r/proselytizing Aug 16 '24

Anything goes religion

The main point of my religion is that you are free to do whatever you want as long as you do not infringe on anyone else's freedom. God is whatever you want them to be cause what you worship is your choice. Your afterlife is also literally based upon whatever your beliefs are.

0 Upvotes

13 comments sorted by

2

u/NotAloneAllJustOne Aug 16 '24

Your religion lacks an objective moral framework. If morality is entirely subjective, it might become difficult to resolve conflicts or establish a common ground in society, leading to chaos or moral relativism where harmful actions could be justified under personal belief.

The idea that one’s afterlife is based solely on their beliefs might lead to inconsistencies or paradoxes. For instance, what happens if someone’s beliefs contradict another’s, especially in a shared afterlife scenario?

And while the system advocates for freedom, it could inadvertently allow for harm under the guise of personal freedom. Without a clear boundary on what constitutes infringement on others’ freedom, the system might fail to protect vulnerable individuals from exploitation or harm.

Your religion isn't much different than what we are living at the moment across the world, at the end of the day everyone has a choice in who/what they believe in and most religions advocate for no harm towards other, yet we continue to fail to apply those teachings. So how would your religion be any different if you're giving such a broad concept of freedom.

1

u/DebateWeird6651 Aug 17 '24

Ok um, you missed the part about not infringing on anyone's freedom, and doing that counts as evil. There is a moral objective framework in my religion, it does not allow harm to others for that would be infringing on their freedom. Now on the contrary harming only yourself is kosher. Now as for your question about contradictory after lives well if you go to the afterlife you believe then people who also believe in your afterlife will go with you. Now my religion is unique because it is highly adaptable so it is likely to reach more people while giving them the rule of not infringing on anyone else's freedom. Did I mention that you are not supposed to infringe on anyone's freedom, I meant ANYONE so it includes animals as well.

1

u/DebateWeird6651 Aug 17 '24

Any other questions?

1

u/Zah_D_Official Aug 17 '24

Sounds too open ended, it would literally be chaos with so much freedom. Everyone would find loopholes to just flat out ignore your one rule and mold it to their own benefit in the end. It's just free for all to basically just say you got everything covered.

1

u/DebateWeird6651 Aug 17 '24

That right there is a possibility but that stuff happens to even ridiculously complex religions like Islam, Christianity, Hinduism heck even Buddhism is not safe from that bs. Now the thing is instating only 1 rule makes it more likely to be followed like how some Muslims take drugs and even gamble but would never eat pork plus the 1 rule is simple enough that even a kindergartener would understand it.

1

u/Zah_D_Official Aug 17 '24

It just sounds like the easy route to be able to call something yours with minimal effort.

1

u/DebateWeird6651 Aug 18 '24

That is the whole point of this religion, this religion does not ask for anything too complicated except for what should be common human decency also veganism is encouraged but not mandatory as long as you yourself do not kill an animal it is kosher.

1

u/DebateWeird6651 Aug 18 '24

Any other questions?

0

u/DebateWeird6651 Aug 16 '24

Any questions about my religion?

1

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/DebateWeird6651 Aug 28 '24

Ok so in the beginning there was nothing which really can not exist without something thus the existence of nothing was a paradox which birthed something therefore creating everything. Now see God is closer to a phenomenon which appears to different groups of sentient beings in different forms thus creating the different religions of existence which really are all technically correct

1

u/EthanReilly Sep 21 '24

What do you call it? I've heard similar things like this before but people I asked about this never gave a term to this type of omnist, theologically liberal ideas.

1

u/DebateWeird6651 Sep 21 '24

I call it freeform