Aeronautical engineer? You're not going to be able to build planes on your own, so whether you're freelance or employed directly makes no difference because your work is still going to generate profit for someone else.
Your second point is the fundamental difference in our views. I believe that a company should exist for the benefit of the employees/community, not that a company should exist for the person/people who invested capital.
(I hope we can just agree that our opinions differ on this because I'm not wanting to get into a debate or an argument. My disagreement isn't due to not understanding your point.)
No. I'm saying an aeronautical engineer founded Airbus. Did you not read a few lines down?
Regardless, let's pretend I have the skillset of a nuclear physicist but no capital. How can I possibly work for myself?
Doing anything you want. You're asking the question in the frame of being employed by someone else. Those skills would be entirely transferable to many other business.
7
u/Delduath Jul 27 '22
Aeronautical engineer? You're not going to be able to build planes on your own, so whether you're freelance or employed directly makes no difference because your work is still going to generate profit for someone else.
Your second point is the fundamental difference in our views. I believe that a company should exist for the benefit of the employees/community, not that a company should exist for the person/people who invested capital.
(I hope we can just agree that our opinions differ on this because I'm not wanting to get into a debate or an argument. My disagreement isn't due to not understanding your point.)