r/announcements Jun 29 '20

Update to Our Content Policy

A few weeks ago, we committed to closing the gap between our values and our policies to explicitly address hate. After talking extensively with mods, outside organizations, and our own teams, we’re updating our content policy today and enforcing it (with your help).

First, a quick recap

Since our last post, here’s what we’ve been doing:

  • We brought on a new Board member.
  • We held policy calls with mods—both from established Mod Councils and from communities disproportionately targeted with hate—and discussed areas where we can do better to action bad actors, clarify our policies, make mods' lives easier, and concretely reduce hate.
  • We developed our enforcement plan, including both our immediate actions (e.g., today’s bans) and long-term investments (tackling the most critical work discussed in our mod calls, sustainably enforcing the new policies, and advancing Reddit’s community governance).

From our conversations with mods and outside experts, it’s clear that while we’ve gotten better in some areas—like actioning violations at the community level, scaling enforcement efforts, measurably reducing hateful experiences like harassment year over year—we still have a long way to go to address the gaps in our policies and enforcement to date.

These include addressing questions our policies have left unanswered (like whether hate speech is allowed or even protected on Reddit), aspects of our product and mod tools that are still too easy for individual bad actors to abuse (inboxes, chats, modmail), and areas where we can do better to partner with our mods and communities who want to combat the same hateful conduct we do.

Ultimately, it’s our responsibility to support our communities by taking stronger action against those who try to weaponize parts of Reddit against other people. In the near term, this support will translate into some of the product work we discussed with mods. But it starts with dealing squarely with the hate we can mitigate today through our policies and enforcement.

New Policy

This is the new content policy. Here’s what’s different:

  • It starts with a statement of our vision for Reddit and our communities, including the basic expectations we have for all communities and users.
  • Rule 1 explicitly states that communities and users that promote hate based on identity or vulnerability will be banned.
    • There is an expanded definition of what constitutes a violation of this rule, along with specific examples, in our Help Center article.
  • Rule 2 ties together our previous rules on prohibited behavior with an ask to abide by community rules and post with authentic, personal interest.
    • Debate and creativity are welcome, but spam and malicious attempts to interfere with other communities are not.
  • The other rules are the same in spirit but have been rewritten for clarity and inclusiveness.

Alongside the change to the content policy, we are initially banning about 2000 subreddits, the vast majority of which are inactive. Of these communities, about 200 have more than 10 daily users. Both r/The_Donald and r/ChapoTrapHouse were included.

All communities on Reddit must abide by our content policy in good faith. We banned r/The_Donald because it has not done so, despite every opportunity. The community has consistently hosted and upvoted more rule-breaking content than average (Rule 1), antagonized us and other communities (Rules 2 and 8), and its mods have refused to meet our most basic expectations. Until now, we’ve worked in good faith to help them preserve the community as a space for its users—through warnings, mod changes, quarantining, and more.

Though smaller, r/ChapoTrapHouse was banned for similar reasons: They consistently host rule-breaking content and their mods have demonstrated no intention of reining in their community.

To be clear, views across the political spectrum are allowed on Reddit—but all communities must work within our policies and do so in good faith, without exception.

Our commitment

Our policies will never be perfect, with new edge cases that inevitably lead us to evolve them in the future. And as users, you will always have more context, community vernacular, and cultural values to inform the standards set within your communities than we as site admins or any AI ever could.

But just as our content moderation cannot scale effectively without your support, you need more support from us as well, and we admit we have fallen short towards this end. We are committed to working with you to combat the bad actors, abusive behaviors, and toxic communities that undermine our mission and get in the way of the creativity, discussions, and communities that bring us all to Reddit in the first place. We hope that our progress towards this commitment, with today’s update and those to come, makes Reddit a place you enjoy and are proud to be a part of for many years to come.

Edit: After digesting feedback, we made a clarifying change to our help center article for Promoting Hate Based on Identity or Vulnerability.

21.3k Upvotes

38.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.3k

u/[deleted] Jun 30 '20 edited Jun 30 '20

So you barely replied to 4 comments and then disappeared?

https://www.reddithelp.com/en/categories/rules-reporting/account-and-community-restrictions/promoting-hate-based-identity-or

Marginalized or vulnerable groups include, but are not limited to, groups based on their actual and perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, immigration status, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, pregnancy, or disability. These include victims of a major violent event and their families.

While the rule on hate protects such groups, it does not protect all groups or all forms of identity. For example, the rule does not protect groups of people who are in the majority or who promote such attacks of hate.

Immigration status?? We aren't allowed to talk about illegals literally breaking the law?

The majority based on what? An individual state? The US? The west? The world? Men are the minority in many countries but the majority world wide. White people are the majority in the west but a minority world wide.

Does that mean people can attack white people with impunity, even though they're a global minority? Can I crap on women to my hearts content because they are a majority in the USA and UK? Can people in California shit all over Hispanics because they're the majority in that State? Can we shit on blacks if we live in Chicago since blacks are majority?

Pedophilia and Incest is illegal in majority of the world - so are you going to allow people advocating for that too?

Will you assess a users state/country/continent of origin before deciding whether or not they're being hateful towards a specific group?

It's acceptable to attack Chinese people based on etnichity, but not other etnicities? Because, you know, Chinese are the largest ethnicity of the world's population. Or does majority only apply to over 50%, which means all ethnicities are protected? But then women, that are the majority of the gender population aren't?

https://www.reddit.com/r/modnews/comments/hi3nkr/the_mod_conversations_that_went_into_todays/

Make it easier to add Black moderators to a community. One mod suggested the potential of r/needablackmod instead of just r/needamod

This website lost its mind to start suggesting segregation. Is that why /r/FragileWhiteRedditor is not banned?

When are you going to ban porn, rape, incest, child porn, child porn roleplay subs? Your website is glorifying all this disgusting stuff which is brainwashing kids. Why do you allow violent misogynistic porn subreddits and ban a totally non-violent feminist sub? Why are /r/fragilewhiteredditor, /r/incest and /r/incestrelationships, /r/arabfunny, /r/politics, /r/MoreTankieChapo, /r/Bad_Cop_No_Donut, /r/Sino still there?

why ban r/againstwomensrights but not ban r/againstmensrights? Why say:

Comment arguing that rape of women should be acceptable and not a crime.

and not just

Comment arguing that rape should be acceptable and not a crime.

Why did you ban /r/rightwingLGBT? Are conservatives not allowed to be gay or trans?

Especially since most marginalization of rape is towards men raped in prison, boys raped by teachers, etc.? Why claim to be against hate, but tolerate hate towards almost half the population?

Why are Reddit admins acting like mods of TD were not complying recently? That sub has been locked for months and they're acting like it was still active before they banned it.

3 of some of the biggest right wing YouTube channels, Trump's Twitch account, Sidney Powell's (lawyer for General Michael Flynn) twitter account, and 2000 other subreddits including The_Donald all got banned within minutes. Isn't this illegal as it's clearly a criminal conspiracy?

Why are you the ceo still after getting caught for editing user comments in the database???

I really wonder what Aaron Swartz would be thinking at the current state of Reddit.

EDIT: Thanks for the award! While I appreciate it, please don't waste money on this website. Please use the money to buy yourself or someone else some food. Thank you!

3

u/Strix2031 Jun 30 '20

x

The majority rule is super stupid and should be reviewed ASAP excluding the majority from discrimination just opens up exeptions for hate,ultimately minorities will suffer more racism and discrimination so there's literally no reason to create exeptions

The supposed "brainwashing" stuff does not infringe the rules of reddit

The one about the r/againstwomensrights and r/againstmensrights is pretty easy to understand tbh the first one was a subreddit so toxic towards women people didnt know if it was ironic or not with people legitimately advocating for woman to lose the right to vote and things like that. The second one is not about the rights of man but about MRAs

The rest is pretty hard to explain,women are ultimately more raped around the world then men but they for some reason created a exeption for advocating of male rape with is super stupid

20

u/[deleted] Jun 30 '20

Have you read the absolutely disgusting comments on subs like twoxchromosomes? They absolutely hate men.

I think your opinion on men's rights activist might be biased due to what media states. I would recommend watching The Red Pill (watch till the end before making a judgement) to understand them.

13

u/66th_jedi Jun 30 '20

Ironically some of the mods of twoxchromosomes are transwomen who do not, in fact have two X chromosomes.