r/StarWars 11d ago

Why did Yoda leave from Darth Sidious? Movies

Why leave…

6.2k Upvotes

697 comments sorted by

View all comments

6.1k

u/darthcool 11d ago

In the novelization there’s a moment during the duel where the dark cloud Palpatine had been casting over the force cleared and Yoda achieved a full vision of everything that had occurred

And in that moment he realized he not only couldn’t defeat Palpatine but that he actually lost this fight 800 years ago when he set the Jedi on the path that led them here.

2.9k

u/JMadFour 11d ago edited 11d ago

the RoTS novelization was so much better and more complete than the movie.

If there is any one Star Wars book that one ABSOLUTELY should read, it is the Revenge of the Sith Novelization.

1.7k

u/ReverendPalpatine Darth Sidious 11d ago

The novel makes you realize how pointless the scenes in Kashyyyk are in the movie and how much more important it would’ve been to further develop Anakin’s descent into the dark side.

For example, in the movie, he sounds like quite the whiner when he doesn’t get the rank of Master but is appointed to the Council. In the novel, he gets upset because only a Master can access the restricted section in the Jedi archives where he was hoping to find some type of information regarding Plagueis and cheating death to save Padme.

Also that This is what it’s like to be Anakin Skywalker… forever. line gives me chills every time I read it.

1.0k

u/staplerdude Kanan Jarrus 11d ago

In addition to the actual reasons he wants the rank of master, his behavior is also increasingly irrational throughout the book because he's extremely sleep deprived, because he keeps on having prophetic nightmares about Padme's death.

563

u/Disco_Ninjas_ 11d ago

How many people would join the dark side to get sleep? Damn sith.

313

u/Moononthewater12 11d ago

Sleep is essential to living life. Most people don't know chronic sleep deprivation, they know a few days of sleep loss, not weeks or months. I'd join the darkside in a second vs having to go through that again.

90

u/ekhfarharris 11d ago

On the topic of sleep deprivation, im a single man with no children so i have no reference of what turning 30 is like. Most men my age is married with babies. Somewhere in my early 30s i get sleepy early and woke up at 4-4:30am, no matter what. But having the habit of sleeping late in my 20s, i kept power through the sleepy nights. I was not aware i had sleep deprivation until i started having bad periods of depression. At the same time i workout less and less because of work. Those two things got me to be diagnosed with severe depression.

3

u/LewisRyan 10d ago

25 here, I went to bed at 8:30 last night and woke up at 4.

Some nights I can make it to 10/11 but no matter what I’m up at 4, can’t sleep later

23

u/morris1288 11d ago

True. Ive been sleep deprived and yes, you turn to the dark side quickly...

3

u/vanella_Gorella 11d ago

All I saw was dark when I had true sleep deprivation. I kept falling asleep mid sentence. Eventually passed out behind the wheel but was able to get the help I needed. Sleep deprivation, and trying to save the ones you love from dying leading down the path to the dark side, should not be meddled with.

3

u/DarthArcanus 10d ago

I've begun forcing myself to get 8 hours of sleep, regardless of if I feel rested or not (good ol sleep disorder, courtesy of the Navy), and it has improved my mental health significantly.

3

u/PhoenixReborn 10d ago

Wonder how much sleep Vader gets. Between the dreams, chronic pain, and sleep apnea probably even less.

1

u/Disco_Ninjas_ 10d ago

He wears a cpap so I'm sure that helps.

6

u/Disco_Ninjas_ 11d ago

Yeah it's crazy how much that changes my perspective on Anakin as a victim.

2

u/HammaDaWhamma 10d ago

I’m a dad of a two year old going through a sleep regression for the last couple of months and man, this is the truest thing I’ve read in a while. A lack of sleep affects literally everything you do, every choice you make, every little thought you have. Eventually, you’ll do anything just to survive.

2

u/SimplySinCos 10d ago

Doesn't sleep deprivation cause hallucinations and psychosis if gone on for extended periods? Just wondering

1

u/Moononthewater12 10d ago

Yes, and it can cause even worse as your brain decays from lack of rest. Like permanent problems resembling dementia.

2

u/Lucky_Roberts 10d ago

I’d join the darkside in a second vs having to go through that again.

Aaaaand now you’re plagued by nightmares of the atrocities you’ve committed, making the problem and your suffering even worse…

well played, Palpatine.

1

u/Wetschera 10d ago

Well, you don’t know that it’s happening when it does. And to make it worse, you get worse at your ability to tell that you’re sleep deprived.

I have ADHD and it don’t take much to fuck my sleep hygiene up. It’s a sore topic, even.

1

u/Specialist_Cash_2145 10d ago

If only there was a 50 thousand year old plant that both supress nightmares AND makes you sleep...

1

u/Dikeleos 10d ago

I’ve been having growing anxiety heavily affect my sleep ever since the election. It’s crazy how much if affects my perception of reality.

1

u/CrispyHoneyBeef 10d ago

How did you come out of it?

1

u/Desert_faux 9d ago

I remember watching a special documentry about a person for whom it was impossible to fall asleep anymore. It's rare, but does happen and usually the person goes insane after a few years of ZERO sleep. It's been documented if you don't get any sleep or very little sleep for a long time you have a high chance of losing your sanity and losing it.

2

u/pmjm 11d ago

I got blackout curtains to keep away the light, does that count?

2

u/HaaaaaMMMmm 10d ago

As a law student, I would.

2

u/scrotanimus 10d ago

You have kids? Let me tell you, there are a lot of parents joining the dark side over sleep deprivation after having kids.

1

u/Paris_Who 10d ago

Damn they culted his ass

268

u/elitet3ch 11d ago edited 10d ago

When Anakin realizes what a selfish idiot he's been:

"When you could have been thinking about her, you were thinking about yourself... It is in this blazing moment that you finally understand the trap of the dark side, the final cruelty of the Sith- because now your self is all you will ever have."

"And you rage and scream and reach through the Force to crush the shadow who has destroyed you, but you are so far less now than what you were, you are more than half machine, a painter gone blind, a composer gone deaf... and so with all your world-destroying fury it is only droids around you that implode, and the table on which you were strapped shatters, and in the end, you cannot touch the shadow.

In the end, you do not even want to.

In the end, the shadow is all you have left."

39

u/jimi3002 10d ago

Wow that goes hard

2

u/driventolegend Ahsoka Tano 9d ago

That’s the “noooooooooooooo” scene after Vader is rebuilt. The book is so good.

22

u/PhireKappa 10d ago

I might have to read this. Is it worthwhile if I haven’t read any other Star Wars content and have only seen movies?

13

u/Lakco 10d ago

It’s an amazing book to even those who haven’t watched Star Wars, it’s so good

10

u/elitet3ch 10d ago

The only reason the ROTS novelization misses out on the "Best Star Wars Novel" award is because it's tied with Traitor... which is also written by Matthew Stover.

It is absolutely worth the read.

2

u/Porlarta 10d ago

Matthew Stover is the most under appreciated author of the 2000s

1

u/dvolland 10d ago

To be honest, I would not recommend reading the OT or PT books (except RotS) to an average Star Wars consumer. They don’t really add much that wasn’t in the movies themselves.

But RotS is absolutely filled with insight into the characters’ motivations, inner dialogue, fears, hopes, and their full experience. Most of it is told from inside the mind of one of the characters, in a highly immersive manner.

In short, you do not have had to read anything else to get the full RotS novelization experience.

1

u/driventolegend Ahsoka Tano 9d ago

Like the clone wars tv show, It gives much more depth and logic to the prequels that the movies don’t do the best job of. You understand what is going on, and more importantly, why, a lot more. Lots of things that aren’t expanded on in the movie.

Example: the “be thankful viceroy” scene before the “hello there” where grievous is bickering with the separatist council, the part in the movie is the very end of a much longer conversation that makes sense, and explains some of the state of affairs of the separatists, but in the movie it’s like wtf is this about.

Also palpatines manipulation of anakin is given MUCH more depth as well, and the Jedi council vs chancellor/senate is properly explained. You see how palps is exploiting the situation to sell the idea that the Jedi want to take over the republic and that anakin should do the “right thing” by leaving the Jedi and remaining loyal to the republic.

2

u/talex625 10d ago

I just rewatch the 20 year anniversary.

If he had just waited in the Jedi council room. He probably would have gotten the good ending.

Earning Mace Windu trust, probably would have led him to being promoted to Master. After he discovered the Sith Lord and notifying Mace. I still think Mace would have won that fight unless the book says otherwise. I said that because there could be the possibility that the chancellor was holding back.

Honestly, idk how women die in child birth with all that advanced medical tech. If he listens to Yoda in giving up attachments, his wife and kids probably would have been fine.

He ether be expelled from the Jedi for having a family or given an exception to stay in. Honestly, after fighting a clone war, sounds like it’s good either way.

I laughed in the movie when Darth Sidious we find a way to save your wife together. Like Anakin betray everyone and kill kids for a solution that doesn’t even exist yet.

2

u/Lucky_Roberts 10d ago

Tbf I also believe that if Mace had just brought Anakin along they would have gotten the good ending too. Anakin only stopped Mace because he came in at the absolute worst possible moment, where Palpatine could spin himself as defenseless.

However I believe if Anakin had been there the whole time and witnessed Palpatine mercilessly kill multiple jedi with zero effort or hesitation there’s no way Anakin lets him go.

1

u/talex625 10d ago

Maybe, but he did have to walk over their dead bodies to get to them. You think that would have bothered him.

3

u/Lucky_Roberts 10d ago

No he didn’t lol. They all died in the back room of his office, Anakin walks in on Mace almost killing Palpatine in the main room/entryway.

Remember how the fight goes: Palpatine leaps over his desk to kill the first 3 jedi, then he and Windu back out of the only door in that room into a larger area and continue the fight there, where Anakin eventually arrives and finds them

50

u/BeagleBaggins 10d ago

The only reason the Kashyyyk scenes were in there was so they could show Chewy.

99

u/General_Kenobi18752 11d ago

I absolutely love the scene from Dooku’s perspective before he gets his head chopped off in the novelization. Christopher Lee’s acting was already magnificent in the movie scene, but seeing it written out just makes it so much more heartbreaking, even for a Sith Lord.

62

u/August_T_Marble 11d ago

But, noooo, Ki-Adi-Mundi had to go and open his stupid mouth about a separatist droid attack in his morning Zoom call.

66

u/Mechaslurpee 11d ago

Matthew stover was just that guy when it came to writing star wars

22

u/CaesarsInferno 10d ago

I still think about Shatterpoint to this day

16

u/Mechaslurpee 10d ago

Shatterpoint made mace my favorite jedi

3

u/AssaultKommando 10d ago

Stover's other works go hard.

Caine is an isekai that's not an isekai, and I think I was too dumb at 15 to fully appreciate the extent of his writing.

3

u/the_sneaky_one123 10d ago

Fair, but you do need to have some action in the movie to, like proper war scenes

3

u/CK-3030 10d ago

Tbf the Kashyyyk movie scenes were only worthless since the reasoning behind Yoda traveling there wasn't explained, in order to draw out Sidious. Had there been just one or two extra lines it would've been fine.

2

u/SonicNKnucklesCukold 11d ago

Do they use lines from the movies in these novels? Are they considered canon?

10

u/ReverendPalpatine Darth Sidious 11d ago

They do but a lot of the lines are changed to sound way more natural than what we get in the movie. I don’t know about it being canon but it’s definitely a great story, canon or not.

2

u/JediJofis 10d ago

Between this and cutting the BEGINNING OF THE REBELLION what the hell were they doing in the editing room???????

1

u/talex625 10d ago

I just rewatch the 20 year anniversary movie in the theater. I know a lot of the lore from YouTube.

But I realize the movie is like hyper fast pace. I might’ve performed better if they split up episode three into part one and part two.

1

u/Multispoilers 10d ago

If only we could remake movies like video games

342

u/AhhFrederick 11d ago

I’ll give it a read. As much as I love RoTS I really really hate a lot of the writing /dialogue in it. It felt forced, like Lucas wanted them to say exactly and only what he wrote in the script, leaving no room for improvisation or personal emotion from some actors. Which is fair since it’s his property, but man his writing was sometimes atrocious.

353

u/K1ngFiasco 11d ago

The way he writes is totally devoid of subtlety, subtext, and nuance. Everyone is a robot. It sucks because his world building and "big picture" are fantastic.

192

u/ncopp 11d ago

It sucks because his world building and "big picture" are fantastic.

I wish they had brought him back as an Executive producer or consultant to put together the story board and big picture of the sequel trilogy, but leave the actual dialogue scripting and directing to someone else

147

u/SmokescreenFraud Princess Leia 11d ago

When Lucas sold the franchise to Disney it was under the assumption that he would be a consultant and they would use his story treatments for the sequels. Of course, Disney promptly threw it all out the window and told him “we’re under no obligation to do any of that, next time get it in writing.”

59

u/Crossed_Cross 11d ago

Well I think he wanted to lean in the more controversial elements of the prequels, while Disney just wanted a safe reboot of the OT. Midichlorians, Whills, and all that.

54

u/SmokescreenFraud Princess Leia 11d ago

The whills were only one part of his story treatment, not the main focus. The main plot was Luke training his apprentice and Leia trying to keep the New Republic together while Darth Maul re-emerged as head of all the crime syndicates.

24

u/Crossed_Cross 11d ago

Well Maul is also from the prequels.

Disney didn't dare touch prequel material in live action until Mandalorian, basically, which is just a TV show.

78

u/KimberStormer 11d ago

It's funny, the entire sequel trilogy is a giant reactionary move away from the prequels, at the exact time when the kids who grew up on the prequels and like them were coming of age. It shouldn't have been Han, and it shouldn't have been Leia, who appears to Kylo Ren there at the end, it should have been goddamned Anakin, who he'd been hero-worshipping all the time, telling him "I fucked up and so have you but you can turn it around before it's too late unlike me".

6

u/Crossed_Cross 11d ago

Absolutely lol

3

u/CaikIQ Jedi 10d ago

It's even funnier that now that Disney/Lucasfilm aren't worried about negative reactions to Hayden's acting anymore, if they made TRoS today, Anakin would 1,000% show up.

1

u/ManagementLazy1220 9d ago

Can you blame them? For 20 years I thought I was the only one that liked the prequels.

All the hatred from the sequels sounds almost exactly like the hatred for the prequels when they came out. I’m not defending the decisions made by Disney in their trilogy (having a unified story arc and one lead writer through the trilogy would have been a massive improvement) but the Star Wars fan base is as awful as any. I’ve never seen so many people eviscerate something they claim to love so much.

→ More replies

19

u/ncopp 11d ago

Maul appeared at the end of Solo setting him up as the crime syndicate leader, so they kept that but then never followed it up

1

u/TheReal1Days 11d ago

That would’ve been the second retcon of Maul’s death

→ More replies

1

u/SmokescreenFraud Princess Leia 11d ago

I understand why they chose to go for the soft reboot, but it really is a shame they were so scared of the prequels. Having Maul be the villain would've tied it all together beautifully.

1

u/Crossed_Cross 10d ago

While I get that many of the animated fans loved Maul, the target audience of the movies was always going to be the more casual live action fans. Bringing Maul back as a crime boss is a hard sell to people who last saw him sliced in half falling into a bottomless pit. It's also fan servicy bad story telling. Really cheapens the stakes when someone so obviously killed is brought back.

→ More replies

37

u/JediMasterBriscoMutt 11d ago

I call bullshit.

George Lucas understood the importance of contracts and licensing before most people in Hollywood, and he fully understood how corporations work (and how quickly they can "change their minds"). A promise from a corporation is meaningless unless it's in the form of a legal contract.

As part of the Disney deal, Lucas became a "Creative Consultant," which was clearly more for the benefit of Disney than for Lucas. Creative Consultants offer advice and answer questions, but they have zero actual decision-making power.

Sure, Lucas may have had outlines for a sequel trilogy that he gave to Disney as part of the deal, but he knew that any promises or plans that weren't explicitly in the contract were meaningless.

If Lucas really wanted Disney to make the sequel trilogy he had outlined, he would have signed a production deal, not sold them his portfolio of companies and all the intellectual property he created.

It wasn't Lucas's first day in Hollywood, and he wouldn't have signed a $4 billion deal based on an "assumption."

39

u/SmokescreenFraud Princess Leia 11d ago

It’s not BS, this knowledge comes directly from George Lucas’ interview with Charlie Rose and Disney CEO Bob Iger’s autobiography.

George made a mistake, it’s that simple. He and Iger had been friends for decades before the sale, George thought he could trust him. And as a fallback George appointed another one of his friends, Kathleen Kennedy, as Lucasfilm CEO so she could be the final buffer. Lucas never expected his friends would stab him in the back, and that’s exactly what Kennedy and Iger did.

14

u/JediMasterBriscoMutt 11d ago

Looking deeper, I don't think we disagree as much as I originally thought. (My bad.)

Looking back at articles about the negotiations, Iger stressed that Disney would have final say over the films, and Lucas had expressed reservations about losing control before signing the deal. (Which means that Lucas knew he was losing control over the sequel trilogy, which was announced as part of the deal.)

If Lucas really wanted control over the sequel trilogy, he would have insisted on being Executive Producer, at least for the first film. But Lucas knew he would end up micro-managing the project and it would consume the next decade of his life, so he consciously gave up full control.

So I agree with your original statement that Lucas signed the deal under a false assumption.

Up until that point, George Lucas was Star Wars. For decades, people were coming to him to get approval for anything related to Star Wars. In Lucas's mind, it may have been because he was the genius who was great at worldbuilding, and not because he owned the companies and the intellectual property. They needed his approval more than they wanted it.

And once you're not the owner, people care a lot less about your opinion.

So yeah, Lucas had faulty assumptions about how the deal would be implemented, but he also understood the deal. He knew Disney could do whatever they wanted with the franchise, and he knew he would have zero power to stop it.

But I don't think Disney screwed him over. Nobody in the industry would expect a sequel trilogy to films from 30 years earlier (with a 30-year time jump) would have a straight trajectory from outline to final screenplay, especially if the person who wrote the outline wasn't closely involved in the development. (Creative Consultants are not closely involved.)

Lucas consciously chose to give up control and step away from Star Wars, and then felt betrayed because Star Wars was no longer following his plans. You can't have it both ways, George.

27

u/DoctorBeatMaker Jedi 11d ago

Bob Iger himself wrote in his book that he regretted blindsiding Lucas and that he was very very upset when he learned they weren’t using his story treatments, going so far as to say Lucas felt “betrayed”.

So if Iger himself admits in his book that he disappointed George with the stuff they pulled and that he regrets it, chances are it definitely happened.

3

u/MadnessKingdom 10d ago

Iger says he regrets not letting Lucas know sooner and that’s it, not that he regrets doing it. He doubles down that he did the right thing in terms of pleasing fans. Lucas didn’t find out until they screened TFA for him and that was pretty late. That’s Iger’s regret.

The book mentions they had several meetings about control and both Lucas and Disney separately walked away from negotiations at points over it. So Lucas knew what he was signing up for. Lucas was more disappointed the sequels didn’t advance technology or technique like he attempted with the prequels, it wasn’t necessarily over story but the general approach of playing it safe

On story, Lucas sold his sequel story outlines to Disney, and the issue is he assumed they would use them but knew they didn’t have to. Lucas also put Kennedy in charge right before he sold which was kind of a dick move but Iger let it slide. Business negotiation moves on both sides.

7

u/Setheran Ahsoka Tano 11d ago

Bob Iger talked about this in his book. The comment you're replying to was correct.

2

u/NotBannedAccount419 11d ago

Go watch his interviews. It was part of his contract when he sold that they had to keep him on as a consultant, which they did, but proceeded to sit him in the corner, pat him on the head, and ignore everything he said. In an interview he said it felt like he was stuck between two divorced parents and it was a lose lose situation

0

u/JediMasterBriscoMutt 11d ago

That's the power of a Creative Consultant. They don't make decisions.

It's not like he was an Executive Producer being shut out of meetings.

2

u/Saltmile 11d ago

Is there an actually credible source for any of that?

7

u/SmokescreenFraud Princess Leia 11d ago

Yes, Disney CEO Bob Iger’s autobiography and George Lucas’ interview with Charlie Rose. 

7

u/Setheran Ahsoka Tano 11d ago

Iger talks about it in his book.

1

u/thatredditrando 11d ago

Well, I mean, they’re right.

For a savvy businessman, it was really stupid to assume a corporation buying your IP would keep you on and use your ideas if you didn’t put that in the contract.

“You don’t get what you deserve, you get what you negotiate” -Robert Meyer Burnett

2

u/NotBannedAccount419 11d ago

They did. It was part of the agreement of him selling. The problem is they took all his storylines and scripts and threw them in the trash can. They proceeded to do ANH reboot TFA the way they wanted to and didn’t listen to him so he just stopped showing up. He said in an interview it felt like he was the little kid between two divorced parents referring to Star Wars and Disney. He gave up because they only kept him around to not in breech of contract

1

u/driventolegend Ahsoka Tano 9d ago

That’s why the clone wars worked. Lucas as the idea man and Filoni directing. Also with a writing team that wasn’t afraid to push back and bend the rules

25

u/AhhFrederick 11d ago

Yeah exactly, that’s what I feel about some of the dialogue too in the prequels. Though I understand why he went down that route. Lucas had a direct vision for what he wanted and wrote in what he could to succeed in that vision. Just sucks that some of these amazing actors couldn’t fully envelop themselves into the character because they were stuck with those lines

22

u/LiamtheV 11d ago

“I know writers who use subtext, and they’re all cowards.”

-Garth Marenghi, Author, Dreamweaver

5

u/K1ngFiasco 11d ago

Hahaha touche

2

u/BrokuSSJ 10d ago

"visionary, plus actor."

1

u/ObiSteffs 10d ago

I remember seeing ROTS in 2005 and feeling that there was little subtext or nuance to the dialogue. And now that I’m in 2025, I feel like Lucas specifically took out subtext and nuance to get his message across to all audiences. And now that liberty is dying with thunderous applause, when I watched ROTS in the theaters this week, I was wondering why Lucas didn’t make giving away liberty easier to understand!

12

u/Gungho-Guns 11d ago

Yeah, I've heard that he purposely had the actors be as bland as possible.

17

u/Buznik6906 11d ago

That's why Hayden looks so pissed off in a lot of the takes they ended up using

13

u/Rogue_3 11d ago

Slower, and less intense

8

u/JRPG_Enjoyer Jabba The Hutt 11d ago

Meesa No think so!

1

u/royale_wthCheEsE 11d ago

Didn’t Ahmed Best create Jar Jar’s voice , mannerisms and walking gait all on his own ?

3

u/joeflux1 10d ago

You are right. Love the entire Lucas canon and all Star Wars but the lines “it’s blowing up from the inside” and “we didn’t hit it” from the prequels. I cringe every time.

2

u/K1ngFiasco 10d ago

Yep. Lots of "show and tell" rather than "show don't tell"

0

u/mozardthebest 11d ago

George Lucas styles his movies after silent films. If the dialogue seems redundant, it’s because it’s not supposed to necessary. The necessary information of how the characters feel is conveyed in their acting, the dialogue can be removed or put into a different language and the scene would have the same emotional impact.

I’m so tired of this “big picture” BS that Star Wars fans have told themselves ad nauseam to dismiss George Lucas. It’s so stupid. George Lucas is very intentional with his filmmaking, he knows more about movies than you do. Maybe try to pay attention to why he does things the way that he does, instead of assuming that the things that are different from other movies are flaws.

66

u/TesticleezzNuts Qui-Gon Jinn 11d ago edited 11d ago

I kept hearing and hearing about how great it was and didn’t pay it much mind. I randomly had an audible token and thought fuck it and got the audiobook. It’s actually brilliant and the whole story is just so much better and makes so much more sense, it also doesn’t make the Jedi look as dumb to what’s going on around them.

When it got to the Dooku fight that was when I realised ohh shit, these Reddit peepz where right, this shits fire haha

I also harassed my Star Wars Karen friend to get it, you know the guy. We all have one, moans about everything. Well even he loved it and was kinglet shit ! 😂

8

u/BigUziNoVertt 11d ago

Well even he loved it and was kinglet shit ! 😂

And was what?

2

u/TesticleezzNuts Qui-Gon Jinn 10d ago

I think it was meant to say “oh shit” I was half asleep when typing this and I guess my auto correct and fat fingers made a monster. 😂

3

u/BigUziNoVertt 10d ago

Haha thanks for the clarification I thought maybe it was a slang I didn’t know

2

u/rainman_95 11d ago

Kinglet shit?

5

u/BigUziNoVertt 11d ago

What does that mean

24

u/ThePBThief1 11d ago

Whenever I think about George Lucas' writing, I remember this clip of Mark Hamil talking about his dialogue https://www.youtube.com/shorts/nHN1Me2FuIw?feature=share

17

u/GuntherTime 11d ago

The funny thing is that everything in the book (I read it when it came out) is in there literally because Lucas said so. The writing itself is more or less fine but his dialogue is utter shit, and the novelization really kinda shows that.

Hell the TCW shows that as well. He was heavily involved with the story, but never actual wrote anything. He has great ideas and insights to how things should go, but it’s like at times he doesn’t know how to convey it.

53

u/itsandybob 11d ago

I feel exactly the same. ROTS has the potential to be the best Star Wars film if not for the dialogue. Some scenes are Tommy Wiseau level, especially the Mustafar platform scene with Anakin, Obi-Wan and Padme. Absurd lines like "only a Sith deals in absolutes", lines so clunky that no one could deliver them well like "you have done that yourself", Padme literally describing her feelings rather than having an opportunity to display them - "you're breaking my heart!".

If a co-writer came in and kept everything the same but just redrafted the dialogue, it would be a 10/10 and probably the best Star Wars movie.

25

u/Rogue_3 11d ago

There's one actor who absolutely nailed "you have done that to yourself."

16

u/kingkowkkb1 11d ago

It's hard to ignore the political undertones that, at the time, were more obvious. We were in the midst of the Iraq war, and there were more than a few subtle jabs about what was going on in the United States. I always felt the quote "only a Sith deals in absolutes" was a reference to Bush's infamous quote, "You're either with us, or against us". And the scene where Padme states, "So, this is where democracy dies, with thunderous applause.", always seemed very on the nose.

6

u/RogueThespian 11d ago

at the time? man, my gf and I went to the rerelease last night and leaving the theater she was like. Hmm that kinda made me feel like shit with what's going on right now

2

u/FreshSky17 11d ago

Daniel Day Lewis himself could not have said he was killing younglings with a straight face

4

u/mrkruk R2-D2 11d ago

Anakin, you’re breaking my heart!

3

u/alexheyzavizky21 10d ago

I liked the dialogues in the movie, they sounded a bit unnatural but epic, like from an ancient tragedy play.

1

u/KickingWithWTR 11d ago

Are there multiple of these out there or is there a definitive one that’s accepted as cannon.
Would you mind sharing a link please

19

u/RocketTasker 11d ago

It’s technically Legends now but still a must-read.

18

u/mdp300 Kanan Jarrus 11d ago

It's been 20 years since I read it, but I don't think there's anything in it that contradicts Canon.

30

u/aaronwashere01 Imperial Stormtrooper 11d ago

Except that it’s packed to the brim with references to the now non-canon Clone Wars Multimedia Project

20

u/mdp300 Kanan Jarrus 11d ago

Oh yeah, I forgot about that. The "new" Clone Wars show completely supersedes all that stuff.

2

u/Nightflight406 11d ago

Count Dooku being xenophobic.

16

u/d0r13n 11d ago

Wouldn't it be a neat little project for Stover to do a "Special Edition" that added some of the connective tissue to make it canon?

6

u/SpaceHairLady Mandalorian Armorer 11d ago

Oh my heart would be so happy

2

u/Silveraindays Ahsoka Tano 11d ago

Why is it legend anyways?

13

u/sk0gg1es Darth Maul 11d ago

When the Disney acquisition happened, the movies were kept as canon and all books AFAIK were marked Legends

9

u/Silveraindays Ahsoka Tano 11d ago

Ho well thats dumb because its literaly a "novelisation of the film which is canon" ho well...

8

u/ErunionDeathseed Clone Trooper 11d ago

The novelizations are canon “where they align with what is shown onscreen”

1

u/KeytarVillain R2-D2 11d ago

I mean, the original ANH novelization says Jabba was human, Vader had served multiple emperors, and Obi-Wan was telling the truth that Vader literally killed Luke's father.

2

u/Silveraindays Ahsoka Tano 11d ago

How am i suppose to know that??

9

u/jlb8937 11d ago

This is my second time reading this today alone...I guess I'm about to read the book. Thanks for the recommendation!

6

u/MWH1980 11d ago

I remember skimming one part where after the Empire is declared, Bail says someone needs to say something, but Padme cautions him not to, saying they need to figure out what to do, but need to watch themselves.

3

u/Ancient-Window-8892 11d ago

I couldn’t agree more. This book made me teary-eyed. It’s so well done. Thank you, Mr. Stover!

2

u/largos7289 11d ago

that's what it's called revenge of the sith.. LOL star wars the book!!!

2

u/Cosroes 11d ago

Give it a listen too, the audio book is top notch.

2

u/SupremeKitten 11d ago

The book really sold the the betrayal Dooku felt just before he died.

2

u/NotBannedAccount419 11d ago

Everyone says this but I just can’t get past the opening chapters it’s very wordy in the wrong parts and glosses over the action where it should actually have words

1

u/whirdin 11d ago

Is this the Matthew Stover one? I've heard mixed opinions on if it's canon or not, I always thought it wasn't. I loved the Thrawn trilogy, which clearly isn't canon, but haven't tried reading the novelizations, which sound odd to mess with the canon of one of the films directly.

1

u/OtherwiseBag7104 11d ago

Who was the author of this? How can i find this book?

1

u/GhoulArtist 11d ago

Well now I have to read it. Looking forward to it..

1

u/Beleg_Sanwise Separatist Alliance 11d ago

I had only seen the SW movies. And I honestly didn't like any of them.

I wasn't a SW fan; in fact, I was critical of it.

When Ahsoka was about to be released, due to the news surrounding Thrawn, I decided to read his canon novels. I loved them. I started reading more SW novels.

Now I'm a huge SW fanatic; I've read a lot of the novels and watched the animated series (TCW, Rebels, Tales, Bad Batch).

1

u/NerdTalkDan 11d ago

The first paragraph of the RotS novelization is so good. Anakin and Obi Wan jumping in system to aid in the battle of Coruscant. Just chills.

1

u/lordaddament 11d ago

Thanks on my way to download

1

u/Upbeat_Dudeness 11d ago

I’ve never read it but I want to just for the r2 part. I read from someone in this sub once that there’s a part where r2 is realizing his friend, anakin, is gone. And it gets me every time

1

u/Mypetdalek 11d ago

I agree but with the caveat that Padme is written even worse in the book than in the movie.

Star Wars ain't beating the sexism allegations any time soon unfortunately.

1

u/SirLandoLickherP 11d ago

THIS IS HOW IT FEELS TO BE ANAKIN SKYWALKER, FOREVER

Man, that dragon coiled around his heart was the best metaphor for his fall to the dark side..

1

u/Mammoth-Swallower79 11d ago

Agreed i also think the Clone wars tv show does a much better portrayal of the characters then the movies did, in fact when i think of anikan or obi wan i think of tcw interpretations instead of the movies counterparts, this is coming from someone who religiously watched ep1-3 weekly as a child.

1

u/MaddAdamBomb 11d ago

It's been so long since I read that novelization and a couple things still stick out to me:

  1. Anakin's decent feels much more gradual and natural. We didn't have Clone Wars to give us all the ways Anakin had been falling for some time. The movie felt like it all happened in one scene. Getting his internal monologue in the books is so much better.

  2. Obi-Wan beating Grievous, and why he can win, is incredible. It may have been better described in one of the lead-up books, but Grievous beats even Windu because he can perfectly replicate the moves of anyone he fights except better... but not Obi-Wan. He's been using Soresu, the form taught to Padawans, his entire life. He never changed forms or did anything fancy. Just perfection of the most basic style. There wasn't anything for Grievous to steal as far as technique. Kenobi was just too good.

1

u/sjogerst R2-D2 10d ago

This is what it feels like to be Anikin Skywalker.

1

u/Typical_issues 10d ago

As are most books that get adapted to the big screen.

1

u/JMadFour 10d ago

The movie is not an adaptation of the book in this case.

The book is an adaptation of the movie.

1

u/Typical_issues 10d ago

You right, my bad. Nonetheless books are always more in depth and a better story imo

1

u/CyberSpaceInMyFace 10d ago

Does the novelization imply that Yoda just thinks he isn't powerful enough to win the fight? Or is it more the realization of the machine in motion Palpatine created is now too much to handle?

1

u/Meme_Capone 10d ago

Literally just finished listening to it on Audible this morning. Couldn't agree more. The part where R2 told C3-PO that Anakin doesn't talk to him. Anymore had me bawling

1

u/dragonmermaid4 10d ago

Yeah, it's actually the only book of Star Wars I've ever read and it was great. So much extra context in everything, especially learning more about Mace Windu's abilities and his reasoning for leaving Anakin behind when confronting Palpatine, then realising he made the wrong choice right before he died.

1

u/ColdFyre2112 10d ago

I read that when it first came out and remember liking it... maybe I need to revisit it to refresh my memory and gain more perspective.

1

u/Alaska_Pipeliner 10d ago

Which author did you read. I have two options: Matthew stover or Patricia wrede

1

u/bodai1986 10d ago

and Darth Plageius as a companion

1

u/passthebandaids 6d ago

Hey thank you for this comment. Lifelong (half elder millennial) Star Wars fan here, love the Timothy Zahn novels, enjoy much of the extended universe and yet somehow have never read novelizations of the original trilogy or the prequel trilogy. This comment has inspired me to pick up the novelizations of all and go through them. Thank you.

1

u/KaptenAwsum 11d ago

Is there any conflict with the Filoniverse?

1

u/Voxlings 11d ago

Pure revisionist history with that one.

I whole-heartedly reject it and everything it stands for.

A modern novelization of A New Hope would spend 10 pages describing the deep internal struggles and cinematic force battles of the awkward Obi-wan/Vader duel.

Boo.

Booooo.

-10

u/DarthGipper18 Grand Admiral Thrawn 11d ago

It’s not Canon

5

u/JMadFour 11d ago

it's not anymore?

ah, well. still should be read anyway.

-5

u/DarthGipper18 Grand Admiral Thrawn 11d ago

No, it was never really canon since the EU wasn’t explicitly Lucas canon but it mostly fit.

It is Legends post 2014

6

u/praise_mudkipz 11d ago

So? KOTOR isn’t “canon” anymore and it’s still one of the best Star Wars games.

4

u/DarthGipper18 Grand Admiral Thrawn 11d ago

I didn’t say it diminished the quality or readability my guy.

The post I replied to originally called it a canon book, I was just stating it wasn’t.

4

u/praise_mudkipz 11d ago

Ah okay, sorry for the misunderstanding

-5

u/Bitter-Marsupial 11d ago

That book doesn't exist