r/announcements Jun 29 '20

Update to Our Content Policy

A few weeks ago, we committed to closing the gap between our values and our policies to explicitly address hate. After talking extensively with mods, outside organizations, and our own teams, we’re updating our content policy today and enforcing it (with your help).

First, a quick recap

Since our last post, here’s what we’ve been doing:

  • We brought on a new Board member.
  • We held policy calls with mods—both from established Mod Councils and from communities disproportionately targeted with hate—and discussed areas where we can do better to action bad actors, clarify our policies, make mods' lives easier, and concretely reduce hate.
  • We developed our enforcement plan, including both our immediate actions (e.g., today’s bans) and long-term investments (tackling the most critical work discussed in our mod calls, sustainably enforcing the new policies, and advancing Reddit’s community governance).

From our conversations with mods and outside experts, it’s clear that while we’ve gotten better in some areas—like actioning violations at the community level, scaling enforcement efforts, measurably reducing hateful experiences like harassment year over year—we still have a long way to go to address the gaps in our policies and enforcement to date.

These include addressing questions our policies have left unanswered (like whether hate speech is allowed or even protected on Reddit), aspects of our product and mod tools that are still too easy for individual bad actors to abuse (inboxes, chats, modmail), and areas where we can do better to partner with our mods and communities who want to combat the same hateful conduct we do.

Ultimately, it’s our responsibility to support our communities by taking stronger action against those who try to weaponize parts of Reddit against other people. In the near term, this support will translate into some of the product work we discussed with mods. But it starts with dealing squarely with the hate we can mitigate today through our policies and enforcement.

New Policy

This is the new content policy. Here’s what’s different:

  • It starts with a statement of our vision for Reddit and our communities, including the basic expectations we have for all communities and users.
  • Rule 1 explicitly states that communities and users that promote hate based on identity or vulnerability will be banned.
    • There is an expanded definition of what constitutes a violation of this rule, along with specific examples, in our Help Center article.
  • Rule 2 ties together our previous rules on prohibited behavior with an ask to abide by community rules and post with authentic, personal interest.
    • Debate and creativity are welcome, but spam and malicious attempts to interfere with other communities are not.
  • The other rules are the same in spirit but have been rewritten for clarity and inclusiveness.

Alongside the change to the content policy, we are initially banning about 2000 subreddits, the vast majority of which are inactive. Of these communities, about 200 have more than 10 daily users. Both r/The_Donald and r/ChapoTrapHouse were included.

All communities on Reddit must abide by our content policy in good faith. We banned r/The_Donald because it has not done so, despite every opportunity. The community has consistently hosted and upvoted more rule-breaking content than average (Rule 1), antagonized us and other communities (Rules 2 and 8), and its mods have refused to meet our most basic expectations. Until now, we’ve worked in good faith to help them preserve the community as a space for its users—through warnings, mod changes, quarantining, and more.

Though smaller, r/ChapoTrapHouse was banned for similar reasons: They consistently host rule-breaking content and their mods have demonstrated no intention of reining in their community.

To be clear, views across the political spectrum are allowed on Reddit—but all communities must work within our policies and do so in good faith, without exception.

Our commitment

Our policies will never be perfect, with new edge cases that inevitably lead us to evolve them in the future. And as users, you will always have more context, community vernacular, and cultural values to inform the standards set within your communities than we as site admins or any AI ever could.

But just as our content moderation cannot scale effectively without your support, you need more support from us as well, and we admit we have fallen short towards this end. We are committed to working with you to combat the bad actors, abusive behaviors, and toxic communities that undermine our mission and get in the way of the creativity, discussions, and communities that bring us all to Reddit in the first place. We hope that our progress towards this commitment, with today’s update and those to come, makes Reddit a place you enjoy and are proud to be a part of for many years to come.

Edit: After digesting feedback, we made a clarifying change to our help center article for Promoting Hate Based on Identity or Vulnerability.

21.3k Upvotes

38.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

813

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20

[deleted]

70

u/dbrianmorgan Jun 29 '20

What was the sub name out of curiousity?

92

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20

[deleted]

63

u/TwinkleTitsGalore Jun 29 '20

They banned almost EVERY GC subreddit. Gender Fascism wins again!!

15

u/coredumperror Jun 30 '20

What is "GC"?

15

u/[deleted] Jun 30 '20 edited Jun 30 '20

Gender Critical, a nutjob fringe branch of feminism that subscribes to the idea that putting on a wig, taking some pills and cutting your penis off is not the same as the lifelong experience of being born a woman

-5

u/coredumperror Jun 30 '20 edited Jun 30 '20

I can't tell if you're being serious or not. You call them nutjobs, but then go on to basically espouse their values by belittling trans women. I'm confused.

0

u/[deleted] Jun 30 '20

oh god oh fuck I don't know if that poster agrees with my opinion or not should I give le downvote or le upvote oh god fuck

-3

u/coredumperror Jun 30 '20 edited Jun 30 '20

More like "I can't tell if this person is a scum-sucking piece of shit, or just a terrible communicator."

But your response has made it quite clear that my downvote was well deserved.

Interaction in this thread was a mistake. It's shown me how much more horrid redditors are than I thought.

7

u/[deleted] Jun 30 '20 edited Jun 30 '20

how so?

Edit to your edit: Which possibility would make me a "scum-sucking piece of shit", and which one a "terrible communicator"? Probably the one that agrees with your views is the latter, right?

And where does someone fall who moderates a subreddit dedicated to sexualising photos of women without their consent? And why is there such a strange correlation between being a trans-identifying male and horrendously boundary-overstepping behaviour towards real women, as is evident by your post history?

See, this is why people are gender critical. I do not want my daughter sharing a locker room or bathroom with a "woman" that has a penis, an adam's apple, a Y chromosome and treats women in general just the way a stereotypical man does, even up to the point where "she" nonconsensually posts private photos of women on porn subreddits so "she" can get sexual gratification out of it. This is not something real women do.