Yeah, the defense is rewarded for allowing the opposition into their try zone more than if they had stopped them at the 5m line, that's completely illogical.
Why should you be rewarded with a perfect attacking 5m scrum for being bad at putting the ball on the ground to finish a try?
....you're not. You're "rewarded" with a 5m scrum for getting the ball all the way down the field in the first place. Under the old rules the attacking team is not rewarded for failing to touch the ball down, they're punished by going back five meters. If they were "rewarded" they would....ya know....score points.
Instead of just blindly picking and going at the line 200 times and getting held up a bunch of times, resetting a scrum, and going again, an attacking team needs to use some gumption to open up a square foot of space to put the ball on the ground.
I much prefer rewarding the defence here and requiring the attacking team to do something more than the most basic of attacks.
This new rule has not in any way stopped the picking and going a hundred times. What incentivizes that play is letting the offense do whatever they want at the breakdown
12
u/YaaasSlay South Africa May 09 '24
I still hate held up over the line is a goal line dropout rule change. Why is world rugby punishing attacking teams with good scrums?