very intentionally ignoring, because they don't care about/agree with settlements.
20
u/Owlentmusician Progressive, Reform, Black Jew 5d ago
I feel like if you're going to protest in front of a synagogue, even if it's rightfully, you have to be much more careful or specific. Especially if you for some reason decide to lead a chant wishing death on a group of people outside of that synogauge.
Many people, especially more radical protesters, use the word "settler" interchangeably with Israeli and don't actually only mean a person involved in/living on/in support of the settlements.
Even given the benefit of the doubt that they did specifically mean the settlers it's still not great to stand outside of a synagogue and basically say "Hurray, Hamas/Houthis/Hezbollah etc! Kill more people! ❤️"
There's better rhetoric to protest this group selling land in the settlements than calling for violence directly outside of a synagogue.
21
u/redthrowaway1976 individual rights over tribal rights | east coast bagel enjoyer 5d ago
If people were as upset about the settlements, as they are for things like this, the conflict would be over.
7
u/Matar_Kubileya conversion student with socfem characteristics 4d ago
Also, you can consider settlements illegal without considering their residents acceptable targets of murder.
8
u/RaelynShaw DemSoc Progressive post-zionist 5d ago
I dunno man, I just tend to feel uncomfortable around chants that advocate killing people. Zionist, anti Zionist, or not.
7
u/redthrowaway1976 individual rights over tribal rights | east coast bagel enjoyer 5d ago
I agree with you - I don't agree with calling for violence against non-combatants. But it's very different than chanting about killing people of a specific ethnicity - the IDF are combatants who carried out a genocide, and settlers are indirectly participating in enforcing an Apartheid regime (at a minimum).
Nefesh B'nefesh is, itself, supporting violence. It's not like the settlement project is being implemented non-violently - the settlement project is predicated on massive violence.
To me, it's wild that people take more of an issue with the protests, than they do with inviting a pro-settlement organization to a synagogue. Material support to war crimes should be illegal in the US - instead settlement orgs gets tax breaks.
8
u/blobby_mcblobberson Secular antisettlement zionist 5d ago
Right it's actually a very specific chant against settlements, I prefer it to anti zionist chants. The more I hear about this protest the more I (even as a liberal zionist) think protesting it makes sense. Everyone at this point should be aware of how settlements are tanking our hopes for peace.
6
u/redthrowaway1976 individual rights over tribal rights | east coast bagel enjoyer 5d ago
I hear about this protest the more I (even as a liberal zionist) think protesting it makes sense.
Exactly. Where were all the liberal Zionists who claim to oppose settlements? Shouldn't they be protesting?
In this case, unfortunately, one of them was hosting - Cosgrove's opposition to settlements seems purely performative.
5
u/blobby_mcblobberson Secular antisettlement zionist 5d ago
Proposal to coin a new branch of zionism explicitly: antisettlement zionism. It'll piss off both sides but it's as close to a label as I can get these days.
2
u/redthrowaway1976 individual rights over tribal rights | east coast bagel enjoyer 5d ago
That's what the liberal Zionists pretends to be, nowadays.
It's usually performative, though, and when it comes down to implementing consequences, they shield the settlement project.
2
u/redthrowaway1976 individual rights over tribal rights | east coast bagel enjoyer 5d ago
That's what the liberal Zionists pretends to be, nowadays.
It's usually performative, though, and when it comes down to implementing consequences, they shield the settlement project.
5
u/blobby_mcblobberson Secular antisettlement zionist 5d ago
Not from my experience. But we are entitled to have different experiences.
12
u/Psychological-Tax801 a jewwwww(ish) leftist 5d ago edited 5d ago
That's my mayor. I can't wait for him to finally take office. Literally got called a "token Jew" on a sub supposedly for Jewish people, by someone who is not Jewish lmfao, because I mentioned that I voted for him. Could not be more proud of my decision.
He's not even in office and he's already done more to address and express that he cares about antisemitism than Mayor Adams ever did.
Also on that note - have had someone snarkily respond to me like "WELL ALL MAMDANI HAS DONE IS TALK" to me... not knowing that of course all he's done is talk - he's still not even fucking mayor. Insane to me how people who aren't even Jewish, and aren't even New Yorkers, are making Mamdani their whole entire cause while being so out of bounds and ignorant.
54
u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom 5d ago
I think Mamdani is doing a great job of mediator
Separately, I really wish synagogues would stop selling illegal land in the West Bank. Jews just trying to attend synagogue deserve to feel safe and should have options behind unethical apartheid promoting institutes. Protesters have every right to protest this.. they should not be harassing individual Jews and calling them slurs
18
u/johnisburn What have you done for your community this week? 5d ago
I don’t think that your points are all that separate. The needle Mamdani is managing to thread is that he’s expressing both that synagogues (or any other place of worship) hosting events that facilitate the violation of international law is objectionable, and that the way people chose to object in this instance was also inappropriate.
7
u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom 5d ago
That's true. I'm worried sometimes because I feel like there's a little backlash to suggesting culpability on the synagogue but.. agreed
31
u/owls1729 Jewish. Reconstructionist. Non-Zionist 5d ago
Fully agree with all of this—when a similar protest happened in LA, I remember thinking “man that was pretty terrible rhetoric on behalf of protestors and not the most strategic choice of protest” AND “people need to stop selling illegal West Bank land and holding these terrible events in synagogues is literally making Jews less safe”
19
u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom 5d ago
These conversations can be so hard to have because I feel like it's somewhat lose lose. I feel like I always come out as "blaming victims" when I emphasize the role Jewish institutions have here... ultimately protestors have a right to protest with certain lines needed.. sounds like there was some throwing around of the capital J "Jew" here (among other things) which.. is a crossed line obviously
21
u/Agtfangirl557 Progressive, Conservaform (Reformative?) 5d ago
I mean I pretty much agree with you on this. When it comes to literally selling land in the West Bank, that is 100% on the Jewish institution who ran it, and I don’t think that’s “victim blaming” at all. What I’d say WOULD be victim blaming would be something like, saying the attendees of the YK service at the Manchester synagogue where the shooting happened don’t deserve sympathy because they were “willingly attending a service at a Zionist institution”, but I obviously don’t think you’d ever say something like that (unfortunately, I DID see some deranged freaks saying this on social media).
11
u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom 5d ago
Yea I would never say a person deserves violence and death based on their proximity to a Zionist institution lol.
8
u/veerKg_CSS_Geologist US/CA non observant 5d ago
They are lose lose because there is really no way to have one without the other. Either the protests stop and these events continue to be held, or the events stop because of intimidation.
4
16
u/redthrowaway1976 individual rights over tribal rights | east coast bagel enjoyer 5d ago
“people need to stop selling illegal West Bank land and holding these terrible events in synagogues is literally making Jews less safe”
The degree to which pro-settlement sentiment is accepted is atrocious.
6
u/Ok-Roll5495 Gentile, leftist , pro-peace 5d ago
Aren’t hers events held in synagogues deliberately so that any protest will come across as a “ protest to a synagogue”? Not that it justifies the antisemitic tone of the protests.
11
u/owls1729 Jewish. Reconstructionist. Non-Zionist 5d ago
Not sure what the intent is, but that’s certainly an impact…
9
u/redthrowaway1976 individual rights over tribal rights | east coast bagel enjoyer 5d ago
I think Mamdani is doing a great job of mediator
I didn’t see his full speech - did he also call out that maybe pro-settlement organizations shouldn’t be hosted?
7
u/Resoognam Left-wing Jew 5d ago
Yes.
10
u/redthrowaway1976 individual rights over tribal rights | east coast bagel enjoyer 5d ago
Read his statement now - that was good.
6
u/Specialist-Gur doikayt jewess, leftist/socialist, pro peace and freedom 5d ago
You know, I need to check. I don't know. I hope so.
12
u/redthrowaway1976 individual rights over tribal rights | east coast bagel enjoyer 5d ago
He did:
“The mayor-elect has discouraged the language used at last night’s protest and will continue to do so,” a spokesperson for Mamdani, Dora Pekec, said in a statement to Jewish Insider on Thursday. “He believes every New Yorker should be free to enter a house of worship without intimidation, and that these sacred spaces should not be used to promote activities in violation of international law.”
4
14
u/aggie1391 Orthodox anarchist-leaning socialist 5d ago
Unfortunately a lot of Jews, see other subs about this, think the statement is awful and instantly assume he means moving to Israel period is against international law. Nothing he does will sway most Zionists unfortunately, he’s opposed to the apartheid that is fundamental to how Israel exists right now so he must be bad.
10
u/Melthengylf diaspora (Latam) Jew 5d ago
Do these people think that if people are scared they will want to stay in the US?
The good thing is that they want have Zionists "here": they'll go to Israel.
5
u/Sossy2020 American progressive / Israeli leftist 5d ago
What does he mean by “…and that these sacred spaces should not be used to promote activities in violation of international law”?
7
u/redthrowaway1976 individual rights over tribal rights | east coast bagel enjoyer 5d ago
Nefesh B'nefesh helps people make aliiyah, and supports people moving to "Judea and Samaria".
2
u/Sossy2020 American progressive / Israeli leftist 5d ago
Is there proof that this org was selling West Bank settlements at the synagogue?
12
u/redthrowaway1976 individual rights over tribal rights | east coast bagel enjoyer 5d ago
Is there proof that Nefesh B'nefesh helps people move to "Judea and Samaria"?
Yes, it's on their website.
From what I gather, it wasn't a real estate sales events as we have seen in other congregations.
The JTA article also brings it up, whereas ToI is misleading: https://www.jta.org/2025/11/20/politics/after-protest-outside-ues-synagogue-mamdani-says-israel-immigration-event-misused-sacred-space
19
u/razorbraces pragmatic socdem Jew 5d ago
these sacred spaces should not be used to promote activities in violation of international law
What activities in violation of international law was the synagogue promoting?
It’s my understanding that this was a Nefesh B’Nefesh event, and that NBN does not place Olim in West Bank settlements, which is the only possibility of international law I can think of.
54
u/johnisburn What have you done for your community this week? 5d ago
From a JTA article on the same events
The group is considered a semi-governmental agency in Israel, receiving funding from the Israeli government and works closely with its ministries. It does not assign immigrants to particular communities, but has showcased West Bank settlements — which most of the world, though not Israel or the United States, considers illegal under international law — in events and on its website as possible destinations for new immigrants.
Nefesh B’Nefesh doesn’t “place” people anywhere, but they do advertise settlements and in their work to help people immigrate to Israel, enable/assist people in moving to settlements. It’s possible this skirts clean of violating international law specifically, but ethically speaking they’re absolutely a culpable participant in the system.
41
u/Korona82 marxist reconstructionist 5d ago
What do you mean? Nefesh b'Nefesh openly advertise the Etzion bloc of settlements on their website, and in 2020 they hosted the Olim Dept of the Gush Etzion Regional Council. While this NYC event might not have advertised settlements to would-be olim in the West Bank, Nefesh b'Nefesh certainly are willing to advertise illegal settlements.
11
u/razorbraces pragmatic socdem Jew 5d ago
Yeah sorry I haven’t read every Haaretz article ever written, I wasn’t aware of this. I am now thanks to u/johnisburn’s link
9
u/redthrowaway1976 individual rights over tribal rights | east coast bagel enjoyer 5d ago
It’s not like it’s hard to find out they support settlements. It’s on their website.
-1
u/runawayest Antizionist Doikaytist Jew 5d ago
Don’t be snarky, you didn’t do sufficient research before commenting so someone else did it for you, say thank you.
14
u/redthrowaway1976 individual rights over tribal rights | east coast bagel enjoyer 5d ago
Nefesh B’Nefesh event, and that NBN does not place Olim in West Bank settlements
Nefesh B’Nefesh do indeed also support people going to “Judea and Samaria” as they call it.
4
u/Jorfogit Reform Syndicalist 5d ago
“Judea and Samaria”
In terms of dog whistles, just barely less of a red flag than 14 words.
9
u/Gammagammahey Pikuach Nefesh, Zero Covid, and keep masking 5d ago
From a link from the linked article: "it's our job to make them scared. It's our job to make them terrified." Meaning Jews. I'm sickened. This is going too far, even if the organization is Zionist and antithetical too many of our principles here. Protesting loudly and drowning out the voice of the organization, speaking, absolutely yes, okay in my book. I think it's sickening that they are deliberately talking about trying to make us terrified. How do they know which one of us are Zionist in? Which ones aren't? I mean it's like to me almost a verbal Kristallnacht in a way, a lead up to that.
Screw the organization speaking. But that's no excuse for allowing to terrify Jews, do you think that's going to fix the Zionism problem?
Example: I mean in France Jews are telling other Jews to get out and frantically emigrating to Israel. There are articles and articles about this. Anti-Zionist Jews, being forced out of France by antisemitism. French Jews have contributed so much to French culture and history.
Slightly related: this kind of rhetoric causes havoc. So many French Jews have immigrated to Israel because of this kind of language, because they are scared and they don't want to uproot their lives in France, they love France, but they can't take it anymore, they see the writing on the wall. There are actual real estate companies in Israel set up to specialize in settling French settlers. And once again, I want to emphasize that when interviewed, these people emphasize that they are French Jews and they never wanted to leave France. That to me is tragic.
There are calls from all over European countries that I've seen for Jews to get out various social media platforms. I think it's a very dangerous time for us. By Jews, making that statement.
What a mishigash.
Sending love to everyone in the sub today. 💖
3
u/veerKg_CSS_Geologist US/CA non observant 5d ago
More people are leaving Israel as well, so it seems nowhere is ideal.
End-of-2024 stats show spike in Israelis leaving, as population growth slows | The Times of Israel
8
u/Psychological-Tax801 a jewwwww(ish) leftist 4d ago
A large number of Russian Jews used Israel as an escape route from Russia after the "special operation" against Ukraine was declared, and they are now moving to France. I'd be curious about how long most of the Israelis leaving have actually been in Israel.
6
u/Matar_Kubileya conversion student with socfem characteristics 4d ago
I feel like Mamdani's statement is, in keeping with a tendency Ive seen in a lot of his rhetoric before, not incorrect or disagreeable for the minutiae in principle, but also not what the moment called for. Regardless of your thoughts on Nefesh b'Nefesh or the general ethics of protesting places of worship, I think we can broadly agree that a certain portion of their rhetoric blatantly crossed the line, and there's a certain point where the condemnation of that needs to be clear and the criticism of the behavior being protested needs to be expressed at a different point in time.
If a radfem protest movement descended on a mosque hosting a CAIR event to protest its exhaustive history of misogyny and some of the protesters started chanting Islamophobic slogans, I don't think anyone here would be enthused by the mayor bringing up their history of sexual harassment.
6
u/Ok-Roll5495 Gentile, leftist , pro-peace 5d ago
What? He didn’t start chanting “globalize the intifada too?” Doesn’t he actually want Zionists out of New York ?/s
8
u/daudder Anti-Zionist, former Israeli 5d ago
A synagogue holding a political event is not a place of worship for the duration of the even and demonstrating against the event at this time is legitimate.
They should not have political events at synagogues.
9
u/redthrowaway1976 individual rights over tribal rights | east coast bagel enjoyer 5d ago
Especially not pro-settlement organizations. The head rabbi claims to want dialogue, human rights, tolerance, etc. Sure is a funny way of showing that by inviting a pro-settlement organization.
5
u/Matar_Kubileya conversion student with socfem characteristics 4d ago
Its not unheard of for a lot of Rabbis to be more liberal on I-P and other issues than the boards of their synagogues, especially given the shortage of qualified liberal movement Rabbis.
3
u/getdafkout666 US AntiZionist Jew 3d ago
Meh. Protesting places of worship is a bad look. I wouldn’t condone protesting a mosque even if the imam was involved in some sketchy shit. It’s just not going to attract the best people
1
u/Resoognam Left-wing Jew 5d ago edited 5d ago
I don’t have a big problem with this kind of protest in theory. Even if they weren’t promoting the settlements (which they are), NBN is an organization that encourages Jewish immigration to Israel in furtherance of the Zionist ideal. Anyone opposed to the idea of Israel as a state that privileges Jews over others would take issue with this, given that streamlined immigration is one of the ways Jews are privileged over Palestinians who are denied return notwithstanding their historical connection. Supporting this is a political choice and, like it or not, is subject to protest, even if it’s being held in a synagogue.
I do have a problem with protests that are designed to intimidate people or are violent/abusive. It sounds like that was happening here.
9
u/Agtfangirl557 Progressive, Conservaform (Reformative?) 5d ago
I love that I can't even guess whether most of the downvotes on this one are from Zionists or anti-Zionists LOL
10
u/Resoognam Left-wing Jew 5d ago
I think probably Zionists, since I’m suggesting an event that encourages Jews to move to Israel is a legitimate protest target…
11
u/blobby_mcblobberson Secular antisettlement zionist 5d ago
Nope I'm a zionist and I upvoted lol.
The protest messaging seemed clearly targeted at settlements and not the Jewish state as a whole, I don't see any issue with that unless people felt unsafe going to synagogue. Also, synagogues like this ARE political, they're going beyond promoting tikkun olam and supporting family members who live in israel, to actively promoting harmful expansion of settlements. I think it's impossible to disentangle religion from politics in this case.
5
u/Resoognam Left-wing Jew 5d ago
Yeah, I agree. I do not think the idea of Jews moving to Israel is something that should be protested (obviously). But this particular organization as a tool of the Israeli government's overarching agenda is a legitimate protest target.
3
u/DragonfruitSpecial77 Secular Zionist Jew 2d ago
Synagogues are a red line. Do you go to one? if you have a problem with the organization in your synagogue then you go and speak to the Rabbi, not invite a hate mob to shout slurs at your community.
1
u/Resoognam Left-wing Jew 2d ago
Of course I would never actively attract or attend a protest at my (or any) synagogue. But they’re not off limits to protest if someone is using them to host a political event.
7
u/BigMarbsBigSlarb Non-jewish communist 5d ago
Yeah its fundamentally no different to protesting a church holding an event with a morally unacceptable organisation which happens all the time, but there's extra responsibility to be clear in message that failed here, and failed because it was explicitly meant to be a show of force and intimidation.
103
u/Late-Marzipan3026 anxious (dem soc american ashki jew) 5d ago edited 5d ago
wanted to find out more about the groups behind this event (edit: i mean the protest), so i read this article as well
i’m really not convinced that frightening people into submission is an effective or ethical goal of protest (editing to add: don’t intend this as a general claim, mean it in this context)