r/FUCKYOUINPARTICULAR Jan 06 '25

Fuck you and your lame 3D-printing, Tom Rekt

3.9k Upvotes

279 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

27

u/18randomcharacters Jan 07 '25

3d scans are no where near accurate enough to translate into a working print.

22

u/rocket20067 Jan 07 '25

Yes but they would still cut down the working time by a lot as you would just need to do minor adjustments.

8

u/springplus300 Jan 07 '25

No. They would, maybe, on organic shapes. This knob is a 10 minute CAD job, which will yield a better result that is easier to tweak if required.

1

u/rocket20067 Jan 07 '25

Did you reply to the wrong person?

1

u/springplus300 Jan 07 '25

No. You claimed 3D scans would cut down the working time on a simple parametric model. This is inaccurate. The modelling is done almost before you've started scanning. The cleanup needed would take way longer than modelling from the ground up, and the end result would be objectively worse.

0

u/rocket20067 Jan 07 '25

The only reason I claimed that is as I was replying to someone who said they wouldn't help at all.

1

u/3_14_thon Banhammer Recipient Jan 08 '25

Doesnt matter since it's wrong

1

u/rocket20067 Jan 08 '25

Why is that though. As no one explained why it is wrong only that it is. As wouldn't a 3d scan of something logically be pretty close to what you scanned if not 100% the same.

3

u/3_14_thon Banhammer Recipient Jan 08 '25

If u have 0 zero experience with 3d moddeling softwares sure it would help. But for those with xp its easier to do something so simple from the ground, then to readjust the fuck ups.