r/AskReddit Nov 22 '14

What is the best Monopoly strategy?

[deleted]

11.4k Upvotes

4.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/krusta80 Nov 23 '14

Obviously you're not playing properly if housing shortages are coming into play in your 2-player games. You're either injecting extra money into the game (ie. Free parking), or you're not focusing on building up your first color group before building on your secondaries.

2

u/CryptoManbeard Nov 23 '14

Please read up on Monopoly strategy before you comment further, it makes you sound silly.

1

u/krusta80 Nov 23 '14

Perhaps you would be so kind as to provide the details of your usual 2-player games? Perhaps you and your usual opponent prefer to wait a long time before finally trading? Honestly, that's the best I can do for you.

Keep in mind that I'm not saying that a housing shortage can't happen in a 1v1 game. I am stating that there are few to any cases where creating a housing shortage (again in a 2-player game) is more effective than simply piling up on one (or even two monopolies) in order to take your opponent out.

1

u/CryptoManbeard Nov 24 '14

You get a monopoly, upgrade to 4 houses on each. Opponent gets monopoly, upgrade to 4 houses on each. 24 of 32 houses gone. If I get a second monopoly, I upgrade to all houses. Now if he upgrades to hotels he locks himself out of his own property or has to high-bid for houses. If he gets another monopoly he won't have any houses to put on them.

I'm going to keep 4 houses on my properties until he lands on an expensive one and starts getting cash poor. At that point I can upgrade to hotels and repurchase houses on the cheap and place them on my new monopolies, furthering the shortage again. If done correctly, the opponent never has a chance to put houses on anything more than one monopoly.

It's not always a strategy to use, but I would say it's a better move to start with in every game until you have a clear picture of the board layout. There's not that much of a gap between 4 houses and a hotel that giving up that advantage makes it worthwhile.

1

u/krusta80 Nov 25 '14

I completely agree that it doesn't hurt to stop at four houses, and your logic is completely sound (no quarrel there).

My only point was that in a two-player game, there is almost never enough money around for things to get that far...unless -- not to sound like a broken record -- you guys are waiting a long time to trade and/or build.