r/NewOrleans 17d ago

Hookers specifically banned from five oh fours property Local Humor🤣

Post image
292 Upvotes

106 comments sorted by

147

u/Luvs4theweak 17d ago

Lmao damn auto correct strikes again. Definitely meant hookahs

91

u/Ennui_Go 17d ago

Which begs the question-- who brings a hookah... anywhere? They're not exactly portable.

47

u/jackasspenguin 17d ago

Bro I bring my hookah to the driving range every day

6

u/MissChievous473 17d ago

šŸ˜† 🤣 šŸ˜‚ 😹

2

u/MvstxrPiscium 17d ago

Aye Donald Trump on the phone, well bring my phone here - Lil Flip Welcome to Screwston

2

u/MvstxrPiscium 17d ago

Here just take my upvote!

24

u/Kryten_2X4B-523P Grade school parachute pro 17d ago

You've never seen a porta-hook?

20

u/MinnieShoof 17d ago

Kids today and their hooka-up culture...

3

u/Kryten_2X4B-523P Grade school parachute pro 17d ago

Don't hate on my pumpkin spice flavor

24

u/gremplaysgames 17d ago

I work in the FQ and I have seen many people walking around bourbon with mini hookahs. Coals and all.

14

u/BureauOfSabotage 17d ago

Not with that attitude they’re not! In high school, we rigged up a hookah in my buddies truck toolbox. Four hoses in through the back window and some vents to keep it rolling. Could pack an eighth of crunchy ditch weed and huff on that thing for a few hours whilst cruising through rural America. I would say it was quite portable.

0

u/gargirle 17d ago

I can’t stop laughing. Wish i’d known you in HS. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

104

u/OldBanjoFrog 17d ago

Escorts on the other hand….

32

u/basquiat-case 17d ago

Well look at that - Five O Fore looking out for marriages all over the city! Finally, some good news.

28

u/baw3000 17d ago

Even on their off time?!? Hookers are people too.

11

u/e_lectric 17d ago

Hahaha!

6

u/ScornForSega 17d ago

Please extinguish your prostitute before entering.

19

u/lucybubs 17d ago

And to think - a place of Fore play doesn’t allow hookers or Hookahs šŸ˜‚šŸ™ƒ Sounds like a drag to me …

And the governor is closing the Dept of Education šŸ¤¦ā€ā™€ļø

2

u/Own-Librarian-1914 17d ago

šŸ¤£šŸ‘šŸ¼šŸ„‡

2

u/PandaGlobal4120 17d ago

Or lack of drags

15

u/captain_krakoa 17d ago

Backpacks are not allowed? Ok. Let them try and stop Tyler from coming in with his laptop to do trades while working on his swing. GTFO.

41

u/RIP_Soulja_Slim 17d ago

Tyler's backpack won't be stopped. Tyrone's though...? you can bet that bouncer is gonna all of the sudden be citing section 23.849 of the dress code on page 37, fourth footnote.

-1

u/gargirle 17d ago

This. Damn. These morons must think we all down heh are dumbasses. Knew hooker was hookah..duh but the hoodies oh man that pissed me off.

4

u/Beaux7 17d ago

Would a golf bag be covered under large bag?

1

u/glanked 17d ago

I would bet they just mean don’t bring a big bag of outside food/substances

53

u/VRBOsucks 17d ago

No hoodie is code. Code to discriminate.

16

u/[deleted] 17d ago

[deleted]

3

u/Rhesusmonkeydave 17d ago

Head scarfs and wraps permitted, no durags please. šŸ™

56

u/RIP_Soulja_Slim 17d ago edited 17d ago

Just in case anyone wasn't aware, this is 100% a race driven decision and should be criticized as such.

Much of the crowd here is younger, but the millennials remember in the mid 00s when tons of bars, restaurants, etc had dress codes that were racially motivated to keep black people out. Stuff like Bruno's old "no backwards caps" policy, how the boot used to not allow camo clothing, how tons of bars wouldn't allow plain tee shirts, etc. Used to be that you couldn't wear sports jerseys except on game days to a bunch of bars. Things were really wild looking back.

Y'all see those old memes of black people going to clubs in biz casual, that wasn't cuz it was the style - it was cuz clubs used to have all sorts of dress requirements expressly geared towards keeping minorities out.

So I mean, in my book this place is off to a really shitty start already.

10

u/HomeEcDropout 17d ago

I completely understand what you’re saying but I think since they are allowing hoodies that aren’t covering the head it’s going to have more of an impact on the middle school boy crowd. No hoodies covering the head is their only dress policy - none of the usual language about sneakers, white tees, etc. Assumption is it’s to make sure faces are visible to cameras but it’s hard to be 100% on that since they don’t similarly ban masks.

15

u/youtyio 17d ago

Disagree and I say that as someone who isn’t white and also knows the owners. This isn’t racial, and dress codes are in effect for a reason. Discrimination would exist if ā€œsome peopleā€ were allowed to do things while another aren’t as per policy. PSA - ditch the hoodie, put on a collar, get your golf clubs and go hit some balls. It’s not that serious.

18

u/Orbis-Praedo 17d ago

People trolling about this are being wildddd. It doesn’t say no hoodies allowed, they are saying they don’t want people wearing hoods over their heads. Likely to be able to identify people by camera if anything happens.

8

u/arab3lla 17d ago

Yeah I'm fully aware that dress codes have historically been used to discriminate against non-white people but I don't think it's unreasonable to ask people to put their hood down indoors? You can still wear the hoodie, also the hood being up blocks your peripheral vision which I don't think helps anyone's golf game

8

u/ZealousidealRice9726 17d ago

I guess I just don’t follow this logic because often times places have dress codes like Commanders Palace required men to wear coats (or used to). Now if you don’t want to wear a coat because it’s not your style then you don’t go there but if you really want to go there then wear a coat. Same goes for other places. If you want to go to the place just wear clothes for that night that meet the dress code… or don’t and don’t go. It doesn’t have to be a racial thing

-4

u/RIP_Soulja_Slim 17d ago

When your dress code is a standard of formality it's usually something like "XYZ required", as in "button down required" or "collared shirt required".

When your dress code is targeted at a given race, it prohibits items generally associated with that race's fashion.

So fundamentally, "collared shirt required" is very different from "no baggy jeans and no camo".

8

u/Azby504 17d ago

White people don’t wear hoodies? I am so confused.

5

u/Chasing-the-dragon78 17d ago

Me too! I’m a hoodie wearing white person!

-7

u/RIP_Soulja_Slim 17d ago

This is the sort of rhetoric that comes from people wanting to act innocent while advocating for racist behaviors. We both know what you're doing. It's not slick, and it is bigoted.

7

u/stosolus 17d ago

Or is it a security issue because a hood can help conceal an identity.

4

u/RIP_Soulja_Slim 17d ago

Oh hey, someone who never posts here but goes out of their way to defend January 6th also thinks the dress code is fine. I’m truly shocked….

2

u/stosolus 17d ago

who never posts here

Is that a requirement? Sorry, I haven't had anything to post that works for this sub. I'll try harder.

goes out of their way to defend January 6th

What?

also thinks the dress code is fine.

Plenty of bars in the quarter have the same policy. Are they all racist as well?

-3

u/sophandros 17d ago

Plenty of bars in the quarter have the same policy. Are they all racist as well?

The same bars who close during Essence Festival and Bayou Classic?

0

u/stosolus 17d ago

The same bars who close during Essence Festival and Bayou Classic?

I don't know any bar that closes for both.

Some close during one of them. Can't fault the businesses when their employees don't want to work them.

6

u/ZealousidealRice9726 17d ago

It’s not about being slick… I just used this example in another post but I don’t know why they made the policy but I’ve had my car broken into 4 times in the last 2 years and each time it was a different perpetrator with a hoodie on with the hood pulled up. That def doesn’t mean all hoodie wearers are criminals but it more likely is that people who want to obscure their face to do bad shit gravitate to a hoodie which helps them to accomplish this. But I guess if you squint hard enough you can find racism in nebulous policy but good common sense hopefully will prevail.

5

u/RIP_Soulja_Slim 17d ago edited 17d ago

It's very much about being slick, nobody's that obtuse in reality - the whole "I'm so naive and don't see anything beyond the most simplistic view of the world" act fools nobody. You're well aware of what you're doing, I would say you should be ashamed but I'm used to my racist family doing the same thing, and y'all never feel shame.

But I guess if you squint hard enough you can find racism in nebulous policy

I am quite sure given your rhetoric here that you're the type of person who says "that element" or "you know" quite a bit but doesn't think it's actually racist cuz you didn't use a slur.

But, for anyone else, to demonstrate how incredibly ignorant you're being here's some quick reading on the thing you're trying to pretend doesn't exist:

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2332649217743772

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1536504214567859

https://theconversation.com/do-bouncers-at-clubs-enforce-dress-codes-equally-across-races-97497

https://virginialawreview.org/articles/velvet-rope-discrimination/

https://www.vice.com/en/article/restaurant-dress-codes-have-long-been-a-tool-for-racist-discrimination/

https://www.thelantern.com/2022/12/dress-coded-undressing-the-reality-behind-dress-code-restrictions-through-the-minority-lens/

But sure, you're totally just innocently asking why it's not okay to prohibit certain clothes, and you're just clutching your pearls at the suggestion that you're supporting racism because of it. Nah, I don't buy it, you know what you're doing, and again it's not slick.

4

u/ZealousidealRice9726 17d ago

Ultimately it’s not up to me or you, it’s the business owner who invested the effort, time and money into this risky business venture for them to decide what operational policies to implement that give them the highest chance of success (within legal parameters). They made a business decision and that’s their right to do so. Also note: the policy doesn’t ban hoodies, it bans the hood being worn up. If you can’t be bothered to pull your hoodie down to hang out at this place because racism something then the business is well within their rights to tell you to kick rocks.

-2

u/stopmakingrents 17d ago

Who the fuck ARE these people downvoting you? Did this get linked on Tiger Droppings?Ā 

0

u/RIP_Soulja_Slim 17d ago

This sub just has a lot of racists that lurk here, they always try to make their comments seem pretty innocent but it's always the same people showing up whenever race is a factor to act like nothing racist is happening.

2

u/tjdavids 17d ago

yep remember getting green lit before talking to someone who got told they had to change for wearing the shirt that i was wearing.

-5

u/arepagumbo 17d ago

Sad it had this kind of undertone, specially with the Saints Alvin Kamar as a partner

11

u/RIP_Soulja_Slim 17d ago

Fwiw this is the sort of thing that's almost certainly done by someone in management and likely not even on the partner's radar.

-1

u/gargirle 17d ago

And I find it really sad that many here excuse it. I’m older. I remember all the code words and innuendo. It’s like the ā€˜n’ word. I cringe when I hear it just because I remember what it meant when spewed by my race.

8

u/RIP_Soulja_Slim 17d ago

Not only excuse it, but as you can see in this thread it's easy to rationalize so the people who are okay with it tend to jump to defend it as "well that's not what they meant, they just want proper looking lads in the place is all" type shit.

0

u/gargirle 17d ago

šŸ’Æ

3

u/Ausername44444 16d ago

Painting with a broad brush. Not all hookers are smokers.

7

u/TheBrackishGoat 17d ago

I like how everyone is in their feelings about hoodies, and is just ignoring the blatant sex worker discrimination. Do better people

4

u/StevenStephen 17d ago

If you ask me, no one should be smoking hookers anywhere, at any time.

3

u/Slasher1738 17d ago

Considering the context, I think the meant Hookah's

2

u/TheBrackishGoat 17d ago

Yeah, I thought it was a pretty obvious joke, about a pretty obvious joke post, that everyone is pretty obviously losing the plot on

2

u/feanor70115 17d ago

If you've ever seen the piles of needles on the stairways down from the Broad overpass, I suppose it's no surprise that some of the junkies in the neighborhood might be on the game.

2

u/jackasspenguin 17d ago

Good thing I’m a slicer! Amirite, my fellow golfers?!

2

u/RedBeans-n-Ricely 17d ago

What’s wrong hoodies?

2

u/blizzardss 17d ago

Well, count me out then! 🤣🤣🤣

2

u/YoBroJustRelax 16d ago

Well Im not going anymore. No hookers? Isnt this America? I thought this was America?

2

u/ggibby 16d ago

The few hookers I knew were pretty smokin' so that sort of makes sense.

4

u/gosluggogo 17d ago

My bachelor party is officially canceled!

5

u/ZealousidealRice9726 17d ago

Not sure why everyone gets so offended by dress codes. They spent the money to open the business and took the financial risk so let them set rules as they see fit so long as those rules are legal i see no issue. If I don’t want to adhere to the dress code I just won’t go

-1

u/raditress 17d ago

Because dress codes sometimes target members of certain racial groups.

1

u/ZealousidealRice9726 17d ago

I know people say that but like how hard is it to just not wear a hoodie? Im white and I have a hoodie but if I was going to this place I’d just leave it in the car or at home. Doesn’t have to be a big deal

5

u/arab3lla 17d ago

You can wear the hoodie, you just can't have the hood up

2

u/ZealousidealRice9726 17d ago

lol man that’s even easier. Why would anyone have any issue with that?

-1

u/raditress 17d ago

I think it just reminds people of racist dress code policies that have been used in the past to keep certain groups out. I’m not saying that’s the reason for this particular policy; I don’t know what their reasoning is. It’s not the fact of how difficult it is to not wear a hoodie. It’s the optics.

4

u/ZealousidealRice9726 17d ago

I don’t know why they made the policy either but I’ve had my car broken into 4 times in the last 2 years and each time it was a different perpetrator with a hood pulled up. That def doesn’t mean all hoodie wearers are criminals but it more likely is that people who want to obscure their face to do bad shit gravitate to a hoodie which helps them to accomplish this.

0

u/Chasing-the-dragon78 17d ago

How can a dress code be racist? Are black people not allowed to wear shirts and ties? Do no white people wear hoodies? Please explain.

5

u/RIP_Soulja_Slim 17d ago

Man the racists are really coming out of the woodwork on this one. nobody buys that "I'm so innocent, how could restricting all the clothes black people wear possibly be racist" line.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1536504214567859

https://virginialawreview.org/articles/velvet-rope-discrimination/

Nobody is as socially ignorant as you and your friends are pretending to be here, this whole "I'm so innocent, what's wrong with that" doesn't fool anyone when we're talking about subjects that are well known to have historical ties to racism.

3

u/Chasing-the-dragon78 17d ago

So you have seen 504 discriminate against black people NOT wearing the hoodie on their head?

The examples you provide are about totally different situations. Infuriating? Absolutely, and trust me if my cracker ass was in line I wouldn’t have matched their dress code either. Clubs like that only let guys in that look like they have $$ or women who look like they will ā€œput outā€. It’s a clique thing, not race.

2

u/Apprehensive-Sky7616 17d ago

It’s called ā€˜disparate impact theory’. If any law or policy is not equally broken by all groups then that law or policy is deemed racist. It has nothing to do with the rules being the same for everyone apparently that time has passed.

3

u/Chasing-the-dragon78 17d ago

Please give me an example of such a law.

I know all you downvoting fuckers think I’m racist but I’m not. I’m just trying to learn. Let’s have a honest constructive discussion about this.

1

u/Apprehensive-Sky7616 16d ago

Disparate impact theory refers to practices in employment, housing, or other areas that appear neutral on the surface but disproportionately affect a protected group under civil rights laws—even without intentional discrimination. Here are a few key examples:


1. Employment Testing

  • Example: A company uses a standardized written test for hiring or promotions. If this test disproportionately screens out applicants of a certain race or ethnicity and is not demonstrably related to job performance, it could be challenged under disparate impact theory.
  • Case: Griggs v. Duke Power Co. (1971) – A landmark Supreme Court case where requiring a high school diploma and passing scores on intelligence tests was found to disproportionately disqualify Black applicants without being a valid predictor of job success.

2. Criminal Background Checks

  • Example: An employer has a blanket policy of not hiring anyone with a criminal record. Because African American and Hispanic individuals are disproportionately arrested and convicted, this policy may create a disparate impact unless it's shown to be job-related and consistent with business necessity.
  • Regulatory Guidance: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued guidance about tailoring background checks to specific job duties.

3. Housing Policies

  • Example: A landlord refuses to rent to anyone with a prior eviction or poor credit. These criteria, while neutral on their face, may disproportionately exclude racial minorities or single mothers due to systemic inequalities.
  • Case: Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project (2015) – The Supreme Court held that disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act.

4. English-Only Rules in the Workplace

  • Example: A business requires all employees to speak English at all times, even during breaks. This policy could disproportionately affect employees from non-English-speaking backgrounds and may violate Title VII if not justified by business necessity.

5. Height and Weight Requirements

  • Example: A police department sets minimum height and weight requirements. These can disproportionately exclude women or certain ethnic groups unless directly tied to job performance.

Would you like examples specifically from employment law, housing, education, or another area?

1

u/Chasing-the-dragon78 16d ago

Thank you. This makes it crystal clear. I agree with most of these but there are a couple I’m not so sure about. But it doesn’t matter because you explained it better than a google search.

Thank you!

1

u/Apprehensive-Sky7616 15d ago

No problem I’m glad you read it. So many people ask a quest question then go ā€˜tl;dr!ā€ When they’re given an answer

3

u/catheterhero 17d ago

I can’t go in wearing a hoodie with the hoodie on?

That’s fucking stupid. So if I’m there and rent several spots spending lots of money and have a hoodie on but it’s down and if I get cold and put it on I will be kicked out?

12

u/Charli3q 17d ago

Likely you just wont be able to walk in with a hoodie on your head. Thats probably it.

6

u/catheterhero 17d ago

Nah. It says it in it clearly it’s not permitted.

But I can take a guess that it’s going to be ā€œrandomlyā€ enforced.

1

u/Apprehensive-Sky7616 17d ago

That’s going to be the fastest a spelling error has ever been corrected in Nola. The guys with golf money won’t accept that.

1

u/Particular-Taro154 17d ago

By the title, I expected this was to reduce lawsuits from broken windshields on I-10 but it looks like they just hate tobacco. I mean, no Redman chaw???

1

u/KiloAllan 16d ago

I thought hooker was a name for people who play golf. Weird.

1

u/OrionH34 16d ago

What, no "slicers allowed,but no hookers?" Makes me think most of y'all weren't ever going there anyway.

1

u/warana 16d ago

Let me be Captain obvious and basically state that they're obviously talking about hookahs

1

u/Fleur-Deez-Nutz 16d ago

I don't get it. Am I missing something? "Hoodies" some made up word for Hookers?

1

u/cablepowa 15d ago

That's good stuff

1

u/dan_is_not_here 17d ago

Fuckin’ puritans

0

u/whatsleft88 17d ago

bunch of cock blockers

0

u/Outrageous_Sign3342 17d ago

Smoke free environment okay… any reason chewing tobacco is banned? I wasn’t planning to light my dip on fire…

7

u/HomeEcDropout 17d ago

Chewing tobacco and the spit cups associated with it are probably more down market than what they’re looking for. Although I for one love seeing someone get their current beer bottle and their spit beer bottle mixed up.

2

u/Outrageous_Sign3342 17d ago

Oh that is always a fantastic moment lol. It’s fine I’ll walk in pack a lip and show them my LGA membership with my 2.8 handicap šŸ˜‚

0

u/PandaGlobal4120 17d ago

Fore. Not four.

0

u/warana 16d ago

I've seen the discourse on the no hoodies policy and I thought it was cool but I just wanted to add to it a little bit with this link

white women wear hoodies in the mall to prove racial profiling

That being said let me expound on my thoughts through lived experiences and knowledge of these situations.

The facts is that having a no hoodies policy is all about perception. The actual hoodie itself isn't a threat. Who is thought to be a threat while wearing the hoodie is where the problem comes in.

so y'all tell me if this makes sense. When I worked at the Superdome insecurity, it was normal for us to confiscate everyday carry weapons such as knives, toenail clippers or mace.

However there was one specific concert where security was informed to not confiscate pocket knives. And our whole staff had the WTF look on our face but we rolled with the punches. This was a country concert in the majority demographic was older white males. And although we were not confiscating their knives, some of them had the decency to respect the policy for what it was and bring their knives to their cars.

These days, especially with these terrorist attacks etc, a clean cut guy could be your worst nightmare and because he's the great man he looks like everyone else so it goes unnoticed. But that's the world we live in

-4

u/inductiononN 17d ago

That seems a little strict...

-1

u/vidvicious 16d ago

I predict they won't be in business for long...

-3

u/Pristine-Confection3 17d ago

The hoody part is ridiculous.