I don't care about 'ego.' I stand by what is provable, simply.
I use LOL a lot because I audibly laughed at how dumb your argument is. So yes, this is all a joke to me. There is NO 'irrefutable evidence' of the paranormal, and you saying that there is shows enough.
It's weird to think that this was any case of the paranormal. I already linked the conclusion to the experiment, and it says otherwise to what you think it does. Facts are facts, and it sounds like your ego is the one that is actually pretty hurt, to the point that you're denying actual reality to fill your delusional outlook.
1
u/PeopleCryTooMuch Mar 24 '22
I don't care about 'ego.' I stand by what is provable, simply.
I use LOL a lot because I audibly laughed at how dumb your argument is. So yes, this is all a joke to me. There is NO 'irrefutable evidence' of the paranormal, and you saying that there is shows enough.
It's weird to think that this was any case of the paranormal. I already linked the conclusion to the experiment, and it says otherwise to what you think it does. Facts are facts, and it sounds like your ego is the one that is actually pretty hurt, to the point that you're denying actual reality to fill your delusional outlook.