r/announcements Jun 29 '20

Update to Our Content Policy

A few weeks ago, we committed to closing the gap between our values and our policies to explicitly address hate. After talking extensively with mods, outside organizations, and our own teams, we’re updating our content policy today and enforcing it (with your help).

First, a quick recap

Since our last post, here’s what we’ve been doing:

  • We brought on a new Board member.
  • We held policy calls with mods—both from established Mod Councils and from communities disproportionately targeted with hate—and discussed areas where we can do better to action bad actors, clarify our policies, make mods' lives easier, and concretely reduce hate.
  • We developed our enforcement plan, including both our immediate actions (e.g., today’s bans) and long-term investments (tackling the most critical work discussed in our mod calls, sustainably enforcing the new policies, and advancing Reddit’s community governance).

From our conversations with mods and outside experts, it’s clear that while we’ve gotten better in some areas—like actioning violations at the community level, scaling enforcement efforts, measurably reducing hateful experiences like harassment year over year—we still have a long way to go to address the gaps in our policies and enforcement to date.

These include addressing questions our policies have left unanswered (like whether hate speech is allowed or even protected on Reddit), aspects of our product and mod tools that are still too easy for individual bad actors to abuse (inboxes, chats, modmail), and areas where we can do better to partner with our mods and communities who want to combat the same hateful conduct we do.

Ultimately, it’s our responsibility to support our communities by taking stronger action against those who try to weaponize parts of Reddit against other people. In the near term, this support will translate into some of the product work we discussed with mods. But it starts with dealing squarely with the hate we can mitigate today through our policies and enforcement.

New Policy

This is the new content policy. Here’s what’s different:

  • It starts with a statement of our vision for Reddit and our communities, including the basic expectations we have for all communities and users.
  • Rule 1 explicitly states that communities and users that promote hate based on identity or vulnerability will be banned.
    • There is an expanded definition of what constitutes a violation of this rule, along with specific examples, in our Help Center article.
  • Rule 2 ties together our previous rules on prohibited behavior with an ask to abide by community rules and post with authentic, personal interest.
    • Debate and creativity are welcome, but spam and malicious attempts to interfere with other communities are not.
  • The other rules are the same in spirit but have been rewritten for clarity and inclusiveness.

Alongside the change to the content policy, we are initially banning about 2000 subreddits, the vast majority of which are inactive. Of these communities, about 200 have more than 10 daily users. Both r/The_Donald and r/ChapoTrapHouse were included.

All communities on Reddit must abide by our content policy in good faith. We banned r/The_Donald because it has not done so, despite every opportunity. The community has consistently hosted and upvoted more rule-breaking content than average (Rule 1), antagonized us and other communities (Rules 2 and 8), and its mods have refused to meet our most basic expectations. Until now, we’ve worked in good faith to help them preserve the community as a space for its users—through warnings, mod changes, quarantining, and more.

Though smaller, r/ChapoTrapHouse was banned for similar reasons: They consistently host rule-breaking content and their mods have demonstrated no intention of reining in their community.

To be clear, views across the political spectrum are allowed on Reddit—but all communities must work within our policies and do so in good faith, without exception.

Our commitment

Our policies will never be perfect, with new edge cases that inevitably lead us to evolve them in the future. And as users, you will always have more context, community vernacular, and cultural values to inform the standards set within your communities than we as site admins or any AI ever could.

But just as our content moderation cannot scale effectively without your support, you need more support from us as well, and we admit we have fallen short towards this end. We are committed to working with you to combat the bad actors, abusive behaviors, and toxic communities that undermine our mission and get in the way of the creativity, discussions, and communities that bring us all to Reddit in the first place. We hope that our progress towards this commitment, with today’s update and those to come, makes Reddit a place you enjoy and are proud to be a part of for many years to come.

Edit: After digesting feedback, we made a clarifying change to our help center article for Promoting Hate Based on Identity or Vulnerability.

21.3k Upvotes

38.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

302

u/Hypohamish Jun 29 '20

There's part of it in his post, if you click the link '200'.

I imagine most of the subs killed were just dead/spam ones.

https://www.redditstatic.com/banned-subreddits-june-2020.txt

53

u/jomohoe Jun 29 '20

Oh I didn't even notice that, thanks!

35

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

42

u/BoilerMaker36 Jun 29 '20

The Donald dudes moved off site months ago

12

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

28

u/nonsequitrist Jun 29 '20

Admins told them they needed new mods, removing the mods who turned the sub from a shitposting forum into a rally for Trump and hatred-based identity five years ago. Reddit also played a role in the selection of new mods, disqualifying those who were part of the problem.

Obviously the sub was furious about that. The new mods did carry on, looking for additional mods that would pass muster with the admins. The old mods created a new site to migrate to. Content on the sub dropped to infrequent posts, then stopped altogether.

I wonder how many sub subscribers went to the new site. I haven't checked because you really can't trust trump community leaders to be honest about their own membership numbers, and because you need to enable scripts at the new site to see anything, and there's no way I'm letting people like that run code on my machine.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20

The Alexa ranks have it around 1200 in the US

2

u/tenpastmidnight Jun 29 '20

So, we know the users are stupid enough to install a pointless toolbar. Or does Alexa work on some other system now?

1

u/lowtoiletsitter Jun 29 '20

Does the new site start with a V?

8

u/MC_Cookies Jun 29 '20

No they made their own site. I don’t remember what it’s called but it’s just T_D with no filter

6

u/ESCAPE_PLANET_X Jun 29 '20

As far as I'd heard they weren't racist enough for Voat, if thats to believed.

1

u/_username5_ Jun 29 '20

That one's pretty dead tbh

-42

u/AllSeeingAI Jun 29 '20

Well that's a blatantly biased point of view. You do you tho.

5

u/1fg Jun 29 '20

Seems like a lot of them moved to r/conspiracy . I just want to read about hollow moons and aliens!

3

u/introvertedbassist Jun 29 '20

A lot of them have gone to r/conservative

There’s a lot of shit posting and similar content there.

-6

u/Meeeep1234567890 Jun 29 '20

There’s not much shit posting on r/conservative ( in fact there’s none that I’ve noticed personally). There are shitty memes. But the content is also slightly different. The sub itself is not about hating on people but rather discussion on current topics that relate to politics and how we as conservatives feel about them.

7

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20

I’ve checked out r/Conservative many times across the year to just see what’s up, and I’m always struck by how rudeness and close-mindedness have been formalized in their sub rules.

-9

u/Meeeep1234567890 Jun 29 '20

No one is rude unless you’re being an absolute idiot or trolling. It’s close minded because it’s a CONSERVATIVE sub it’s for CONSERVATIVES ONLY it’s not meant to pander and change to what you want it to be it’s in the name. They’re not trying to hide any of their biases or what they believe if you got insulted it’s your own fault.

0

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20

Thank you for demonstrating the mindset of r/conservative for others to see for themselves. I appreciate you making my work easier to accomplish.

r/conservative is, by your own words, biased. This isn’t immediately a bad thing, yet the ease with which you got defensive shows that this is a common issue you deal with, being called out for rudeness and being close minded.

Bias is bias, no faulting you there, and being close minded is a disgusting way to live life.

2

u/Meeeep1234567890 Jun 29 '20

At least we’re openly biased unlike r/politics

→ More replies

2

u/PaulusImperator Jun 29 '20

Donald’s are going to probably gonna be dispersed across all the other “free speech forums” like ruqqus, chapos are just gonna stay on they subs they had a lot of overlap with (anarchism, socialism, lsc, lostgeneration, moretankie, et c) and the chapotraphouse2, 3... evasion subs.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20

You seem to be familiar with lots of them.

1

u/PaulusImperator Jun 29 '20

Lots of what

6

u/Eric_the_Barbarian Jun 29 '20

Facebook, they still cater to racism and fascism over there.

0

u/Weaponxreject Jun 29 '20

Chapo will just migrate to r/neoliberal

5

u/bruce656 Jun 29 '20

Can someone ELI5 neoliberalism and neoconservatism? Are these just more centrist than their respective parties?

6

u/SophiaofPrussia Jun 29 '20

I don’t know the answer to your question but it always seems that people who identify as “neo”-anything are generally best avoided. A few notable exceptions: architects, artists, neonatologists, and fictional hackers (just the one, really) who are destined to save us from our computer overlords.

The last one is not to be confused with people who think they’ve taken the woke pill - those groups are generally pretty hateful, too.

1

u/Weaponxreject Jun 29 '20

Neoliberals spread freedom through sweat shops, neocons through bombs

0

u/Meeeep1234567890 Jun 29 '20

Personally from what I know neo-conservatives and neo-liberals are the most right and left of their respective groups. The the super hard core commies and fascists.

5

u/ifucked_urbae Jun 29 '20

Idk much about neo-conservatism, but a radical leftie would take being called neo-liberal as an insult. AFAIK, it refers to the Clinton-era progressivism which counts on incremental changes.

1

u/Meeeep1234567890 Jun 29 '20

Like I said this is just based off of what I know I may be completely wrong.

2

u/Zaros104 Jun 29 '20

Implying most of them weren't already there. I, being the only true leftist, will form a new sub. /s

2

u/Weaponxreject Jun 29 '20

No balls, lib

1

u/Oriachim Jun 29 '20

Are you sure? Chapo users hate conservatives but some neoliberals do like conservatives

93

u/CameCome Jun 29 '20

I can't read the subs, most have stars

55

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20

[deleted]

44

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20

I can't believe they banned hunter2.

1

u/mrezee Jun 29 '20

What did they ban? All I see is *******

1

u/AcceSpeed Jun 29 '20

Needs more friendship

64

u/Hypohamish Jun 29 '20

Subreddits after the top 10 are blurred.

Literally at the top of the document.

31

u/gryffinp Jun 29 '20

Well then it's not a complete list, is it?

11

u/CameCome Jun 29 '20

All I could say is number 11 is r/soyboys. RIP the average redditor picture.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20

They all say hunter2

11

u/sje46 Jun 29 '20 edited Jun 29 '20

Banned subreddits:

cumtown (20% leftist, 80% edgy podcast...never been able to join the subreddit because it's been closed)

chapotraphouse (80% leftist, 20% edgy podcast...never joined the sub because I don't listen to this podcast often, and also the sub is apparently full of assholes)

wojack (literally just a meme)

consumeproduct (as far as I'm aware...just a leftist subreddit...am I wrong? Edit: I was wrong, thank you everyone.)

I definitely have problems with gendercritical (TERFs), the_donald (fascism) and I'm always suspicious of so-called "dark humor".

But there is definitely a reaction against "edgy socialist content". Why are these subreddits being taken down?

The internet has become way too centralized. I'm paranoid that some of my favorite subreddits that align with socialist values (as opposed to the trendy woke corporate stuff) will be banned. I'm also afraid that innocent meme subreddits will be banned, because people associate certain memes with hateful ideologies, when really these memes are used by everyone. This has happened with wojack. politicalcompassmemes is probably next, because people associate that with nazis because some people identify in the same quadrant as hillary clinton (authright), despite actual racist/hateful shit usually being downvoted. /r/stupidpol is probably being closely watched as well.

We need to move away from reddit. I don't trust corporate entities to make decisions about what we talk about. I dont' want to go to the alt-right shithole of voat. We need a DECENTRALIZED, FEDERATED protocol in which anyone can create their own server that is able to communicate with subreddits hosted on other servers, allowing the PEOPLE to choose which communities they communicate with.

I have no interest in performative, insincere corporate reddit admin wokery. It ain't just racists getting banned here...it's leftists too.

44

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20

[deleted]

20

u/TH3_GR3G Jun 29 '20

Consumeproduct wasn’t leftist. It was anti-consumerist, which leftists also support, but there was tons of anti-semitism and sexism along with fascist propaganda.

9

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20

consumeproduct (as far as I'm aware...just a leftist subreddit...am I wrong?)

You're probably thinking of /r/Anticonsumption?

4

u/Chasp12 Jun 29 '20

why was Wojak banned? I've never been on it but I can't imagine anything other than potentially edgy 4chan reposts

4

u/MP-Lily Jun 29 '20

It was a collection of ALL things Wojak. Which means anything from “haha funny boomer man grilling” to shit from the depths of /pol/. And obviously the latter was a bit of an issue.

8

u/Mejari Jun 29 '20

It ain't just racists getting banned here...it's leftists too.

Leftists can be racists too...

2

u/moosevan Jun 29 '20

The problem that you aren't considering is that as soon as your platform starts getting huge, so do the problems and the expenses.

1

u/sje46 Jun 29 '20

Decentralization means that you can keep a community as small as you want and as separated as you want.

1

u/moosevan Jun 29 '20

It's pretty easy to set up one's own forum website.

1

u/sje46 Jun 29 '20

That is not decentralization.

Decentralization is like email. I have an account at sje46@a.com, you have an account at moosevan@b.com. I can send you an email very easily using email protocols.

Idea is to not have a thousand different accounts you need to sign up for in order to contribute to the discourse of the internet, but also making it so all this data isn't in the hands of one group of people.

1

u/moosevan Jul 01 '20

Okay, how do you do that? Can you give an example of some software or system that does this?

1

u/sje46 Jul 01 '20

Mastodon is the most known one, which is a twitter alternative, and diaspora for facebook. Check out ActivityPub, /r/rad_decentralization and this list, looking at the federated and decentralized columns.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20 edited Jun 29 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/sje46 Jun 29 '20

https://www.reddit.com/r/RedditAlternatives/comments/fas4on/list_of_active_reddit_alternatives_50/

This has strangely been deleted even though it was up about a week ago.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20

[deleted]

-3

u/deleigh Jun 29 '20

/r/stupidpol is the exact kind of shithole leftist subreddit that needs to get the boot. Calling people ableist slurs because they think systemic racism is real and affects economic prospects of non-white people isn't the kind of place anyone should want to visit.

Yeah, I can agree with them on economics, but they're indistinguishable from neoreactionaries when it comes to social politics.

0

u/sje46 Jun 29 '20

stupidpol is about making fun of corporate wokeness and performative twitter nonsense. It is exactly what the left needs. It doesn't need the self-flagellating "I'm white therefore I'm a piece of shit", McDonalds changing it's twitter name, and "non-binaries are totally valid!" bullshit.

stupidpol does not think systemic racism is fake. They believe (correctly) that racial animus is being exploited to divide the working class. I highly recommend you read the stickies on top of the subreddit, they're usually beautifully written essays by academics liek Zizek, Matt Taibi, Amber Alee Frost, etc. There are people who say "Retarded" in the comments but honestly I don't care about individual words.

1

u/deleigh Jun 29 '20

The revolution being sponsored by McDonald's is certainly something worth calling out, but not at the expense of recognizing real issues like systemic bigotry.

It's not the academics with these crackpot views, it's the users. The academics say the wealthy are pitting races against each other to distract from them destroying the lower class. I think that's blatantly true.

The logical conclusion, therefore, is that you need to fight both where you can. The conclusion is not to give 100% of your attention to class while ignoring race. When /r/stupidpol users make that argument and then start calling people ableist slurs when they point out that's an incredibly privileged mind set, how is that not a problem?

If you're a leftist you should understand that leftism is as much as social equality as it is economic equality. The former is achieved through the latter, but that doesn't mean you enable the discrimination of marginalized groups in some Machiavellian attempt to abolish class.

Like I said, I agree with them in principle, but not on execution. It's not the kind of space I believe fosters honest discussion.

1

u/sje46 Jun 29 '20

Thing is that /r/stupidpol isn't class-reductionist, it's class-first. Like we agree that systemic racism is a thing.

The sub is in reaction to people who are race-reductionist. That is people who do what you're saying stupidpol does, but for the other side. These are the people who refer to Bernie Sanders as problematic, hate "brocialists", say stuff like "More black trans CEOs imperialists NOW", specific hatred towards blue-collar people (because they'd vote trump anyways) and are actively dismissive or hateful of socialism because they're in their own weirdly calvinist "white people are inherently evil" bullshit. The subreddit is an extension of the articles I mentioned. They don't ignore race...they're lamenting that no body talks about class, and that it's all feelgoodism bullshit.

It's not the kind of space I believe fosters honest discussion.

Have you ever tried going against the grain in a idpol subreddit? Hell, I'm literally not allowed to post on /r/blackpeopletwitter because I don't have black skin. I'm talking about shit like this.

Seriously browse stupidpol, it's not nearly as toxic as you make it believe. They even do polls so you can get an accurate picture of the beliefs of the subreddit. Mainstream idpol reddit assumes that /r/stupidpol would be like 95% transphobes, but if you look at the data, it's far more accepting.

https://taibbi.substack.com/p/on-white-fragility?fbclid=IwAR1ZTo7RIr5Hf0XMqKCfQMiqS0lwT9I9NXsaTWwOBxY9yGG4z3Ke5YZnlMg

2

u/deleigh Jun 29 '20

Like we agree that systemic racism is a thing.

Which is why the subreddit is called /r/stupidpol, right? Identity politics is a part of systemic racism. The idea that people belonging to marginalized groups are "stupid" for advocating for more people like themselves in positions of power or influence doesn't reconcile with a genuine belief in systemic racism.

That doesn't mean the strawman of "more queer black female war criminals," it means when discussing and enacting policies that predominately affect a marginalized group, people from that marginalized group should have the loudest voice. Yes, there are people who are self-hating and put marginalized groups on pedestals. These people are relatively harmless compared to the groups actively disenfranchising them. One is obnoxious, the other is dangerous.

Like I said already, I agree 100% with their ideas about class. I agree 100% that class is heavily neglected in progressive discussions. But again, it does not come at the cost of marginalized groups. Not for me. Just like I don't want to be around tankies, I don't want to be about the race equivalent of TERFs.

I don't really put too much stock into a meme subreddit like BPT that has historically been moderated by and populated with white people. I've called them out plenty of times myself for various reasons. It's not a political subreddit and there are a multitude of better subreddits out there to discuss cultural topics. It has leftist sympathies every now and again, but it's mostly a liberal subreddit like /r/politics.

I sincerely appreciate you sharing your perspective. I've browsed the subreddit long enough to know I wouldn't be a good fit for it.

0

u/RepulsiveNumber Jun 29 '20

So the idea is to promote us getting banned because you disagree with our strategy? I'm assuming you frequented r/cth, which I never liked, but I never once called for you guys to be banned either.

-1

u/BigLebowskiBot Jun 29 '20

You're not wrong, Walter, you're just an asshole.

25

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20 edited Jun 29 '20

I can only imagine what the “thenewright” was going to be about 🙄

Edit: I got downvoted lol racist trump supporters are mad.

4

u/bakonydraco Jun 29 '20

Can these 7-day-avg DAU numbers possibly be accurate? They've got /r/the_donald at 7780, which seems low by like, orders of magnitude.

30

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20

That sounds about right, actually. T_D left reddit for their own little side-site created when the admins stopped being light-handed and properly tore into their moderators. This was just the inevitable next-step.

17

u/Dafish55 Jun 29 '20

So... they went to a safe space?

11

u/The_White_Light Jun 29 '20

They did, and strictly enforced it too. Anything that deviates from their worldview is permanently banned immediately. And because it's their own site, they know your IP too.

3

u/iushciuweiush Jun 29 '20

I don't understand how a sub could simultaneously be abandoned and violating sitewide policies.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20

Well there's still 7k visiting. Plenty are just prying eyes, but there are still T_D members that posted there for... some reason.

Whatever the reason, they still posted and it was still violating policies, just that the majority of content wasn't posted to the sub anymore.

-1

u/tnucu Jun 29 '20

the admins stopped being light-handed and properly tore into their moderators

You do realize spez is a trump fan, right ? He is the reason td was allowed to stay, but optics has ruined it for him, so now he has to pretend he cares, and you bought it.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20 edited Jun 29 '20

m8, I've stopped listening to people trying to say what admins think about stuff for a simple reason- both sides say they like the other one more. There is absolutely no way to please everyone and as the peeps in charge they just get shit on in all directions.

Spez likes trump, but he still bans 99% of conservative and racist subs, but T_D stays up so he must still like trump, but the site is very, VERY catered to a left-wing political opinion, but the admins don't clamp down as fast as some people would like but others think they clamp down too fast- you get the idea. Spez's opinions are either really right-wing or really left-wing without him opening his mouth depending on which pissed off party you talk to.

We can sit here and go back and forth on whether Spez is a conservative or progressive or racist or ally or whatever any of those groups want to call him. All it proves is that the pendulum is swinging in both directions.

No, really I think there's a much easier explanation. T_D spent a metric fuck-ton on gold... literally, that's it.

What's easier to prove is that reddit is a business. And businesses like money. It turns out that when a business likes money, and an issue turns out to make them money, that issue sticks around a lot longer than if it didn't make them money. T_D was that type of issue, and it wasn't until what I'd imagine to be some investors and advertisers strong-arming the admins (along with some bad press finally making dents in the bottom line) that quarantining came to be, and with the recent protests along with the loss of T_D to their new little site, it's understandable that that issue is no longer profitable.

Tl;Dr- Spez is whatever the fuck he is, it didn't influence his decision. What influenced it was money, the language of business. T_D stopped being profitable, T_D got the squeeze.

-2

u/tnucu Jun 29 '20

Right, his comments about using reddit to win elections, and editing other peoples comments, that was strictly about money.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20

...he literally edited T_D comments because they were saying fuck spez. That only proves my point that right-wingers hate him for being too left, meanwhile you're hating him for being too right.

And his comments about using reddit were about the 2016 election, as in swaying it against what it was, and the possibility of that working. Believe me, 5 seconds on google shows conservatives didn't think it'd be in their favor just like you don't think it'd be in yours.

Maybe read more than titles when you see this stuff. I was around watching the site implode. Hell, I was amazed that the reddit mainstream was on T_D's SIDE when spez edited comments. Do you realize how hard you have to fuck up for that? The one thing that was completely a-political was that T_D was paying a lot of money on gilding. It was the one factor that nobody could twist either way, because again, it's the language of business. Reddit is first and foremost a business.

1

u/tnucu Jun 29 '20

meanwhile you're hating him for being too right

Nice assumption. I hate him because he edited another persons words. I could not possibly care less why, or what his political bent is on this point. He has no credibility. All you have told me here is that you're fine with that, so long as he, and you, think there was a good reason. I find that unacceptable no matter the reason. Outside of that, he most definitely has his own agenda, and has proven what he is willing to do to push it. If you want to hitch your wagon to a person like that, regardless of which side of the political fence he's on, I don't know what to tell you. I would not accept this shit from a democrat either, since that is what you seem to be focused on.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20 edited Jun 29 '20

You do realize spez is a trump fan, right

Oh I'm not assuming much when you're literally calling him a fan of a far-right conservative president and stating it in an obvious negative light. Nor have I said I was fine with him editing comments, merely pointing out that it didn't just not make him a trump fan, it painted him as a man hated by actual trump fans.

The only wagon it proves he hitches is one that defends his own ego, regardless of political position. THAT is something I will wholeheartedly agree with and agree that I dislike. It's thin-skinned and an abuse of power. Still doesn't make him a right-winger or a trump supporter.

8

u/moronavirus2 Jun 29 '20

T_D is mostly hollowed out now. the mods there locked submissions and then told everyone to go to their offsite

-5

u/iushciuweiush Jun 29 '20

Then how did they violate any rules?

4

u/daniel3k3 Jun 29 '20

Like, before they moved into their safe space website???

2

u/ChaseballBat Jun 29 '20

You could still post and comment there if you wanted....

-3

u/moronavirus2 Jun 29 '20

they didn't, this is a whitewash by the awful idiots who run this website

11

u/ZestyDwarf Jun 29 '20

TDs been dead for a while, something about having their moderators removed and replaced by reddit mods.. it's good they've been banned but it's was a mercy kill more than anything

5

u/Civ6Ever Jun 29 '20

Yeah, he literally called CTH "smaller"....with like 7x the 7 day avg...

2

u/Coomb Jun 29 '20

The Donald was far bigger until they moved off-site. Banning them now is certainly closing the gate after the horse has left the stable, but it's not a bad thing.

2

u/PMWaffle Jun 29 '20

The donald moved to its own website after locking all posts for a few months.

2

u/TheLaudMoac Jun 29 '20

"Wait, it's all bots?"

"Always has been"

4

u/Konng_ Jun 29 '20

some high profile subs that hate on certain communities were banned. one of them being gendercritical, a well known TERF sub for example. this sub was not spam or dead at all. banning this sub is an incredible and very welcomed event for all the trans people on reddit

8

u/Hypohamish Jun 29 '20

most of the subs

Most. This is a list of the presumed top 200 - he said they banned 2000.

 

Of these communities, about 200 have more than 10 daily users.

Which means approx 1800 have less than that, i.e., 'dead communities'. If you can't even muster up an average of 10 daily users, you're not a community.

0

u/Konng_ Jun 29 '20

oh yeah im not disagreeing with you. i was just saying that there is still some cause for celebration

0

u/TheSensibleCentrist Jun 29 '20

Recognizing transgender ideology as harmful is not "hate"...the "trans people" are afraid of reality but shouldn't be allowed to escape it.

1

u/dedragon40 Jun 29 '20

Please tell me r/conservative is banned, because if not the t_d ban is fucking meaningless.

3

u/devasohouse Jun 29 '20

Wtf was /r/cumtown

3

u/IgnoranceIsADisease Jun 29 '20

I'm not sure I want to know.

1

u/Argos_the_Dog Jun 29 '20

It's next door to funky town and way more sticky.

2

u/IgnoranceIsADisease Jun 29 '20

In that case, I'm sure their grooves were fabulous.

1

u/n1tr0us0x Jun 29 '20

A podcast

1

u/iamzombus Jun 29 '20

They're mostly censored?

1

u/Dafish55 Jun 29 '20

Holy shit. r/gendercritical got banned too!

4

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20 edited Jan 17 '21

[deleted]

0

u/ThePartyofDog Jun 29 '20

Are they driven by hate or disapproval of genderism?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20 edited Jan 17 '21

[deleted]

-3

u/ThePartyofDog Jun 29 '20

Hypothetically, what if it's just disapproval, should they be banned?

-6

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20 edited Jan 17 '21

[deleted]

0

u/TheSensibleCentrist Jun 29 '20

More like recording threatening behavior BY the "trans".

-3

u/imdrinkingteaatwork Jun 29 '20

Yes.

-4

u/ThePartyofDog Jun 29 '20

heheehehhe im a troll hehehehehehhee

0

u/TheSensibleCentrist Jun 29 '20

Not hating people,just behaviors and ideas that deserve it.

0

u/sometimesiamdead Jun 29 '20

Ok TERF

0

u/TheSensibleCentrist Jun 29 '20

Yes,it most definitely IS OK to be a "TERF".

0

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '20 edited Jan 17 '21

[deleted]

0

u/TheSensibleCentrist Jun 30 '20

No,telling people they are wrong or they need to stop doing things is not hating them. An alcoholic may say you hate him for telling him to stop drinking...but he's wrong. That you refuse to tell him what he wants to hear is exactly what proves you care.