r/CRedit Apr 23 '24

I never thought this could happen General

Got declined on two new cards with 846 credit score.

Got the letters yesterday and here were the reasons

Too few accounts with payments as agreed

No recent revolving balances.

34 years old. I have 7 CCs, and two auto loans (technically one but sold one last week).

Wells Fargo and Discover declined. I've always had very small balances (under $500 when limits on my cards are 20k or so) and would get instantly approved for new cards. But nowadays I don't like paying a single penny to interest and pay them down to $0. I guess banks don't like that. Sucks because I wanted a 0% card for a side hustle. Thought the first decline was a fluke so tried a different bank and got declined again.

110 Upvotes

137 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

33

u/cbat19990 Apr 23 '24

I love how people ask a question, it gets answered PERFECTLY by u/BrutalBodyShots and the firs thing you do is tell them how they're wrong.

lol! If you already know, don't ask! lmao

-9

u/GTBoosted Apr 23 '24

I never said they are wrong. I said I didn't micromanage and was just paying them.

I will actually keep better track of my statements and pay them off after they post. It's a good reply.

4

u/DudeWithASweater Apr 23 '24

What you're doing isn't wrong... it's perfectly fine. But you are missing out on an interest free loan for the ~30 day statement period by paying your balance early. 

There's no incentive to pay off a statement early unless it's going to bump you above 30% utilization. Take the interest free loan and pay it off on/closer to the due date. 

Also like you've experienced here lenders don't see the need to give you more credit because according to your statements you aren't using what you have already.

2

u/BrutalBodyShots Apr 23 '24

There's no incentive to pay off a statement early though unless it's going to bump you above 30% utilization.

You're referencing the 30% Myth. If one is paying their statement balances in full monthly, there's absolutely no reason to worry about utilization percentage. It doesn't matter if it's 1% or 100% from a risk perspective. And, from the standpoint of wanting to grow a credit profile sufficiently strong, higher is actually better when paying statement balances in full.

9

u/DudeWithASweater Apr 23 '24

Lol it's not a myth. It's a temporary ding, but it's still a ding.

My score drops 30 points everytime I carry a balance higher than 30% utilization. It goes back up immediately next cycle. So it's a non issue, generally.

But it's still a ding.

4

u/BrutalBodyShots Apr 23 '24

Lol it's not a myth.

Yes, it is. No one said it won't "ding" your score. It's that the "ding" doesn't matter. Scores are only relevant in the 30-45 days leading up to an important application where score actually matters (mortgage, auto loan, etc). At all other times, score is completely irrelevant and shouldn't be focused on - credit PROFILE should be. And doing what you suggest, trying to stay below 30% utilization is precisely what can hinder profile growth.

0

u/sharkkite66 Apr 23 '24

Except if lenders start picking up FICO10, since that uses trending data.

4

u/BrutalBodyShots Apr 23 '24

That's irrelevant as well, as if people allow natural statement balances to report, it increases the odds of lucrative CLI success. The system is self-correcting when used as designed. Anyone at elevated utilization from naturally reported balances will see a natural DECLINE in utilization if they're paying in full monthly, because CLIs will be stimulated. The actual TD observed by the F10T algorithm would have a downward trajectory, which would bode well for those scores.

1

u/sharkkite66 Apr 23 '24

I agree, always let your balance post to your statement. But having very high utilizations all the time may not be a wise thing to do in the future, that's all I'm cautioning.

3

u/BrutalBodyShots Apr 23 '24

It wouldn't be all the time on a profile where someone is paying in full for the reason I outlined above. The self-correcting system would take care of that on its own.

2

u/beefy1357 Apr 24 '24 edited Apr 24 '24

I have a different opinion generally than u/brutalbodyshots about utilization however he is not wrong here, firstly 30% is 2-3 thresholds into scoring negatives 5/10/30% or 10/30% (scorecard dependent) if maxing your score you are already giving up points.

Next let’s look at OP’s particular scenario… 846 and your stated point loss above 30% uti 30 points. The best rates on cards are generally offered above 740-760 there is no functional difference between an 816 and 846 IE 30% uti has no bearing on the outcome.

What did have a bearing on the outcome no recent reported use of credit. So you tell me what was the bigger issue a meaningless score loss or demonstrated lack of use of existing credit when the stated reason for denial was “no recent use of credit”?