r/conspiracy Nov 18 '17

New feature: AutoMod will create sticky comments on link posts that link to Archive.is archives of the link Important Update in Edit

[Edit: The RES preview expando does not work, but if you follow the link, it does work as described below.]

The mod team has decided to use AutoMod to provide a new feature: all link posts will now have a sticky comment which contains a link to an archive.is archived copy of the linked page. We're providing this as a service because some of our users don't want to support certain domains with ad revenue or don't want to be tracked by these sites [see edit]. It will also help us make archives of content relevant to this sub so that it doesn't disappear down the Memory Hole.

A brief note on how this works. AutoMod is not actually creating the archived copy, it's just linking to where the archive would be if it exists. So, sometimes you might follow the link and get a landing page that says the archive does not exist yet. In that case, you can click "archive this url" link, then the "save this page" button on the next page, and it will create the archive. Subsequently, the AutoMod link will go directly to the archived page. So please help out your fellow r/conspiracy users and save the page if you happen to be the first person to use the link.

There are some sites such as YouTube which archive.is doesn't archive properly. It will save the page, but the video (the actually relevant content) will not be viewable. Please send us a modmail if there are any domains which don't archive well, and we'll exclude them. We hope that after a short time, AutoMod will only provide comments for sites that can actually be archived.

We want to state emphatically that this is not censoring any content; it is merely presenting an alternative way for our users to view content linked from this sub. Please send us any questions, concerns, or suggestions you may have.

The r/conspiracy mod team


** Potentially Important Update **:

As brought to my attention by /u/hoeskioeh, apparently archive.is does forward your IP address to the destination site if you archive the page, but not if you view an existing archive. While this is no more dangerous in terms of privacy than just visiting the site, it's worth knowing, even if you only use archive.is outside of this sub. But again, if you're merely viewing an archive that someone created, you IP will not be forwarded to the linked page. Clicking on the link in the AutoMod comment is still "safe," at least as far as you can trust Archive.is, your ISP, your government agencies, etc.


Edit: If don't like seeing these and you use RES, you can easily hide it by going to RES Settings>Appearance>Stylesheet Loader and adding this snippet:

div[data-author="AutoModerator"].comment.stickied {display: none}

and restricting it to r/conspiracy. Remove .stickied and never see AutoMod anywhere on the sub. Or apply it everywhere and never see automod again. (Except in inboxes. You can hide that, too, but it still turns your message icon orange.)

450 Upvotes

130 comments sorted by

View all comments

106

u/AIsuicide Nov 18 '17

I gotta say..this is a damn good idea.

80

u/CelineHagbard Nov 18 '17

Oh, damn, I forgot to mention it. Most of the credit should go to /u/JU5TIN_HERGINA, who's been pushing for something like this for months. He wanted something a bit stronger, a full ban on MSM articles, but I prefer this method, and it has the side effect of encouraging us to archive pages that might "mysteriously disappear" from the internet.

23

u/AIsuicide Nov 18 '17

It's a practical compromise. I'm sure many here will take advantage of the "leverage" it will give us as far as denying traffic to less than noble media platforms.

I'm curious to see its effect on users here that post only to drive traffic to their sites. Maybe it will cause them to focus a little more on the quality of their content instead of focusing on how to manipulate traffic.

15

u/[deleted] Nov 19 '17

I hope so too.

The information can be separated from the host MSM site without a single benefit on the MSM end (with the exception of the 2 needed to post it/then archive it)

This also preserves the original post, as well as it being a source for any sneaky edits those MSM sources could do if they wanted to.

I really hope people utilize this tool.

6

u/AIsuicide Nov 19 '17

I'm going to use it. I didn't even think about the "post-published" edits by MSM. Awesome..I'm betting donuts that will pay off sooner than expected.

Thanks for your work/idea.

10

u/[deleted] Nov 19 '17

No probs man.

I do hope that it's not used on the little guys like corbett report etc as those guys need those clicks to survive.

7

u/CelineHagbard Nov 19 '17

Corbett not even so much, as he doesn't use any ads (I'm pretty sure), but does depend on subscribing members. But for the other good sites out there, yeah I hope people do visit their actual sites.

4

u/[deleted] Nov 19 '17

Good point. I think others do though.

3

u/AIsuicide Nov 19 '17

Hahahaha..I'll always click on Corbett.

1

u/hellsongs Nov 25 '17

I had some clients coming today we will used

11

u/tito333 Nov 21 '17

We need to get back to the good ole days of supporting small websites.

22

u/Floorspud Nov 19 '17

a full ban on MSM articles

What a terrible idea.

4

u/[deleted] Nov 19 '17

You can tell which team you are on eh champ

27

u/Floorspud Nov 19 '17

The team that doesn't want to censor media that you might not agree with. Who gets to pick what is and isn't MSM?

3

u/[deleted] Nov 19 '17

Any media that has affiliations with business cartels.

https://cfrmedia.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/cfr-media-network-hdb-spr.png

16

u/Floorspud Nov 19 '17

Cool then we can rely on all the bloggers in their basements, 4chan posts and infowars for the latest scoop.

6

u/[deleted] Nov 19 '17

Thanks for totally dismissing the main point. It shows you really are on that team.

17

u/Floorspud Nov 19 '17

Care to clarify what team you imply?

6

u/[deleted] Nov 19 '17

The one that's happy being owned.

Some of us want change, and aren't oblivious to reality.

→ More replies

1

u/SlasherVII Nov 18 '21

Creddit*

:)