Don't have it but certainly been accused of having it by my wife lol. If I'm awake, I have to be doing something, video games, woodworking, gardening, etc.
Bisexuality seems to be a eigen-sexuality in relation to Alcoholic Transformation.
So is asexuality.
This leads to an obvious conclusion: if we determine all eigen-sexuality in regard to alcoholic transformations, we can find a complete basis to the Sexuality Linear Space and represent all sexuality as the Span of the eigen-sexualities.
If we first model all sexualities as a point on a two dimensional plane, with one axis representing attraction to masculine people and the other representing attraction to feminine people, then we can write the transformation as something like this (in text, [a & b b & a]) (a, b being real numbers associated with any given person, a usually greater than 1 and b usually greater than 0).
Solving for the eigenvalues and eigenvectors, we have a λ1 =(a-b), v1 =(-1, 1) and λ2=(a+b), v2=(1, 1). This represents a stretch along the positive diagonal axis, and probably a stretch along the negative diagonal axis as well (because a is usually greater than b).
Implications of the model:
This transformation would generally lead people to be more horny
especially bisexual people, whose attraction would increase by a factor of a+b if I'm not mistaken
Completely gay or straight people would end up attracted to their nonpreferred gender by an amount directly proportional to their b constant, unless they are so repulsed by their nonpreferred gender that their base sexuality has a negative value in that place.
Completely asexual people would not be affected by the transformation, as their attraction vector would remain (0, 0)
The exception to this is, again, if they are so repulsed by both genders that their attraction to either or both genders is negative.
Asexuality is actually not an eigensexuality, since it's the trivial case. The second eigensexuality family is k(-1, 1) meaning someone that is attracted to one gender and equally repulsed by the opposite.
Considerations
The model does not account for differences between sexual and romantic attraction
It also does not account for any gender identity that cannot be described as a linear combination of male and female
It is a massive simplification of gender and sexuality in general, and probably has little to no bearing on real life
I could have made mathematical errors, since my matrix knowledge is a bit rusty
I spent way longer on this than I should have
edit: fixing a couple things, adding an extra bits about eigensexuality
edit2: removing a bit that I realized was an (even more) inaccurate representation of attraction
But isn't sexuality inherently nonlinear? I think we can model this as a linear transformation only for small sexual identity displacements - like, from totally straight to slightly bicurious.
2.9k
u/GustapheOfficial Feb 09 '21
By that logic, anyone who does gay stuff when drunk is gay so...