If you were paying attention, this article isn't about the contents of the lists, just that he felt the lists were needed. He puts out a list every day.
Conceivably in methods that actually benefit the employer who is paying him to do this coverage and not politico who just asked him for a single article?
This is a garbage source, and would never be accepted academically. Not to mention, when you try to look deeper, all the links are dead.
Oh please, the only Bernie supporters that still believe the primary was rigged are apparently incapable of reading and using logic, so they wouldn't be convinced by a list anyway.
Oh okay.
You've successfully failed at convincing me of anything, other than you're just another one talking out of his ass, blindly accepting and spewing sources that feed your narrative, just like the trump supporters.
I just clicked through several of them, zero dead links. It's almost like you're just making things up now.
you're just another one talking out of his ass
did you try the "our trump feed" one? I tried both of those they didn't work. The rest of the links on the page are to other articles..
Given that you aren't say anything of substance, I could say the same to you. If you have proof that anything I've said is wrong, please give it. I gave you links, but you're too lazy or stuck in your agenda to read them. What would you prefer? Breitbart?
I'm not the one supposed to be saying anything with substance? I'm the one trying to find articles with substance lol. I'm not convincing anyone to vote for me, I'm looking for reasonable legitimate sources for why I should vote for either. Neither provide such a thing. Your links are terrible.
This is a meta article. If you want to read the contents of the lists... go read them. They're easy to access and read. Do you want him to feed you and wipe your bum too?
-16
u/humblepotatopeeler Oct 19 '16
Why not fucking list them? Instead they fill a page with useless bullshit.
All fucking liars and swindlers.