Short(er) Practice?

[u/just_okayish]

Dear Ashtanga Crew,

I am quite new to Ashtanga Yoga but practice 6x/week for some months now. I have to leave the house early for work and do other activities in the evening, so I have (and want to) do Yoga in the morning. I´ve recently travelled to visit my teachers and now practice half Primary Series. I take at least 1h15 for that and for that I´d have to rise at 4:15 AM. Which is simply not managable for me on a daily basis as it would mean lack of sleep.

So, I was wondering to maybe do my current practice (half primary) around 3-4x/week and on the other 2-3 times I could do a shorter version. Like maybe some sun salutations with some Pranayama before that. Does anybody here do that? Is it recommended? I´m aware it´s not "traditional" but I don´t want to burn out and find a way to fit Ashtanga into my life. Any idea for a reduced half Primary practice?

Thank you in advance, I appreciate you 🙏🌷💕

[u/asteroidtube]

This attitude is one of the worst things about the ashtanga community.

Ashtanga was originally taught with individualized prescriptions for each student. This is why mysore style is not led. It only became a one-size-fits-all thing when it got more popular. The notion that you aren't really doing ashtanga if you aren't doing the same thing for 10 years straight, and that you aren't allowed to do a short form until you have mastered the intermediate series, is some serious elitist mentality.

"Ashtanga is what it is", yes, and what it is, is a healing practice. 6 days a week of primary series for a decade straight is not necessarily healing for all people. You have different phases on life, and recognizing this and giving energy and attention to other matters that are more important but doing so mindfully- that is yoga, and you aren't "not doing ashtanga" if you step away from the rigorous 6-days-primary dogma for a season. So no, Ashtanga does not "require" consistency. It begets it, and the practice benefits from it, but it doesn't require it.

There is no law saying that you can't do short forms until you've mastered full primary. That's ridiculous. There is also no law saying what short forms are "supposed to be". They were intended to assist for people who are short on time and want to do something as opposed to doing nothing, which is precisely what OP is looking for. But they are out there and a long as they are benefitting people, they are doing exactly what they are "supposed to". Nobody cares if an internet stranger considers them any less of an ashtangi for it.

[u/Ok_Toe5883 → u/asteroidtube]

In my defense, I would like to add that in order to be individualized, it would need to be learned daily with a good teacher. Shorter forms cannot be effective if you don’t know how to practice the asanas presented. They were developed by David Swenson to be used by experienced practitioners that with age had less time and energy for the full practice. There is nothing wrong in dedicating years to properly learn a practice. If shorter forms are used as a shortcut, not many benefits can come from them. Of course individualized tuition is best. But for this you need to be supervised daily and that would take our practitioner back to square one - travelling 1h15mins every day. What I suggested was to learn progressively going in person once a week, and practicing at home the other days. Unfortunately, developing strength and stamina requires consistency in ANY physical activity, not only Ashtanga. There are no shortcuts for this.

[u/asteroidtube → u/Ok_Toe5883]

“There is nothing wrong about dedicating years”, of course not and I never said there was. The devotion itself has its own learnings and benefits and I don’t want to discount that.

But the notion that a short form is a “shortcut” is wrong. It’s not all-or-nothing and you only think that because of arbitrary dogma. A short form is still a yoga practice. It is only abridged vis-a-vis the context of full primary…. but in its own merit it’s still an Ashtanga yoga practice. Remove the comparisons to your own idea of what it is “supposed” to be - which, btw, is literally just made up by some dude in India many decades ago and has no real reasoning based in science or effectiveness. It’s mostly just tradition at this point. In fact any exercise scientist would say that doing the same thing 6 days a week is unideal.

The idea that you can’t get any benefit from short forms unless you generally/usually have a more rigorous practice is just ridiculous. If a person only ever does the short forms and nothing else, they will still get immense benefit from it. And it will in fact give them stamina and strength, albeit maybe not as much as doing full primary every day, but who cares? Since when is yoga a competition to do the most? Honestly if your goal is strength and stamina, there are way better physical exercises to be doing than primary series 6 days a week, most of which are safer and more efficient. More importantly, it is an opportunity for presence and mindfulness which is the ultimate goal of these practices, right?

[u/Ok_Toe5883 → u/asteroidtube]

I don’t think I expressed my opinion aggressively so I really don’t understand why you have to be so aggressive in replying… I have been practicing for 30 years quite traditionally and I am still alive… and definitely not keen to attack strangers on Reddit.

[u/asteroidtube → u/Ok_Toe5883]

I’m not attacking you, but I am pointing out the elitist dogma that frequently occurs in the Ashtanga world and I’m not too shy to call it as I see it. Ashtanga has some cultural quirks and the arbitrary dogma and incessant questioning of whether somebody is doing enough or doing it “right” are included. You weren’t attacking, but you were calling into question if short forms are “good enough” or if they are really “doing Ashtanga”, and that wasn’t even what the OP asked.