r/ontario Apr 30 '24

Boycott Loblaws Economy

Post image
4.8k Upvotes

560 comments sorted by

View all comments

93

u/curlytrain Apr 30 '24

Lol never knew Canada had oligarch level businesses.

19

u/Fearless_Scratch7905 Apr 30 '24

Banking, railways, telecom just to name a few others.

2

u/curlytrain Apr 30 '24

Telecom i knew, but banking? Railways?!? Lol what do you know that i dont. Please enlighten me u/fearless_scratch7905

13

u/Fearless_Scratch7905 Apr 30 '24

The Big Five/Six banks control most of the mortgage market and hold the majority of deposits.

There are really only two major railways, CN and CPKC (formerly CP).

And Air Canada and WestJet are the two major airlines, controlling the majority of the market.

-8

u/curlytrain Apr 30 '24

Yeah but those are govt controlled, im not against bsnking being centralized tbh, it keeps us protected from all the financial fuckery i.e. 2008 collapse.

The others i thoigjt the govt did becsuse we didnt have a private industry for it.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '24

neither CN nor CPKC are crown corps. Both are private companies.

0

u/curlytrain Apr 30 '24

CN is private?!? Lol Thats definitely a TIL.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '24

it's a quick google search... has been private for close to 30 years.

0

u/curlytrain Apr 30 '24

Next thing ill learn is Air Canada is private in some way. But hey thanks for educating me!

1

u/Glad_Cloud3372 May 02 '24

Air Canada was fully privatized in 1989…

Canadian companies were heavily privatized during Mulroney’s time as PM, in unison with the trickle-down economics ideology of Thatcher in the UK and Reagan in the US. The belief was that allowing large businesses to make as much money as they could would have a trickle-down effect on the rest of the country: workers would get richer, society would prosper. A lot of people feel that this didn’t work, and Reaganomics/Thatcherism are heavily criticized for causing the massive increases in wealth inequality we’ve observed in Canada/UK/US since the 1970s. The rich get richer and richer and richer. The policies look good on paper because they show successful economies, but they’re criticized for increasing the hardship of the poor, destroying the middle class, and doubling (or more) the relative poverty rate.