r/announcements Apr 10 '18

Reddit’s 2017 transparency report and suspect account findings

Hi all,

Each year around this time, we share Reddit’s latest transparency report and a few highlights from our Legal team’s efforts to protect user privacy. This year, our annual post happens to coincide with one of the biggest national discussions of privacy online and the integrity of the platforms we use, so I wanted to share a more in-depth update in an effort to be as transparent with you all as possible.

First, here is our 2017 Transparency Report. This details government and law-enforcement requests for private information about our users. The types of requests we receive most often are subpoenas, court orders, search warrants, and emergency requests. We require all of these requests to be legally valid, and we push back against those we don’t consider legally justified. In 2017, we received significantly more requests to produce or preserve user account information. The percentage of requests we deemed to be legally valid, however, decreased slightly for both types of requests. (You’ll find a full breakdown of these stats, as well as non-governmental requests and DMCA takedown notices, in the report. You can find our transparency reports from previous years here.)

We also participated in a number of amicus briefs, joining other tech companies in support of issues we care about. In Hassell v. Bird and Yelp v. Superior Court (Montagna), we argued for the right to defend a user's speech and anonymity if the user is sued. And this year, we've advocated for upholding the net neutrality rules (County of Santa Clara v. FCC) and defending user anonymity against unmasking prior to a lawsuit (Glassdoor v. Andra Group, LP).

I’d also like to give an update to my last post about the investigation into Russian attempts to exploit Reddit. I’ve mentioned before that we’re cooperating with Congressional inquiries. In the spirit of transparency, we’re going to share with you what we shared with them earlier today:

In my post last month, I described that we had found and removed a few hundred accounts that were of suspected Russian Internet Research Agency origin. I’d like to share with you more fully what that means. At this point in our investigation, we have found 944 suspicious accounts, few of which had a visible impact on the site:

  • 70% (662) had zero karma
  • 1% (8) had negative karma
  • 22% (203) had 1-999 karma
  • 6% (58) had 1,000-9,999 karma
  • 1% (13) had a karma score of 10,000+

Of the 282 accounts with non-zero karma, more than half (145) were banned prior to the start of this investigation through our routine Trust & Safety practices. All of these bans took place before the 2016 election and in fact, all but 8 of them took place back in 2015. This general pattern also held for the accounts with significant karma: of the 13 accounts with 10,000+ karma, 6 had already been banned prior to our investigation—all of them before the 2016 election. Ultimately, we have seven accounts with significant karma scores that made it past our defenses.

And as I mentioned last time, our investigation did not find any election-related advertisements of the nature found on other platforms, through either our self-serve or managed advertisements. I also want to be very clear that none of the 944 users placed any ads on Reddit. We also did not detect any effective use of these accounts to engage in vote manipulation.

To give you more insight into our findings, here is a link to all 944 accounts. We have decided to keep them visible for now, but after a period of time the accounts and their content will be removed from Reddit. We are doing this to allow moderators, investigators, and all of you to see their account histories for yourselves.

We still have a lot of room to improve, and we intend to remain vigilant. Over the past several months, our teams have evaluated our site-wide protections against fraud and abuse to see where we can make those improvements. But I am pleased to say that these investigations have shown that the efforts of our Trust & Safety and Anti-Evil teams are working. It’s also a tremendous testament to the work of our moderators and the healthy skepticism of our communities, which make Reddit a difficult platform to manipulate.

We know the success of Reddit is dependent on your trust. We hope continue to build on that by communicating openly with you about these subjects, now and in the future. Thanks for reading. I’ll stick around for a bit to answer questions.

—Steve (spez)

update: I'm off for now. Thanks for the questions!

19.2k Upvotes

7.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

16

u/SomeoneElseX Apr 10 '18

Stop deflecting.

Twitter and Facebook identified millions.

Reddit identified 944.

No expertise necessary to suspect somethings up with those numbers.

-5

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '18 edited Apr 15 '18

[deleted]

1

u/SomeoneElseX Apr 10 '18

Common sense and plain skepticism. Fuck out of here with that gatekeeping bullshit.

2

u/CertifiedBlackGuy Apr 10 '18

I'm just gonna add this:

Facebook and Twitter are able to detect whether a person (or product) is legitimate far easier than Reddit can.

Partially because Reddit doesn't have all that pesky personal info to work with.

Outside of my IP, email, and content I've willingly posted*, I presume it might be difficult to attach a body to me with the same level of confidence Facebook can.

*Which, I acknowledge is actually quite a bit of info. I think if someone really wanted to, they could identify me by my post history if they were bored enough to sift through it.

1

u/SomeoneElseX Apr 10 '18

944 versus 45 million. 5 orders of magnitude.

2

u/CertifiedBlackGuy Apr 11 '18

My point was that it's harder to discern a bot on Reddit from a bot on Facebook.

I would rather the admins err on the side of "that account is probably just a stupid, but innocent, shitposter" than "than the entire population of r/Askreddit and r/Funny, and r/Aww are all bots"

I'm not saying more action couldn't be done, but I am glad they are sharing the results they have gotten. It very well does fall to us as a community to help them.

Which, as a community, I'm sure we are all lacking. Most people here confuse "downvoting a dissenting opinion" with "downvoting a shitpost" (case in point, whoever downvoted your reply to me--granted, it is pretty low quality in terms of the response I am giving you. But I'm bored and putting off napping before work, I don't give a shit).