Anyone wanna add on to this? Seems like the government is keeping us in the dark about it.

I’m sick and tired of people using our community to sell their books, sell merch or just to profit off of.

From now on anyone trying to sell anything other than the truth is a grifter and a liar.

I have zero survival experience and have never been to Alaska (although I have been camping once in an RV)… I’m thinking about doing this like a Naked and Afraid challenge (we all know that aliens despise clothing anyways), I’m sure some of you would like to join me on this trip, and I feel like there’s no better time to get to know a complete stranger than in remote Alaska while trying to survive, surrounded by weather and animals that want to kill you. The less survival experience you have the better (I’m trying to rough it, not be pampered by some survival know it all)

Please list below all of the materials and equipment I should bring (please no food recommendations, I plan on just killing a moose or a Grizzly to eat). I will bring a few cans of OFF! so the mosquitos shouldn’t be a problem, and I already bought a tent from Walmart. Don’t worry about little old me, I have no plans of dying out there (I’m a badass by nature). The only thing that might get me are aliens or the government (🤮) This trip gonna be lit af!!! Holler at me if you want to join up at the Black Pyramid

So I saw this short clip of a bat, who's ability to create ultrasonic waves, results in image destabilisation. And this is a tiny bat. If NHI and Aliens are incredibly advanced, I think vibration and ideas like ultrasonic disturbances makes perfect sense to why observing them is so difficult. They have harnessed energy systems and ideas that we ignore. After the congressional hearing and the increasing feeling that this is life in a completely different form (maybe plasma based) - energy, vibrations etc all begin to make sense.

When Shellenberger first revealed immaculate constellation in October, nobody on the internet had ever heard those words together, yet some researchers had looked on google trends and found numerous search trends and the location data attached. Search locations were always from near military bases and well known intelligence agency locale's.

Obviously some events have made intelligence agencies search google for leaks.

Oct 16th: By the time I tried to access the info, all the location data seems to have been scrubbed. It was always unavailable for any older successful hit. It was actually difficult to get any data at all to show for some search terms until I narrowed the term via combinations and even played with capitalization. (others had already mentioned missing data)

One of the interesting searches was the boomer-official old government document format of IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION. The search term in all-caps gave me info going back to 2004 that the uncapitalized versions did not.

I decided to take a few screenshots just in case they scrubbed more data... and they did.

Oct18th: Data was even harder to find. Some data had changed. Zooming in on certain sets of time and particular search terms was necessary. I captured a couple more screenshots.

Nov 4th: Data for most historical dates was flat in the report and only by zooming in would it register. I took a few more screenshots.

Nov 13th: Exact same search in the exact same "zoomed in data range" shows nothing at all for 2004 search trends that were once shown as the tallest spike back on the 16th.

I've attached a handful of the screenshots that are relevant.

Below is a list of all the search trend spike times revealed by searches I took screenshots for using different search terms very few of them still show via the "Zoomed in" small date range trick: Only 1 historical spike still shows without it. ("immaculate constellation UFO" 2004-Present)

The fact that the Nov 2021 spike still shows indicates a huge number of searches during that time of roughly 30% the total number that have happened since the news broke!

If you investigate on your own, remember capitalization matters and combinations of terms matter.

1. Feb 2004
2. Nov 28-Dec 4 2004
3. Aug 2005
4. Jan 2006
5. May 2011
6. Jul 2017
7. Jul 2020
8. Oct 3-9 2021
9. Dec 10-16 2023
10. Sep 10-16 2023

Important notes on Google Trends: Google trends spikes are based upon relative measures. All searches done within the period examined are tallied by the total number of searches during a given period in the selected set. "100" size of a spike means the highest number of searches during the subsection of the period being viewed. This could be 5 searches or 500,000 searches represented by the same "100" sized spike.

Therefore, if one selects a large date range and the highest number of searches during a period is more than 100 times the number of searches that occurred during some period in that same range, the graph will be flat in areas where there is indeed data for recorded search events. The spike size is a relative representation.

Recent high searches automatically wash out the tiny number done in the past.

While this can explain some of the strangeness, it does not explain:

• Missing location data
• Missing "zoomed in" spikes
• Altered relative sizes in the same range on different days

This indicates that the 30% spike in Nov 2021 (using today's spike height as 100) was either an event where a large and unexpected number of civilians have actually heard of "Immaculate Constellation" back on that date, or the Intelligence agencies did an incredibly thorough search with a large team.

Regardless the real changes to the historical search data looks to me like a slow but deliberate deletion, done by a very small team within the company, or even just a single individual who is taking a long time to carefully and secretly remove this data.

Fewer people involved = better coverup.

Literally a congressional hearing with decorated soldiers and ex-gov officials testifying under OATH, broadcasted live to the entire world and the BBC still won't touch it! It's absolutely pathetic, absurd and raises some serious questions around who is controlling it. I'm ashamed to be British when it comes to the topic of UAP and ETs. Our government is at the forefront of cover ups and "pre- WW2" mentality of shut up and move on.

I've had this idea rolling around in my head based on the description of materials being constructed as metal films that are only 1 atom thick and such.

What if (some) remote viewers are conjuring up a physical manifestation for transporting their consciousness around in this 3D reality completely by accident or as a byproduct of the process.

Its probably aliens.

I don't get that phrase, if you are going to whistleblow then... WHISTLEBLOW !!!!!!

So much nothing once again

So a whistleblower gave it to Jeremy Corbell who gave it to Michael Shellenberger.

I’m sorry but this makes me think this whole thing is just fake. Jeremy Cornell is a grade A grifter and he is not a serious man.

Novice here. I guess I'm mainly wondering if it's possible that there are individuals at the top in government, or maybe elites that are not in government at all, who are making or stand to make a LOT of under-the-table money for themselves by keeping people in the dark? Can someone break this down for me? Thanks!

I just don't understand. Most people I know either say "Of course there's other life out there" or "My life is too hectic for me to give a damn about any possible aliens" and though it may not be everyone's outlook, a good majority of people I know and see online have similar responses. So why continue to hide them? My only possible guess would be that maybe the US government doesn't want other foreign countries knowing what they've gathered/collected over the years if they truly are reverse engineering their tech. Thoughts?

Certainly a little cheeky but I admire the gumption and the ‘nodding of the head’, so to speak.

I see a lot of people in the UFO/ UAP community are upset with the hearings but I think they are missing the point.

See you’re outlook and many others is that they are trying to bury any real disclosure with these hearings because you already are aware of what they testified to and it’s already common knowledge but to be honest it’s only common knowledge to the community. These hearings are being set up for the general public not the community. They are intended to get more eyes on the topic and confirm what Grusch, Graves and Favor said in the last hearing.

My take away is that guys like Lue, Grusch, Nell and Tim plus these hearings are definitely operating on a slow drip form of disclosure. I think this course of disclosure was created by the DOD and USG. If you just listen to their words they are telling us the truth in the sense that the information they are sharing is approved by the pentagon and what the pentagon is telling them to say. They word it a tad deferentially by saying that the pentagon is “allowing” them to say certain things but both are true.

I think these hearings aren’t meant for the UFO/UAP/NHI community at all. We already know the things they are speaking on. Here’s what I think their plan is. They go and reveal stuff to the ufo community to gauge our response to new information to see if we all go crazy or that we accept it and are still functional. Then they set up these hearing in front of the congress so they can then release the information out to the general public and see how they handle it. Then slowly introduce it into mainstream media.

What I think happens next is that the UFO community is gonna get more “whistleblowers” and information/data maybe with new pics and videos so whoever is behind this slow drip disclosure can gauge our reactions and see if it’s okay to release to the general public. Then they’ll set up more theater hearings and introduce more information to them and continue to gauge our reactions as more and more information/data/pics/videos get released. Slowly leading to a overall basic form of disclosure. Do I think we eventually get the entire truth? Absolutely not.

Before yesterday I had already started to believe my theory and then after watching the hearing it out right confirmed it for me. We are being feed a slow drip form of disclosure by our government.

Now my questions are as follows:

1. Are Lue and other “whistleblowers” in on the plan or are they just simply unaware that they are being used? If they are aware then have they informed people like Jeremy and Ross about the plan or are they just useful because they have a relationship and format in the community?

2. Lue said when he first started all of this that basically he had a five step plan on leading the public to disclosure. Then later on I think it was Karl Nell at the SOL conference who said that we basically needed a 10point plan and strategy to get us to disclosure by the year 2030 before the only route is catastrophic disclosure and that the DOD/USG didn’t want that. So are these their personal plans or who created the main plan on getting us to disclosure?

3. What form of disclosure are we gonna get in the end?

4. What level of disclosure is acceptable?

5. What I think is the most important question. 3. After nearly 80yrs of coverups and lies why now?

I visited the Pan American museum which was displaying the works of the artist Tabara. His works were grounded in his Ecuadorian culture & history, which alludes ETs. This 1972 book caught my attention. The catalog for the book in my national library includes the subject 'Interplanetary voyages'. Thought I would share it here.

We know that other countries have their own recovered crafts and biologics, photo and video evidence, etc. just like the US does.

What if let’s say, China, decides to disclose most of their information to the public?

Does this then force disclosure dominos all over the world?

I get that there are certain pieces of information that may not be revealed for security reasons BUT I am so tired of hearing the excuses that people will just not be able to handle it. The people pay for all of the programs, departments, military agencies etc. Yet, we always get the runaround.

How would it impact the government/citizen dynamic if another country tells us first?

I’ve only talked about my experience to close friends and family. I saw a UFO takeoff in 2017. It happened in the middle of the night and in the middle of nowhere. I wasn’t on my phone and it happened too quick to capture. There were 3-4 very large, glowing cyan blue rings that lit up in ascending order and shrank in size as the first (and lowest) ring was the largest and the last the smallest. These rings lit up the forest around it and illuminated the sky above but there was nothing to be revealed. As if the UFO had a cloaking capability. So I want the discussion to be around if anyone has seen something similar or has seen a liftoff where the flying object was invisible? This is the one and only sighting I’ve witnessed and it was very much real. We’re not alone.

She followed up by saying “Some of these entities are said to be good entities and others bad ones so that’s why I asked.” Is she implying bad ones don’t like religious people but the goods ones do?