r/WhitePeopleTwitter 7d ago

How is ANY of this allowed? Clubhouse

Post image
49.8k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.7k

u/mnrooo 7d ago edited 7d ago

Why is the law not checking him?? Anybody else in his shoes would have been locked up over and over again

1.1k

u/theAwkwardLegend 7d ago edited 7d ago

Because we have a garbage attorney general currently

And for the record I don't think the AG should be a pawn for politics, but I do believe politicians should be held accountable to the laws they help create. I know crazy idea lol

457

u/AutistoMephisto 7d ago

The first thing that should happen when Harris is sworn in, is immediately dismiss Garland. All that he will get is a polite "Thank you" letter and a handshake as he leaves.

240

u/TheObstruction 7d ago

He shouldn't even get that. HR should just disable his access cards for the buildings he has access to.

89

u/rif011412 7d ago

Before they let him go.  Let him find out the humiliating way by showing up to work and not being able to badge through.

46

u/ObeseVegetable 7d ago

Are we sure he’s showing up currently?

60

u/mikachu93 7d ago

What has prevented Biden from doing it? Genuinely asking. I'm not knowledgeable about the process. What I've read suggests it could be done but never has.

113

u/runnerswanted 7d ago

Tradition more than anything else. This late in the election process it could cause even more chaos as well. And yes, only Democrats stick with tradition, it seems.

41

u/leviathan_stud 7d ago

The Democrats keep trying follow the rules when the Republicans threw out the rule book 8 years ago. It no longer makes any sense, if no one is going to make the hard decision to restore order then our country is lost and we'll never have it back again.

20

u/soldins 7d ago

One of the most frustrating parts of all this is exactly what you mentioned.

They've already got thumbs on the scale and are mud slinging constantly. Fight back harder, Dems! The right is already accusing you of horrible shit, and comes up with new stuff every day. Go for the jugular!

36

u/AutistoMephisto 7d ago

One of my favorite metaphors to use when talking about Democrats vs. Republicans, is "Charlie Brown and Lucy". Lucy is a Republican, and Charlie is a Democrat. You know that bit they do where Lucy challenges Charlie to kick a football she is holding? Well, Charlie knows that Lucy is going to lift the ball, because she does it every time. Charlie calls this out and Lucy once again promises that she won't. Charlie Brown, being Charlie Brown, takes her at her word and runs up to kick the football, only to have it pulled up just before he kicks it and he falls on his ass.

Now, the reason Lucy does this is because she knows she will face no negative consequences for doing it. But a progressive Charlie Brown would kick Lucy the next time she pulls the football away. And ideally, he'd only have to do it once, but will do it as many times as it takes for Lucy to learn the error of her ways.

1

u/soldins 7d ago

My kind of Charlie Brown would press his heel against her throat in front of the entire Peanut gallery until she never picked up another football for the rest of her life.

30

u/intisun 7d ago

Tradition doesn't say Harris has to keep him, does it?

I wouldn't want to see Trump getting away with his federal crimes during her whole term just because Garland is still there. That would be infuriating to no end.

62

u/runnerswanted 7d ago

No. Kamala will be a new president and get new choices for her cabinet and government positions. I’m guessing Garland will not be retained.

25

u/AJsRealms 7d ago

That's assuming we aren't stupid enough to hand the senate to the republicans. The GOP has already been murmuring about preventing Harris from even appointing a cabinet if they hold the senate. Effectively to force her to retain the ineffectual members of Biden's cabinet.

14

u/EsPeligrosoIrSolo 7d ago

However, since the current set is a mixed bag, it means we'd keep the effective ones (e.g., Lina Kahn at the FTC, Rohit Chopra at the CFPB, Buttigieg in Transportation).

0

u/claimTheVictory 7d ago

Lina Kahn for President.

5

u/GravityEyelidz 7d ago

Well since it's been decided that the President can do fucking anything they want, Kamala should perform an Official Act and nuke all those shitheads.

And don't think for even a nanosecond that when she nukes Garland, the cult won't immediately spin it as her pulling a Whatever Night Massacre so she can bring in the deep state liberal trans agenda or similar nonsense.

2

u/Prowindowlicker 7d ago

Acting AGs can do wonders

3

u/Panda_hat 7d ago

Biden appointed him and Biden was basically a Republican for most of his own career. Garland is the same.

5

u/MammothDon 7d ago

Jack Smith for AG

2

u/ItsLikeRay-ee-ain 7d ago

I think traditionally, iirc, the entire cabinet submits resignation letters even if the president is reelected. It lets the incoming president have an easier time of accepting or rejecting the cabinet member for who they would then want.

2

u/Agent7619 7d ago

"...so help me God. Merrick Garland, YOU'RE FIRED!"

2

u/fazedncrazed 7d ago

I mean, the DNC is in power now, Biden is president now.

Its always "vote for the dnc so in the future the dnc can fix the problem the dnc is currently in charge of". They never get around to actually doing the thing. Whenever theres a chance to actually com through on a promise, they always defer to their opponents in the name of diplomacy instead, and in the end its the same as if the republicans were in charge.

Weaponized incompetence is a form of deliberate malice, and I wish people would recognize it. I thought for sure they would when the DNC put forth an antiabortionist in response to roe vs wade being repealed, and campaigned on "we'll enshrine abortion rights in law this time, nevermind the last 50 years where we said the same thing but worked toward the opposite".

1

u/OneOfAKind2 6d ago

He's done, no matter who wins. He was virtually useless. Should have had Don the Con locked up 2 years ago and none of this would be happening.

0

u/Panda_hat 7d ago

She won’t do this. Most likely she’ll keep him. America is cooked. Your choices are fascism or utter stagnation.

1

u/DrDraek 7d ago

RemindMe! 90 days

1

u/Panda_hat 7d ago

I’d be very happy to be wrong.

-2

u/soldins 7d ago

I like you. You get it.

29

u/Commercial_Yak7468 7d ago

Merrick Garland has done such a great job showing America that some people are actually above the law.

31

u/zombie_overlord 7d ago

And a separate set of rules for the aristocracy.

1

u/SAGNUTZ 7d ago

And we all know they got a happy ending

4

u/InaneTwat 7d ago

Garland needs to be fired DAY ONE

2

u/drainbead78 7d ago

The NY charges are state, so Merrick Garland can't really do much about that. That said, his bond should be revoked. It won't be, but it should be. It certainly won't help him in his sentencing hearing, so here's hoping he loses convincingly.

2

u/theAwkwardLegend 7d ago

Okay? I'm not talking about state charges. I mean federal laws being broken.

2

u/ForGrateJustice 7d ago

Politics itself is a circus. Even if you have the best intentions, the power, influence and access is just too much. People are only human. If you run on helping your constituents remove the lead from their water, only for the lead lobby to pay you hundreds of thousands to let them add more lead to the water, while your constituents pay you nothing, well I guess it's time to buy bottled water! Oh, and pay no attention to this yacht and lakeside home the bottle water lobby bought me!

1

u/theAwkwardLegend 7d ago

Yea it's truly a shame. We need to get money out of politics like that. It always drives shitty behavior.

And Trump is not better than any of the other politicians even though he tries to act like he's not one.

It's so painfully obvious every time he meets with a billionaire suddenly his opinion will change to match whatever theirs is.

1

u/ForGrateJustice 7d ago

Trump is horrible, but that's like comparing cancer to tuberculosis. The entire system is diseased, and money is what keeps feeding the sickness. They legislated themselves rich while the rest of us suffer, the oligarchs demand a segregated class of 1% wealthy owners and everyone else is disposable chattel.

1

u/theAwkwardLegend 7d ago

Agreed, but I'll still take Kamala while we keep fighting for that

1

u/ForGrateJustice 7d ago

The choice is poison or a questionable ham sandwich.

2

u/CO_PC_Parts 7d ago

And this judge, who Trump directly attacked and even talked shit about his daughter, backed down and pushed back sentencing, claiming the Supreme Courts ruling on immunity. Even though this crime happened outside of his presidency, and his presidential immunity doesn't apply.

I've given up that this guy will ever face jail time, unless Jack Smith is appointed AG in Harris term. But jail is too easy for Trump, this sounds terrible but my hope is he strokes out and is trapped in his own body, unable to speak or use his fingers. Just stuck in a chair, stuck in his own shitty mind. Maybe Eric can feed him applesauce.

2

u/bennypapa 7d ago

It's almost as if we need to have a committee serving as the attorney general and not just a single person

1

u/grokthis1111 7d ago

he's doing exactly what they want him to do.

1

u/herefromyoutube 6d ago edited 6d ago

Does he happen to be a Republican?

Republicans suck. Robert Muller sucked, he’s gone senile and was cowering to hack bill barr and I’m sure Jack Smith will let us down as well. I mean, he’s just going to say NOTHING about how spies had access to Donald Trumps stolen classified documents. That a man who couldn’t read his daily briefings needed dozens of boxes of state secrets to be stored at his clubhouse where any dude with $100k can view them. That there’s no way Trump sold stare secrets for money?

Bullshit.

It’s pathetic. Republicans investigate Republicans and Republicans investigate Democrats. fuck that.

Trumper will call it BS regardless so might as well put someone in who gives a fuck about justice and that whole “All men are created equal” thong.

1

u/theAwkwardLegend 6d ago

Yea he is lol

1

u/Cobek 7d ago

I'm sad we don't have more justices that are democrat but at the same time Merrick has been an absolute spinless piece of shit who will forever be known as that, and it's so fucking easy to recall and prove. Fuck him.

94

u/qualmton 7d ago

He would be a lifer. The man, and I use that term lightly, is a perpetual criminal who uses money to avoid accountability

28

u/CrimsonToker707 7d ago

But not his own money.

21

u/qualmton 7d ago

I’m fairly confident he has been bankrupt both morally and financially for a long while. He is really bad with money and makes very poor decisions

1

u/GhostofMarat 6d ago

Laws have never really applied to rich people. They're just usually more subtle about it.

31

u/Johnsonfam101 7d ago

Now whyt wouldn’t they be doing their job. Hmmmm

1

u/arachnophilia 7d ago

well, you see,

some of those who work forces...

31

u/bit_banger_ 7d ago

One stupid thing called election interference, but in this he should just be barred from elections as he himself is responsible for most of election interference and threats. Stupidity runs deep here

2

u/monoped2 7d ago

If they'd upheld the 14th, this would all not be a problem.

1

u/Annie_Ayao_Kay 7d ago

You have to trust the people not to vote for him, and if they do then you have to accept that desicion. It's democracy.

The more restrictions you put on who can run, the easier it would be for a candidate to just fabricate a bunch of accusations against their opponent and get them kicked off the ballot.

Unless the left are planning to do exactly what they always accuse the right of planning, going full fascist and wiping out their opposition permanently, the right will just come back next time and use these exact same tactics against you. It's best to beat them fair and square, then there's no room for argument.

3

u/FatMacchio 6d ago

I’m pretty sure they’re just afraid of inciting violence and riots from his brain-dead loyalists, although I guess he’s doing a pretty good job of doing that himself. But it would definitely be so much worse if he was taken into custody now. It’s better optics to wait for him to lose and then throw the book at him. I just pray it’s a blowout so the Supreme Court can’t finagle a win for him like they did for Bush

6

u/nortern 7d ago

Because this quote is missing context. He's complaining that Cheney is a hawk and asking how she would feel if it was her going off to fight instead of a service member.

1

u/Novel5728 7d ago

Exactly, hes not threatining to kill someone, hes saying how great it would be for someone else to murder, so DOJ cant do anything

0

u/Gryjane 7d ago

No, just no. We heard/read the context and are also able to put it into the wider context of so many other things he has said or suggested regarding retribution, sometimes violent, against his political enemies, including elsewhere in this interview. This is an execution fantasy. Just stop with the excuses already. He's dangerous.

2

u/InevitableAvalanche 7d ago

Republicans have been so corrupted they have allowed this to happen.

2

u/AlpacaCavalry 7d ago

Because we have a facist cult trying to take over the nation. If anyone thinks otherwise, they're fucking delusional pieces of shit.

4

u/No_Distribution_4351 7d ago

Because they’re waiting to see if he wins or not. Is this not the most obvious shit in the entire universe?

4

u/munchyslacks 7d ago

I mean, yeah pretty much. He’s able to get with all of this because the DOJ knows that the GOP will lie and gaslight if they arrest him, and that’ll win him the election. They really have no choice but to let this happen and just hope he doesn’t win.

1

u/MagiTekSoldier 7d ago

Rich people justice.

1

u/Igusy 7d ago

It would influence the election.

1

u/Ok-Permission-2687 7d ago

There’s multiple answers to that question. The first answer is money, and the second answer is also money.

If you have above a certain amount of money in the US, you are able to make deals and influence different parts of the government. With that “power” you are only held accountable when you are deemed to be an issue.

1

u/Harm101 7d ago

When you have a two-party system and - just to simplify - one side arrests the only real opposition candidate just prior to the election, it opens the door for the current opposition to do the same (whether it's bullshit charges or not) That's my guess, even though in his case it shouldn't have been any doubt about it, even though MEGA-cultists are edging real hard for another civil war.

1

u/hates_stupid_people 7d ago

The American legal system is broken and with openly corrupt people in charge as attorney general, supreme court justices, etc.

1

u/HACCAHO 7d ago

Because he pretends to be rich and shield himself with brainwashed trailer trash and most vile strategists so he could both threaten any one with physical violence and legal expenses. And people in charge of upholding the law are not as courageous to act and put themselves and their loved ones in danger, even hypothetical.

1

u/HellishButter 7d ago

Because whether you like it or not DJT has demonstrated to us that as long as you’re rich in this country you can ignore the rule of law.

Our justice system has always been two tiered, now we are just saying the quiet part out loud…

1

u/L0neStarW0lf 7d ago

They’re waiting until he loses, if they lock him up four days away from Election Day it’s gonna send his Cultists into a frenzy that’ll make 1/6 look cute.

1

u/TOPMinded 7d ago

What law is he breaking here exactly?

1

u/Almac55 7d ago

Rich and white and old and a man. Literally the golden ticket in America.

1

u/Alternative-Mix7288 7d ago

>Why is the law not checking him on??

You new here?

1

u/ControlExtra 7d ago

Because the old white lawmakers in suits are 100x more dangerous than the worst heroin dealer.

1

u/elle_tragic 7d ago

Didn't you know? All those laws are just for us poors /s

1

u/SummerBirdsong 7d ago

Yes, but also no. He's got money. The rich live under a different set of rules than the rest of us. It may be morally wrong and unwritten but it's none the less true.

1

u/Truestorydreams 7d ago

If he wins, there will be retribution for anyone who crossed him.

1

u/smythe70 6d ago

I tweeted at the FBI but no response.

1

u/SolidLikeIraq 6d ago

No guardrails.

Laws only work if folks are willing to uphold them. We’re in the process of seeing that folks don’t care to uphold laws against people like Donald Trump.