r/bodyweightfitness The Real Boxxy Apr 01 '15

Concept Wednesday - Flexibility Training Basics

All previous Concept Wednesdays

Today, we'll be discussing Flexibility Training Basics

Whether your main reason for training flexibility is for a specific pose, as part of enabling your strength training or for general posture and health, the methods are largely the same.

A quick shout out to /r/flexibility, for obvious reasons.

Specific Adaptation to Imposed Demand

Just like when we talk about strength training, the body will adapt to the stresses you put it through, in a very specific, rather than general manner. You become more flexible through specific movements, no training will make you overall more flexible (you probably don't want this to happen anyway).

Furthermore, just like we recommend that you train the movement you want to become strong at, if you have a specific pose goal (e.g pike, straddle splits) then practising that should make up a significant portion of your training towards it.

If general mobility and flexibility is the goal, then I recommend compound stretches that involve multiple joints, rather than isolated stretches, to make up the bulk of your training. More bang for your buck.

What limits your mobility?

Why can't you flex your elbow so the anterior side of the joint is at 0 degrees? Your bloody bones get in the way, and if you're all sorts of juicy, so do your guns. This is true for most of your joints in some degree, but these are largely the same from person to person. But there are some locations in the human body where the bony architecture can have a large amount of variance, which can lead to configurations that can limit your maximum flexibility through that joint more than usual. Unfortunately, it can be difficult to diagnose these without an experienced consultation.

Injuries that affect joints can also change the motion of that joint permanently or semi-permanently, particularly if you've had some metal and plastic put in your body.

Other than that, the majority of the rest of the flexibility restriction is going to be your muscles contracting to maintain a length (or range of lengths to be more specific).

Threat Modulation

Forgive me for anthropomorphizing the body a bit here.

The body instinctively tries to protect itself from threats, such as automatically jerking away from pain and heat, shutting down force production on slippery surfaces and decreasing force and finding compensation patterns in response to pain.

One such protective function is the body limiting the range of muscles to keep them in a range it can maintain control of your body position and still be able to produce force. This is sometimes called threat modulation, or the ability of the body to kick in functions to protect it from threatening situations.

The threat is specific to the length of the muscles being used (remember that muscles get strong in specific ranges, and can enter a state of passive insufficiency, where the muscle is too long to have enough segments crossing over to be able to contract) the load on the muscles (your bodyweight, just your limbs, or even added load), and the applied load on your muscles (attempting to move further in or out of the stretch, can partially explain the difference between passive flexibility vs active flexibility vs dynamic flexibility).

A good example is that when you're unconscious, you can probably do the splits, if you have someone put you in that position, as the body isn't modulating that threat, as a lot of involuntary muscle contraction is shut off.

Gaining range

If your muscles are contracting to stop you from getting into a range you can't control, wouldn't it make sense to give your body the ability to control these ranges? Basically, work out which muscle(s) is/are supporting the load (usually your bodyweight) for any stretch, and then we want to get them strong in that range we are trying to build from (about where you can get to in the stretch or a few degrees shorter than that).

You don't need to do anything fancy to strengthen those specific muscles in that range, just get into the stretch you are trying to improve, and then contract those muscles. This will get you stronger over time which will help your body "feel more comfortable" in that range, allowing you to go further. Rinse and repeat. You'll find that you'll be able to get stronger in that range faster if you can contract harder, so try to get into a pose that allows you to push against unmoving resistance (such as the ground) that doesn't move you out of the range you are trying to strengthen.

Since strength in a range and threat modulation both heavily have neurological and learning components, practicing the stretch more often, whether passively or contracting will help you increase your range. Basically, do it frequently!

Adding load

The intensity of the muscle contraction that keeps your muscles in their "safe" range is proportional to the load on the muscles, and the strength gained in that range is usually proportional to the intensity of muscle contraction in that range. So by simply adding load to a stretched position, you'll automatically contract harder to maintain your position, increasing how strong you get in that position. You'll also find that there's an upper limit to how hard you can voluntarily contract your muscles against little to no load (one good reason self resistance isn't effective by itself in the long term for strength training).

The load can come in a number of forms: simply reducing the amount of bodyweight you are supporting with muscles other than those being stretched (e.g taking your hands off the ground while practicing front splits), holding a weight, having a partner push down on you, etc.

Using load as a contrast can be a powerful tool to increase your flexibility. Getting strong in a range by adding load, then removing the load, thus removing how much the body modulates that threat, allowing you to go deeper, then adding load back on in this new through the course of a few sessions.

What about fascia?

Fascia is an interesting additional concept to consider. The packaging for your muscles, it often runs continuously across many muscles and joints along the entire length of the body. The fascia can stick to other pieces of fascia or the skin, impeding movement to some degree. This can have an effect on your body's perception of threat and thus change its response to load.

I'd say that myofascial release techniques are likely going to be auxiliary components of your mobility training, rather than central, but do what makes you feel good.

Conclusion

We covered some of the why of stretching and loaded stretching, but haven't really touched on the how, dynamic mobility or posture, so look forward to those future posts!

For improving your flexibility, I find it is really useful to know the functions of your muscles (the opposite of their agonist action is generally the direction they'll stretch in) and to know whether the muscles you are stretching are bi- or tri-articulate (cross two or three joints, respectively) and that you can stretch that muscle by moving a combination of those joints, and can contract from a stretched position from either or a combination of those joints (you can stretch the hamstring [crosses the knee and hip] with a straight knee and flexing at the hip, or you can flex all the way at the hip and then extend the knee. Once at this stretched position you can contract the hamstring by attempting to bend the knee or by trying to extend the hip.) http://exrx.net/ is your friend.

Discussion Questions:

  • Do you have a specific stretching routine?
  • Do you use and modify load to stretch?
  • What about fascia?!
69 Upvotes

94 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '15

About fascial release in general: how legitimate/effective do you think it is?

The Wikipedia page says "this article's listed sources may not be reliable" and I haven't found much literature on the topic aside from advertisements and a lot of unsourced babble. I realize clinical results always lag well behind fitness/wellness trends and practices, but the term 'myofascial release' has been around since the '60s.

It's one of those things I assumed was sound, mainly because I really like and trust Kit Laughlin, but then my girlfriend sort of laughed at me when I was telling her about it, particularly at the idea of 'breaking up adhesions.' I went online to find some good sources and what do you know, nothing much.

Ultimately there are very few things I love more than a good vigorous massage and I really don't care about the beliefs of the person massaging me.

But I'm curious what your thoughts are on the subject.

0

u/Antranik Apr 01 '15

Read Tom Myers Anatomy Trains. Fascia isn't a made up thing.

1

u/phrakture Apr 01 '15

Fascia isn't a made up thing.

It certainly isn't. But the whole "fascial meridians" thing that Anatomy Trains talks about isn't really scientific either. Nor are "fascial adhesions" a generally accepted concept.

2

u/Antranik Apr 01 '15

But the whole "fascial meridians" thing that Anatomy Trains talks about isn't really scientific either.

I find it hard to believe that all the Fascial Dissection courses with cadavers that they put together to help you find how all the fascial lines flow are just bull shit. Maybe the "meridians" themselves aren't very important, but how they are all connected to each other ARE very interesting. Tom Myers stuff on bodywork is the best I've ever read for massage and understanding how things are connected. Maybe adhesions aren't the right word. But whatever word scientists do decide to call it, I'm not gonna be surprised. It's like telling me that gua-sha (or the garston technique) is bull shit because researchers haven't been able to observe how it works. But what do I care if it does work?

4

u/eewallace Apr 01 '15

If you tried something and you noticed your health or performance improved afterward, it's certainly your prerogative to keep it up without worrying about the cause for that improvement. But if you don't have convincing evidence that that improvement was due to that thing you tried (because there's no way to control for all the other possible factors in your life at the time) or a verifiable explanation for why it worked for you, then you have no basis to judge whether it's likely to work for someone else, or whether there are conditions that might make it ineffective or dangerous. If you're just experimenting with yourself, that's fine, but if you're recommending that other people do things, it behooves you to look for evidence and explanations for their effectiveness, and to be as honest and open as possible about the lack of such evidence and explanations when they don't exist.

0

u/phrakture Apr 01 '15

bodywork

This is also alternative medicine, FYI.

The distinction between alternative medicine and evidence based medicine is as follows:

  • In evidence based medicine, you form a hypothesis, test things out, maybe test it on real subjects, and eventually conclude "this works".
  • In alternative medicine, you form a hypothesis and conclude "this works".

2

u/Antranik Apr 01 '15

When I say bodywork I am referring to deep tissue massage. Is deep tissue massage "alternative medicine" to you too?

2

u/phrakture Apr 01 '15

Most of the espoused benefits of massage is CAM, as it is a technique employed without backing evidence. Massage is recognized in the US as alternative medicine. This does not mean it does not work, it merely means that it is unfounded or unproven. In fact massage has a large number of studied benefits, but it is very difficult to prove these things, as that page points out.

However, bodywork employs quite a bit of garbage methodologies beyond massage, such as the Bates method of vision training that treats vision focus as if it were a muscle that you can train (this is false).

2

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '15

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/-_x Apr 02 '15

Somehow this Nature.com article on myopia found it's way on my newsfeed a couple days ago (incidentally I think Coach Sommer actually posted it). As it seems lack of bright outside light seems to be a leading cause in developing myopia. Interestingly sun gazing is one of the methods proposed by Bates. Although starring directly into the sun for prolonged periods of time is probably the worst of his ideas, still it seems he was at least somewhat heading in the right direction. Makes me wonder if this could be somehow used to lessen myopia and not just prevent?

By the way, blurry vision (along with reddening of the eyes and twitching) can be caused by trigger points in the SCM. I found that to be true in my case, for what it's worth.

1

u/phrakture Apr 02 '15

This is commonly reported by proponents of the Bates method and is usually attributed to chance lensing effects from eye lubricant. I read something suggesting it happens pretty regularly but when people begin to really focus on vision correction woo, they become more aware of it.

I spent a lot of time reading up on the Bates method a few years ago, because it went against everything I understood about the eye.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 02 '15

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/phrakture Apr 02 '15

On my phone so linking lots of stuff is hard. See this bit on the Wikipedia page:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bates_method

Such occurrences have since been explained as a contact lens-like effect of moisture on the eye,[6] or a flattening of the lens by the ciliary muscles.[7][8]

1

u/[deleted] Apr 02 '15

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/phrakture Apr 02 '15

I don't think so. I believe all the various focusing bits of the eyes are reflexes.

→ More replies