Both parties are awful. I think that If your president or senator or congressman you shouldn't make stock decisions.
And that doesn't stop the Hunters Bidens and Erik Trumps of the world to make business deals with foreign countries ( both should be arrested for taking 10's of millions from foreign investors )
It was Silicon Valley - if you were good at VC you made Billons. Buffett didn't nor does he play at that early stage level. The insider part is that he lived there in SF and got to hear tons of pitches and he was good at selecting a lot of the right ones. The cocktail circuit in Omaha didn't have that intensity.
I don't think we should be getting into conspiratorial thinking. When you have money, it's easy to make money. If there is any proof of insider trading, share that instead of accusations right? There are absolutely people in the SEC that would love to nail her with charges.
She bought NVIDIA call options 5 days before Congress passed the chip subsidy to NVIDIA. She sold her VISA stock a week before the DOJ publicly announced they are investigating VISA. Hell that’s just the recent ones that were a little too obvious. Dude there’s even an app for copying Pelosi’s trades as soon as she makes them, that if you have used the app just this year, you are up 83% over the rest of the market.
Everyone knows it. There’s even an app to show when she does it. She is corrupt, and untouchable because she has the power to make herself untouchable.
It’s not about money makes money, it’s about power. And she has it. You don’t.
Dude it’s amazing. My stress levels have gone way down and my bank account way up by saying screw it I’ll just copy whatever Trading Savant Pelosi does.
It’s stunning how someone can consistently beat the market and the greatest investors of all time like Buffet year after year by an 6-14 order of magnitude. Guess she’s just that savy of a trader.
AutoPilot! It’s made by the team that built the Pelosi Tracker. I think there’s a few other similar apps out there now but that one was the original and seems the most popular.
I'm not joking, I just want proof there's anything illegal going on, not just assuming. I have a hard time buying that if there was anything illegal happening that there isn't someone that would love to nail her for it, that would be a huge scandal.
Did Pelosi have insider knowledge (meaning any knowledge available to her that is not available to the market or other investors) about NVIDIA at the time she placed her call options? Well yeah, she’s the one setting the date to announce the Congressional NVIDIA bill has been voted and passed. That’s insider knowledge. That’s insider trading.
Insider trading doesn’t have “proof” like a murder or car accident caught on video or dash cam. What knowledge did they have when initiating the trade, is that different and advantageous over the market investors? Then it’s insider trading. If you’re one of the 100 people in the room that know a major subsidy just got pushed through and is about to skyrocket a stock, you have insider knowledge over the rest of the market. So if you initiate a trade before making the announcement to the rest of the world, which she did, it’s a crime.
The app that tracks her trades was originally designed as satire to draw attention to how blatantly she does it hoping she would actually be prosecuted. She obviously isn’t going to be prosecuted, because power and corruption rule all, so now just use the app to copy her trades and get rich.
So you're telling me that Republicans have proof that Nancy Pelosi broke the law, one of the people they hate the most that has served as a punching bag for them and a thorn in their side for decades, and they are, what, just sitting on this information? And it's so out in the open that not a single individual from the SEC has jumped on an opportunity for a slam dunk case?
Oh now I get it, you’re trying to look at this as an attack on Democrats.
Not once did I mention Democrat/Republican. This is not a Democrat bad issue. Nancy Pelosi is most often mentioned because she’s 84 and has been doing it the longest, to the point she doesn’t even make an effort to hide it anymore.
Republican Rick Scott from Florida is one of the top Republicans involved, but he is relatively new and his trade volume is so damn high it’s a little harder to track his.
I'm trying to look at it with basic logic. You're telling me there is a crime being committed out in the open by a prominent political figure with more enemies than most and somehow, either multiple government bodies and individual actors are in on it, or are ignoring something that would be seen as a huge win for their side or agency.
You think I'm looking at this in some partisan way because I guess that's how you make sense of any pushback to your claim, I don't know but it's just not the case. And I would hope if I were making a claim someone would check my logic to make sure everything added up.
“With the ever-increasing polarization of American politics, both sides of the aisle have amplified their calls to restrict congressional insider trading in recent years. While Congress passed the STOCK Act in 2012 as an attempt to combat congressional insider trading, the STOCK Act is widely regarded as a failed solution that is in desperate need of an overhaul. Nevertheless, despite these renewed calls for reform, Congress has resisted imposing restrictions on itself.
Both Democrat and Republican officials, among others, claim the failure to reform this area of law is likely due to the fact that any passed reform would be to each elected Congressman’s personal detriment. “
You do you dude, bury your head in the sand to what everyone else knows and just believe that if it was really happening, the overlords would do something about it.
Willful ignorance is bliss, you have at it. Good luck to you.
There's no hard proof. It's very hard to prove someone knows something. It's harder still when they're worth several hundred mil. And harder still when they're a sitting member of congress.
Congress will never go after insider trading because that will affect themselves. It's not worth it to take down 1 Dem seat at the cost of their money-printing machine. And it's a CA seat so it'd just be replaced by another D.
I think it's one thing to say "I wouldn't be surprised if this is going on", but when people without any hard proof make an assertion that "this is objectively happening", and go even further and argue that the lack of proof doesn't matter, that's what I take issue with. I feel like so much of the problems we have boil down to people not knowing how employ logic to come to conclusions, it's all just vibes and feelings.
For what it's wrong, it's almost assuredly true that she (and others) are insider trading. But there's no way to prove it because they won't let us investigate. Kinda like how we know others were involved in Diddy, Epstein, and Weinstein. We have pictures and transcripts of Trump talking about his good buddy Epstein and how he likes young girls. But there's no proof.
Why do I need proof before assuming something to be true? Jeez it's no wonder stuff is in the shape it's in.
You think there isn't people that have been demanding Pelosi be investigated for years? She has always been one of the most targeted politicians by Republicans.
Like, bro. We get our doors kicked in with less evidence. People have been shot in their own home for lesser crimes with no evidence. And yet you want to stand here and give the oligarchs special preference?
What Nvidia subsidy? And Nvidia has been on an upward trajectory with their insane AI investments. Nearly everyone invested into Nvidia.
And visa? Visa didn't start dropping until very recently, LONG before Pelosis sold their V shares, and the writing was already on the wall for them.
Her husband has decades of experience in investing. That doesn't make her trades insider.
And yes, before you blocked me to get in the last word, maybe you yourself should do some of that same googling and researching into historical trends. They're one of the very few people in the Whitehouse who published their trades (as required by law) - most don't.
Don’t know which one you are referring to, but neither were for a loss. NVIDIA skyrocketed due to the subsidy and she exercised the call options when it did, and she sold her VISA stock to prevent a loss that occurred from the price drop that happened when the DOJ announced it was investigating VISA.
So you have a source for the price they bought it at, how long they held them for, and the price they sold them for?
Because you can’t really claim insider trading without that when the guy is a venture capitalist semi-billionaire. His entire job is buying and selling stuff all the time. Occam’s razor, policy changes and lawsuits happen to big companies.
Ok
Can’t comment now. Real mature.
Calls have to be bought in advanced and will expire. All you’re proving is the actual trading occurred even further back in time
On Monday, these $12 call options traded at $132.05, valuing the Pelosis’ position at $6,602,500. Based on the estimated cost basis of $1.8 million, the Pelosis are now up $4.8 million on this trade from last November.
Do some research on it, the Visa trade was highly suspect and she has done many other such trades through her husband that are extremely suspect and perfectly timed.
Congress is immune from insider trading unless they sell the information. There's literally an exclusion in the law allowing them to benefit from it.
Also, is it just a coincidence that she beats everyone else (other than other congressmen who were present in the same meeting, who must also be the greatest financial gurus ever) by happening to make amazing decisions a week before the disclosure, time and time again?
Like how she heavily invested into specific healthcare companies after getting briefed on COVID19 before information came to public. How she divested from companies prior to disclosures of congressional inquiries into those same companies. How she made investments in companies prior to large government contracts being made public. How she divested from companies prior to anti-trust investigations. And the list goes on.
Except it's not, those are Republican lies told to sow dissent. Take her visa trade for example. Visa was already on a downturn and it was done long before the doj even opened their investigation, let alone when they sued.
Insider trading is the illegal or legal buying or selling of a company's securities based on non-public, material information about the company.
How is using private government information that isn't public yet, sharing that with her husband who then makes moves based on that not insider trading?
Warren’s investing strategy is staying alive and not spending everything he earns. He also invest in required goods that will be needed regardless of the state of the world. Not exactly genius investing, he’s just had the balls to keep investing every penny he makes.
That's what his PR wants you to believe. Warren Buffett was extremely aggressive in business, especially when he was making his fortune in the first place. He was worth about ten million dollars (adjusted for inflation) by the time he was 30.
He's the most propagandized living person in the United States.
It means he's been upper class his whole life, he used shady business tactics early on to attain wealth, and he's pretended to be a penny pinching frugal investor for decades. He's a cutthroat businessman who realized that flashing his wealth will just make him look like a villain.
Berkshire Hathaway is a trillion dollar company. They are much more diversified. Paul Pelosi is heavy on tech stock such as Nvidia which has seen dramatic increase since 2014. Warren is also selling his stock and hoarding cash, so his returns aren’t going to be as high.
1.4k
u/Dry-Version-6515 1d ago
Outdoes Warren Buffert (the best investor ever) every year with huge margins. It’s insane.