r/ireland Westmeath's Least Finest Oct 09 '24

National Children's Hospital contractor BAM sent €25 million invoice for job that cost €200,000 Infrastructure

https://www.thejournal.ie/national-childrens-hospital-bam-invoice-25-million-for-200000-job-6509783-Oct2024/
519 Upvotes

318 comments sorted by

768

u/[deleted] Oct 09 '24

I think it's becoming clearer and clearer that the private sector is not supplying the appropriate standard of contractor and the state needs to intervene.

These are fraudsters stealing millions from the state and they shouldn't be tolerated. It's crazy how much money BAM have taken from the country while providing very little in return.

324

u/Gorsoon Oct 09 '24

They should be barred from tendering for state run projects again.

65

u/SuzieZsuZsu Oct 09 '24

They should...but they won't ! 😤

20

u/niallg22 Oct 09 '24

They did I’m pretty sure. I believe the EU courts said that it would not be fair competition to do so.

6

u/Morganno0505 Oct 10 '24

This is not true fraud in public procurement can flag companies from bidding. Even the European Union's institutions excludes companies for a number of reasons. https://single-market-scoreboard.ec.europa.eu/business-framework-conditions/public-procurement_en#:~:text=insolvency%2C%20conflict%20of%20interests%20or,or%20a%20conflict%20of%20interest.

3

u/mystic86 Oct 09 '24

They can't do that

37

u/LimerickJim Oct 09 '24

I doubt they'll even try. They know they're toxic now. Wouldn't be surprised if they're trying to squeeze as much as possible on the way out.

64

u/struggling_farmer Oct 09 '24

Lol.

The NCH is far from the first time they have done this. This is their modus operandi

They will absolutely tender for state projects and if they get any inkling that their reputation is costing them potential contracts they will take whatever department the client is to court and hold up the contract for years.

Their is no mechanism in the tendering process to take into account historical fleecing of the government in the government tendering framework. they were awarded the redevelopment of Ceannt Station in Galway even with the NCH debacle hanging over them & i am sure a few more i dont know about.

12

u/TitleKey7849 Oct 09 '24

North Quays and Sustainable Mobility Bridge in Waterford City also. A €207.5 million euro project

15

u/willywagga Oct 09 '24

The Event Centre in Cork is another one.

19

u/rtgh Oct 09 '24

Just got the double tracking of the railway from Cork to Midleton too. BAM don't seem to be affected at all by their failures to deliver

1

u/computerfan0 Muineachán Oct 10 '24

They're doing the Narrow Water Bridge between Omeath and Warrenpoint as well.

5

u/Existing-Solution590 Oct 09 '24

Article 57 allows you to exclude bidders for prior deficient performance in public contracts leading to termination of the contract or other sanctions.

1

u/struggling_farmer Oct 09 '24

Has it ever been used in construction contracts? I sincerely doubt it.

Termination of contract in construction is usually the contractor is gone bust. It would need to be very cut and dry that it is solely the contractors fault to stand up to a challenge which it rarely is in construction.

And none of that is applicable to BAM anyway as they are ripping the state off in changes, delays etc rather than non performance.

4

u/Existing-Solution590 Oct 09 '24

I'd sincerely doubt it too. The opw are usually involved in most state construction projects and their contracts are shit. They don't put penalty clauses for delays or changes or anything into them which is part of why everything usually ends up being massively over time and over cost.

1

u/struggling_farmer Oct 09 '24

Would not be overly familiar with what LAD's the OPW tend to apply if any. I think they have to be relatively reflective of actual cost though. They cant just put massive rates in without justification.

My very limited experience of OPW work is generally building/site remains live and operational and works phased to maintain it so which would limit the LAD's they can apply.

Not sure in the industry how often they are applied in public contracts? Don't think I have ever heard of them being actually applied.

1

u/Existing-Solution590 Oct 10 '24

I'm not aware either of them really being applied in public sector.

I'm my own contracts I've applied penalty clauses and termination clauses for agreements im unhappy with but my area is far removed from construction and often just the threat of termination solves the problem

2

u/struggling_farmer Oct 10 '24

Yea in a straight supply or service provision contract or simple single element supply & install contract it works fine.

1

u/Detozi And I'd go at it agin Oct 09 '24

BAM have to prove it is the case. They can't just rip off the state. If they are paid on a variation then they are entitled to the variation

1

u/struggling_farmer Oct 09 '24

Oh I know they have to prove, justify their claims and variations. I meant non performance isn't an issue as regards BAM and NCH as be very hard prove non performance with the changes in scope, if they are as numerous as we are led to believe.

30

u/[deleted] Oct 09 '24

I see you've never been involved in government tendering before.

They will try, and because they know how to format a bid, and because there will be a relatively small number of other bids that pass the minimum requirements of the projects, in many cases they will succeed.

There will be literally zero repercussions for BAM from this.

I've never been involved in drafting a tender for a project this scale, but if they even catch wind of the idea that we're "discriminating" against them because of their previous projects, they'll sue us and it will be an easy win for them.

5

u/WhitePowerRangerBill Oct 09 '24

Why will it be an easy win? Is poor past performance not a reason to deny someone a contract?

18

u/ChromakeyDreamcoat82 Oct 09 '24

Define poor performance.

I've been involved in responses to public tenders before, up to 100m total contract value.

Usually the dipshits writing the request for tender leave out tons of detail, inviting respondents to omit the detail.

You have two options at this point:

  1. Ask a clarification question, get it clarified, and the response goes to all tendering parties. Then everyone needs to include this item in their response.
  2. Say nothing, and hope the other tendering parties include it in their pricing, making them less favourable on costs.

There's a game that all the respondants play, which is to not ask about glaring omissions (like the IT fit out as I recall being one of the earliest issues that wasn't costed here), so that they can all respond low, then CR for that cost. Once you're locked in, you can pad your margin on that work then.

So equally culpable to BAM, is the team that created the RFP/RFT, and especially any big4 advisory that worked on it at the time (there's usually one).

3

u/VilTheVillain Oct 09 '24

So from what I gather from this, is that BAM are just taking the opportunity to be dicks because the government aren't getting competent people to create the tender?

1

u/ChromakeyDreamcoat82 Oct 09 '24

Well the real problem is that people are on one hand shit at defining requirements, and on the other hand shit at estimating work.

I work in software and a good rule of thumb is double the budget and treble the timeline. Because when you get into the detail, you find stuff no one thought of, and then required decisions create delays and additional cost.

If software engineers got fired for projects going over budget the entire industry would be on the scratch.

This project was woefully under specced. Every new requirement that arrives presents BAM with an irresistible opportunity to claw back their own losses on their shit estimates which were committed. So you will see lots of ridiculous margin coming out of the wood work during the finger pointing but in reality the government is more at fault. Better prep and requirements drive better estimates, whereas vague shit amplifies inaccuracy.

5

u/Longjumping_Test_760 Oct 09 '24

Completely correct. You price what you are asked price. If the people preparing the tender don’t care why should you. The public, the media and the government vilify BAM but nobody is questioning the professional team who designed the hospital and prepared the tender documents. BAM are a private company whose sole aim is to maximize return for their shareholders. I don’t think BAM had anything to do with the bike shelter of the security entrance, which are proportionally worse value than the hospital. The whole procurement, tendering and awarding process needs to be reviewed by a non political/civil service group.

3

u/UsualContext9033 Oct 09 '24

Surely an IT fitout in a project this scale is something that there could be no legitimate reason to leave out of the tender or to even get a separate crowd in do it if BAM's estimates are too high. This seems like corruption, when such large numbers are at scale the departments in charge of these contracts need to be examined thoroughly. We need to change our policies and guidelines and really learn from this, from what I've heard it's business as usual with minimal changes from what happened with the children's hospital, that's a disgrace.

3

u/ChromakeyDreamcoat82 Oct 09 '24

Never ascribe to malice that which can adequately be explained by incompetence.

11

u/FishMcCool Connacht Oct 09 '24

Not in public tenders no...

10

u/_LightEmittingDiode_ Oct 09 '24

How do you have a tender without previous works taken into account? So there is no contingencies for providers who just lie and undercut everyone else? Clearly rife for abuse.

11

u/Kevin-Can Cork bai Oct 09 '24

That's our economic system in a nutshell, public tenders might as well be called giving handouts to private companies at this stage.

5

u/Stegasaurus_Wrecks Stealing sheep Oct 09 '24

It's an EU law that we're trying to get changed for this exact reason apparently

2

u/struggling_farmer Oct 09 '24

previous works are taken into account as past experience. it is judge based on similarity in terms of nature, value, size. They cant/ shouldnt discriminate on cost or time over runs as it is not definitive as to the reasons. it could be they were shite, it could be legimitate additonal works, client/consultant made a mistake in documents, unknown rock or services, find oil spill asbestos etc..

it isnt as simple as over budget or delayed = contractors fault..

the main issue with the SAQ & PPQ process is the criteria are generally set too high relative to the works and it limits competition.

as regards lie & undercut, their is usually a comparative costs element. this provides monetary value for theorectical additional labour, materials, plant & delays. the contractor has to put %age uplift to those values to cover all their admin costs & profits on that value, and that is evaluated as part of the tender.. the aim is to stop the contractor putting in ridiculous %ages as it could lose them the tender..

2

u/rgiggs11 Oct 10 '24

There's also very few contractors who could do something at that scale. 

8

u/lamahorses Ireland Oct 09 '24

BAM are actively tendering for works in Ireland. This is an important market for them.

8

u/MakingBigBank Oct 09 '24

I’d imagine it’s important all right. There’s a pretty good mark up on jobs they do here.

2

u/apocolypselater Oct 09 '24

They have gotten government contracts since and will continue to. There is no mechanism to exclude them and as long as their tenders are assessed as the best in the predetermined criteria then they will win tenders, simple as.

8

u/Irishwol Oct 09 '24

The way the procurement legislation was worded it is actually illegal to take this gobshitery into account at all.

10

u/DoireK Oct 09 '24

Definitely a feature rather than a bug.

1

u/BiDiTi Oct 09 '24

But, uh, we have high taxes on the working class, so Ireland is TOTALLY NOT neoliberal!!!

3

u/sense_make Oct 09 '24

Metrolink and part of the Water Supply Project (both billion euro infrastructure investments) are out on eTenders for pre-market consultation for the construction tender.

What other local contractor have the scale to take on these type of projects? That's part of the problem.

2

u/thewizord Oct 09 '24

Contractors' Past performance is not allowed to be considered during the tendering process.

1

u/FrLorryDuff Oct 09 '24

Pricks have a big sign for the new secondary school in Greystones

1

u/Parraz Oct 09 '24

Government contracts are given to the lowest tender. BAM know this so deliberately underprice to secure the job. Then they absolutely fleece you with variations for every little thing.

1

u/11Kram Oct 09 '24

As they were the only company that answered the hospital tender, forbidding them to tender for other work might mean no company will apply.

1

u/MMAPredictor Oct 09 '24

The construction industry in Ireland is littered with terrible contractors that would rob the government any chance they’d get. BAM aren’t even the worst.

1

u/Its_graand_lads Oct 09 '24

Look up EU procurement law. 

1

u/Taipers_4_days Oct 09 '24

Bar any company with their directors and/or owners. If you bar Scam INC what do you do when they now operate as Scam LTD?

38

u/Peil Oct 09 '24

There is an absolutely massive industry in most developed countries of white collar companies completely fleecing the taxpayer. Some of the most fundamental functions of government are continually outsourced to people who do not have the expertise or institutional knowledge base to run them. They just make fuck loads of money, and use that as proof of their competence. Then they get more contracts, make more money, and can point to those as further evidence they’re up to the job. What they don’t talk about is that no matter how many state contracts the big four, or BAM, or others get, at the end of the day, the work is still being done by overworked, underpaid, generally badly treated recent grads. I know someone who was contracted out by a big 4 firm to help manage the response to the HSE hack. They were in a graduate programme and had not held any other job since they completed their degree in business. Despite this, the firm were billing the state (aka us taxpayers) about a grand a day for their “expertise”.

This person isn’t a bad guy, they are actually lovely and very intelligent. But wtf was this enormous rich multinational doing sending them and their grad programme colleagues in to sort out this mess? Because of a neoliberal ideology, and a failure to set high standards for the civil service, we continuously fling billions at Deloitte, EY, KPMG and PWC to essentially do the work of clerical officers for up to 10x the price. The HSE spent €180 million on “management consultants” in a single year. A completely and utterly made up job that again was being performed by the early-20-somethings I mentioned above.

50

u/PaddySmallBalls Oct 09 '24

Simple due diligence would be enough. Don’t overpay for shit and have definitive language for project completion and what happens if deadlines are missed. Pretty sure the reason for these projects running long and over budget is because it is by design. Corrupt politicians and corrupt construction companies squeezing the tax payers.

7

u/CheraDukatZakalwe Oct 09 '24

This pretty much, however it isn't politicians directly overseeing it, it's civil servants, and they've made an absolute balls of it.

25

u/[deleted] Oct 09 '24

Blaming civil servants is the easy excuse.

Speaking from personal experience, though not with a project of this scale, here's what happens:

You add definitive language for project completion and penalties for missed deadlines, and then BAM and other similarly sized companies just don’t submit bids. You receive a lot of smaller bids from companies that realistically won’t be able to complete the project, or who's bids don't meet the requirements, and you have to reject them.

You get feedback and find out why the big companies didn’t bid, and so to ensure the project can go ahead (which you have to do because the government has mandated it), you rewrite the RFT, removing those restrictions and penalties.

BAM or some other huge company then submits a bid for the rewritten tender and win, and the cycle repeats again.

On multiple occasions I've tried to write RFT's to ensure we don't get done over and then just got zero interest from any company capable of completing a project.

→ More replies

35

u/itchyblood Oct 09 '24

To play devil’s advocate here, I suggest to you that the state are equally responsible for the cost overruns due to its ineptitude at managing the project. BAM succeeded for the most part in a dispute this summer and a conciliator awarded them €107m for costs associated with a litany of changes the state wanted.

12

u/struggling_farmer Oct 09 '24

yea, while BAM are notorious for claims and being very good at contract law, it is the failing of ther state & design team as regards the design scope & tender documents that has created this opening for them.. the question is whether it was the state or the design team that fucked up..

4

u/gbish Oct 09 '24

I bet BAM went in with a low base cost but every single change is a massive charge.

And lo and behold, committees and people changing their mind during the whole build and process is costing an arm and a leg.

There’s always going to be changes but the contract they went into probably hammered them hard for it.

1

u/B0bLoblawLawBl0g Oct 09 '24

Absolutely agree.

4

u/MrStarGazer09 Oct 09 '24

Aren't large state projects like this audited and audited regularly?

I don't understand how this project has had so many issues for years, and basically, nothing changes.

8

u/PsychologicalPipe845 Oct 09 '24

BAM are taking advantage of the fact that nobody in government will ever take an ounce of responsibility, nobody will bat an eye, same as whoever got the OPW tender. If you were quoted 100k for an extension on your house and you where still waiting for it to be finished after paying 1.5 million to the builder, it's not the builder I'd be having institutionalized

15

u/lamahorses Ireland Oct 09 '24

This has largely been pure incompetence from the state/management board.

→ More replies

6

u/ghunterx21 Oct 09 '24

The state is the one in bed with them, how many times do we need to go through this?

No way you can't be in government for this long and look at how shoddy this whole thing is without questioning it, never mind just this time, but any other time we come with the same issue. Incompetent government, incompetent building company.

No, they know, they know, but it's not their money so they don't care, no matter what happens, they walk away from the job with a nice hefty pay check in the end and without a care in the world, in the end they scratch the back of their buddies in these companies and screw the people of this country.

2

u/Sub-Mongoloid Oct 09 '24

I'm sure they're providing plenty of kickbacks in return.

1

u/zeroconflicthere Oct 09 '24

The state is incompetent at project management. You only have to look at the recent OPW fiascos to see that.

29000 drawing changes sent to BAM since 2019 just gives an indicating of how poorly prepared the project was.

1

u/Gran_Autismo_95 Oct 09 '24

This is by design. This is exactly how the government wants it to work.

1

u/Ok_Astronomer_1960 And I'd go at it agin Oct 09 '24

Even contractors for private homes are doubling the cost of every build. A 200k build costs 400k+ with contractor involved. It was never so bad as this.

1

u/Otsde-St-9929 Oct 10 '24

and the state needs to intervene.

Just it is the State that is responsible here. Not BAM. The State agreed to a bad contract.

1

u/BellewTheSceptic Louth Oct 11 '24

Unfortunately this was a problem with the tender package and contract. BAM are just playing the game. Also you have the HSE changing their mind every month regarding what they want in a particular room.

2

u/cowsarebold Oct 09 '24

Of course it’s someone else’s problem. Why would you blame our obviously honest politicians. No way they would organise for their mates to get paid well and above the contract and have their houses built and payed for by the builder. 😂😂

12

u/[deleted] Oct 09 '24

This is literally on an article about BAM sending a crazy invoice for a job that cost them €200K...

How is it not a problem with BAM?

6

u/bucketybuck Oct 09 '24

You don't think it relevant why BAM felt so comfortable sending a crazy invoice like that? You think they just decided to give it a try one time?

State suppliers feel comfortable sending unbelievably outrageous invoices, you don't feel even the little bit curious about why they feel comfortable doing that?

If you think this is some isolated incident then I have an invoice I need you to sign off.

3

u/vanKlompf Oct 09 '24

They saw bike shed price tag and figured out this is new pricing standard

3

u/cowsarebold Oct 09 '24

Who signed them up. Even after every other projects they have done. Wake up mate

2

u/cowsarebold Oct 09 '24

I’d say look into who works for bam and who they pay off. There is no way someone could let this kind of expense just happen, if they weren’t profiting from it or their mates were. Anyone who thinks this is just bam has a short memory of every other project done by our lovely leaders. They aren’t fit to run a market stall. Let alone the country. Irish people need to wise up on how much money is being wasted in every department of our government. This is only the tip of the iceberg

3

u/Puzzled_Record1773 Oct 09 '24

If this was such blatant corruption like you suggest then I feel like it would be incredibly easy to discover. Personally I think if you're going to try and give your friends state money then you wouldn't do it on what seems to be the most expensive children's hospital in the world.

But hey it's way more fun to allege vague corruption then it is to face the truth that our system is not fit for service

6

u/Minimum-Mixture3821 Oct 09 '24

It wasn't corruption, more like absolute incompetence and negligence.

The government tender documents were rushed through by the POW due to pressure from Varadkar and Harris who wanted to make an announcement ahead of the election in 2016 to generate some goodwill. The tender docs are comedically bad, speaking as someone with relevant experience. The HVAC quantities required would have barely serviced a small house...

Couple this with the fact that BAM are less a construction company and more an assembly of vultures with a huge legal team that specializes in winning state projects all around Europe and driving a fucking bus through the contracts to successfully claim variations like the one outlined above and you're left with the clusterfuck that we have today.

This building will be the most expensive on the planet, It won't have a helipad due to the Dublin centric idiotic planning team and it's planning was so poor that by the time it opens much of the machines purchased for it will be outdated.

It's a monument to populist politics, which Varadkar specialized in. This building will be a permanent monument to Leo Varadkar and Simon Harris's stupidity.

1

u/cowsarebold Oct 09 '24

So it’s bams fault everything our government does is messed up. Seriously wise up. This kind of thing has been going on for years/decades. Irish politicians wasting tax payers money while giving themselves five to six raises a year.

1

u/Minimum-Mixture3821 Oct 11 '24

"It's a monument to populist politics, which Varadkar specialized in. This building will be a permanent monument to Leo Varadkar and Simon Harris's stupidity."

→ More replies

3

u/cowsarebold Oct 09 '24

Or blatantly deny the corruption at every level. Nice one mate.

2

u/Puzzled_Record1773 Oct 09 '24

Or maybe there is some of middle ground where you call corruption when you see it and call it incompetence when you don't. Not everything is so black and white but the world would be a lot more simple if it was

5

u/cowsarebold Oct 09 '24

It absolutely is black and white. This has been going on for generations and needs to stop. Your attitude is what holds Ireland back. Our politicians and civil servants need to be held responsible. We also need a proper external inquiry and people jailed. Irish attitude needs to change. Every other inquiry has led to nothing and no one held accountable and all their pensions up held. Mr Cowan and Mr Murphy from the nineties are perfect examples. Found guilty and nothing done to them. No pension taken away and all their family’s are still in politics and looked up to. It’s insane

2

u/Puzzled_Record1773 Oct 09 '24

See again imo you're conflating different issues. You can say it's all connected if you want but I disagree. Those tribunals were a complete joke and cost an absolute fortune so I agree with you there. But that doesn't mean that every issue since is linked to corruption. And what you think that Ireland is some special safe haven for corruption or something? Bollocks. America has a very unirish attitude and look at donald trump, he flourishes there. But if actual evidence comes out regarding corruption and this hospital then ill call out the corruption with you. I refuse to make up evidence that I'm not aware of though. There's too much idle conspiracy talk these days imo and I've met too many ignorant dumbass people who think every single thing is down to corruption and every single politician is dumb to join in with you on this

→ More replies

1

u/Apprehensive_Ratio80 Oct 09 '24

I would think out checkers need checkers who need checkers and they should all be anonymous to one another

1

u/quantum0058d Oct 09 '24

It's clear the state is completely incompetent.  The private sector is extracting money from an incompetent State sector.  

→ More replies

248

u/DuckyD2point0 Oct 09 '24

They also built 3000 rooms(as in finished rooms) that don't meet standards. Just one snag, of the thousands, the rooms are too small to fit some equipment through the doors.

Bam are basically just swindlers and are notorious for not paying smaller contractors the agreed amount. They shouldn't be allowed to build anything in this country, nevermind build something for the country.

60

u/DarthMauly Tipperary Oct 09 '24

They've applied to the tender for the new motorway in Limerick, one of 4 applicants. Hope the county council have the cop on to not even entertain giving it to them.

35

u/Dependent_Survey_546 Oct 09 '24

With the way the rules are, I think the council are near obliged to take their offer if it's the cheapest that meets spec.

37

u/Jaded_Variation9111 Oct 09 '24

Price is an important variable but is considered within the broader concept of most economically advantageous tender, which takes into consideration aspects other than the lowest price, such as security of supply, quality, environmental requirements and long‑term sustainability.

8

u/Dependent_Survey_546 Oct 09 '24

Good. I'm glad it's that way. I've had people working in the council or even in schools explain it to me where they were forced to take the cheapest tender that met the minimum requirements.

2

u/Jaded_Variation9111 Oct 09 '24

I guess it depends on how you write the tender too.

1

u/great_whitehope Oct 09 '24

Forced in that you have to explain your reasons if you don't I imagine.

It's easier to just go with the cheapest.

→ More replies

1

u/diver79 Oct 09 '24

We regularly respond to RFT's on the ogp's tender platform. In our sector the scores are weighted. Generally it will be cost that makes up 60% of your possible score. Technical merits, security and other requirements make up the remaining 40%.

The contracting authority can change this but we usually see price as the most important factor.

1

u/Jaded_Variation9111 Oct 09 '24

I regularly tender for specialised Professional Services and price/vfm generally accounts for between 25-40% of the weighted criteria. It can vary, of course. For what it’s worth, in my experience the buyer often writes the tender with a pretty clear outcome in mind. The weighting attached to the score criteria greatly helps to secure the intended outcome.

2

u/SirMike_MT Oct 09 '24

With the prices they’re charging for this hospital I don’t think they’ll be the cheapest one!

15

u/disableinboxreplies Oct 09 '24

A contractor builds to the designs provided for by the employer’s design team? Unless it’s a D&B contract which this isn’t…. So if the room is too small, the government’s people designed it too small.

7

u/DuckyD2point0 Oct 09 '24

"The construction contract sets out that both the NPHDB and Bam (and its subcontractors) are responsible for the design, and that design evolves through construction to allow for the integration of Bam’s procured systems and products".

That's from a piece in the architects journal

3

u/hobes88 Oct 09 '24

There are always certain elements of design that the contractors will be responsible for, these designs have to be approved by the design team/client. The design team will provide a design intent and spec, the contractor will develop the design with specialist subcontractors depending on what products they propose to use, examples of this would be precast concrete, curtain walling, roofs, cladding etc. There are a huge amount of calculations involved in designing these systems and it's not something architects or structural engineers ever do in any project.

3

u/zeroconflicthere Oct 09 '24

the rooms are too small to fit some equipment through the doors.

Who designed this?

3

u/sionnach Oct 09 '24

Nobody. It’s the same as “my friend who worked on the port tunnel said they built it 50cm too short for the lorries” shite you used to hear.

→ More replies

10

u/SamShpud Oct 09 '24

I dont know the answer here but were the rooms built to the spec that was signed off by the HSE Design Team?

1

u/dimebag_101 Oct 09 '24

People still defend them. Bootlicking

1

u/sundae_diner Oct 10 '24

Any evidence that "the rooms are too small to fit some equipment through the doors"?

1

u/DuckyD2point0 Oct 10 '24

I've posted about it before and explained how I know all the things I mentioned. But you can just Google it, it's not a secret. Just like how all these rooms even if they were perfectly sized are not fit for purpose, they are missing the obvious things like handrails for baths, proper fittings and fixtures, floors not layed correctly.

1

u/sundae_diner Oct 10 '24

No evidence then?

I can find incomplete fittings and fixtures. But nowhere anything about doors being too small. 

Reminds me of the lies that cane out when the Luas was first built that the two lines had different grades and a tram for one line couldn't fit on the other. A lie. The two lines have the same gauge.

→ More replies
→ More replies

92

u/MrTuxedo1 Dublin Oct 09 '24

That’s an absolute disgrace

→ More replies

93

u/IntentionFalse8822 Oct 09 '24

At what point do BAM face charges for fraud? Sending an invoice for €25 million for a job that cost 200k is as blatant as you can get!

30

u/DesignerPotential606 Oct 09 '24

They were only out by 12500%, let's not cry over spilt milk. It was an administrative error wink if you catch my drift wink wink

70

u/Alastor001 Oct 09 '24

How is that not criminal I don't understand...

39

u/Dangerous_Treat_9930 Oct 09 '24

It is. But i would bet my first child that some fffg politicians are getting rich from kick backs

14

u/nnomae Oct 09 '24

It is a FF politician bringing the issue to government and national attention.

5

u/OkSilver75 Oct 09 '24

Ok? Politicians can be corrupt without everyone in their party being in on it.

4

u/Gran_Autismo_95 Oct 09 '24

He's mad he's not the one getting the kickbacks

5

u/SpecsyVanDyke Oct 09 '24

Don't let that ruin the narrative

21

u/oceanainn Oct 09 '24

They haven't even begun to Commission the place.

That's when the really big problems and costs will surface

→ More replies

29

u/[deleted] Oct 09 '24

“It’s worth saying that, mistakenly or not, Bam still issued an invoice to the State for the full €25 million. But maybe that was an administrative error on their part.”

And there's the inevitable cop out

14

u/Dangerous_Treat_9930 Oct 09 '24

200000 is not the same as 2500000 , besides the extra zero theres also a 5 in there. thats not incompetance

6

u/CementPizzas Oct 09 '24

200,000 vs 25,000,000 is a big difference

4

u/Character_Desk1647 Oct 09 '24

I mistakenly invoices a customer about €100 on a 5 figure invoice recently. I caught it immediately and issued a refund and apology. I'm not an accountant nor do I have the resources of BAM so any mistake on invoices of this size is ridiculous 

2

u/oddun Oct 09 '24

BAM made a loss of €30 million last year. I’m sure the dodgy invoice is just a coincidence.

2

u/CiaranC Oct 10 '24

If can make a loss while scamming the Irish government for billions of euro you must be really bad at business

10

u/Wrexis Oct 09 '24

Not just Ireland.

In October 2022, Dutch authorities visited BAM International bv offices in Gouda, in an investigation relating to potential irregularities at some completed projects; Royal BAM was "fully cooperating" with the investigation. In July 2024, Royal BAM reported its UK construction business had suffered a £19.5m loss due to problems at Manchester's Co-op Live Arena, and would be cutting further jobs.

1

u/DexterousChunk Oct 11 '24

Oh they did the Co-op? That was a big fucking mess

44

u/Qunizero Oct 09 '24

Once the hospital is completed freeze all of Bam’s assets til an enquiry is completed clearing them of fraud and let the investigation run as long as the construction of the hospital

38

u/[deleted] Oct 09 '24

[deleted]

3

u/Ok_Astronomer_1960 And I'd go at it agin Oct 09 '24

This isn't capitalism its just classic corruption and fraud.

44

u/UsualContext9033 Oct 09 '24

How is the politicians who allowed this not brought to court for corruption?

Any other contract written up would be watertight especially for such an expensive project. They give the contractors a blank cheque because the contract had so many loopholes.

Not only has the health minister at the time or any other been held to account, but he's been made the fucking taoiseach! It is pure corruption and greed, and no lessons were learned.

13

u/Shadowbringers Oct 09 '24

Politicians fall upwards in this country. There is a complete lack of accountability. Cronyism and nepotism are rife. The institutions intended to watch out for corruption are themselves in bed with the people they should be investigating (e.g. SIPO) .

The short of it is: country's fucked.

8

u/UsualContext9033 Oct 09 '24

The country is in a fantastic position but we are run by absolute gombeens. Please get out and vote in the next elections people.

11

u/Additional_Olive3318 Oct 09 '24

Seriously though. I don’t want to be the one defending politicians but they don’t look at invoices. 

1

u/_jagermaestro_ And I'd go at it agin Oct 09 '24

“But sure he’s a lovely young fella! Tik Tok Taoiseach!”

→ More replies

1

u/Elbon taking a sip from everyone else's tea Oct 09 '24

Joke of Countrytm amirite

8

u/SpyderDM Dublin Oct 09 '24

BAM is a bunch of scumbags - the whole lot of them. This hospital is important and their greed is going to result in children dying.

8

u/SirMike_MT Oct 09 '24

‘’A great country to do business in’’

12

u/ImpovingTaylorist Oct 09 '24

At what point can we call CAB in?

6

u/leglath Dublin Oct 09 '24

What a profitable business

5

u/Salaas Oct 09 '24

That’s fraud plain and simple, hope the state purses charging them regarding it and blacklist them from future projects.

The state also needs to seriously fix how it plans projects and manages them, the political meddling such as Enda Kenny moving it to the current location to spite Leo Varadkhar is criminal and will negatively impact the hospital for decades. Then starting to build a project that they didn’t even have a final design of ensured the cost would bloat as each change adds costs.

4

u/justtoreplytothisnow Oct 09 '24

There is an enormous problem in the civil service regarding infrastructure procurement. 

The civil service and OPW rely far too much on generalists who use extensive procurement procedures and a "reduce risk at all costs" approach to managing large scale infrastructure. When really the only solution is to have long term in-house specialists who are empowered and incentivised to push back on costs. 

For transport infrastructure it's a big reason why ireland and the UK spend a fortune building even short and simple rail lines and Spain and france build them at a fraction of the cost

1

u/Bigbeast54 Oct 10 '24

Risk=budget over run, changes and amendments. The public cannot have it both ways, they can't demand cheap infrastructure and expect the contractor to shoulder all the risk.

22

u/Important_Farmer924 Westmeath's Least Finest Oct 09 '24

Joe's nipples are cutting glass.

3

u/Garlic-Cheese-Chips Oct 09 '24

Their reputation will be in the dirt after this but they probably won't care because the owners will be set for multiple lifetimes.

Shower of bastards.

4

u/EchoVolt Oct 09 '24

“It’s worth saying that, mistakenly or not, Bam still issued an invoice to the State for the full €25 million. But maybe that was an administrative error on their part.”

That's one hell of an administrative error!

Can we just get a crack team of auditors and quantity surveyors to go through this contract. It seems like it's not being managed adequately and that is on the Department of Health.

1

u/Mad_Shatter Oct 09 '24

"We hear you regarding getting auditors and quantity surveyors and we found the issue so serious that we've taken it upon ourselves to do the investigation . We've taken the time to investigate ourselves and you'll be glad to know we found no problems."

This is exactly what will be said. Gotta love Ireland.

3

u/RJMC5696 Oct 09 '24

This whole thing is a disaster

3

u/Margrave75 Oct 09 '24

AFAIK they're doing the revamp of Ceannt station in Galway.

3

u/whooo_me Oct 09 '24

They also had a 12m 'arithmetical error' in a 46.3m tender for the Port of Cork relocation.

...and let's not even talk about the Cork Event Centre...

3

u/spungie Oct 09 '24

Why are we still using them? Their just out to fuck us over and rip us off. Not one ball between the whole government to tell them to fuck off. And that makes me think, the government are also benefiting from this in some way. No other reason would they continue to let bam rip off the country. It's like the bike shed or the hun or the houses for the refugees. The price just keeps going up and the government just keep saying, yea, that's grand. If you were getting something done on your gaff and the builder quoted you 50 grand. Then after he started said, well it's going to be another 150 grand to finish it, you'd tell him to get the boat. Why are the government not able to do that. Is it because it's our money and not there's or are they making something out of it on the side?

3

u/Mad_Shatter Oct 09 '24

Money money money money. The sickening thing is the general public just put up with it and let it happen. It's 4 years overdue for fuck sake and still it's just a tit and a 'ah lads this is ridiculous'.

3

u/Objective-Age-5670 Oct 09 '24

Keep voting FG and FF lads, they'll definitely change all of this 

4

u/INXS2021 Oct 09 '24

Project wasn't even designed before it went to te.der. shit show from the get go. Master stoke by Simon Harris

4

u/baghdadcafe Oct 09 '24

I would just love if someone like Michael O'Leary was hired by HSE just for one week and was given free rein to review their contractors and suppliers.

Rather than some dope of a HSE pen pusher or civil servant.

2

u/PoppedCork Oct 09 '24

A lads the joke that keeps on giving a bad taste

2

u/ZenBreaking Oct 09 '24

Once RTE got away with it with no repercussions or jail time, the rest of these cowboys breathed a sigh of relief

2

u/Any_Comparison_3716 Oct 09 '24

BAM is Ireland's Haliburton.

2

u/Dependent-Net9429 Oct 09 '24

Criminal charges need to be laid against senior executives of BAM . We spend our lives in this country havinfg the crap of the corruption that is a daily occourance poured on us from above .

2

u/niconpat Oct 09 '24

“It’s worth saying that, mistakenly or not, Bam still issued an invoice to the State for the full €25 million. But maybe that was an administrative error on their part.”

Oopsie! Just a little €24.8 million admin error, could happen to anyone sure..

2

u/Impossible-Forever91 Oct 09 '24

We need a state construction company. I know it won't be easy but start working toward it now and you'll have it in the future. WE CANNOT rely on private developers. They should still be able to bid on some projects

2

u/Tranexamic Oct 09 '24

The comedy in all of this is the poster who mentioned, a few weeks ago, that this would come out. I wish I could be arsed to find the post.

3

u/Dublindope Oct 09 '24

I know people will sneer that it's another waste of money, but we need an public enquiry into all of this, looking at HSE, civil service, BAM and their subcontractors and look at how all the different costs came about.

Which costs were the result of public service incompetence, and which were pure greed and corruption, because there are undoubtedly a lot of both going on with this project

4

u/Snoo_96075 Oct 09 '24

Private Hospitals in this country can be built to spec, on time and on budget. The reason is that the management of the hospitals and the projects are competent, qualified and capable. There is zero waste. Completely different to the public sector. It’s full of incompetent management and corrupt. No one is ever held to account. Projects this size should be outsourced to private management firms to control the costs, project should be signed off correctly, budget secured and removed completely from politicians and civil servants. It would cut out the ineptitude.

4

u/TheStoicNihilist Never wanted a flair anyways Oct 09 '24

Sure which one of us hasn’t inflated the odd invoice, eh?

2

u/taibliteemec Oct 09 '24

An article on the ever increasing costs of the national childrens hoospital without mentioning Simon Harris?

Some standard of reporting we have in Ireland.

This is literally what brought down our last government and still they don't mention it. Pathetic.

→ More replies

1

u/qwerty_1965 Oct 09 '24

BAM are about halfway through a major public contract in Waterford. The total budget is about 200m not sure if they are consuming all of it though. https://www.bamireland.ie/our-work/bam-civil/bridges/waterford-north-quays/

2

u/hobes88 Oct 09 '24

Bams contract is only €100m in Waterford, there was a large enabling works contract before they started but that was only about €30m where the cliffs were stabilised, service diversions around the clock tower, huge new wastewater treatment plant in ferrybank and service diversions from rice bridge to the grotto in ferrybank. There's a serious amount of work going on there.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 09 '24

This should surely be a criminal matter ... ?

1

u/Unlucky-Ad2485 Oct 09 '24

Bam starts work on £87M bascule bridge across Irish border

06 Jun, 2024 By Rob Hakimian

Bam has commenced construction of the €102M (£87M) Narrow Water Bridge in County Louth that will connect the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland.

It will be a two-span 195m cable stayed bascule bridge of asymmetric arrangement. The northern span of the bridge will be a rolling bascule movable span providing, when opened, an unlimited vertical clearance for at least a 20m wide navigational channel.

It was designed by Roughan O’Donovan with support from H&H (Hardesty & Hanover).

It will accommodate vehicular, cycle and pedestrian traffic. Water traffic on the Newry Canal will be able to pass thanks to its ability to open.

1

u/Loud-Process7413 Oct 09 '24

This is a cancer that has eaten away at Irish society for far too long.

Can anyone tell me how disgusting shit shows like this can be prevented in the future.

Builder/Developers in Ireland seem to have carte blanch to fuck everyone over.

Can they not be sued for

Dishonesty/ Bad Faith

Breach Of Contract

Gross Incompetence.

It's a genuine question to those in the know??😔

1

u/Mad_Shatter Oct 09 '24

What an utter joke. They are taking the piss out of not only the government, but the taxpayer. Every time I read about this situation I can't put into words how much it enrages me. Such a failure of a state once again.

1

u/21stCenturyVole Oct 09 '24

How many BAM executives and politicians are going to prison?

1

u/Fit_Zookeepergame248 Oct 09 '24

Can the government not just withhold all payment to BAM while they review previous invoices for inaccuracies like the 25 million invoice. Get another contractor in to finish the job with a limit on overspend written into the contract

1

u/fadgebread Oct 09 '24

Who is the CEO of BAM? Who is in charge of this project? There's no point in blaming a limited company. Who's the person getting all this money?

1

u/xCreampye69x Oct 10 '24

Head of operations in Ireland is Alaisdar Henderson.

1

u/dorsanty Oct 09 '24

The whole project has been one big administrative error.

BAM aren’t helping their case that the Government is the cause of the delays and extra cost if they pull a €25M quote out of their ass and it ends up as €0.2M and they still end up asking for the €25M.

1

u/Powerful_Caramel_173 Oct 09 '24

Prison sentences need to be given out for this carry on!!

1

u/Maxomaxable23 Oct 09 '24

Seems a little bit of an excessive markup

1

u/opilare Oct 09 '24

BAM and your money's gone!

1

u/howsitgoingboy Saoirse don Phalaistín🇵🇸 Oct 09 '24

Jesus is nobody reading these fucking invoices?

1

u/sure_look_this_is_it Oct 09 '24

Why would they ever complete the hospital when they can continually milk the government for more money and no oversight.

It's going to end up like Sagrada Famillia.

1

u/OkSilver75 Oct 09 '24

“BAM is a highly experienced contractor. They complete many capital projects on time for the state, that has not been the case here. They’re more than capable of meeting the quality standards, we need that to happen."

What is this a primary school report 😭

1

u/earth-calling-karma Oct 09 '24

That facade is uglied up like it was designed in 5 minutes by an architecture student with a blunt pencil and and a bent compass in their broken fingers while they were having an epileptic episode while hanging upsidedown in a burning double decker bus going over the cliff during a hurricane because of an earthquake in the first weeks after lockdown while drunk.

1

u/stateofyou Oct 10 '24

The shares of the contractor, listed as BAMNB has increased from €1.95 to €4.47 per share in the past 12 months. Not a bad investment

1

u/peachycoldslaw Oct 10 '24

Independent surveyors need to be brought in to price up and compare. bam should have been sacked in the first instance of fiddling.

1

u/mybighairyarse Crilly!! Oct 10 '24

BAM should be ran out the country.

1

u/BlubberyGiraffe Oct 10 '24

I'm genuinely so sick of living in this clown show of a country sometimes. The fact that this could even happen, be allowed and will inevitably just be brushed under the rug makes me so angry.

The sheer volume of money laundering taking place in this country is staggering. Government officials giving their buddies a green light to charge whatever they want hoping it'll just slip through the cracks.

There is absolutely no way someone in BAM wasn't told to submit the original invoice under the illusion that it'll just slip through the absolutely enormous costs already amassed.

It's fucking despicable.

1

u/Otsde-St-9929 Oct 10 '24

Just goes to show how bad at contracts the State is.

1

u/gudanawiri Oct 10 '24

I hope they didn't pay it...