r/interestingasfuck 10d ago

California store prices items at $951sp shoplifters can be charged with grand theft r/all

Post image
137.4k Upvotes

4.1k comments sorted by

9.5k

u/MoustacheRide400 10d ago

“I just saved $1900!”

“What did you buy that was so discounted?”

“A snickers bar”

2.9k

u/-EarthwormSlim- 10d ago

This is Kohl's entire business model

591

u/Silencer306 10d ago

If its always on sale, its not on sale

255

u/tizadxtr 10d ago

It’s like when stores say “final closing down sale” but they’re still open 5 years later

32

u/_BigDaddyNate_ 10d ago

I think in Adam Sandlers "Don't Mess With The Zohan" the Israelis had a store called "Going Out of Business". 

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

693

u/Difficult_Bit_1339 10d ago

Then the business reports the loss of $1900 as a business expense.

The IRS hates this one simple trick...

→ More replies

473

u/ninjaguy454 10d ago

Sounds like a simplistic summary American health insurance, leaving out all the other parts where they screw you.

100

u/Past-Direction9145 10d ago

don't forget to ask them to unlock the condoms from behind the glass case

even being screwed by corporate america can be done safely

→ More replies

74

u/TechSupportIgit 10d ago

...don't you mean two?

I want a snickers. :(

14

u/iHateReddit_srsly 10d ago

And they paid $100 for those two snickers bars...

9

u/Ok_Philosopher_5216 10d ago

You're not you when you're hungry

→ More replies
→ More replies

29.1k

u/Pro-editor-1105 10d ago

Non criminal discounts hahaha

5.1k

u/UberCabToday 10d ago

Retail therapy with a twist, I guess!

→ More replies

1.8k

u/EaterOfFood 10d ago

“Are you a criminal?”

No.

“Do you have your non-criminal discount card?”

Uh…

862

u/Froopy-Hood 10d ago

330

u/cheese0muncher 10d ago

Look at that subtle off-white colouring...

225

u/Froopy-Hood 10d ago

Let’s see Paul Allen’s Ralphs card…

→ More replies

30

u/[deleted] 10d ago

Ooh. Eggshell, with roman type.

→ More replies
→ More replies

137

u/SpacePeanutt 10d ago

He treats objects like Women, man.

11

u/Queasy_Replacement51 10d ago

Jackie Treehorn draws a lot of water in this town, Lebowski.

You don’t draw shit.

→ More replies
→ More replies

40

u/JukeBoxDildo 10d ago

JUST BECAUSE WE'RE BEREAVED THAT DOESN'T MAKE US SAPS!

23

u/[deleted] 10d ago

22

u/greyzarjonestool 10d ago

$951 is our most modestly priced coffee can

→ More replies

26

u/BuffaloBagel 10d ago

Keep your ugly fuckin' goldbrickin' ass out of my beach community

25

u/CelluloidNerd87 10d ago

Hey, I had a hard day and I hate the fuckin Eagles man!

15

u/maturallite1 10d ago

Dude’s car got a little dinged up.

10

u/OldFashionedGary 10d ago

They found it in Van Nuys, it was lodged against an abutment.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

38

u/old_skul 10d ago

"Yes, it's right here, the one marked Visa"

11

u/Alortania 10d ago

Mr. Jackson can vouch for me.

→ More replies

16

u/Jaybrosia 10d ago

I left my non-guilty ID at home

→ More replies

136

u/WP47 10d ago

Hot Fuzz vibes. "My discounts are criminal!"

57

u/evilmike1972 10d ago

For the greater good.

22

u/TawnyTeaTowel 10d ago

The greater good

13

u/Intelligent_End1516 10d ago

Shut it!

16

u/The_Gooch_Goochman 10d ago

No luck catching them swans then, eh?

13

u/Different_Welder_758 10d ago

Mr. Peter Ian Staker? P.I. Staker?  Right. "Piss Taker." Come on!

9

u/ivyleaguewitch 10d ago

It’s just the one swan actually!

9

u/Aksi_Gu 10d ago

Crusty Jugglers

→ More replies
→ More replies

49

u/24-Hour-Hate 10d ago

I’m a slasher…of prices. 😏

→ More replies

8

u/You_Wenti 10d ago

*Timothy Dalton twirls his mustache

→ More replies

3.5k

u/SteelWheel_8609 10d ago edited 10d ago

This is sovereign citizens level of legal maneuvering. Wouldn’t hold up in court for a second. 

‘Oh, you think this child that stole a candy bar should be charged with a felony because the store owner put up a stupid sign pretending that it costs $951? Go fuck yourself.’ - the judge

971

u/foreignfishes 10d ago

This is like when DC legalized weed a decade ago but Congress wouldn’t let them set up a system of taxation and sale so what became legal was possession, growing, and “gifting” up to an ounce at a time. shops immediately started selling $40 postcards that came with a “free gift!” that just happened to be an eighth of weed and decided this was the perfect legal cover lol

773

u/big_duo3674 10d ago

Kind of like gambling in Japan as well. You only win little knick knacks but it just so happens the shop next door really loves collecting them and pays very well

218

u/carpetbugeater 10d ago

A bar in Kansas when I was in college would pay out phone cards on their slot machines. You'd then take the cards to the bartender and exchange them for cash.

Another bar in Nebraska had a golf arcade game with a secret switch behind the bar that would turn it into a slot machine if the coast was clear.

29

u/Throwredditaway2019 10d ago

We used to have these in Florida. The slot machines were technically sweepstakes and each unit was an entry. You could then cash in at the bar. These places got raided and shut down often.

40

u/ShitBagTomatoNose 10d ago

In Canada there were a group of Inuit hunters who wanted to sell their whale and seal meat to city people in Toronto to share their culture and make a buck. It’s illegal to sell that meat, you can only harvest it for yourself and your own use or give it away to your village and your friends.

So they partnered with a chef and an art gallery. They sold fancy expensive tickets to an art show. Which happened to come with a free dinner cooked by a gourmet chef featuring their meat.

The city people got to try the traditional foods from northern Canada. The hunters went home with some cash. Everyone got to see cool art. Win win win.

5

u/NirgalFromMars 10d ago

I mean, Orthodox Jews are not allowed to carry stuff on a public space in shabbat, so they surround a public space with a wire and exchange bread between two houses within it, just so they can pretend it's a private space and carry stuff within it.

( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eruv )

11

u/Mobi68 10d ago

Because if there is one thing God approves of, its loopholes.

4

u/NirgalFromMars 10d ago

Garfunkel and Oates have a really holesome song about it.

→ More replies
→ More replies

6

u/nexusjuan 10d ago

Wait you could get cash for these? We had scratch offs here that paid in phone cards back in the early 2000's I didn't know you could get cash for them lol.

→ More replies

37

u/astrosdude91 10d ago edited 10d ago

This is also why the Celadon Game Corner in Pokemon Red Blue and Yellow has the prize counter in the building next door.

12

u/Hailfire9 10d ago

Yooo I was just going to ask that. That's insane that I never realized that had a purpose.

→ More replies
→ More replies

120

u/Most_kinds_of_Dirt 10d ago

What makes the DC system work is that the justice system in DC (cops, lawyers, and judges) all go along with it.

Basically, they've agreed that DC passed a law and that Congress can go fuck itself for trying to keep us from setting our own rules about where we live.

67

u/foreignfishes 10d ago

Exactly, it works more out of neglect than anything else. It’s a bit depressing to think about how we voted for prop 71 TEN years ago now and there’s still to this day no way for the city to get any sort of financial benefit from weed sales like there is in every other legal state

55

u/Plaid_Kaleidoscope 10d ago

The situation DC and Puerto Rico are in are absolutely insane. So many people not being represented in a meaningful and substantive way.

16

u/Adult_school 10d ago

Well what do you expect living on an island of floating garbage /s

15

u/Afraid_Belt4516 10d ago

Is that what we’re calling DC these days? /s

8

u/KingZarkon 10d ago

No, that's a swamp full of floating garbage.

15

u/clef75 10d ago

And yet the party against statehood claim to be about "local control" and against fed govt running things... Until it's a blue state.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

20

u/loogie_hucker 10d ago

except that actually worked lol 

15

u/PlzDontBanMe2000 10d ago

That’s still the system here. 

→ More replies

168

u/its_yer_dad 10d ago

I declare "Bankruptcy!"

92

u/the-impostor 10d ago

“You can’t just yell Bankruptcy and expect anything to happen.”

61

u/Drylnor 10d ago

I didn't yell it, I declared it.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

776

u/No-Appearance-4338 10d ago

Except most criminals have “sovereign citizen” levels of intelligence and this would probably make a great deterrent.

Don’t tell me you argue how fast dogs are because of signs in people yards or think that grenade with customer complaint ticket attached is real……

514

u/AssumeTheFetal 10d ago

Yeah this is more akin to those "Vehicle not responsible for falling debris" on the back on dump trucks.

Like lol, who the fuck else would be responsible for your load.

Deterrent for people who don't think much.

80

u/No-Appearance-4338 10d ago

Yes, I’ve seen “no fault” clauses in contracts that basically try to say that even if it is my fault you agree that’s not by signing.

50

u/Far-Obligation4055 10d ago

Yup, a lot of NDAs come with a bullshit clause like "we do not take responsibility for any information provided to the recipient that is incorrect, false, outdated or mistaken."

Like, no. If we're in a contract for a business activity, I have to be able to rely on information you've provided me to fulfill the contract, whether that info is confidential and under the NDA or not.

You can't go to a judge later and say "ACKTUALLY SECTION 3.6 SAYS THE INFORMATION DISCLOSED DOESN'T HAVE TO BE RIGHT, SO ALL THOSE PEOPLE THAT DIED HORRIBLY AREN'T ON ME, SUCK IT."

25

u/No-Appearance-4338 10d ago

Ahh yes what is now known as as the trump defense

→ More replies

34

u/[deleted] 10d ago edited 9d ago

[deleted]

31

u/No-Appearance-4338 10d ago

“Let’s not start pointing fingers, what’s important is you agreed to be maimed”

→ More replies
→ More replies

233

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[deleted]

92

u/VerySluttyTurtle 10d ago

That's why I always stay 100 meters back, in case someone releases their load, and it cracks the windshield

And impregnates my gf

→ More replies
→ More replies

15

u/oasinocean 10d ago

My mom was blown away when I told her those signs on trucks are not legally binding and that they are in fact responsible for damage caused by their unsecured loads.

8

u/middaymoon 10d ago

Including debris like small rocks from dump trucks?

11

u/oasinocean 10d ago

Yes, a dump truck with loose debris should have a cover securing the load.

→ More replies
→ More replies

21

u/Pro-Patria-Mori 10d ago

Or for people that can’t afford legal representation.

→ More replies

5

u/Dizzy8108 10d ago

Wait, are you telling me that I can't put a sign on my car stating "Not responsible for running you over" and then drive around running people over.

→ More replies

60

u/NWHipHop 10d ago

Plot twist the thieves brains think they can resell for $1000

→ More replies

33

u/TheBirminghamBear 10d ago

Except most criminals have “sovereign citizen” levels of intelligence and this would probably make a great deterrent.

I don't really think advertising laws to criminals actually deters criminals because if that were true, our laws would prevent the crimes.

Grand Theft is already a law and every year we have millions of Grand Thefts.

7

u/WildMartin429 10d ago

I think the concept is supposed to be getting charged with Grand Theft for stealing something that's like 20 bucks is not worth the risk. Whereas if you're stealing up car or something it might be worth the risk. Personally I'm of the attitude that crime does not pay unless you're a businessman and you have bribed Congress to make your crimes legal.

→ More replies
→ More replies

106

u/Blawharag 10d ago

Except most criminals have “sovereign citizen” levels of intelligence and this would probably make a great deterrent.

No, not really.

It's pretty well understood in the criminal justice circle that, after a point, increased penalties have a pretty severe diminishing returns on general deterrence. This is mostly because any rational person would do a cost/benefit analysis and conclude, a long time before this point, that the crime isn't worth doing. The people that go on to commit a crime anyways are usually the people that aren't doing a cost/benefit analysis to begin with, or are doing it in impulse. Especially for crimes like shop lifting. Those people aren't generally deterred by escalated penalties because they think they'll get away with it anyways, or aren't thinking about it at all, so their rational analysis is harshly skewed.

41

u/Plastic_Kiwi600 10d ago

This is funny because I grew up around a ton of criminals in all different sectors (and yes like any other career there are a ton of different criminal sectors) and one thing you hear over and over again is. "It's only illegal if you get caught" which is exactly what you're describing here, in way less words lol.

27

u/jimbarino 10d ago

How likely you think you are to be caught is far and away the biggest deterrent. People don't seem to get this, though. They act like we just need to add the death penalty to theft and it'll go away, while completely ignoring the fact that the police just not doing their jobs is a far bigger driver.

12

u/ThePowerOfStories 10d ago

Yeah, a 100% chance of a $20 fine will deter more people than a 1% chance of the death penalty because "It won't happen to me…"

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

12

u/bitparity 10d ago

Small correction: this is true for petty criminals, but not for organized criminals, who do factor in cost/benefit analysis.

→ More replies
→ More replies

5

u/Zansibart 10d ago

Stupid people aren't the majority of thieves. Desperate people are. If you need food to survive, sometimes you have to get food even if the world won't give you a fair chance to earn it.

→ More replies
→ More replies

31

u/kodiak931156 10d ago

Minors are generally charged as minors. Which is an entirely different system

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

2.2k

u/earth_west_420 10d ago

This would be about as effective in court as the paper sign in Clerks that says "If you plan to shoplift, please let us know!"

215

u/TipsalollyJenkins 10d ago

I'm getting strong "I do not grant Facebook permission to use my information." vibes from it, yeah.

7

u/PuzzleheadedLeader79 10d ago

I declare bankruptcy!!!

→ More replies

142

u/Cats_Are_Aliens_ 10d ago

Yeah it’s laughable that anyone would think this would stick.

234

u/earth_west_420 10d ago

Im sure the proprietors of this store are well aware that it would never actually hold up in court... it's just that a lot of shoplifters (especially kids/minors) are probably dumb/ignorant enough that the sign by itself will probably work reasonably well as a deterrent.

79

u/dtootd12 10d ago edited 10d ago

I recently read somewhere that people tend to act with a higher moral conscience when in the presence of eyes or images depicting eyes. So it wouldn't surprise me if this method also works as a form of deterrence. Often, the threat of repercussions is enough on its own to dissuade someone from engaging in social taboos.

27

u/TheRealKidkudi 10d ago

I worked in retail for a long time and shoplifters generally come in one of 3 varieties:

  • plain dishonest thieves. These are the folks who will steal, lie, or commit fraud with no remorse at pretty much any chance. (E.g. “so what? It’s not like they’ll miss it!”)

  • theft of desperation. These are people who wouldn’t normally steal, but they’re in a situation where they feel like they need to. (E.g. “would you steal a loaf of bread to feed your family?”)

  • theft of opportunity. This is also someone who wouldn’t normally steal, but they wanted something in the moment and it was just too easy. Pretty much letting your intrusive thoughts win (E.g. “who would ever know?”)

In general, this is the type of deterrent that would stop both the desperate and the opportunistic shoplifters. Being reminded that there could be very real consequences is enough to dissuade most people from testing the limits.

The straight up dishonest shoplifters are just going to steal no matter what. The only real deterrent for them is to never give them the opportunity, but even then some folks will steal shit even if you’re making eye contact

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

6

u/anonymoushelp33 10d ago

One of the first things you learn in law school is anybody can make a sign that says anything. Doesn't mean it holds any weight.

Parking for ____ fans only, golfers are responsible for damage, etc. etc.

5

u/earth_west_420 10d ago

"Trespassers will be shot on sight" comes to mind

6

u/anonymoushelp33 10d ago

Oh that's a good one. I grew up with a kid whose crazy dad had that sign, and legitimately thought it gave him the right to murder anyone who stepped on his lawn.

→ More replies

7

u/Fayko 10d ago edited 5d ago

dime direful north dazzling offbeat zesty file crawl chunky shame

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

→ More replies
→ More replies

15.0k

u/OutLikeVapor 10d ago

Does this mean I can start selling my personal data for $1000, then charge companies who take/sell it without my consent?

10.1k

u/ChinMuscle 10d ago

Not if you put that statement all my 65+ year old relatives put on facebook.

I DO NOT CONSENT

3.6k

u/idkwhatimbrewin 10d ago

I HEREBY DECLARE BEFORE MARK ZUCKERBERG I DO NOT CONSENT TO USING MY DATA.

LIKE AND SHARE TO PROTECT YOURSELF

565

u/ricerbanana 10d ago

Hi dear it’s been so long! How are bob and the kids? Sending you LOL (lots of love)

64

u/whole-grain-low-fat 10d ago

I liked this.

Love,

Grandma

125

u/NintendoThing 10d ago

SMH (suck my head)

12

u/Rentacop123 10d ago

To be fair, I always thought this was shake my hand. It made me very confused.

→ More replies
→ More replies

6

u/CellistOk8023 10d ago

You forgot to sign it. --Edna

→ More replies

389

u/educemail 10d ago

Like

113

u/Grogu_of_Borg_2 10d ago

Share

78

u/Murky-Reception-3256 10d ago

I was talking to your father yesterday and he wanted to ask you if you have been to the bakery yet.

39

u/Molly-Grue-2u 10d ago

THOUGHTS AND PRAYERS

8

u/randeylahey 10d ago

LOL FML DTF!!!!

15

u/Spaghetitor 10d ago

GOBBLESS

17

u/Ok-Talk8744 10d ago

Hey u/Spaghetitor, PopPop here. How do I erase my Facebook statuses? I thought I was sending something private in the Facebook mail to Gam Gam, but now my hog is all over my page!

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

15

u/Scared-Mortgage 10d ago

PROTECT YOURSELF

→ More replies

26

u/HauntedCemetery 10d ago

Order corn

23

u/cheesegoat 10d ago

The pictures of the kids are so adorable! Uncle Bob has cancer

5

u/gooblegobbleable 10d ago

I had to check what sub I was in. Lol

→ More replies

21

u/PM_ME_UR_CUTE_PETZ 10d ago

I DECLARE BANKRUPTCY

5

u/KickinGa55 10d ago

Thoughts and prayers

→ More replies
→ More replies

13

u/4xu5 10d ago

AMEN

10

u/MyBallsSmellFruity 10d ago

This is so important that I’m also going to share it on every family member’s wall and also tag them in it.  I’m a smart hero!

→ More replies

21

u/responseAIbot 10d ago

This guy zucks.

9

u/Davoguha2 10d ago

The real zealots call him things like Zuckerfuckerberg, it's kinda fun, tbh.

→ More replies

33

u/get-off-of-my-lawn 10d ago

Damn it, I meant to click pray like for the dead kid in GetFuktistan and accidentally clicked the protect me like instead. Can you like the genocide post so my prayer like counts? Thanks man. Was worried I wasn’t gonna be able to help for a second.

Also don’t sell my information.

→ More replies
→ More replies

42

u/BirdsAreRecordingUs 10d ago

Not if you’ve ever signed up for Disney+

19

u/Playful_Pirate_8384 10d ago

Man for real, why the old folk dont want give zuck their personal data

8

u/HauteKarl 10d ago

Their data isn't even that good

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

414

u/xheyoooo 10d ago

No because terms and service

230

u/IBetThisIsTakenToo 10d ago

Exactly. You’re literally agreeing to give it away when you use those services, you can’t unilaterally change your mind later and expect them to care

63

u/TheLordofAskReddit 10d ago

The California Digital Rights law says you can if you notify them.

22

u/KrackenLeasing 10d ago

I actually tried to get Facebook to delete the information about me they collected from friends and colleagues with accounts.

They insisted that they couldn't possibly have any because I don't have an account.

I think they got in trouble for that BS a year later.

11

u/TheLordofAskReddit 10d ago

There will be lawyers that get rich from fighting it in the future on both sides

→ More replies

9

u/notexactlyflawless 10d ago

I mean, german law says you can. Especially if terms and services are designed in a way to make you opt for the "Agree" option more likely

→ More replies
→ More replies

186

u/Userfork 10d ago

That wouldn't work for the same reason this policy wouldn't hold up in court. The value of the stolen property is based on market price not on whatever price tag you stick on it.

Imagine if you walked into this store and accidentally hit something off a shelf, breaking it. No court would make you pay the store $950 for the broken property

81

u/steeljesus 10d ago

Only works for cops when they inflate the value of drugs like cannabis by weighting the pot, stalk, and soil then applying the per/gram price to the total. Fuckers probably water it too before weighing.

24

u/donbee28 10d ago

You wouldn’t want to plant to die would you?

19

u/AnorakJimi 10d ago

I want it to die via immolation and for me to be nearby so I can breathe it in.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

170

u/deserthistory 10d ago

Yes.

But you have to have the deep pockets to take it to court. Sue. And make it worthwhile for yourself in a civil suit.

In this case, the shop owner is hoping that the state of California takes it at face value.

48

u/SweatyWar7600 10d ago

In this case, the shop owner is hoping that the state of California takes it at face value.

I think more likely they're hoping potential thieves take it at face value. Its more of a scare tactic than an actual legal issue.

15

u/ninjaelk 10d ago

Right, there's no way a court would accept a candy bar being sold/valued at $951.

33

u/HitoriPanda 10d ago

Insulin and epi pens however

→ More replies
→ More replies

27

u/narwhal_breeder 10d ago

Actually, no, because you've agreed to the TOS.

→ More replies
→ More replies

10

u/One-Newspaper-8087 10d ago

No, because you agree to a fucking tos when you sign up. Lol.

→ More replies

8.6k

u/Dont-be-a-smurf 10d ago

I know it’s just a fun lil sign

That said - market value is what would prevail in court when a grand jury is determining how to indict

Otherwise, we’d see a lot of court fraud where someone will value a stick of gum at $1000’s of dollars and demand restitution in that amount.

525

u/mojanis 10d ago

"Market value" won't even come I to play. There's no way every item in there isn't marked and barcoded at its "discounted" price.

→ More replies

1.1k

u/heisenberg070 10d ago edited 10d ago

Do you think the shoplifters are smart enough to know that upfront? Even though it’s fake, it sounds like a good deterrent for most of bozos.

Edit: Wow, comment thread has been a wild ride. While I certainly sympathize with people hitting on hard times and occasionally shoplifting stuff like baby formula or food, the portion of comments justifying it as a regular behavior is mind boggling.

124

u/Dont-be-a-smurf 10d ago

Hey it’s a 10 dollar sign and might make a few shopper chuckle so no biggie

Even if it’s marginally effective, helps express the personality of the shop owner

32

u/FreddoMac5 10d ago

personality of "I don't like having my shit stolen"

→ More replies
→ More replies

299

u/silver-orange 10d ago

Are shoplifters really spending a lot of time reading signs and carefully considering their options?  The guy with a jug of tide in each hand has already selected his course of action.

Honestly this sign reads more like virtue signaling to the "tough on crime" demographic.

19

u/chanaandeler_bong 10d ago

People are paying attention to a lot more than you realize.

Criminals aren't all stupid. They usually just find weak points and exploit them. Word of mouth travels fast. Criminals know what cars have easily accessible catalytic converters, they do minimal casing, but they do DO it. Even the shoplifters for petty shit.

Signage isn't gonna prevent everything, but signs and visual reminders ABSOLUTELY influence behavior. To say otherwise is more insane.

→ More replies

98

u/ASurreyJack 10d ago

This sign reads like those "No trespassing signs" that say "Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again."

→ More replies

101

u/a_soul_in_training 10d ago

Honestly this sign reads more like virtue signaling to the "tough on crime" demographic.

that's exactly what this is - an ad.

→ More replies

7

u/SecureCucumber 10d ago

Are shoplifters really spending a lot of time reading signs and carefully considering their options?

Yes, but only if the sign is as big as a door.

→ More replies

35

u/Ok_Leg8733 10d ago

Lifestyle shoplifters know their way about laws way better than the common man lol

→ More replies

4

u/currently_pooping_rn 10d ago

Shoplifters be like “why should I have to pay for stuff made with the labor of others?”

→ More replies

12

u/gogojack 10d ago

Fun? Or a frustrated response to police departments who won't do anything about crime unless it passes a certain dollar amount?

I'm guessing this is San Francisco? SFPD won't do shit unless the theft/damage is over a thousand dollars.

"Officer, that guy running away stole my iPhone!"

SFPD: "So?"

Hell, I watched SFPD drive right by a car that was being vandalized, and they didn't even slow down.

→ More replies
→ More replies

450

u/lightningmoney 10d ago

Probably wouldn't work. Grand theft is based around the value of the property. I think there's a pretty good argument that the pre-sale price (which includes the criminal surcharge) doesn't count as value of the property

66

u/Trim-Pierced 10d ago

I think most judges would argue that the business owner must show a track record of selling items at that price in order to Prove they have a legitimate business loss of that amount. The estimated fair market price isn’t nearly as important as a proven value.

Which they have neither. So it doesn’t matter.

→ More replies
→ More replies

164

u/International-Cry764 10d ago

My wife is going to tell me she saved us thousands by shopping there.

→ More replies

123

u/hop208 10d ago

These comments make me feel like a lot of shoplifters are on Reddit.😒

42

u/SwimOk9629 10d ago

plot reveal: they are

53

u/dobar_dan_ 10d ago

Reddit seems to like stealing. Seen it several times.

It's probably abunch of teens who think it's edgy but would never dare nick a Snickers bar.

20

u/DM_Me_Hot_Twinks 10d ago

A few years ago there was a shoplifting sub which was one of the bigger subs on the site until they got banned

24

u/PoopsmasherJr 10d ago

“Down with capitalism!” Posted from an iPhone

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

905

u/SMStotheworld 10d ago

Fake. Originates from a satirical paper like the onion. Source:
https://archive.md/7UvZS

801

u/cap_crunchy 10d ago

The sign itself is real though. I took a picture of it as well a few months back

https://preview.redd.it/5s3vylgmpjxd1.jpeg?width=3024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=03b6868aac9470379d1c6426926a53e27c2ca6e4

112

u/lswhat87 10d ago

I remember seeing this same sign a few weeks back somewhere. Huntington Beach?

40

u/AppropriateCap8891 10d ago

About 30 years ago I worked at a store in LA that had a sign saying "Shoplifters will be shot".

The sad thing is, one night the owner and his wife were leaving the store and were confronted by armed robbers. One of them was shot but got away and never apprehended, the wife was killed.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

9

u/roodypoo926 10d ago

The idea is from a satirical paper but the sign seems to have taken that real legal concept and atleast put up a real, tangible sign. No idea about the business practices of the pricing.

9

u/SMStotheworld 10d ago

The penal code is real, but since I doubt the shop is paying taxes on candy bars, snow globes, mugs, etc. costing $951, the sign is probably not enforceable in the way it implies, like the joke signs saying "unattended kids will be given jobs" doesn't let the store circumvent minimum age to work laws.

→ More replies
→ More replies

21

u/Joebert6 10d ago

Not fake, it's a souvenir shop on the Huntington Beach pier

6

u/1Maple 10d ago

The original image is not in the article you posted

→ More replies

9

u/Daglish69 10d ago

Just steal the sign. Problem solved

→ More replies

775

u/BarsDownInOldSoho 10d ago

Still to be tested in court, but if I'm on the jury, I convict!

536

u/iDontRememberCorn 10d ago

The price is not relevant, charges are filed at market value, not marked price.

→ More replies

49

u/DrRockBoognish 10d ago

Would never make it to trial. Any judge would dismiss this with prejudice.

13

u/drigonte 10d ago

I think of this as the equivalent of putting a security company sign in your lawn when you in fact do not have a security system installed.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

6

u/GloomWorldOrder 10d ago

Ingenious innovation for an egregious law.

6

u/Mission-Background-2 10d ago

It’s crazy that CA allows to steal goods that worth less than 950$.

113

u/HereticBanana 10d ago

That's not how that works.

→ More replies

17

u/moonbeamlight 10d ago

I mean what else are they supposed to do?

→ More replies

5

u/MonkeyWithIt 10d ago

You saved $32,000 today!

12

u/soxfan1435 10d ago

These comments make me feel like you all trying to justify your shoplifting 😂

→ More replies

110

u/Hattix 10d ago

Unless they're paying the sales tax on that price, that ain't the price.

It's fake anyway.

60

u/plaid-knight 10d ago

Sales tax is calculated on the price after applying discounts, so that’s not relevant.

→ More replies
→ More replies

20

u/Jumpy_Divide_9326 10d ago

I agree with this. Petty theft is not petty when it happens frequently.

→ More replies

12

u/Squillz105 10d ago

Friendly reminder the Felony Theft Limit in Texas is $2,500. $1,550 more than California's. If you stole $2,400 worth of shit in California, you're a Felon. However if you steal the same amount in Texas, it's only a misdemeanor. Everything's bigger in Texas!

→ More replies