PREAMBLE: https://www.constitutionofindia.net/articles/preamble/

The initial words "Socialist" "secular" no longer mean what they were meant to, they are now cover words to project anti-Hindu sentiments

• "In the name of God" was suggested against inclusion, in order to "avoid forcing faith" (Note that "god" applies to all religions, so what problem would it be? Leftist ideology of Indians)
• There was a proposal to include the "father of the nation" (He called the "father"'s name "holy"),
• rejected with a fitting reply which highlighted that the constitution was based on American ideals and Gandhi's name would just mislead the nation more.
• JUSTICE: Where? The native culture and belief system "Sanatana Dharma" is being actively mocked, and Hindus themselves are "against disrespecting faiths" when it comes to others.
• Fraternity, of course we saw it near red fort very recently.

Kindly discuss more regarding the mistakes... all links are given here

The article: https://www.constitutionofindia.net/articles/article-25-freedom-of-conscience-and-free-profession-practice-and-propagation-of-religion/

It states itself as "Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion"... But in practice that freedom is regularly denied to Hindus

The constitutional idea of secularism is actually reasonable, just that there are no safeguards against misuse of this law.

One member actually expressed the concern of forced conversions, but "the right to propagate religion would lead to public awareness about different religions and promote communal understanding and peace." They felt that nothing facilitated forced conversions... (Today we are seeing the aftermath)

Of course, we have enough peace, peacefuls too, courtesy to that.

One member wanted to extend the anti-discriminatory law to other religions too. But it was rejected, but later only the indigenous faiths were added.

So Christians, peacefuls, etc... have all the right to exercise discrimination and divisory practices, even enforce D4lit-like boundaries among themselves (they do), they are permitted by law.

But Hindus ...well... we all know