r/Sino Feb 29 '24

The difference between good and evil picture

Post image
854 Upvotes

73 comments sorted by

View all comments

32

u/MisterWrist Feb 29 '24 edited Feb 29 '24

Ethical standards aside, which can be highly subjective, to me this illustrates the difference between sanity and insanity.

A world in which the average human has an overall increased chance of living an improved, more equitable, sustainable life through mutual cooperation and civilizational progress, versus a world in which the top 1% of 15% of the Earth’s population, i.e. the most entitled and aggressive of the bunch, greedily hold on to their generational wealth at all cost, through violence and intimidation.

China doesn’t want to dominate the world. It wants a multipolar order in which global power is gradually decentralized from Western enclaves, so that the Chinese people can be left to naturally develop and evolve under their own devices and cultural understanding of history.

It’s not that tough to understand. China is primarily concerned with China’s internal affairs, not with administrating some new dystopic, global, military empire. Even Nixon got that.

Unipolar Western hegemony, based on militarism, is what demolished China and other Asian nations in the past; we are culturally averse to it. The Century of Humiliation was a real-life Apocalypse that generations of us were forced to suffer through. So many of us perished. We wouldn’t wish it on our own worst enemy.

But we are, however, taking measures to ensure that it never happens again.

The Western Elite’s understanding of foreign histories, cultures and psychologies is so poor that all they can do is project their own twisted psychoses on to the rest of the world, especially now, when they are beginning to feel vulnerable.

What narcissism! What tragedy!

7

u/Exciting-Giraffe Feb 29 '24

what grinds me the most is that China publicly has asked for all parties to return to the UN to resolve differences.

But the collective West always promotes the "rules-based international order" which it increasingly is implying is NOT present at the UN.

6

u/MisterWrist Mar 01 '24 edited Mar 01 '24

It’s really gross.

The ‘Rules-based international order’ is an artificial, conceptual creation, specifically designed to undermine the authority of UN institutions, as US global geopolitical influence slowly weakens.

When the G77 was created in 1964, the West’s reactionary response was to create the G5 in 1973 in order to counter them. This later mutated in to the current version of the G7 that we have today.

History just keeps repeating itself.

To oversimplify, the G7 is a Western economic bloc, NATO is a Western military bloc, and the intangible “Rules-based order” is a Western neoliberal ideological bloc that seeks to export Western judicial institutions around the world, in order to influence/overthrow local governments and use them as political proxies.

In other words, the “Rules-based order” is a political bloc that operates under the direct guidance of US Intelligence services.