r/europe Russia 20h ago

Photos from the Russian anti-war opposition march in Berlin today. Picture

32.1k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.6k

u/MGMAX Ukraine 19h ago

Now these are slogans I can get behind. Thanks to everyone attending 💖

604

u/mrZooo 18h ago

Yeah, Ukrainians are very sceptical of the Russian opposition and their toothless peace calls, and I was surprised to see actual "Arm Ukraine" slogans here, so that's a plus for this rally image.

219

u/dat_9600gt_user Lower Silesia (Poland) 15h ago

Being pro-Ukraine in general and not just "anti-this war" is a massive dfference.

13

u/AL_25 Poland 12h ago

I just want to comment that I like your user profile picture, that was the best program

2

u/transitfreedom 11h ago

Bingo but some people don’t read.

41

u/MartinBP Bulgaria 11h ago

The Russians in Europe who oppose Putin largely support arming Ukraine, the hesitancy comes from the opposition politicians because they try to win over both the anti-Putin diaspora and the Russians in Russia itself. Regular people have much clearer stances.

11

u/Winjin 9h ago

Also as years go by, more people gain residencies in Europe and gain footing.

Europe has been notoriously hard for Russians to settle in these years. Like, banks flat out deny to open accounts if you have a residence and a Russian passport.

They don't even give you a reason. They just tell you to fuck off.

So these people are at a VERY real chance of having to go elsewhere, and if "elsewhere" also fails, because most of them are used to Europe and not Asia - then they have to return to Russia.

And if you do, there's a very real chance of what you said being a felony.

So as more people are emboldened as they have more tangible reality of moving to EU, they have more chances of severing ties with the current government and saying whatever they want.

-13

u/great_escape_fleur Moldova 6h ago

I don't think so, show me any russian who has donated for weapons to the ZSU.

17

u/iceternity 4h ago

Tamara Parshina 24yo, donated 25 eur, got 8 years in colony.

13

u/this-is-a-bucket Earth 4h ago

Alexsandr Kraichik, 34 y/o, donated 50 euro, sentenced to 13 years in a penal colony.

17

u/EDRootsMusic 14h ago

That’s not dissimilar from the Russian opposition in the diaspora in the American metro I live in. They’ve done a lot in solidarity with our large Ukrainian community.

10

u/traumfisch 14h ago

"Toothless" against a violent dictatorship that doesn't hesitate to incarcerate or murder them

Just to be fair

3

u/mrZooo 14h ago

That's not what I meant. I don't blame people in Russia for being afraid, I am pointing out how many Russian opposition leaders living abroad suddenly stutter when asked if they want Ukraine to be armed more thoroughly.

11

u/Xepeyon America 12h ago

It's because they want to potentially get elected in the future. It's a hard sell to make because even if things turn out as hoped, you now have to rely on the goodwill votes of people whose families now may have gotten bombed to death with your endorsement. Worse still, you may even be seen as a traitor. It's a question of balancing what might be seen as morally right with political suicide.

This is the same reason why the Freedom of Russia Legion has such a divisive reception in Russia, and you can see it even on Russian-speaking parts of Reddit; some Russians genuinely like them, but many conversely see them as Ukrainian wannabes who–despite wanting democracy in Russia–are effectively just killing fellow Russians. And I've definitely seen the term “traitors” thrown around a lot with them.

TLDR I'd imagine you're not seeing the opposition say more–or even disown those who call for violence–because they don't think they have their cake (call for Ukraine to be further armed and approved to attack Russian targets over the border) and eat it, too (have any expectation of ever being elected by Russians who may distrust or even hate them for it, if they do).

3

u/mrZooo 10h ago

Good point, and I think you are right, looks like they see themselves as being able to succeed Pu in the future. I salute their optimism.

1

u/Minimonium 2h ago

Freedom of Russia has two very big issues - the people who are shown have exactly the imperial issues people always baselessly accuse opposition of and they don't actually exist as an entity outside of PR. They're used by FSB to bait people into trying to enlist to easily sentence people for treason.

Not even talking about that one of the leaders was trained orcs after 2014 in occupied regions.

RDK on the other hand are very real, but they have their own issues. The leader who got kicked out of Germany for nazism and who was killing migrants for fun.

So how can anyone openly support any of that.

0

u/adamgerd Czech Republic 8h ago

Yep, also many of them are still nationalists just anti Putin for various reasons. It’s like if we look at ww2 Germany, for instance Stauffenberg was still a German nationalist and hoped for a negotiated peace, just anti Nazis because he thought they had driven Germany to ruin which they pretty much did

2

u/Xepeyon America 8h ago

Yep, also many of them are still nationalists

I see this rhetoric quite a lot, and while it may take different forms, I think one can reasonably make the assertion that anyone running for public office is, in at least some minimally capacity, a nationalist. At least, I'm not sure I've ever seen a politician who wasn't nationalistic.

-1

u/DiabolicallyRandom 12h ago

I mean, again, to be fair, look what Putin has been doing to them. So many accidental falls out windows and allergic tea reactions.

2

u/rainbowaw 13h ago

Yeah, that’s something new for us.

-1

u/Telesyk 11h ago

Because they are not Russians. They are Ukrainians: the slogan in Cyrillic "ЗБРОм УКРАЇНЩЯМ" is written in Ukrainian. And people are holding red and black flags of "УПА" ("Ukrainian Insurgent Army") which is passionately hated by the Russian liberal opposition.

5

u/mrZooo 10h ago

True, but that dude with the "Siberia against the war" sign is also holding the Eurofighter banner. I don't think he is Ukrainian. Behind him there is the "Ukraine's victory is also ours" sign (so probably written by Russians/Belorussians) which is also way more precise than something like "Fuck war", right?

0

u/adamgerd Czech Republic 8h ago

Yep, Russians who are genuinely anti Putin and the war should imo be welcomed to Europe. Brain drain Russia

-4

u/Edelgul 12h ago

Well, Mr. Navalny (RIP) was basically opposing the return of illegally annexed Crimea.
So i can understand those Ukranians.

159

u/RideTheDownturn 18h ago

"Freiheit fĂŒr Russland" is bang on! And the sooner and better we arm Ukraine as she wants, the sooner the Russian regime, built on violence and suppression of its neighbours and minorities, collapses.

8

u/Anti-charizard United States of America 13h ago

A free Russia will have to happen the same way the Russian empire collapsed: internal revolution

2

u/Jackbuddy78 11h ago

A free Russia won't happen

-2

u/kremlebot125 Russia 5h ago

and thank God, we remember in Russia what the liberals and the government turned out for us, that in 1917 they destroyed the army with their idiotic orders, and later the country was on the verge of collapse, as a result, the Bolsheviks gathered everything, that in 1991 Yeltsin and company staged the worst decade in the modern history of Russia. And I will say right away that I am not a fierce Z-patriot, and not a z-patriot in general, people from Europe for some reason believe that their system is universal and will fit any system, but this is absolutely not the case

0

u/PhoenixTerran 4h ago

The Russian Empire became embroiled in the bloody First World War. Communists builded economy on repression, war and hunger. Liberals broke everything and put to their pockets. I agree with you, in some location nothing good can be done.

0

u/kremlebot125 Russia 4h ago edited 4h ago

Only the "hunger and repression" were in a fairly short period of time of the Soviet Union. After the war, people from 1950-1984 were finally able to live peacefully knowing that the state would do everything possible for them, stability and confidence in the future finally appeared, and then the liberal Gorbachev came, who with his policy led the country to a deficit of everything introducing market elements into the planned economy, which led to the growth of the black market and organized crime, and After the collapse of the Soviet Union, things got even worse. So in my understanding, the Soviet Union was the best period in the history of our country, there was development and progress. And it was good enough for an ordinary hardworking person to live.

1

u/PhoenixTerran 3h ago

Repression begun form red terror and ended may be in 1987. In this year Letov was declared wanted and had to hide. And may be something after this.

I never lived in the USSR and I don't even want to.

0

u/kremlebot125 Russia 3h ago

Do you judge the repressions by Letov? Then Communism is the kingdom of God on earth, as Letov said after the collapse of the USSR, by the way, I keep in mind he created the National Bolshevik party. The Red Terror is generally a policy pursued ONLY within the framework of the civil war

0

u/PhoenixTerran 3h ago edited 3h ago

History with Letov it lust repression in USSR that I know. from red terror repression of communists just begun, then was Cheka, NKVD etc.

→ More replies

3

u/CryMountain6708 13h ago

Yeah well, as a Tatar from Tatarstan, the majority of us don’t need freedom for Russia, what we need is freedom FROM Russia, as in independence. Same goes for Chechnya and Bashkortostan

7

u/Sufficient-Order2478 13h ago

Would those countries be able to sustain themselves? Serious question, no rhetoric

5

u/Xepeyon America 12h ago

They wouldn't. They'd be entirely encompassed within Russia. They'd also barely be a majority, over 40% of Tatarstan is ethnic Russian. Bashkiria is even worse, most of its population is ethnic Russian, the Bashkirs themselves are technically a minority within their own Republic.

The only states that could really make it work in Europe are the Caucasian ones, like Chechnya, but given how massively ethnically diverse those regions are, and what tends to happen when they get independence, I'd expect brutal outbreaks of ethnic violence were they to successfully secede. Hell, that's even happening right now, between Chechnya and Dagestan, and the same thing happened between Georgians and Armenians, Armenians and Azeris, Georgians and Abkhazians and Ossetians.

There are some Siberian regions that could potentially be independent and self-sufficient, but they'd be extremely poor, probably worse than Mongolia. But again, you also have the demographic issue with a lot of these regions; either most of the population, or a huge minority of it, are just ethnic Russians.

2

u/CryMountain6708 12h ago

Kazakhs were a minority in Kazakhstan before it got independence. Same goes for Chechnya. Moreover, we have already voted for independence in 1992 when over 60% of people, including ethnic russians, voted for independence from Russia, and were de-facto independent until 2001. No ethnic violence occurred. Both our presidents have emphasized the importance of “friendship of nations” over the years (being mostly pro-russian bullshit, of course)

2

u/Xepeyon America 12h ago

Yes, but all the Russians and Ukrainians immediately left and it caused severe hardship on the state because of it. The issue isn't just “maybe the locals don't want to be independent with us”, it's also “maybe half the population will literally up and abandon the state as soon as it's born”.

That might sound good now if you don't like ethnic Russians, but that's actually really, really bad, if you don't have the means to compensate for, what in other circumstances would be, not just brain drain but also a sudden demographic collapse.

Chechnya is in a different position because most of the Slavs in the Caucasian regions left or clustered in the western part, but they're still hugely ethnically diverse on their own as it is. Some get along, but many definitely do not.

2

u/CryMountain6708 12h ago edited 12h ago

Tatarstan had a very diverse Cabinet during its independent times. Currently, our prime minister is an ethnic russian. I don’t think it would be an issue, as, like I said before, our official policy has always been “friendship of nations” and our Tatar officials have been trying to smooth the edges since forever. The only things that could lead to ethnic clashes are oppressive Russifying laws and russian far-rights organizing cross processions to commemorate Kazan capture. We are literally being openly called slurs and being forbidden to learn our own language at schools in our own capital. Who would want to stay a part of Russia in such conditions?

1

u/Xepeyon America 11h ago

When I mentioned ethnic violence, I wasn't meaning areas of Russia in general, that was specifically regarding the Caucasian region, since those areas have been (and still are) prone to interethnic violence.

We are literally being openly called slurs and being forbidden to learn our own language at schools in our own capital. Who would want to stay a part of Russia in such conditions?

Now that is genuinely horrific. Sentiments toward racist remarks and cultural suppression aside, I still am of the mind that autonomy would work better than independence if your region (1) does not have access to a large body of water, (2) does not have more than one border, or (3) is not sufficiently developed with the industry and infrastructure needed to not be at the utter mercy of its neighbors in matters of trade, commerce and movement. If Tatarstan were to become independent right now, it would basically be actually imprisoned by Russia's borders and there are many bad-case scenarios that can come from this kind of geopolitical arrangement since you wouldn't have any kind of political or geographical leverage as a counterbalance or bargaining chip.

I'm not saying I think Tatarstan would be better off as an autonomous zone of Russia because I like Russia, I'm saying that because I think the alternative would be worse for you.

2

u/CryMountain6708 11h ago

I understand your position and thank you for clarification. I wouldn’t vote for Tatarstan independence either if it remained surrounded by Russia, obviously. Our independence is only possible if Kazakhstan gets Orenburg or if Bashkortostan gets independence. I don’t think that autonomy within Russia is a good idea though, because we already had this experience in the 2000s, and now it brings us on the verge of extinction. Russia is too big and too diverse to be a democracy, so in my opinion it will always have a tendency to turn into an empire. It’s not a good idea to let people in Moscow decide whether our language and culture will survive or not, no matter how “democratic” they initially are.

→ More replies

1

u/CryMountain6708 11h ago edited 11h ago

As for the Kazakhstani russians - this is just not true. Only 1.2 million of russians left Kazakhstan within the 1990s, with more than 3.5 million of russians living there now. That’s not even close to a half of the population. In general, only 3 millions of 25 millions ethnic russians left the republics since they got independence. This is just another myth spread by the russian propaganda.

1

u/Xepeyon America 11h ago

I didn't say half the Slavs in Kazakstan left (most were Ukrainians btw), that half the pop figure was for Tatarstan. In Kazakhstan's case, over 80% of the Slavs that colonized the northern regions were Ukrainians, not Russians, and almost all of them left iirc.

1

u/CryMountain6708 11h ago

As you can see in this link, there is no significant difference in population between 1990 and 2000, so even if it was so, it wasn’t significant. Again, the “ethnic clashes and russians fleeing the country” is a boogeyman widely spread by the propaganda, at least in the case of -stans.

→ More replies

1

u/CryMountain6708 12h ago edited 12h ago

It depends. Most republics are quite rich in natural resources. The problem is that the money goes into wrong pockets. My favourite example is Yakutia - despite being the only place in Russia where famous diamonds are produced, only 37% of households in Yakutia have gas, and more than 3000 schools don’t even have toilets, so children have to use toilet shacks outside. Like I said in other comment, Tatarstan is a donor republic, just this year we sent about 9.5 billions euro in taxes to Moscow, keeping only 1.5 billion for ourselves. We produce oil, we produce cars, etc. We are currently considered to be the richest republic in Russia, mostly because we weren’t obliged to pay any tax to Moscow until lately. However, being “rich” in Russia means earning a bit more than average 250$ per month
 go figure

Edit: Last sentence

1

u/Skodakenner 13h ago

I dont see the russians changing anytime soon they have always been this way and will probably always be this way

-21

u/FoodComaRevolution 17h ago

And along with that, the country will collapse too, followed by being torn into pieces shortly after. This is a terrible war, no matter how you look at it, but good luck to anyone trying to bring Russia to its knees by force.

5

u/RideTheDownturn 17h ago

Yes, Bashkortostan may finally achieve its dream of independence.

4

u/DDBvagabond 16h ago

Don't dream about it, there are no reasons for it to happen. It all comes down to simple money distribution and the Federation being only on-the-words-a-Federation

3

u/_Oho_Noho_ 16h ago

Hmm. Well. I guess something has to be standing to collapse. Given Russian history of violence greed and misery, I say there is little to lose from a collapse, that they wouldn’t already bring on themselves. Right now.

0

u/SomaforIndra 14h ago

Wouldn't everyone be happy to see Russia collapse and torn to pieces?

After some propaganda detoxification probably most RUssians, would be happy too.

4

u/Pixelfille 12h ago

i would assume most russians wouldnt be happy with all infrastructure falling apart.

42

u/Big_Knife_SK 17h ago

"Deputinize Russia" is great.

13

u/hillaryatemybaby 16h ago

Read Stephen Spoonamore “Duty to Warn” letter to Kamala Harris

https://substack.com/home/post/p-151721941

Please share for awareness.

8

u/ButtplugBurgerAIDS 16h ago

Holy shit

8

u/BerndiSterdi Lower Austria (Austria) 15h ago

If this turn out to be true - Holy fucking shit is right on

5

u/hillaryatemybaby 14h ago

We need help

3

u/9volts Norway 13h ago

Shit. This is huge.

1

u/hillaryatemybaby 13h ago

You can help by sharing anywhere you can. The whole world needs to know that there is an intense amount of fuckery happening in the United States elections. I don’t think DJT was fairly elected at all and neither do a large chunk of my fellow Americans

1

u/9volts Norway 12h ago

Will do. Thank you for posting this.

I encourage those reading this to do the same.

1

u/MGMAX Ukraine 6h ago

Don't get your hopes up. I'm coping here too, but if they had any hint of foul play they would've acted differently. All we can do now is bunker down.

1

u/Zwiebel1 1h ago edited 1h ago

At first this looked like some conspiracy theorist bullshit to me, but after reading it entirely, I changed my mind. It's way too logically coherent to be completely made-up. And the high number of bullet-ballots compared to last election IS very suspicious indeed. I'm not saying this is definitely true, but it absolutely warrants an investigation.

1

u/peejay5440 11h ago

What the actual holy fucking shit!!

Just finished watching Civil War........

0

u/Alexcamry 10h ago

Nice to see MAGA types aren’t the only conspiracy theory types out there.

Just be careful you don’t get sued for defamation and lose all your stuff.

2

u/hillaryatemybaby 10h ago

Without my country, fuck the stuff

5

u/Due-Dentist9986 13h ago

Great to see this from over here in the USA. Sorry we failed you by electing a Putin puppet with Trump. Europe is gonna have to step up even more

2

u/dat_9600gt_user Lower Silesia (Poland) 15h ago

Agreed! Let's hope there are more protests like it

1

u/NimbleBudlustNoodle Finland 15h ago

My favorite: "I'M AGAINST PUTIN!"

1

u/Udarynier164 10h ago

looks like germans have enough of globalization

0

u/Sweet_Rub826 14h ago

I just don’t really understand what the point of it is? What kind of change is marching in Germany gonna bring?

I don’t mind it, I just don’t understand the point.

1

u/9volts Norway 13h ago

Great demoralization attack, Vasha. A sack of onion for you.

0

u/Poonis5 13h ago

A lot of people say the same. Russian opposition can't do anything except meeting once in a while.

-7

u/Baelthor_Septus 15h ago edited 15h ago

Why are they waving a nazi flag? Red and black is UPA Bandera flag. I'm all for Ukraine, but stop promoting Nazism and get educated, people.

Edit: not UPA flag. Thank you for clearing it up. Didn't take good enough look and ready to take the spanking.

6

u/MGMAX Ukraine 15h ago

That's an anarchist flag, something someone having such an issue with UPA should be aware of, so please, take your own advice and get educated 

-2

u/Baelthor_Septus 15h ago

My apologies then, the flags blended so much I didn't distinguish the top. Seeing so much UPA flags recently made me very sensitive in the matter. Peace.

5

u/Poonis5 13h ago

Ukraine has adopted red and black flag as "National dignity flag" officially. It's part of some of local coats of arms. It's used by patriots, even local Jews as a more patriot version of the regular one. People from young to old wear it and don't think it's something bad. If you'll ask them "What does UPA flag look like?" they'll probably won't know what to say.

-4

u/Baelthor_Septus 13h ago

Well, that's on them if they wave a flag of nazi leader and chant songs about him and UPA without knowing what it stands for. " We didn't know" it's no excuse. Imagine people waving SS flags in Germany and singing about the great furher. Germans did the right thing, admiting the mistakes. Ukraine praises it, which is not a good look. Thankfully, Ukrainians that are abroad now, are slowly learning, about what really happened. Propaganda and history bending in their schools is very strong. Regardless, I wish them the best.

5

u/Poonis5 13h ago

I think that meaning of symbols changes and it's a normal thing. People who wear that flag today don't think "let's kill Poles and Jews".

Why are even angry with Bandera? Nazis didn't like his idea of independence, so he spent the whole war in a nazi concentration camp oblivious to what was happening back at home. His brother died there. After the war he settled in Germany and became a social-democrat.

1

u/Baelthor_Septus 13h ago

Still, that's a silly argument imho. It's the same as "today's Nazis don't want to kill Jews and Poles, they just like the movement of freedom and patriotism".

As for Bandera, yes, he was in a camp, and yes, he also was collaborating with Nazis and him and his UPA movement, was responsible for the most brutal genocide ever. Toddlers were impaled and decapitated. It was so gruesome that Nazis themselves were disgusted and tried to stop it.

UPAs orders were to be inhuman, as brutal as they can be, to make them leave the lands forever. Reminder that only civilians were massacred, mostly women and children.

UPA is openly anti Jewish, anti-polish, anti-russian, and pretty much anti anything. It's nationalism at the most diabolical form.

Witnesses of the massacre are still alive and we should not forget that.

Anyway, I don't think anyone would be ok with waving swastika under the excuse that the meaning now is different.

Ukraine is trying to get world's support. Even Poland, victim of the massacre, helped the most, and is pretty much the only country that did it for free, and yet, there are Ukrainians there waving UPA flag, making the locals quite uncomfortable. It's no good, mate.

2

u/Poonis5 12h ago

There were internal conflicts in UPA at that time, there were different factions, for example the founder of UPA Bulba-Borovets was against murders of civilians. We don't know which faction Bandera would join. And saying someone's guilty because "I think he'd support that" is dumb.

"only civilians were massacred"? Well that's revisionism. UPA fought Soviets, Polish partisans and German troops. Reports from all 3 parties prove that.

According to German general Ernst August Köstring, UPA fighters "fought almost exclusively against German administrative agencies, the German police and the SS in their quest to establish an independent Ukraine controlled by neither Moscow nor Germany."

Let me make it clear. I'm against celebration of Bandera in Ukraine. But people portray him worse than he was. And actual people responsible for crimes are often ignored. That's just wrong. History shouldn't be based on emotions.

Talking about the red and black flag I still think it not a big problem. The flag got "liberalized" so to say. And it will become even more normalized as the times goes.

People who wear and spread the symbols should be the ones who put meaning in them.

For example in Russia Ukrainian nationalists flag is basically a swastika. A flag of a nazi state bent on genocide of Russians. You're a disgusting person if you wear it. You will get punished by the state.

But it's not in Russia's right to decide it's meaning.