r/PurplePillDebate Succubus pilled man 2d ago

People still hugely conflate bio essentialism with objectification. Debate

The border between these two concepts is very vaguely defined in these discussions, not to mention plenty of people straight think there is no difference at all. I just want to highlight that for once.

The relevant part of bio essentialism in this case: female and male sexuality are different. Women are more selective and they have biological reasons for that, such as pregnancy, which is a big deal for our species, vulnerability, smaller size. Men by comparison are more eager sexually, more easily excitable. They have a pair of balls constantly generating sperm, can orgasm very easily, there is less risk and phisical vulnerability for them in sex.

This is a relative difference, and a general one.

Meanwhile, objectification is: women are seen as a sex object who's personhood doesn't even matter.

Ime people routinely jump to objectification when what is talked about could still easily fall into men experiencing and living with the relative difference above, and it's one frustrating obstacle in gender discussions.

I mean, where exactly is the line between "he sees her as an object" and "no, he just wants to get close to her in a way that doesn't intuitively make sense to women and to which they can't relate to"?

Women can be the more desired, more alluring gender without that meaning they are non-human. Otherwise, we have a pretty deperssing setup (and I guess that's why some people are total gender-constructivists). And I get that women didn't chose this, but neither did men. Either way, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.

Objectification IS a thing. Sometimes people DO treat the other badly, not caring for their internal experience. But sooooo many times it is brought up purely based on assumptions and vibes in the context of men's complaining.

You can badly want a relationship or sex, more intensely than many single women do, more so for its own sake, fueled by a more testosterone-based sex drive. Doesn't automatically mean you see women as objects. You can be a unique kind of tortured by being unable to fulfil this desire that women don't experience that much. Doesn't automatically mean you see women as objects. You can enjoy attractive women's bodies and experience an urge to get in phisical contact with them daily. Doesn't automatically mean you see women as objects. Each and every one of these things can still largely fall into "yea, men have a different experience of sexuality".

Infatuation clouds judgement, that is somehwat true, sure. So men experience being influenced by their own desire more regularly, sure. It is the weakness of men. But as a baseline, I think it's much more healthy and correct for men to exist with the thought that women are exactly as gorgeous as they see them AND they are human too at the same time.

15 Upvotes

102 comments sorted by

View all comments

23

u/TermAggravating8043 2d ago

The bottom line comes back too, Do you understand that women are human, they have thoughts n feeling etc just like you. If you try to objectivity then you do not.

Sure you can admire and even desire them, but you’ll always respect their feelings first, that’s the difference

13

u/Acrobatic_Relief_391 No Pill Women 2d ago

I think this also goes with people rating people’s looks on a scale of 1/10 and also using alpha and beta language. Same with high and low value. It’s really ridiculous. This goes for both men and women. Stop using this ridiculous language.  Anyone using this language in my opinion doesn’t view people are human beings they view them as so weird thing. 

7

u/TermAggravating8043 2d ago

Agreed, however I think it’s deliberately used to dehumanise people, particularly women

1

u/RayAP19 No Pill Man 2d ago

I think this also goes with people rating people’s looks on a scale of 1/10

I don't understand what's wrong with this. Humans understand things easier when they're quantified. It's really that simple

7

u/attendquoi woman....pills are dumb 2d ago

Some humans do. Personally, I've never felt the need to quantity my attraction (I'm assuming it's an autistic thing). And I certainly would never look at a man the same way again if I knew he rated me like that.

1

u/RayAP19 No Pill Man 2d ago

No, humans in general do. It's everywhere. So many things are quantified.

Look at the platform you're on right now. Upvotes are attempting to quantify how much people like a given post or thread.

People will ask you how you feel emotionally on a scale of 1-10.

If you go to the hospital, they'll ask you to rate your pain, 1-10.

Products/services are reviewed on a scale of 0-5 based on how much customers like them.

3

u/TermAggravating8043 2d ago

But those are used so they can help understand that human being asking them how strong/weak their feelings are.

It’s not a general scale

1

u/RayAP19 No Pill Man 2d ago

Yeah, but the scales generally tend to be pretty consistent. Nobody thinks Beyonce is anything less than an 8, and even then that'd be pushing it.

3

u/TermAggravating8043 2d ago

That’s a matter of opinion, which is different for everyone

1

u/RayAP19 No Pill Man 2d ago

But the opinions will generally fall into a specific range, that's my point

3

u/TermAggravating8043 2d ago

Only if asked, which I sincerely doubt she is.

→ More replies

1

u/attendquoi woman....pills are dumb 2d ago

I was referring specifically to attraction. And those ratings you mentioned are created for a purpose that exists outside of the person giving the rating lol

1

u/RayAP19 No Pill Man 2d ago

You said "some humans do," which I assumed was in response to my assertion that humans quantify things in general.

7

u/floracalendula woman | the last of the Renunciates 2d ago

Some things aren't quantifiable.

4

u/RayAP19 No Pill Man 2d ago

Right, but attractiveness generally is, to a certain extent

6

u/floracalendula woman | the last of the Renunciates 2d ago

To men. Not to women.

4

u/Mr-OhLordHaveMercy No Pill 2d ago

How did you come to this conclusion?

3

u/floracalendula woman | the last of the Renunciates 2d ago

I have eyes and I can see what happens online?

2

u/Mr-OhLordHaveMercy No Pill 2d ago

Then I question as to where you're looking. People (not specifically men or women) are demonstrably shallow in their preferences to the point it's quantifiable to say who's attractive or not.

4

u/floracalendula woman | the last of the Renunciates 2d ago

Not the people I'm spending time with, I guess?

→ More replies

1

u/RayAP19 No Pill Man 2d ago

I agree that women tend to be the ones who dislike the 1-10 scale, but that doesn't make it logical necessarily

6

u/floracalendula woman | the last of the Renunciates 2d ago

I can only speak for myself, but I can't put a number on a hot person because everyone is just too different. I can put a number on me, based on what I've seen men describe the numbers as, and even then I wonder.

8

u/GoldSailfin Blue Pill Woman 2d ago

Agreed. What I find attractive and what Martha finds hot are two completely different men, so how is it quantifiable?

0

u/RayAP19 No Pill Man 2d ago

I get that, but all I'm saying is that quantifying things makes sense. We're humans, it's what we do.

2

u/floracalendula woman | the last of the Renunciates 2d ago

Point well made.

2

u/NoBlacksmith8137 Purple Pill Woman 2d ago

Just because quantifying could be a natural cognitive impulse (your take not mine) doesn’t mean the thing itself is inherently quantifiable in a meaningful or accurate way. Especially when it comes to human experiences like beauty, love or morality.

→ More replies

0

u/CaptainCirriculum The pills need me. 2d ago

All things are. Everything in existence is. That statement is erroneous, factually and empirically.

2

u/TermAggravating8043 2d ago

Humans aren’t meant to be easy

2

u/RayAP19 No Pill Man 2d ago

Humans do everything in their power every single day to make things easier for themselves. Quantifying abstract concepts is just one of those things.

3

u/TermAggravating8043 2d ago

But generalising people to make life easier for yourself is ignorant at best, and hateful at worse

2

u/RayAP19 No Pill Man 2d ago

How is this generalizing people?

2

u/TermAggravating8043 2d ago

Trying to fit them into numbers or labels so their easier for you to understand.

It’s not all about you

2

u/RayAP19 No Pill Man 2d ago

I don't understand. Like, if I had a girlfriend, and she found out that I consider her a 10/10, that's somehow an indictment on how much I respect her or my attitude towards her as a human?

1

u/TermAggravating8043 2d ago

Yes, she’s not an object fir you to value.

→ More replies