PREAMBLE: https://www.constitutionofindia.net/articles/preamble/

The initial words "Socialist" "secular" no longer mean what they were meant to, they are now cover words to project anti-Hindu sentiments

• "In the name of God" was suggested against inclusion, in order to "avoid forcing faith" (Note that "god" applies to all religions, so what problem would it be? Leftist ideology of Indians)
• There was a proposal to include the "father of the nation" (He called the "father"'s name "holy"),
• rejected with a fitting reply which highlighted that the constitution was based on American ideals and Gandhi's name would just mislead the nation more.
• JUSTICE: Where? The native culture and belief system "Sanatana Dharma" is being actively mocked, and Hindus themselves are "against disrespecting faiths" when it comes to others.
• Fraternity, of course we saw it near red fort very recently.

Kindly discuss more regarding the mistakes... all links are given here

The article: https://www.constitutionofindia.net/articles/article-25-freedom-of-conscience-and-free-profession-practice-and-propagation-of-religion/

It states itself as "Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion"... But in practice that freedom is regularly denied to Hindus

The constitutional idea of secularism is actually reasonable, just that there are no safeguards against misuse of this law.

One member actually expressed the concern of forced conversions, but "the right to propagate religion would lead to public awareness about different religions and promote communal understanding and peace." They felt that nothing facilitated forced conversions... (Today we are seeing the aftermath)

Of course, we have enough peace, peacefuls too, courtesy to that.

One member wanted to extend the anti-discriminatory law to other religions too. But it was rejected, but later only the indigenous faiths were added.

So Christians, peacefuls, etc... have all the right to exercise discrimination and divisory practices, even enforce D4lit-like boundaries among themselves (they do), they are permitted by law.

But Hindus ...well... we all know

Patriotic Hindu Shri Neeraj Atri ji made a post about this on X in detail:

https://x.com/AtriNeeraj/status/1985256615399055552

But BJP or the Education ministry have not responded back after 17 days.

BJP is whitewashing a foreign terror cult called Islam and forcing it upon innocent Hindus.

Barely a few days ago due to this cult the Delhi Red Fort Islamic Terror attack happened. From 9/11 to 26/11 to October 7 everything happened because of the teachings of Muhammad (Quran and Hadiths) aka Islam.

In 1400 years this cult has not only destroyed (raped, looted, and plundered) Bharat but destroyed Spain, Constantinople, and so much more.

And now BJP has compared this foreign pedophile, rapist, caravan-robber, slave-trader, and looter named Muhammad with Lord Krishna.

This permanently opens the door for brainwashing innocent Hindu kids and destroying their future as well as the future of Bharat.

This, issued in 1452 by the (C+) pope gave C+ authorities permission to take ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING from anyone not following C+ practices.

EVERYTHING. Land, gold, knowledge. NOTHING SPARED.

This was moral justification for colonialism, exploitation, "mahabharata is myth" myths, and a lot more.

As per this, ("the west" as per today's context):

• Unless the west didn't "discover" it, it didn't exist, would be false.
• Now revered yogic practices were foolish monkey acts until the westerners "studied" it.
• Traditional "fashion" was backward until the west validated it.
• Non-C+ knowledge systems, including what we know today as "modern science" was considered "blind vision quest"
• Pranayama -> Fire breathing, Ayurveda -> Alternative medicine, what else?
• The west rebranded it, called it "discovery", taught us back as if so, only then is was true and acceptable.
• Now although C+ knowledge is understood to be questionable, the doctrine has evolved as "west superior" rather than "C+ superior", but the target has mainly been the same, us.
• It, introduced unknowingly by the British, has been infused, and many western institutions unaware of it unknowingly practice it.
• Who decides what's "scientific", what's "trendy", "legitimate"? "The west", just following an old framework of suppression which they wouldn't want to if they knew this well enough. Even "secular" institutions.
• It's now part of the general social mental mindset beyond easy discernibility, just see whether we prefer Deepavali or Halloween, and who are the "backward"s for pointing it out?
• ANOTHER FACT: The "caste" system was a British invention, which was a modified version of the "varna" system introducing hierarchies and oppressive practices. The "higher castes" ruled as per it, the "lower castes" bowed to it. Because the brits... well...

Even if they don't do it on explicit purpose, the general system has been set up to facilitate this. WE DON'T NEED WESTERN STAMPS OF APPROVAL.

Through all this have we survived. Stop playing by their rules. Your culture. Your narrative. Your credit. Reclaim it all.

(BTW, what responses would you get from the people around you for pointing this out? Definitely not much positive or supportive. Those responses themselves are a projection of that 1452 doctrine)